Australia
Dash Cam Laws in Australia: What's Legal to Record

Dash cam video of the road is lawful across Australia, because footage of ordinary public road activity is not a private conversation or a private activity under any state's surveillance law. The real legal risk sits with in-cabin audio, which is treated differently by each state and territory, even for the driver's own conversation with a passenger.
This article covers dash cam recording under each state and territory's surveillance-device and listening-device Act, plus the separate publication offences, defamation exposure and the Commonwealth statutory tort that apply once dash cam footage is shared. It does not cover the specific evidence-upload processes individual police forces provide, which vary between jurisdictions and change over time, or a full jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction reading of the road rules on device mounting.
Dash Cam Video Is Lawful on Australian Roads
The optical surveillance provisions in New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory are built around a "private activity" test, or, in New South Wales, a trespass test, not a blanket prohibition on filming. Ordinary traffic, other vehicles, pedestrians and streetscapes captured by a windscreen-mounted camera do not meet that test in the states that use it. New South Wales is structurally different: Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 8 only prohibits an optical device installed through trespass on, or interference with, premises or a vehicle. A dash cam mounted inside your own car, pointed at the road you are lawfully driving on, typically never triggers that test at all. Queensland, Tasmania and the ACT have no general optical surveillance provision in their listening-device Acts, so dash cam video is not regulated by those Acts in the first place.
In-Cabin Audio Splits by the Same Three Groups That Govern Any Recorded Conversation
A dash cam's microphone is judged under a completely different test from its camera, and this is where dash cam recording genuinely varies by state. In Victoria, Queensland and the Northern Territory, the listening device offence only catches a conversation the recorder is not a party to, so a driver recording a passenger is outside the offence entirely. In New South Wales, Tasmania and the ACT, recording a conversation you are part of is prohibited by default, but each Act excuses a recording that is "not made for the purpose of communicating or publishing the conversation... to persons who are not parties to the conversation". Ordinary dash cam audio, kept for personal reference rather than made to be shared, usually falls within that limb. Western Australia and South Australia have no equivalent personal-use limb, so a driver there who wants to record in-cabin conversations needs either the passengers' consent or a genuine justification tied to protecting a lawful interest, such as documenting a dispute.

Dash Cam Audio, State by State
| Jurisdiction | Governing Act | Driver recording own in-cabin conversation with a passenger | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria | Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) s 6 | Outside the offence | Publishing audio is separately regulated under s 11. |
| Queensland | Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (Qld) s 43 | Outside the offence | A party is exempted outright; publishing is a separate offence under s 45. |
| Northern Territory | Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NT) s 11 | Outside the offence | Same structure as Victoria and Queensland. |
| New South Wales | Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 7 | Usually excused | Personal-use limb at s 7(3)(b)(ii) covers recording not made to publish to non-parties. |
| Tasmania | Listening Devices Act 1991 (Tas) s 5 | Usually excused | Same personal-use limb as NSW. |
| Australian Capital Territory | Listening Devices Act 1992 (ACT) s 4 | Usually excused | Same limb, though s 4(4) blocks the Territory itself from using it. |
| Western Australia | Surveillance Devices Act 1998 (WA) s 5 | Needs consent or lawful-interests justification | No personal-use limb; fixed dollar penalties, not penalty units. |
| South Australia | Surveillance Devices Act 2016 (SA) s 4 | Needs consent or lawful-interests justification | No personal-use limb, though s 6 adds a public-interest exception WA lacks. |
This table addresses in-cabin audio between a driver and a passenger only. A conversation between passengers the driver is not part of is a different question, covered next.
A Conversation the Driver Is Not Part Of Is a Harder Case Everywhere
If a dash cam's microphone happens to pick up a conversation between two passengers that the driver is not part of, the driver's ownership of the vehicle does not make them a party to that conversation. In every one of the three groups, the participant-friendly reasoning above depends on the recorder being one of the conversation's own parties. Group 1's carve-out only reaches a conversation the recorder is part of; Group 2's personal-use limb and Group 3's lawful-interests test both apply to "a principal party" recording their own conversation, not a third party's. A driver who records a back-seat conversation they are not part of, without the consent of those who are, is a non-party recording someone else's private conversation, the fact pattern each of these Acts was written to catch. It does not benefit from the relative safety that applies in most states to ordinary dash cam audio.
Publishing Dash Cam Footage Carries Its Own Separate Risk
Recording lawfully and sharing what you recorded are two separate legal questions. Posting dash cam footage to social media, a forum, or a "dash cam Australia" compilation channel, particularly where it includes in-cabin audio or identifies another driver, engages the publication offence in whichever state governs the recording. The Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) s 11 prohibits knowingly publishing a record of a private conversation, subject to exceptions including consent, and the Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (Qld) s 45 separately restrains a party who lawfully recorded a conversation from later publishing it. If footage imputes reckless or criminal driving to an identifiable person before that is established, publishing it also risks a defamation claim. Since 10 June 2025, the Commonwealth statutory tort under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) Schedule 2 sits alongside these rules and, unlike the Australian Privacy Principles, applies to individuals, so footage that seriously and intentionally invades someone's privacy can be actionable even where the recording itself was lawful.
Submitting Dash Cam Footage to Police
Several Australian police forces accept dash cam footage from the public as evidence of a crash, a hit and run, or dangerous driving, generally through some form of online submission process. The exact channel, accepted formats and retention practice differ between jurisdictions and change over time, so check directly with your state or territory police force rather than assuming a fixed procedure. Handing footage to police does not itself change whether recording it was lawful; if the underlying recording breached a state Act, that is analysed separately from whether police accept the footage as a report. Where footage later becomes evidence, its admissibility is a further question, weighed under the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 138 discretion, or the equivalent common law test in Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia, not decided in advance by the fact police accepted it.

Mounting a Dash Cam Legally
Road rules in every Australian jurisdiction require a driver to keep a clear view of the road, and a windscreen or dashboard-mounted device that obstructs that view, or interferes with seeing other road users, can itself be a road rule contravention, separate from the recording law questions above. The specific wording and positioning requirements differ between jurisdictions and are set by road rules and road authority guidance updated periodically, so check the current rules published by your state or territory road authority before mounting a device rather than relying on a fixed position. As a general practice, dash cams are commonly mounted low on the windscreen behind the rear-view mirror, in a spot that keeps the driver's forward sightline clear.

This article provides general legal information about dash cam recording and surveillance law in Australia. It does not constitute legal advice and does not account for your individual circumstances. Statutes referenced were verified against primary sources as at 19 July 2026 and are subject to amendment. For advice on a specific recording, or before enabling audio recording on a dash cam, consult a legal practitioner admitted in the relevant Australian state or territory.
Related reading: the Australia recording laws hub links to a dedicated page for each state and territory, and the flagship guide to recording a conversation in Australia sets out the three-group framework used throughout this article. The CCTV and home security camera laws guide and doorbell camera and neighbour privacy guide cover the same audio trap for other fixed cameras, the drone privacy laws in Australia guide covers airborne footage, and the Australia data privacy laws overview covers organisations rather than individual drivers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to have a dash cam in Australia?
Yes, dash cam video of the road is lawful throughout Australia. In-cabin audio needs closer attention: whether recording a passenger is excused depends on the state, ranging from outside the offence entirely in Victoria, Queensland and the Northern Territory to a narrower lawful-interests test in Western Australia and South Australia.
Can I post dash cam footage online?
Posting is separate from recording. Every state has its own publication offence, for example the Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) s 11, and footage that identifies a driver and implies wrongdoing can also raise defamation risk and, since 10 June 2025, exposure under the federal privacy tort.
Do I need to tell my passengers my dash cam records audio?
The law does not impose a universal notice requirement, but in Western Australia and South Australia recording a passenger's conversation without consent needs a lawful-interests justification, so telling passengers is the safer approach there.
Is dash cam footage admissible in court?
Courts weigh admissibility under the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 138 discretion, or the equivalent common law test in Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia, balancing the footage's value against how it was obtained. No jurisdiction guarantees admission or exclusion in advance.
Can I record the police with my dash cam?
No state or territory makes filming police performing public duties a standalone offence, and audio of a public exchange generally falls outside the definition of a private conversation. Tasmania is a partial exception, since its definition lacks the overheard-in-public exclusion other states carry.
Can my employer require a dash cam with audio in a company vehicle?
Generally yes, subject to any state workplace surveillance law, such as the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 (NSW), which adds its own notice requirements on top of the listening device rules above.
What happens if my dash cam records a conversation I'm not part of?
That is treated as a non-party recording a private conversation without consent, the scenario every state's listening device Act was written to catch, without the participant-based exceptions that make a driver's own dash cam audio comparatively low risk.
Sources and References
- Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 7, prohibition on installation, use and maintenance of listening devices, including the personal-use limb at s 7(3)(b)(ii)(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 8, installation, use and maintenance of optical surveillance devices without consent (trespass test)(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) s 6, listening devices, offence limited to a conversation the recorder is not a party to(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) s 11, prohibition on communication or publication of private conversations or activities(austlii.edu.au)
- Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (Qld) s 43, prohibition on use of listening devices and exemption for a party to the conversation(austlii.edu.au)
- Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (Qld) s 45, communication or publication of a conversation by a party who recorded it(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NT) s 11, installation, use and maintenance of listening devices(austlii.edu.au)
- Listening Devices Act 1991 (Tas) s 5, prohibition on use of listening devices(austlii.edu.au)
- Listening Devices Act 1992 (ACT) s 4, use of listening devices(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 1998 (WA) s 5, listening devices, no personal-use exception(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 2016 (SA) s 4, listening devices, no personal-use exception(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 2016 (SA) s 6, public interest exception to the listening device prohibition(austlii.edu.au)
- Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), including Schedule 2 statutory tort of serious invasion of privacy, compilation as at 10 June 2025(legislation.gov.au).gov
- Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 138, discretion to exclude improperly or illegally obtained evidence(austlii.edu.au)