Defamation Laws by State: Libel and Slander (2026)

Defamation law in the United States is built on a shared federal foundation but turns on state-specific rules, and the two variables that decide most cases are the statute of limitations and whether the state has an anti-SLAPP law. Filing deadlines run from 6 months to 3 years, and 10 jurisdictions have no anti-SLAPP statute at all.

This hub anchors our Defamation Laws by State series, with a deep guide for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. For the underlying concept, see what defamation of character means.

Common Defamation Questions

These national guides explain how US defamation law works, alongside the state-by-state rules above.

• How to Sue for Defamation of Character (Step by Step)
• Can You Go to Jail for Defamation? Is It a Crime?
• How Much Can You Sue for Defamation?
• Elements of Defamation: What You Must Prove
• Libel vs Slander vs Defamation
• Defenses to Defamation (Is It Defamation If It’s True?)
• Defamation Cease and Desist Letter (and Retraction Demand)
• Can a Public Figure Sue for Defamation? (Actual Malice)
• Is Defamation a Tort? How US Law Classifies It
• Can You Defame a Dead Person? Defamation After Death

What is defamation?

Defamation is a false statement of fact that harms a person's reputation, and across the states a plaintiff generally must prove five elements. First, the statement must be a false statement of fact, not opinion, because a verifiable assertion can be proven true or false while pure opinion is constitutionally protected. Second, the statement must be published, meaning communicated to at least one third party other than the plaintiff. Third, it must be of and concerning the plaintiff, so that a reasonable listener would understand it to refer to that specific person. Fourth, the defendant must have acted with the required degree of fault, either negligence or actual malice depending on the plaintiff's status. Fifth, the statement must have caused damages, although certain categories of statement are defamatory per se and presume harm. Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense in every state.

Watch out: Opinion is not actionable. Courts ask whether a reasonable reader would understand the words as stating a verifiable fact rather than a subjective view, so "I think the food was terrible" is protected while "the kitchen failed its health inspection" can be tested for truth.

Libel vs slander

Libel and slander are the two forms of defamation, and the difference is the medium. Libel is defamation in a fixed, lasting form: writing, print, broadcasts, websites, social media posts, and online reviews. Slander is spoken defamation, such as a defamatory remark made aloud in a conversation or at a meeting. Historically courts treated libel as more serious because the written word endures and spreads, so libel was often actionable without proof of special damages while slander generally required the plaintiff to show concrete economic loss unless the words fell into a slander per se category. Most states apply the same statute of limitations to both forms, but a few do not: Arkansas, Rhode Island, and Tennessee set different deadlines for libel and slander, which makes correctly classifying the statement a threshold question in those states. In modern practice, almost all online and media defamation is treated as libel.

The federal baseline: Sullivan and Gertz

One layer of defamation law is identical in all 50 states because it comes from the U.S. Constitution. In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), the Supreme Court held that a public official suing over statements about official conduct must prove actual malice, meaning the speaker knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for whether it was false. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974), reaffirmed that public figures, like public officials, must prove actual malice, and held that private plaintiffs need only prove negligence, though, absent proof of actual malice, they are limited to compensation for actual injury. Actual malice must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, a higher bar than the ordinary preponderance standard. Because this framework is federal constitutional law, no state can lower it, and whether a plaintiff is a public official, a public figure, or a private person is frequently the decisive issue in a defamation case.

That constitutional framework also limits how far a legislature can go in criminalizing false statements outside the defamation context. In Rodriguez-Cotto v. Gonzalez-Colon, No. 23-1626 (1st Cir. Aug. 4, 2026), the First Circuit struck down a Puerto Rico law that made it a crime to spread false information during a governor-declared emergency. Drawing on United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709 (2012), the court explained that false speech is not a category of unprotected expression the way knowing or reckless defamation is, because defamation involves a "legally cognizable harm" to reputation while the Puerto Rico statute "targets falsity and nothing more." Treating the law as a content-based restriction, the court applied strict scrutiny and held it unconstitutional. The ruling is a reminder that, outside the narrow and historically rooted category of defamation, the government generally cannot punish speech merely because it is false.

How the statute of limitations varies by state

The statute of limitations is the deadline to file a defamation lawsuit, and it is the single most important variable from state to state. A majority of states use a 1-year period, including California, New York, Texas, and Illinois, which makes prompt action essential. A smaller group uses 2 years, such as Florida, Alabama, and Washington. The longest deadlines are 3 years, found in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Wisconsin. The shortest is Tennessee, where slander must be filed within 6 months, while libel gets 1 year. Three states split the deadline by form: in Arkansas and Rhode Island, slander carries a 1-year limit but libel gets 3 years, and in Tennessee slander is 6 months while libel is 1 year. Most states follow the single-publication rule, so the clock runs from the date of first publication rather than restarting each time a post is viewed or shared. The state table below lists the exact period and code section for every jurisdiction.

When the clock starts is as important as how long it runs. The defamation cause of action generally accrues at publication, meaning the moment the statement is first communicated to a third party, so the period usually begins before the plaintiff even learns of the statement. A minority of states recognize a narrow discovery rule that delays accrual when the defamatory statement was inherently undiscoverable and not a matter of public record, but most courts apply it sparingly in defamation cases. The single-publication rule, adopted in most states and embodied in the Uniform Single Publication Act, treats one edition of a book, one broadcast, or one online post as a single publication, so re-reading or re-sharing the same content does not reset the deadline. Substantially modifying the content, or republishing it to reach a new audience, can start a fresh limitations period, which matters for material that is edited and reposted online.

Watch out: In single-publication-rule states, the deadline generally runs from the first time the statement was published, not from when you discovered it. For a 1-year or 6-month state, waiting even a few months can forfeit the claim.

Anti-SLAPP laws by state

A SLAPP is a "strategic lawsuit against public participation," a suit filed not to win but to silence a critic by burdening them with litigation costs. Anti-SLAPP statutes counter this by giving a defendant who is sued over protected speech a special motion to dismiss early in the case. These laws typically share three features: the special motion shifts the burden to the plaintiff to show the claim has merit, a discovery stay pauses costly fact-gathering while the motion is pending, and fee-shifting requires a losing plaintiff to pay the defendant's attorney fees. A recent wave of states has adopted the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), a model statute published by the Uniform Law Commission in 2020 that standardizes these protections, including Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Washington. South Dakota joined them when its version took effect July 1, 2026, codified at SDCL 15-40-1 to 15-40-13. UPEPA provides for an expedited special motion, an automatic stay of most proceedings, an expedited appeal of a ruling, and mandatory fee-shifting, giving these states a consistent framework. Ten jurisdictions still have no anti-SLAPP statute at all: Alabama, Alaska, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, New Hampshire, South Carolina, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. In those states, a defendant sued over speech must rely on ordinary motions to dismiss and the constitutional defenses, without the early off-ramp and fee recovery that anti-SLAPP laws provide. The strength of these laws also varies among the states that have them: California and Texas have broad, well-developed statutes with extensive case law, while Maryland's law is comparatively weak and statutes in Missouri, Nebraska, and New Mexico are narrow, covering only limited categories of speech such as statements to government bodies.

Defamation per se and presumed damages

Defamation per se is a category of statement so inherently damaging that the law presumes harm to reputation, so the plaintiff does not have to prove a specific dollar loss. Courts have traditionally recognized four classic per se categories: falsely accusing someone of a crime, imputing a loathsome or contagious disease, attacking a person's competence or integrity in their business, trade, or profession, and imputing serious sexual misconduct or unchastity. When a statement is defamatory per se, most states presume general damages such as reputational harm and mental anguish. Statements that are defamatory only when paired with extrinsic facts are defamatory per quod and require proof of special damages. This presumption is not universal, however: Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, and Tennessee have moved away from presumed damages and per se liability, generally requiring a plaintiff to prove actual injury even for a statement that would be per se elsewhere. In those states, even a statement falsely accusing someone of a crime requires the plaintiff to show genuine reputational or emotional harm rather than relying on a legal presumption. The Gertz decision also limits presumed and punitive damages for private plaintiffs absent actual malice, so the constitutional rule and the state-law trend against presumed damages reinforce each other. The practical effect is that documenting concrete harm, such as lost income, lost relationships, or treatment for emotional distress, strengthens a defamation claim everywhere, and is essential in the states that have abolished presumed damages.

Damages you can recover in a defamation case

The money a successful defamation plaintiff can recover falls into a few categories that are broadly consistent across the states. Special damages, also called actual or economic damages, compensate concrete losses that flow from the statement, such as lost wages, lost clients, canceled contracts, or lost business opportunities, and they must be proven with specific evidence. General damages compensate the more intangible harms of defamation, including injury to reputation, mental anguish, humiliation, and embarrassment. In a defamation per se case, most states presume general damages without proof of a specific dollar figure, although the four states that have abolished presumed damages require proof of actual injury instead. Punitive, or exemplary, damages punish especially egregious conduct and are generally available only where the plaintiff proves the defendant acted with actual malice, and Gertz limits them for private plaintiffs. Several states also have retraction statutes that reduce the damages available, often eliminating punitive damages, when the defendant promptly publishes a correction after a demand.

How to sue for defamation

Pursuing a defamation claim generally follows a sequence, though the right path depends on the facts and the state. Most plaintiffs begin by preserving evidence: the exact statement, the date and place it was published, screenshots or recordings, and the identity of anyone who saw or heard it, because the single-publication rule often ties the deadline to first publication. Many then send a cease-and-desist letter or a retraction demand, which some states require or reward, since publishing a retraction can reduce the damages a plaintiff may recover. The plaintiff then files a complaint in the appropriate state court within that state's limitation period, which can be as short as 6 months. If the suit targets protected speech, the defendant may file an anti-SLAPP special motion that stays discovery and can shift fees, so plaintiffs in those states should be prepared to show the claim has merit. Because deadlines are short, the rules vary widely, and an anti-SLAPP loss can mean paying the other side's fees, consulting a licensed attorney in your state early is wise. This article is general information, not legal advice.

Defamation Laws by State

The table below summarizes the statute of limitations and anti-SLAPP status for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Click any jurisdiction for the full guide, including defamation per se categories, damages, and how to sue.

Northeast states

The table below covers 9 states in the Northeast.

Midwest states

The table below covers 12 states in the Midwest.

Southern states

The table below covers 16 states in the South, plus the District of Columbia.

Western states

The table below covers 13 states in the West.

Defamation Laws in Other Countries

• World Defamation Laws by Country (UK, Scotland, NI, Australia)

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the elements of defamation?

Most states require five elements: a false statement of fact (not opinion), publication to at least one third party, that the statement is of and concerning the plaintiff, fault by the defendant (negligence or actual malice), and damages. Certain per se statements presume damages. Truth is a complete defense.

What is the difference between libel and slander?

Libel is defamation in a fixed form such as writing, print, broadcast, or an online post, while slander is spoken defamation. Libel is often actionable without proof of special damages; slander usually requires proof of economic loss unless it falls into a slander per se category. Almost all online and media defamation is libel.

What is the statute of limitations for defamation?

It varies by state. A majority use 1 year, some use 2 years, and the longest is 3 years (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Wisconsin). The shortest is Tennessee at 6 months for slander. Arkansas, Rhode Island, and Tennessee set different deadlines for libel and slander.

Which states have the shortest defamation deadline?

Tennessee has the shortest, at 6 months for slander (1 year for libel). After that, the large group of 1-year states, including California, New York, Texas, and Illinois, has the next-shortest deadlines, so prompt action is critical in those jurisdictions.

What is an anti-SLAPP law?

An anti-SLAPP law lets a defendant sued over protected speech file an early special motion to dismiss. These statutes typically stay discovery while the motion is pending and shift attorney fees to a prevailing defendant, discouraging lawsuits filed to silence critics rather than to win.

Which states have no anti-SLAPP law?

Ten jurisdictions have no anti-SLAPP statute: Alabama, Alaska, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, New Hampshire, South Carolina, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. In those states, a defendant must rely on ordinary motions to dismiss and constitutional defenses.

What is the actual malice standard?

Actual malice, from New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, means the speaker knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for whether it was false. Public officials and public figures must prove actual malice by clear and convincing evidence. Private plaintiffs generally need only prove negligence.

What is defamation per se?

Defamation per se is a statement so harmful that damages are presumed, such as falsely accusing someone of a crime, imputing a loathsome disease, attacking their professional competence, or imputing serious sexual misconduct. Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, and Tennessee have moved away from presumed damages and require proof of actual injury.

Is truth a defense to defamation?

Yes, in every state. Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a defamation claim. A statement that is substantially accurate cannot support liability no matter how damaging it is, because defamation requires a false statement of fact.

Can I sue over a bad online review?

Only if the review states a false fact rather than an opinion. Honest opinions and subjective complaints are protected speech. A review on a matter of public concern is also likely to trigger the state's anti-SLAPP law, which can shift attorney fees to the reviewer if the suit fails.