Hawaii
Hawaii Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Hawaii regulates employer background checks under HRS 378-2.5, which requires a conditional job offer before any inquiry into an applicant's conviction history. Employers may look back 7 years for felonies and 5 years for misdemeanors, excluding incarceration time, and cannot use arrest records that did not result in conviction.
Last verified: March 2026. This page reflects current Hawaii Revised Statutes Sections 378-2, 378-2.5, 378-2.7, 831-3.1, 831-3.2, and 846-2.7.
Table of Contents
- Overview of Hawaii Background Check Laws
- Ban the Box: HRS 378-2.5
- Arrest and Court Record Protections: HRS 378-2
- Lookback Periods for Criminal Convictions
- The Rational Relationship Test
- Exempt Employers
- Credit History Restrictions: HRS 378-2.7
- FCRA and Federal Requirements
- How to Run a Background Check in Hawaii
- Housing and Tenant Screening
- Professional Licensing and Convictions: HRS 831-3.1
- Expungement of Criminal Records: HRS 831-3.2
- Penalties for Employer Violations
- Recent Changes to Hawaii Background Check Laws
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Sources and References
Overview of Hawaii Background Check Laws
Hawaii has some of the strongest worker protections in the country when it comes to criminal background checks and employment. The state was the first in the nation to pass a Ban the Box law in 1998, prohibiting employers from asking about criminal history on job applications.

Since then, Hawaii has continued to strengthen these protections. The state limits how far back employers can look at criminal records, restricts the use of arrest records entirely, and requires employers to show a direct connection between any conviction and the job before denying employment.
These protections apply to both public and private employers across all counties, including Honolulu, Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii County.
Hawaii's background check framework is governed by several statutes working together. The primary laws include HRS 378-2 (prohibiting discrimination based on arrest and court records), HRS 378-2.5 (regulating employer inquiries into conviction records), and HRS 846-2.7 (governing criminal history record checks through the Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center).
Ban the Box: HRS 378-2.5
Hawaii's Ban the Box law, codified in HRS 378-2.5, sets strict rules about when and how employers can ask about criminal history.
Conditional Offer Requirement
The law requires that any inquiry into a job applicant's conviction record can only happen after the applicant has received a conditional offer of employment. This means employers cannot:
- Include questions about criminal history on job applications
- Ask about convictions during interviews before making a conditional offer
- Use criminal history as an initial screening tool
- Run criminal background checks before extending a conditional job offer
The conditional offer may be withdrawn only if the applicant's conviction record bears a rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities of the position.
What Employers Can and Cannot Do
After making a conditional job offer, employers may inquire about and consider an applicant's criminal conviction record. However, they must follow specific rules:
- Only convictions within the applicable lookback period may be considered
- The conviction must have a rational relationship to the job duties
- Arrest records that did not result in conviction cannot be considered at all
- Employers must conduct an individualized assessment before withdrawing the offer
This structure gives applicants a fair chance to be evaluated on their qualifications first, before any criminal history enters the picture.
Arrest and Court Record Protections: HRS 378-2
Under HRS 378-2, Hawaii makes it an unlawful discriminatory practice for employers to refuse to hire, discharge, or otherwise discriminate against any person because of their arrest and court record.
The definition of "arrest and court record" under HRS 378-1 is broad. It covers any information about a person having been questioned, apprehended, taken into custody, held for investigation, charged with an offense, served a summons, arrested with or without a warrant, tried, or convicted.
Key Protections
This protection means employers generally cannot make employment decisions based on:
- Arrests that did not lead to conviction
- Dismissed charges
- Acquittals
- Pending charges (in most circumstances)
Hawaii's approach stands out nationally. While many states have some form of arrest record protection, Hawaii's is among the most comprehensive because it covers all employers and treats "arrest and court record" as a protected category alongside race, sex, religion, and other characteristics.
Lookback Periods for Criminal Convictions
Hawaii sets strict time limits on how far back employers can look when considering criminal convictions. These lookback periods were significantly shortened by Act 51 of 2020 (SB 2193), which took effect on September 15, 2020.
Current Lookback Periods
| Conviction Type | Lookback Period | Previous Period |
|---|---|---|
| Felony convictions | 7 years | 10 years |
| Misdemeanor convictions | 5 years | 10 years |
How Incarceration Time Is Calculated
An important detail: periods of incarceration are excluded from the lookback calculation. This means the clock does not run while a person is in prison. For example, if someone was convicted of a felony 8 years ago but spent 3 of those years incarcerated, only 5 years of community time have passed, and the conviction could still be considered.
This exclusion ensures that the lookback period reflects the time an individual has been living in the community, not simply the time since the conviction date.
Legislative Purpose
The Hawaii legislature shortened the lookback periods after finding that the previous 10-year window was too long. According to the legislative findings in SB 2193, the longer period contributed to unnecessary employment discrimination against people with older and relatively minor conviction records. The reduction aims to support economic self-sufficiency and reduce recidivism.
The Rational Relationship Test
Even when a conviction falls within the lookback period, employers cannot automatically disqualify an applicant. Under HRS 378-2.5, the conviction must bear a "rational relationship" to the duties and responsibilities of the position.
Factors Employers Should Consider
When applying the rational relationship test, employers should evaluate:
- The nature and gravity of the offense
- The time that has passed since the conviction or completion of sentence
- The nature of the job duties and responsibilities
- Whether the offense is directly related to the position's requirements
For example, a conviction for financial fraud may bear a rational relationship to a position handling money or financial records. However, that same conviction would likely not bear a rational relationship to a warehouse labor position.
Individualized Assessment
The rational relationship test requires a case-by-case evaluation. Blanket policies that automatically disqualify anyone with a criminal record are not compliant with Hawaii law. Employers must assess each applicant's situation individually and provide the applicant an opportunity to explain the circumstances before withdrawing a conditional offer.
Exempt Employers
Certain employers are exempt from the conditional offer requirement and lookback period limitations under HRS 378-2.5(d). These employers are expressly permitted by federal or state law to inquire into criminal history without the standard restrictions.
Categories of Exempt Employers
Exempt employers include, but are not limited to:
- State government agencies pursuant to HRS 78-2.7 and HRS 831-3.1
- Department of Education pursuant to HRS 302A-601.5
- Department of Health for positions involving direct, non-witnessed contact with mental health clients
- Department of Human Services for positions involving vulnerable populations
- Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pursuant to HRS 353-1.5
- Private schools and childcare facilities
- Armed security service providers
- Federally insured financial institutions (banks, credit unions)
- Insurance companies
- Homes and facilities serving developmentally disabled individuals
Even exempt employers must still comply with anti-discrimination provisions and apply criminal history information fairly and consistently.
Credit History Restrictions: HRS 378-2.7
Hawaii extends its employment protections beyond criminal records to also cover credit history. Under HRS 378-2.7, employers face restrictions on using credit reports in hiring decisions.
Key Rules for Credit Checks
Similar to the criminal background check rules, credit history inquiries may only take place after the applicant has received a conditional offer of employment. The offer may be withdrawn based on credit information only if it is "directly related to a bona fide occupational qualification."
Exceptions to Credit Check Restrictions
The credit history restriction does not apply to:
- Employers expressly permitted or required to check credit history under federal or state law
- Managerial or supervisory employees
- Federally insured financial institutions (banks, credit unions, savings associations)
This makes Hawaii one of a small number of states that restrict employer use of credit reports during the hiring process.
FCRA and Federal Requirements
When employers use a third-party consumer reporting agency to conduct background checks, they must comply with the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The FCRA applies on top of Hawaii's state-level protections.
Employer Obligations Under the FCRA
Before running a background check through a third party, employers must:
- Provide a standalone written disclosure to the applicant that a background check may be conducted
- Obtain the applicant's written authorization before requesting the report
- Certify to the consumer reporting agency that the information will be used for employment purposes and that the employer will comply with all FCRA requirements
Adverse Action Process
If an employer decides to take adverse action (such as withdrawing a job offer) based on information in a background check report, the FCRA requires a two-step process:
- Pre-adverse action notice: The employer must send the applicant a copy of the report and a summary of rights under the FCRA before making the final decision
- Adverse action notice: After a reasonable waiting period, if the employer proceeds with the adverse action, they must send a final notice that includes the name of the reporting agency, a statement that the agency did not make the decision, and notice of the applicant's right to dispute the report
Seven-Year Reporting Rule
Under the FCRA, consumer reporting agencies generally cannot report non-conviction arrests, civil suits, or civil judgments that are more than seven years old. They also cannot report paid tax liens older than seven years. However, convictions can be reported indefinitely under federal law. Hawaii's state lookback periods (7 years for felonies, 5 years for misdemeanors) provide stronger protection than the federal baseline.
How to Run a Background Check in Hawaii
The Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center (HCJDC), a division of the Hawaii Attorney General's office, manages criminal history records for the state.
Types of Background Checks Available
Name-Based Checks
Public conviction records can be searched online through the eCrim system, Hawaii's Adult Criminal Conviction Information database. The cost is $5 per name search, plus $12 for each certified record. Physical public access site printouts cost $25.
Name-based checks only return adult criminal conviction information. Arrests that did not result in conviction are considered confidential and are not available through public searches.
Fingerprint-Based Checks
Under HRS 846-2.7, certain agencies and employers are authorized to conduct fingerprint-based criminal history checks. Fingerprints are submitted to both:
- The HCJDC for a state criminal history record check (which may include non-conviction data)
- The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for a national criminal history record check
Fingerprint-based checks are more thorough than name-based searches and are required for many licensed professions, government positions, and positions involving vulnerable populations.
Fingerprint Retention and Rap Back
Applicants must be notified that their fingerprints will be retained by both the HCJDC and the FBI. This retention enables the state's "Rap Back" program, which provides ongoing monitoring. If a person whose fingerprints are on file is subsequently arrested, the agency that submitted the fingerprints may be notified.
Confidentiality Requirements
Anyone who acquires criminal history information from fingerprint records may not disclose that information to unauthorized persons. Criminal history record information must be used exclusively for the stated purpose for which it was obtained, in accordance with HRS 378-2.5.
Housing and Tenant Screening
Hawaii does not have a state law that specifically prohibits landlords from considering criminal history during tenant screening. However, landlords must comply with fair housing requirements at both the state and federal level.
What Landlords Should Know
- Criminal background checks may be used as part of tenant screening
- Blanket policies that deny all applicants with any criminal record may violate fair housing laws if they disproportionately affect protected classes
- Landlords should assess each applicant individually, considering the nature of the offense, time elapsed, and relevance to tenancy
- Under HUD guidance, using criminal history as an absolute bar to housing may constitute disparate impact discrimination
Tenant Screening Fees
As of May 1, 2024, Hawaii's Act 200 prohibits landlords from charging tenant screening fees that exceed the actual cost of obtaining information about the applicant. Any unused portion of the fee must be refunded within 30 days.
Landlords can charge applicants a screening fee to cover costs of personal reference checks, tenant reports, criminal background checks, and credit reports, but the fee must reflect actual expenses.
Professional Licensing and Convictions: HRS 831-3.1
Hawaii provides significant protections for people with criminal records who seek professional licenses. Under HRS 831-3.1, a person cannot be disqualified from public employment or professional licensure solely because of a prior criminal conviction.
The 10-Year Licensing Lookback
For professional licensing, the lookback period is longer than for general employment:
- Convictions within 10 years (excluding incarceration time): May be considered if the conviction bears a "rational relationship" to the duties and responsibilities of the occupation
- Convictions older than 10 years (excluding incarceration time): May only be considered if the conviction has not been expunged and "directly relates" to possible performance in the occupation, and only after a determination that the person has not been sufficiently rehabilitated
Rehabilitation Consideration
The law requires licensing boards to consider evidence of rehabilitation before denying a license based on an older conviction. This includes factors such as completion of sentence, subsequent law-abiding behavior, employment history, and evidence of community involvement.
Scope of Protection
This protection applies to any permit, license, registration, or certificate required by the state. It covers a wide range of professions, from healthcare workers to real estate agents to contractors.
Expungement of Criminal Records: HRS 831-3.2
Hawaii allows certain criminal records to be expunged through the Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center. Expungement removes arrest records from the statewide criminal history database.
Who Qualifies for Expungement
Non-Conviction Arrests
Individuals who were arrested or charged but not convicted may apply for expungement under HRS 831-3.2. However, applications will be denied in certain cases:
- Felony or misdemeanor arrests where bail was forfeited
- Petty misdemeanor or violation arrests with bail forfeiture (5-year waiting period applies)
- Cases where the defendant fled the jurisdiction
- Involuntary hospitalization or acquittals under HRS Chapter 704
- Deferred plea cases (1-year waiting period under HRS 831-3.2(a)(5); a 3-year waiting period after discharge applies to prostitution cases deferred under HRS 712-1200(4)(c))
Certain Conviction Expungements
Courts may grant expungement for specific first-time offenses:
- Underage DUI under HRS 291E-64(e)
- First-time drug offenses under HRS 706-622.5 and 706-622.8
- First-time property offenses under HRS 706-622.9
Expungement Process and Costs
The expungement process is handled by the HCJDC and takes approximately 120 days to complete. No expedited processing is available.
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| First-time expungement application | $35 |
| Subsequent expungement applications | $50 |
| Non-refundable processing fee (included) | $10 |
If the application is denied, the applicant receives a refund minus the $10 processing fee.
Automatic Court Record Sealing (Effective July 2025)
As of July 1, 2025, individuals who receive an expungement order no longer need to separately request that the Judiciary seal related court records. The HCJDC now automatically transmits expungement orders to the Judiciary for record sealing consideration. This change streamlines a process that previously required separate petitions to both the HCJDC and the courts.
Penalties for Employer Violations
Employers who violate Hawaii's background check laws face enforcement action through the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission (HCRC) and the courts.
Filing a Complaint
Individuals who believe an employer has violated HRS 378-2 or 378-2.5 can file a complaint with the HCRC. The Commission investigates complaints and can take enforcement action.
Available Remedies
Under HRS 378-5, if a violation is found, the HCRC or a court may order:
- Hiring, reinstatement, or upgrading of the affected employee
- Back pay (limited to two years prior to filing the complaint)
- Compensatory damages for injuries or losses caused by the violation
- Reasonable attorney's fees and expert witness fees
- Injunctive relief ordering the employer to stop the discriminatory practice
- Other equitable relief as appropriate
The HCRC can also enforce its orders, conciliation agreements, or settlements by commencing civil action in circuit court or by issuing a "right to sue" letter to the complainant.
Recent Changes to Hawaii Background Check Laws
Hawaii has made several notable updates to its background check laws in recent years.
Act 51 of 2020 (Effective September 15, 2020)
SB 2193, signed by Governor David Ige, was the most significant recent change. It reduced the lookback period for employer consideration of criminal convictions from 10 years for all convictions to 7 years for felonies and 5 years for misdemeanors (excluding incarceration time). The legislature stated this change was intended to reduce "conscious or unconscious bias" in evaluating older convictions.
Act 200 of 2024 (Tenant Screening Fees)
Effective May 1, 2024, this law prohibited landlords from charging tenant screening fees that exceed actual costs. While not directly a criminal background check law, it affects the cost of screening that includes criminal record searches.
Automatic Court Record Sealing (Effective July 1, 2025)
This change streamlined the expungement process by requiring automatic transmission of expungement orders from the HCJDC to the Judiciary for court record sealing. Previously, individuals had to file separate requests with both agencies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an employer in Hawaii ask about my criminal history on a job application?
No. Under HRS 378-2.5, employers cannot ask about criminal history on job applications or during interviews before making a conditional job offer. Hawaii was the first state to pass this type of Ban the Box law in 1998. Only after a conditional offer of employment has been extended can an employer inquire about criminal convictions.
How far back can Hawaii employers look at my criminal record?
Hawaii employers can consider felony convictions from the past 7 years and misdemeanor convictions from the past 5 years. Periods of incarceration are excluded from these timeframes. For example, if you were convicted of a felony 9 years ago but served 3 years in prison, only 6 years of community time have elapsed, meaning the conviction could still be considered. These lookback periods were shortened from 10 years by Act 51 of 2020.
Can a Hawaii employer deny me a job because of an arrest that did not result in conviction?
Generally, no. Under HRS 378-2, it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for employers to make employment decisions based on arrest and court records. This protection covers arrests without conviction, dismissed charges, and acquittals. Using non-conviction arrest records as a basis for employment decisions can result in a complaint to the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission.
What is the rational relationship test for criminal convictions and employment in Hawaii?
Under HRS 378-2.5, even when a conviction falls within the lookback period, an employer can only withdraw a conditional job offer if the conviction bears a rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities of the position. This requires a case-by-case evaluation considering the nature of the offense, the time elapsed, and the specific job duties. Blanket policies that automatically disqualify all applicants with any conviction do not satisfy this requirement.
How do I get my criminal record expunged in Hawaii?
You can apply for expungement through the Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center (HCJDC) if you were arrested or charged but not convicted. The process takes approximately 120 days and costs $35 for a first-time application ($50 for subsequent applications). Certain first-time conviction offenses, including underage DUI and first-time drug or property offenses, may also be eligible for court-ordered expungement. As of July 2025, approved expungement orders are automatically transmitted to the Judiciary for court record sealing.
Updates
Corrected the expungement waiting period for deferred prostitution cases to three years under HRS 712-1200(4)(c), and removed an uncitable reference to a 2018 Honolulu fair chance ordinance.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 378: EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES
§ 378-2.5Employer inquiries into conviction recordIn force
(a) Subject to subsection (b), an employer may inquire about and consider an individual's criminal conviction record concerning hiring, termination, or the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment; provided that the conviction record bears a rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities of the position. (b) Inquiry into and consideration of conviction records for prospective employees shall take place only after the prospective employee has received a conditional offer of employment which may be withdrawn if the prospective employee has a conviction record that bears a rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities of the position. (c) For purposes of this section, "conviction" means an adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction that the defendant committed a crime, not including final judgments required to be confidential pursuant to section 571-84; provided that the employer may consider the employee's conviction record falling within a period that shall not exceed the most recent seven years for felony convictions and the most recent five years for misdemeanor convictions, excluding periods of incarceration.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2015
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wright v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2006, 111 Haw. 401)“…f his employment or at the time of his termination. Second, HRS § 378-2.5, concerning employers’ inquiries into c…”
- Shimose v. Hawai'i Health Systems Corp. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2015, 134 Haw. 479)“…[Shimose’s] 2001 felony drug conviction in accordance with HRS § 378-2.5(1), and the conviction disqualified [hi…”
- Shimose (Hawaii Supreme Court 2015)“…[Shimose’s] 2001 felony drug conviction in accordance with HRS § 378-2.5(1), and the conviction disqualified [hi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 378-2Discriminatory practices made unlawful; offenses definedIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice: (1) Because of race, sex including gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, age, religion, color, ancestry, disability, marital status, arrest and court record, reproductive health decision, or domestic or sexual violence victim status if the domestic or sexual violence victim provides notice to the victim's employer of such status or the employer has actual knowledge of such status: (A) For any employer to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or discharge from employment, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual in compensation or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment; (B) For any employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or to classify or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual; (C) For any employer or employment agency to print, circulate, or cause to be printed or circulated any statement, advertisement, or publication or to use any form of application for employment or to make any inquiry in connection with prospective employment, that expresses, directly or indirectly, any limitation, specification, or discrimination; (D) For any labor organization to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 151 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1994, 76 Haw. 454)“…8, asserting claims for: wrongful discharge in violation of HRS § 378-2 (count I); discharge in violation of pu…”
- Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2001, 96 Haw. 408)“…ontract, (2) compensation discrimination based on age under HRS § 378-2(1)(A) (1993), (3) unpaid wages under HR…”
- Shoppe v. Gucci America, Inc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2000, 94 Haw. 368)“…stated claims for: (1) age discrimination, in violation of HRS § 378-2 (Supp.1999); (2) breach of employment c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report, Hawaii Workplace Harassment Laws: Hostile Work Environment (2026), Wrongful Termination in Hawaii (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
§ 378-2.7Employer inquiries into and consideration of credit history or credit reportIn force
(a) Notwithstanding section [378‑2(a)(8)]: (1) Inquiry into and consideration of a prospective employee's credit history or credit report may take place only after the prospective employee has received a conditional offer of employment, which may be withdrawn if information in the credit history or credit report is directly related to a bona fide occupational qualification; (2) The prohibition against an employer's refusal to hire or employ, barring or terminating from employment, or otherwise discriminating on the basis of credit history shall not apply to employers who are expressly permitted or required to inquire into an individual's credit history for employment purposes pursuant to any federal or state law; (3) The prohibition against an employer's refusal to hire or employ, barring or terminating from employment, or otherwise discriminating on the basis of credit history shall not apply to managerial or supervisory employees; and (4) The prohibition against an employer's refusal to hire or employ, barring or terminating from employment, or otherwise discriminating on the basis of credit history shall not apply to employers that are financial institutions in which…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
§ 378-1DefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
As used herein: "Arrest and court record" includes any information about an individual having been questioned, apprehended, taken into custody or detention, held for investigation, charged with an offense, served a summons, arrested with or without a warrant, tried, or convicted pursuant to any law enforcement or military authority. "Because of sex" shall include, but is not limited to, because of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; and women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions shall be treated the same for all employment-related purposes, including receipt of benefits under fringe benefit programs, as other individuals not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work. "Being regarded as having such an impairment" includes but is not limited to employer consideration of an individual's genetic information, including genetic information of any family member of an individual, or the individual's refusal to submit to a genetic test as a condition of initial or continued employment. "Commission" means the civil rights commission.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 30 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1994, 76 Haw. 454)“…e notion that the definition of marital status contained in HRS § 378-1 (1985) "the state of being married or…”
- French v. Hawaii Pizza Hut, Inc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2004, 105 Haw. 462)“…19 S.Ct. 2139 . As to the determination of "disability," HRS § 378-1, similar to the ADA, defines disability…”
- Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2015, 135 Haw. 1)“…e-McDonnell rubric and the definitions and requirements of HRS §§ 378-1, -2, and -3. Sam Teague, 89 Hawai'i…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights, Hawaii Data Privacy Laws: Constitutional Privacy & Consumer Rights (2026)
§ 378-5RemediesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) The commission may order appropriate affirmative action, including, but not limited to, hiring, reinstatement, or upgrading of employees, with or without backpay, restoration to membership in any respondent labor organization, or other remedies as provided under chapter 368, which in the judgment of the commission, will effectuate the purpose of this part, including a requirement for reporting on the manner of compliance. (b) In any civil action brought under this part, if the court finds that a respondent has engaged in or is engaging in any unlawful discriminatory practice as defined in this part, the court may enjoin the respondent from engaging in such unlawful discriminatory practice and order such affirmative action as may be appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to, reinstatement, hiring, or upgrading of employees, with or without backpay, or restoration of membership in any respondent labor organization, or any other equitable relief the court deems appropriate. Backpay liability shall not accrue from a date more than two years prior to the filing of the complaint with the commission.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1994, 76 Haw. 454)“…d be stricken because neither were available remedies under HRS § 378-5 (1985). On August 27, 1992, the circu…”
- Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2001, 96 Haw. 408)“…costs, and prejudgment interest 12 under HRS § 378-5(c) (1993), 13 requesting t…”
- Collins v. South Seas Jeep Eagle (Hawaii Supreme Court 1997, 87 Haw. 86)“…would be entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to HRS § 378-5(c). Collins asserted that her attorneys…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 831: UNIFORM ACT ON STATUS OF CONVICTED PERSONS
§ 831-3.1Prior convictions; criminal records; noncriminal standardsIn force
(a) A person shall not be disqualified from public office or employment by the State or any of its branches, political subdivisions, or agencies except under section 831-2(c), or be disqualified to practice, pursue, or engage in any occupation, trade, vocation, profession, or business for which a permit, license, registration, or certificate is required by the State or any of its branches, political subdivisions, or agencies, solely by reason of a prior conviction of a crime; provided that: (1) With respect to liquor licenses, a person who has been convicted of a felony may be denied a liquor license by the liquor commission; and (2) A person who within the past ten years, excluding any period of incarceration, has been convicted of a crime that bears a rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities of a job, occupation, trade, vocation, profession, or business may be denied employment, a permit, license, registration, or certificate. Nothing in this subsection shall abrogate any applicable appeal rights under chapters 76 or 89.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2013
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Paul v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP., STATE (Hawaii Supreme Court 2007, 115 Haw. 416)“…The ICA grounded its conclusion (1) in the language of HRS § 831-3.1(b)(3) (Supp.1992) (pertaining to crimin…”
- State v. Pali. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2013, 129 Haw. 363)“…1.61 (2008)], loss of civil service employment [see, e.g., HRS § 831-3.1 (Supp. 2003)], loss of a driver’s lice…”
- State v. Simeona (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 1993, 10 Haw. App. 220)“…the records of these penal offenses are “criminal records.” HRS § 831-3.1(b)(3) (Supp. 1992), states as follows:…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 831-3.2Expungement ordersIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) The attorney general, or the attorney general's duly authorized representative within the department of the attorney general, upon written application from a person arrested for, or charged with but not convicted of a crime, or found eligible for redress under chapter 661B, shall issue an expungement order annulling, canceling, and rescinding the record of arrest; provided that an expungement order shall not be issued: (1) In the case of an arrest for a felony or misdemeanor where conviction has not been obtained because of bail forfeiture; (2) For a period of five years after arrest or citation in the case of a petty misdemeanor or violation where conviction has not been obtained because of a bail forfeiture; (3) In the case of an arrest of any person for any offense where conviction has not been obtained because the person has rendered prosecution impossible by absenting oneself from the jurisdiction; (4) In the case of a person who was involuntarily hospitalized pursuant to section 706-607, or who was acquitted or had charges dismissed pursuant to chapter 704 due to a physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect; and (5) For a period of one year upon discharge of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Barker v. Young (2023) held that under HRS 831-3.2(a) a person arrested for a crime but convicted only of a violation is eligible for arrest record expungement, because a violation is not a crime. State v. Sarmiento (2024) applied the section to hold that this power rests with the attorney general, not the circuit court.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Barker v. Young. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2023, 153 Haw. 144)✓Barker was arrested for harassment, a petty misdemeanor, but convicted only of disorderly conduct as a violation; the court held he remained eligible for arrest record expungement under HRS 831-3.2(a) because a violation is not a crime.
- State v. Rogan. S.Ct. Opinion, filed 06/05/2018 [ada], 142 Haw. 412. Petition for Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus, filed 12/29/2017. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2025)“…ised Statutes (HRS) § 831-3.2(f) (2014 & Supp. 2024). HRS § 831-3.2(f) recognizes privacy and restorative…”
- State v. Sarmiento (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2024, 155 Haw. 224)✓After his convictions were vacated and the case dismissed, Sarmiento asked the circuit court to expunge his arrest record; the court held HRS 831-3.2 vests that power in the attorney general and gives a circuit court no authority to order expungement.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Court Records: How to Search eCourt Kokua and How Sealing Works, Hawaii OVUII Laws: Penalties, BAC Limit & License (2026), Hawaii Expungement Laws: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 831-3.2 and the HCJDC Process
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 846: HAWAII CRIMINAL JUSTICE DATA CENTER;
§ 846-2.7Criminal history record checksIn force
(a) The agencies and other entities named in subsections (b) and (c) may conduct state and national criminal history record checks on the personnel identified in subsections (b) and (c), and participate in the rap back program, for the purpose of determining suitability or fitness for a permit, license, employment, or volunteer service; provided that the Hawaii criminal justice data center may charge a reasonable fee for the criminal history record checks performed. The agencies and other entities named in subsections (b) and (c) shall notify applicants, employees, and volunteers subject to a criminal history record check pursuant to this section that their fingerprints shall be retained by the Hawaii criminal justice data center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for all purposes and uses authorized for fingerprint submissions. Notification shall also be given to the applicants, employees, and volunteers subject to the rap back program.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 291E: USE OF INTOXICANTS WHILE OPERATING A VEHICLE
§ 291E-64Operating a vehicle after consuming a measurable amount of alcohol; persons under the age of twenty-oneIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person under the age of twenty-one years to operate any vehicle with a measurable amount of alcohol. A law enforcement officer may arrest a person under this section when the officer has probable cause to believe the arrested person is under the age of twenty-one and had been operating a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway or on or in the waters of the State with a measurable amount of alcohol. (b) A person who violates this section shall be sentenced as follows: (1) For a first violation or any violation not preceded within a five-year period by a prior alcohol enforcement contact: (A) The court shall impose: (i) A requirement that the person and, if the person is under the age of eighteen, the person's parent or guardian attend an alcohol abuse education and counseling program for not more than ten hours; and (ii) A one hundred eighty-day prompt suspension of license and privilege to operate a vehicle with absolute prohibition from operating a vehicle during the suspension period, or in the case of a person eighteen years of age or older, the court may impose, in lieu of the one hundred eighty-day prompt suspension of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Okada (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2007, 113 Haw. 363)“…and driving whether or not the underage person is impaired, HRS 291E-64. COL 6. When both forms are read at the…”
- State v. Yong Shik Won (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2014, 134 Haw. 59)“…alcohol while under the age of twenty-one, in violation of HRS § 291E-64 (2007). Our analysis in this case is li…”
- State v. Hosaka. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2020, 148 Haw. 252)“…s for a refusal by a person under twenty-one arrested under HRS § 291E-64 (2007) (operating a vehicle after consu…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 302A: EDUCATION
§ 302A-601.5Employees of the department of education and teacher trainees in any public school; criminal history record checksIn force
(a) The department of education, including the Hawaii state public library system, shall develop procedures for obtaining verifiable information regarding the criminal history of persons who are employed or seeking employment in any position, including teacher trainees, that places them in close proximity to children. These procedures shall include criminal history record checks in accordance with section 846-2.7. Information obtained pursuant to this subsection shall be used exclusively by the employer or prospective employer for the purpose of determining whether a person is suitable for working in close proximity to children. All such decisions shall be subject to applicable federal laws and regulations currently or hereafter in effect.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 353: CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
§ 353-1.5Criminal history record checksIn force
(a) The department shall develop standards to ensure the reputable and responsible characters of staff members, volunteers, contract service providers, and subcontract service providers of the State's correctional facilities, which shall include criminal history record checks. (b) For purposes of this section: "Contract service provider" means an individual or employee of an entity contracted directly by the department to provide a specific service. "Contract service provider" includes students who, as a part of their educational curriculum or assigned internship from a college or university, regardless of whether or not they receive a stipend, are assigned to the department to provide or learn how to provide a specific service for the department. "Prospective staff member" means any applicant for a job in the department that is directly involved in the treatment and care of persons committed to a facility. "Staff member" means any employee of the department who is directly involved with the treatment and care of persons committed to a facility. "Subcontract service provider" means an individual or employee of an entity hired by a contract service provider.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 706: DISPOSITION OF CONVICTED DEFENDANTS
§ 706-622.5Sentencing for drug offenders; expungementIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Notwithstanding section 706-620(3), a person convicted for the first or second time for any offense under section 329-43.5, except offenses under subsections (a) and (b) of that section which constitute violations, involving the possession or use of drug paraphernalia or any felony offense under part IV of chapter 712 involving the possession or use of any dangerous drug, detrimental drug, harmful drug, intoxicating compound, marijuana, or marijuana concentrate, as defined in section 712‑1240, but not including any offense under part IV of chapter 712 involving the distribution or manufacture of any such drugs or substances and not including any methamphetamine offenses under sections 712‑1240.7, 712‑1240.8 as that section was in effect before July 1, 2016, 712-1241, and 712-1242, is eligible to be sentenced to probation under subsection (2) if the person meets the following criteria: (a) The court has determined that the person is nonviolent after reviewing the person's criminal history, the factual circumstances of the offense for which the person is being sentenced, and any other relevant information; (b) The person has been assessed by a certified substance abuse…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Haugen (Hawaii Supreme Court 2004, 104 Haw. 71)“…circuit court erred in failing to sentence her pursuant to HRS § 706-622.5 (Supp.2002). 4 In response…”
- State v. Reis (Hawaii Supreme Court 2007, 115 Haw. 79)“…nter alia, to a five-year period of probation, pursuant to HRS § 706-622.5 (Supp.2004). [1] On appeal, the pros…”
- State v. Koch (Hawaii Supreme Court 2005, 107 Haw. 215)“…(3), see supra note 1, rather than pursuant to HRS § 706-622.5 (Supp.2002) 4 as a first-t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 706-622.9Sentencing for first-time property offenders; expungementIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Notwithstanding section 706-620(3), a person convicted for the first time of any class C felony property offense under chapter 708 who has not previously been sentenced under section 706-606.5, section 706-622.5, or this section shall be eligible to be sentenced to probation under subsection (2) if the person meets the following criteria: (a) The court has determined that the person is nonviolent after reviewing the person's criminal history, the factual circumstances of the offense for which the person is being sentenced, and any other relevant information; (b) The person has been assessed by a certified substance abuse counselor to be in need of substance abuse treatment due to dependency or abuse under the applicable Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and Addiction Severity Index; (c) The court has determined that the offense for which the person is being sentenced is related to the person's substance abuse dependency or addiction; (d) The court has determined that the person is genuinely motivated to obtain and maintain substance abuse treatment, based upon consideration of the person's history, including whether substance abuse treatment has previously been afforded to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 712: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH AND MORALS
§ 712-1200ProstitutionIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of prostitution if the person engages in, or agrees or offers to engage in, sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee or anything of value. (2) As used in this section: "Minor" means a person who is less than eighteen years of age. "Seeks medical or law enforcement assistance" includes but is not limited to making, or assisting someone who is making, a report to the 911 system, a poison control center, a medical provider, a reproductive health provider, or any law enforcement agency or providing care to someone who is awaiting the arrival of medical or law enforcement personnel. "Sexual conduct" means "sexual penetration", "deviate sexual intercourse", or "sexual contact", as those terms are defined in section 707-700, or "sadomasochistic abuse" as defined in section 707-752. (3) Prostitution shall be a petty misdemeanor; provided that if the person who commits the offense under subsection (1) is a minor, prostitution shall be a violation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 47 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Richie (Hawaii Supreme Court 1998, 88 Haw. 19)“…rts.[ 4 ] Thus, by the plain meaning of HRS §§ 712-1200 and 707-700, touching the sexual or oth…”
- Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1994, 76 Haw. 454)“…e v. Rice, 66 Haw. 101 , 657 P.2d 1026 (1983), that HRS § 712-1200(4) precluded trial courts from granting…”
- State v. Dudoit (Hawaii Supreme Court 1999, 90 Haw. 262)“…from that of Tavares, in connection with our analysis of HRS § 712-1200(4) (Supp. 1992), a statute whose langua…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 78: PUBLIC SERVICE
§ 78-2.7Criminal history record checksIn force
(a) The State or any of its branches, political subdivisions, or agencies shall develop standards and procedures to ensure the reputable and responsible character of applicants and employees, which shall include criminal history record checks in accordance with section 846-2.7. (b) The State or any of its branches, political subdivisions, or agencies shall obtain criminal history information through the Hawaii criminal justice data center on an applicant for a position that has the same type of contact with children, dependent adults, or persons committed to a correctional facility as other public employees who hold positions that are authorized by law to require criminal history record checks as a condition of employment; provided that: (1) The information obtained shall be used exclusively for the purpose of determining whether a person is suitable for working in close proximity with children, dependent adults, or persons committed to a correctional facility; (2) The use of the information shall be subject to those federal laws and regulations as may be now or hereafter adopted; and (3) The Hawaii criminal justice data center may assess applicants a reasonable fee for each…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Sources and References
- HRS 378-2.5: Employer Inquiries into Conviction Record(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 378-2: Discriminatory Practices Made Unlawful(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Act 51 of 2020 (SB 2193) - Session Laws of Hawaii(data.capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 846-2.7: Criminal History Record Checks(law.justia.com)
- HRS 831-3.1: Prior Convictions and Noncriminal Standards(law.justia.com)
- HRS 831-3.2: Expungement Orders(law.justia.com)
- Criminal History Record Check - Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center(ag.hawaii.gov).gov
- Expungements - Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center(ag.hawaii.gov).gov
- eCrim: Hawaii Adult Criminal Conviction Information(ecrim.ehawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Civil Rights Commission(labor.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 378-2.7: Credit History Restrictions(law.justia.com)
- FCRA Requirements for Employment Background Screening(ftc.gov).gov
- Tenant Screening Fee FAQs (Act 200)(cca.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 712-1200(4)(c): Three-Year Expungement Waiting Period After Deferred Plea(data.capitol.hawaii.gov)
- HRS 831-3.2: Expungement Orders (official Hawaii Revised Statutes text)(data.capitol.hawaii.gov)