Background Check Laws by State (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 7, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Background check laws in the United States combine federal rules under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which limits how far back non-conviction records can be reported, with state-level laws that vary widely. As of 2026, 37 states and D.C. have adopted Ban the Box policies restricting when employers can ask about criminal history, though most of them reach public-sector jobs only.
Background check laws determine what employers, landlords, and licensing boards can see on your criminal record and how they can use that information. Every state has different rules, and the landscape is changing rapidly as more states enact Ban the Box and Clean Slate and expungement legislation.
Background Check Laws by State
Select your state for a complete guide to Ban the Box laws, lookback periods, Clean Slate provisions, employer and housing check rules, and professional licensing requirements.
- Alabama Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Alaska Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Arizona Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Arkansas Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- California Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Colorado Background Check Laws: Complete 2026 Guide
- Connecticut Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Delaware Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- District of Columbia Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Florida Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Georgia Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Hawaii Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Idaho Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Illinois Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Indiana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Iowa Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Kansas Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Kentucky Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Louisiana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Maine Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Maryland Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Massachusetts Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Michigan Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Minnesota Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Mississippi Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Missouri Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Montana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Nebraska Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Nevada Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- New Hampshire Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- New Jersey Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- New Mexico Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- New York Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- North Carolina Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- North Dakota Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Ohio Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Oklahoma Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Oregon Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Pennsylvania Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Rhode Island Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- South Carolina Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- South Dakota Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Tennessee Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Texas Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Utah Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Vermont Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Virginia Background Check Laws: Employer, Housing, and Licensing Guide (2026)
- Washington Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- West Virginia Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Wisconsin Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
- Wyoming Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ban the Box?
Ban the Box laws prohibit employers from asking about criminal history on initial job applications. The timing of when employers can inquire varies by state: some delay until the first interview, others until a conditional offer is made. As of 2026, 37 states and D.C. have some form of Ban the Box law, but in most states the requirement applies only to public-sector employers. Fifteen states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington), along with D.C. and a number of cities and counties, extend it to private employers.
How far back do background checks go?
Under the federal FCRA, non-conviction records (arrests, dismissed charges) can only be reported for 7 years for positions paying under $75,000. Conviction records can be reported indefinitely in most states. Some states like California and New York have additional lookback limits.
What is a Clean Slate law?
Clean Slate laws automatically seal eligible criminal records after a waiting period without requiring the person to file a petition. As of 2026, 13 states plus D.C. have enacted Clean Slate legislation. Pennsylvania was the first in 2018. Minnesota sealed over 1.5 million records in the first months after its law took effect.
Updates
Clarified that although 37 states and D.C. have Ban the Box laws, only fifteen states extend the restriction to private employers, and fixed a link that was displaying as raw text in an FAQ question.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
State-by-state comparison
Each state guide below is paired with the governing statute our editors adjudicated for it, held in our own legal record and verified against the official source.
Each statute shown is the same adjudicated anchor its state guide renders, independently verified against primary sources. A dash means not yet adjudicated in our record — never that no law exists.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
United States Code Title 15
§ 1681cRequirements relating to information contained in consumer reportsIn forcecited in 61 of our articles
Except as authorized under subsection (b), no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information: Cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years. Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. Paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years. Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than seven years. Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more than seven years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 383 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (2017) addressed the FACTA truncation rule in 1681c(g) and affirmed dismissal for lack of Article III standing, treating material risk of harm as a fact question. Edward Seamans v. Temple University (2014) held the seven-year window in 1681c(a)(4) is extended for an education loan only until that loan is repaid.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2017, 872 F.3d 114)✓A shopper sued two stores whose receipts printed the first six digits of his credit card number; the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of standing, seeing no clear error in the finding that those digits show only the card issuer, not a material risk of identity theft.
- Edward Seamans v. Temple University (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2014, 744 F.3d 853)✓A defaulted university loan kept appearing on a borrower's credit reports after he repaid it because the school never reported the delinquency date; the Third Circuit held the Higher Education Act suspends section 1681c(a)(4)'s aging-off rule only until repayment.
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2011, 660 F.3d 1055)✓A debt buyer offered to settle health club debts over seven years old, saying that if it was reporting the account the bureaus would be told it was settled; the Ninth Circuit, treating those debts as unreportable under section 1681c(a)(4), called that implication misleading.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Does a Felony Stay on Your Record? (2026), Alabama Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), Arkansas Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 1681Congressional findings and statement of purposeIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
The Congress makes the following findings: The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system. An elaborate mechanism has been developed for investigating and evaluating the credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, and general reputation of consumers. Consumer reporting agencies have assumed a vital role in assembling and evaluating consumer credit and other information on consumers. There is a need to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibilities with fairness, impartiality, and a respect for the consumer’s right to privacy.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,711 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts cite 1681(a)'s findings for the Act's purpose and decide under its operative sections. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (2016) held that a bare procedural FCRA violation divorced from concrete harm does not satisfy Article III, and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (2021) applied that rule to hold 6,332 class members lacked standing.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (Supreme Court of the United States 2016, 578 U.S. 330)✓Robins alleged Spokeo's people-search profile carried false information about him and sued under the FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.; the Court held a bare procedural violation divorced from concrete harm does not satisfy Article III injury in fact, and remanded.
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (Supreme Court of the United States 2021, 594 U.S. 413)✓TransUnion flagged 8,185 consumers as potential matches to a Treasury terrorist list; suing under the FCRA, only the 1,853 whose misleading reports actually reached third parties were held concretely harmed, so the other 6,332 lacked Article III standing for damages.
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010, 605 F.3d 665)✓Police had Pintos's car towed and the towing company transferred its deficiency claim to a collection agency, which pulled her Experian report; the Ninth Circuit held § 1681b(a)(3)(A) gave no permissible purpose, since neither credit she sought nor a judgment debt was involved.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: FTC Fines Amazon $2.25 Million for Denying Identity-Theft Victims Their Fraud Records Under the FCRA, Louisiana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), Michigan Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 1681aDefinitions; rules of constructionIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
Definitions and rules of construction set forth in this section are applicable for the purposes of this subchapter. The term “person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, trust, estate, cooperative, association, government or governmental subdivision or agency, or other entity. The term “consumer” means an individual. The term “consumer report” means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumer’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living which is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumer’s eligibility for— credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes; employment purposes; or any other purpose authorized under section 1681b of this title.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,008 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (Supreme Court of the United States 2016, 578 U.S. 330)“…ther purpose authorized under section 1681b of this title.” 15 U. S. C. §1681a(d)(1). 2 “The term ‘consumer reportin…”
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010, 605 F.3d 665)“…n need to meet section 1681b(c)’s special conditions. Title 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(m) defines “credit ... transaction that…”
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr (Supreme Court of the United States 2007, 551 U.S. 47)“…sed primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.” 15 U. S. C. §1681a(d)(1) (footnote omitted). The scope of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Opt Out of SmartBackgroundChecks (2026), Florida Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026), Hawaii Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026)
Sources and References
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681: Fair Credit Reporting Act, congressional findings and purpose(law.cornell.edu).gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681a: FCRA definitions including consumer report and investigative consumer report(law.cornell.edu).gov
- National Employment Law Project, Ban the Box: U.S. Cities, Counties, and States Adopt Fair Chance Hiring Policies (state counts and private-employer coverage)(nelp.org)
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681c: FCRA requirements relating to information contained in consumer reports (seven-year reporting limits and the $75,000 salary exception)(govinfo.gov)