Massachusetts
Massachusetts Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 20 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Massachusetts regulates background checks through its CORI system, which is created and governed by M.G.L. c. 6, ss. 167-178 and limits what employers, landlords, and licensing boards may see. A separate anti-discrimination statute, M.G.L. c. 151B, s. 4, limits what employers may ask about and consider. The state's Ban the Box law bars most employers from asking about criminal history on job applications, and a 7-year cap on criminal reporting applies to all positions regardless of salary.
Massachusetts has some of the strongest background check protections in the country. The state regulates who can access criminal records, what information can appear on a background check, and how employers, landlords, and licensing boards may use that information in their decisions.
This guide covers everything you need to know about Massachusetts background check laws, including the CORI system, Ban the Box protections, lookback periods, record sealing, and your rights as a job applicant, tenant, or license holder.
The CORI System: How Massachusetts Background Checks Work
Massachusetts criminal background checks run through the Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) system, managed by the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services (DCJIS). CORI records contain arraignment and disposition data from Massachusetts courts.

There are two types of criminal record checks in the state:
- Name-based CORI checks search Massachusetts court records using a person's name and date of birth. These return only Massachusetts records.
- Fingerprint-based checks match against both state and national databases. They return arrest records from Massachusetts and potentially other states.
Most employers use name-based CORI checks. Fingerprint-based checks are required for certain positions, such as workers in early education and care programs, school employees, and certain healthcare workers.
CORI Access Levels
Not every requestor sees the same information. Massachusetts uses a tiered access system that controls what records are disclosed based on who is asking and why.
Standard Access is the level most employers receive. Under standard access, the CORI report includes:
- Murder, manslaughter, and sex offenses with no time limit
- Felony convictions and pending cases within the past 10 years
- Misdemeanor convictions and pending cases within the past 5 years
Open Access is available to the general public and is the most restrictive level. M.G.L. c. 6, s. 172(a)(4) sets out the full list of what a member of the general public may obtain:
- Convictions, and findings of not guilty by reason of insanity, for any felony punishable by 5 or more years of imprisonment, for 10 years after the disposition
- Other felony convictions, and findings of not guilty by reason of insanity, for 2 years after the disposition
- Misdemeanor convictions for 1 year after the disposition
- Custody status and placement in the correction system for someone currently serving a sentence, on probation, or in the custody of the parole board
Pending criminal charges are not part of open access. They appear only at the standard access level under s. 172(a)(3). The permanent murder, manslaughter, and sex offense records described above are also limited by s. 172(b) to requestors under s. 172(a)(1) through (a)(3), so they do not reach a general public request either.
Required Access levels (1 through 4) provide broader information and are reserved for criminal justice agencies, child welfare organizations, and other entities with statutory authorization.
How to Request Your Own CORI
Any individual can check their own CORI through the iCORI online system or by submitting a paper form. The fee is $25, though a fee waiver is available for those who qualify based on financial hardship. Processing takes up to 10 business days, though most results come back sooner. Results remain in your iCORI account for 6 months.
You can also request a CORI self-audit, which shows which organizations have run a background check on you. The first audit every 90 days is free.
Ban the Box: Employment Application Restrictions
Massachusetts was an early adopter of "Ban the Box" legislation. Under M.G.L. c. 151B, s. 4(9 1/2), most employers cannot request criminal offender record information on an initial written job application.
This law took effect in 2010 as part of the broader CORI reform legislation. The goal was to give people with criminal records a fair chance to be evaluated on their qualifications before their criminal history enters the conversation.
What Employers Cannot Ask on Applications
Under the Ban the Box law, the initial written application cannot include questions about:
- Any criminal history whatsoever (for most employers)
- Arrests that did not result in a conviction
- Sealed or expunged records
- Juvenile records
Limited Exceptions
Section 4(9 1/2) carries its own narrow exception. Employers may inquire about criminal convictions on the initial application form only if:
- Federal or state law creates a mandatory or presumptive disqualification based on specific conviction types for that position
- The employer is legally prohibited from hiring people convicted of certain offenses
Examples include positions at childcare facilities, certain financial institutions, and roles that require security clearances.
After the Application Stage
Once a candidate advances past the initial application, employers may ask about:
- Felony convictions
- Misdemeanor convictions from the past 3 years
They still cannot ask about arrests without convictions, sealed records, or the specific categories of first offenses protected under the statute.
What Employers Cannot Consider: Protected Criminal Record Categories
Massachusetts goes beyond Ban the Box. Under M.G.L. c. 151B, s. 4(9), employers are permanently prohibited from requesting information about, keeping records of, or discriminating based on:
- Arrests or detentions that did not result in a conviction. An arrest alone is not evidence of wrongdoing.
- First convictions for certain minor offenses. These include drunkenness, simple assault, speeding, minor traffic violations, affray, and disturbance of the peace.
- Misdemeanor convictions older than 3 years. If 3 or more years have passed since the conviction or the completion of any incarceration, the misdemeanor cannot be considered.
- Sealed or expunged records. These are treated as if they do not exist.
- Juvenile records. Unless the individual was tried as an adult in Superior Court.
Applicants who are asked unlawful questions about these categories may answer "no record" without legal consequences. An employer cannot penalize an applicant for giving an incomplete or inaccurate answer to an illegal question.
CORI Access Rules for Employers
Employer CORI obligations come from two places. Getting access to the database is governed by M.G.L. c. 6, s. 172 and the DCJIS regulations at 803 CMR 2.00. What an employer must do with the results is governed by M.G.L. c. 6, s. 171A.
- Register with DCJIS. Employers must register for an iCORI account and renew annually. This requirement comes from the DCJIS regulations, which s. 172(c) authorizes the department to impose as a condition of database access.
- Obtain written consent. Section 172(c) requires the requestor to certify, under the penalties of perjury, that the applicant or employee has signed a CORI acknowledgment form before the check is run. The employer must keep that form for 1 year, and it is subject to audit.
- Maintain a CORI policy. Under s. 171A, an organization that conducts 5 or more criminal background investigations a year must adopt a written policy consistent with the DCJIS Model CORI Policy.
- Provide adverse action notice. Section 171A requires the employer to give the applicant the criminal history record in its possession before questioning the applicant about it, and before making any decision adverse to the applicant based on it, so the person has a chance to dispute inaccurate information.
Employers may never require applicants to provide their own CORI printout or sign a release for arrest records.
How the FCRA Interacts with Massachusetts Law
When employers use third-party consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) instead of the state CORI system, both the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Massachusetts consumer reporting statute, M.G.L. c. 93, s. 52, apply. Where the two conflict, the stricter rule controls.
Key Differences Between Massachusetts Law and the FCRA
| Rule | Federal FCRA | Massachusetts Law |
|---|---|---|
| Conviction reporting limit | No limit. 15 U.S.C. s. 1681c(a)(5) expressly excludes records of convictions of crimes from the 7-year cap | 7 years from the date of disposition, release, or parole (c. 93, s. 52(a)(5)) |
| Arrest record reporting limit | 7 years, or until the governing statute of limitations expires, whichever is longer (s. 1681c(a)(2)) | 7 years from the date of disposition, release, or parole |
| Salary threshold exception | The subsection (a) time limits do not apply to jobs paying $75,000 or more (s. 1681c(b)(3)) | No employment exception. The only exceptions are credit transactions and life insurance of $50,000 or more |
| Consent requirement | Written authorization required | Written authorization required |
| Adverse action process | Pre-adverse notice, then final adverse notice | Same federal requirements plus state-specific CORI rules |
Massachusetts is stricter than federal law in two separate ways. It caps conviction reporting at 7 years, which federal law does not cap at all, and it has no employment salary exception. A CRA operating in Massachusetts cannot report criminal case information older than 7 years no matter what the position pays.
Employer Obligations Under Both Laws
When using a CRA, Massachusetts employers must:
- Provide a standalone written disclosure that a background check will be conducted
- Obtain written authorization from the applicant
- Follow the two-step adverse action process (pre-adverse action notice with a copy of the report, waiting period, then final adverse action notice)
- Comply with Massachusetts restrictions on what criminal records can be considered
A Massachusetts appellate court has ruled that employers can face FCRA liability for procedural violations even when no actual harm resulted from the violation.
Housing Background Checks
Landlords and housing providers in Massachusetts may conduct criminal background checks on prospective tenants, but the process is regulated.
Rules for Private Landlords
- Landlords must obtain written consent before running a CORI check
- Landlords cannot require applicants to provide their own CORI
- Automatic rejection of all applicants with criminal records is not permitted
- An individualized assessment is required, considering the nature of the offense, time elapsed since the conviction, and evidence of rehabilitation
Rules for Public and Subsidized Housing
Public housing authorities have additional access to criminal records and may request court docket sheets. Federal law creates permanent bars for certain offenses in federally assisted housing:
- Convictions for methamphetamine manufacture on federally assisted housing premises
- Sex offenses requiring lifetime registration on the sex offender registry
For state-funded housing, individuals with these convictions may still apply but must demonstrate why they should be admitted despite their record.
Anti-Discrimination Enforcement
The Massachusetts Attorney General has actively enforced fair housing laws in the background check context. In notable enforcement actions, the AG's office targeted companies selling tenant screening software that offered features to automatically disqualify applicants based on criminal history or receipt of public assistance. The AG found that such automated screening tools can disproportionately impact Black, Latino, low-income, and other protected groups.
Under Massachusetts law, using criminal records as a blanket disqualifier in housing decisions can constitute unlawful discrimination.
Professional Licensing Background Checks
Massachusetts licensing boards conduct CORI checks on applicants for professional and occupational licenses under M.G.L. c. 6, s. 172.
How Licensing Checks Work
- The Division of Occupational Licensure submits CORI checks to DCJIS on behalf of licensing boards
- Applicants must sign a CORI authorization form, valid for one year
- Results may take up to 10 business days
2018 Reform Requirements
The Criminal Justice Reform Act of 2018 (Chapter 69 of the Acts of 2018) added new requirements for licensing boards:
- Boards must publish a list of specific criminal convictions that are directly related to the duties and responsibilities of the licensed occupation
- Only convictions on that published list can serve as grounds for denial
- Boards cannot use a criminal record as a blanket disqualification without establishing a direct connection to the licensed profession
This reform ensures that a decades-old conviction unrelated to the profession in question cannot automatically block someone from earning a license.
Record Sealing in Massachusetts
Massachusetts offers both petition-based sealing and automatic sealing for certain record types under M.G.L. c. 276, ss. 100A and 100C.
Petition-Based Sealing (Section 100A)
Individuals may petition the Commissioner of Probation to seal their records after the following waiting periods:
| Record Type | Waiting Period | Additional Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Misdemeanor conviction | 3 years after conviction or release from incarceration (whichever is later) | No new convictions during the 3-year period (except motor vehicle offenses with fines under $50) |
| Felony conviction | 7 years after conviction or release from incarceration (whichever is later) | No new convictions during the 7-year period (except motor vehicle offenses with fines under $50) |
Records That Cannot Be Sealed
Certain offenses are excluded from sealing eligibility:
- Most firearms offenses (M.G.L. c. 140, ss. 121-131H)
- Corruption and perjury offenses (M.G.L. c. 268 and c. 268A), except resisting arrest
- Sex offenses carry a minimum 15-year waiting period
- Sex offenders classified as Level 2 or Level 3 can never seal those records
Automatic Sealing (Section 100C)
Massachusetts provides automatic sealing for records with favorable outcomes:
- Not guilty verdicts are automatically sealed
- No bill returns from a grand jury are automatically sealed
- No probable cause findings are automatically sealed
- Dismissals and nolle prosequi entries may be sealed at the court's discretion if "substantial justice would best be served"
Records for offenses that are no longer crimes under current law are eligible for immediate sealing.
Effect of Sealed Records
Once sealed, records cannot be used in employment, housing, or professional licensing decisions. A person with a sealed record may legally answer "no record" on any application that asks about prior arrests, criminal court appearances, or convictions.
Sealed records remain accessible to law enforcement, probation officers, and courts if the individual is subsequently convicted of a new offense.
Expungement in Massachusetts
Expungement is a stronger remedy than sealing. When a record is expunged under M.G.L. c. 276, s. 100K, it is permanently destroyed and no longer accessible by any court or government agency.
Time-Based Expungement
To qualify for time-based expungement:
- You may have no more than 2 records total (multiple charges from a single incident count as one)
- The offense did not result in death or serious bodily injury
- The offense was not committed while armed with a dangerous weapon
- The offense was not committed against an elderly or disabled person
- Misdemeanor: 3 years must have passed since completion of the sentence
- Felony: 7 years must have passed since completion of the sentence
Non-Time-Based Expungement
A court may order expungement at any time if:
- The record resulted from false identification or identity theft
- The offense is no longer a crime under current law
The expungement process is free and begins with filing a Petition to Expunge form. The District Attorney's office is notified and may respond.
The Clean Slate Movement in Massachusetts
As of early 2026, Massachusetts has not enacted a Clean Slate law providing for automatic sealing of eligible criminal records. However, the push for this legislation has been active and growing.
Current Status
Clean Slate bills have been introduced in multiple legislative sessions (2019, 2021, 2023, and the current session). Sponsored by State Senator Cindy Friedman and Representative Mary Keefe, the proposed legislation would require the Commissioner of Probation to automatically seal criminal and juvenile records once the existing waiting periods have passed, without requiring individuals to file a petition.
Advocates estimate that automatic sealing could benefit more than 600,000 people in Massachusetts. At least 12 other states have enacted automated sealing laws since 2018.
The bills have not yet passed the legislature, though they continue to gain bipartisan support.
Marijuana Pardon Program
In March 2024, Governor Maura Healey announced a sweeping pardon for all adult state court misdemeanor convictions for marijuana possession entered before March 13, 2024.
Key details of the pardon:
- The pardon is automatic. Individuals do not need to apply for their records to be updated.
- State agencies began automatically updating eligible records.
- A Marijuana Pardon Certificate is available for those who want official documentation.
- The pardon could affect hundreds of thousands of Massachusetts residents.
This was described as one of the most comprehensive state-level marijuana pardon actions in the country, following President Biden's call for governors to take similar steps.
Recent Changes and Developments
Massachusetts background check law continues to evolve. Key recent developments include:
- 2024: Marijuana Pardons. Governor Healey's blanket pardon of marijuana possession misdemeanor convictions, with automatic record updates.
- 2025: Eviction Record Sealing. A new law effective May 5, 2025 allows tenants to seal eviction records, adding another layer of screening protection.
- 2025: Emergency Housing CORI Checks. New legislation requires CORI checks for applicants to the Emergency Assistance family shelter program, with bars for certain serious violent offenses.
- Ongoing: Clean Slate Legislation. Bills proposing automatic sealing of eligible records continue to move through the legislature.
- AG Enforcement Actions. The Attorney General's office has continued to investigate and cite employers for Ban the Box violations and has targeted discriminatory tenant screening software.
Filing a Complaint
If you believe your rights under Massachusetts background check laws have been violated, you can file a complaint with:
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD): Handles employment and housing discrimination complaints related to criminal records. Boston: (617) 994-6000. Springfield: (413) 739-2145. Worcester: (508) 453-9630.
- Attorney General's Civil Rights Division: Investigates employer violations of CORI law. Phone: (617) 963-2917.
- DCJIS: For issues related to CORI accuracy or unauthorized access.
Frequently Asked Questions
What shows up on a Massachusetts background check?
What appears depends on the access level of the requestor. For most employers (standard access), a CORI check shows murder and sex offenses with no time limit, felony convictions and pending cases from the past 10 years, and misdemeanor convictions and pending cases from the past 5 years. Sealed, expunged, and juvenile records do not appear. Name-based CORI checks only include Massachusetts records.
Can a Massachusetts employer ask about criminal history on a job application?
No. Under the Ban the Box law (M.G.L. c. 151B, s. 4(9 1/2)), most employers cannot request criminal offender record information on the initial written application. There are narrow exceptions for positions where federal or state law creates a mandatory disqualification based on specific conviction types, such as childcare workers or certain financial industry roles.
How far back does a background check go in Massachusetts?
For employer CORI checks at the standard access level, misdemeanors go back 5 years and felonies go back 10 years. Murder, manslaughter, and sex offenses have no time limit. When a third-party consumer reporting agency conducts the check, Massachusetts law limits reporting of all criminal cases to 7 years regardless of the salary of the position, which is stricter than the federal FCRA.
How do I seal my criminal record in Massachusetts?
You can petition the Commissioner of Probation to seal your record after a waiting period of 3 years for misdemeanors or 7 years for felonies (measured from conviction or release from incarceration, whichever is later). You must have no new convictions during the waiting period. Not-guilty verdicts, no-bill returns, and no-probable-cause findings are sealed automatically. You can start the process through the Office of the Commissioner of Probation at (617) 557-0225.
Does Massachusetts have a Clean Slate law for automatic record sealing?
Not yet. As of early 2026, Massachusetts has not enacted a Clean Slate law that would automatically seal eligible records without a petition. Bills proposing automatic sealing have been introduced in multiple legislative sessions and continue to gain support. Currently, individuals must petition to seal conviction records, though non-conviction records (acquittals and certain dismissals) are already sealed automatically.
Updates
Corrected the Ban the Box citation to M.G.L. c. 151B, s. 4(9 1/2), attributed the CORI system to M.G.L. c. 6, ss. 167-178 rather than c. 151B, rebuilt the open-access record list and the employer procedure list to match M.G.L. c. 6, ss. 171A and 172, and fixed the federal comparison table, which had wrongly stated that the FCRA caps conviction reporting at 7 years.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 151B
§ 4Unlawful practicesIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
Section 4. It shall be an unlawful practice: 1. For an employer, by himself or his agent, because of the race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, which shall not include persons whose sexual orientation involves minor children as the sex object, genetic information, pregnancy or a condition related to said pregnancy including, but not limited to, lactation or the need to express breast milk for a nursing child, ancestry or status as a veteran of any individual to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. 1A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 878 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Madsen v. Erwin (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1985, 395 Mass. 715)“…Against Discrimination, 379 Mass. 279, 281-282 (1979) (G.L.c. 151B, § 4, [1], which proscribes employment discr…”
- Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2005, 443 Mass. 367)“…the plaintiff; and (3) unlawful retaliation in violation of G. L. c. 151B, § 4. The jury also returned a verdict in fa…”
- College-Town, Division of Interco, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1987, 400 Mass. 156)“…Loretta Rizzi, on the basis of *158 sex, in violation of G.L.c. 151B, § 4 (1) and (4). The commission, affirming…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Massachusetts At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights, Massachusetts Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report, Massachusetts Workplace Harassment Laws: Chapter 151B (2026)
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 93
§ 52Information not to be contained in consumer report; exceptionsIn force
Section 52. (a) Except as authorized under subsection (b) no consumer reporting agency shall make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information: (1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcy, antedate the report by more than fourteen years. (2) Suits and judgments which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. (3) Paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years. (4) Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than seven years. (5) Records of arrest, indictment, or conviction of crime which, from date of disposition, release, or parole, antedate the report by more than seven years. (6) Any other adverse item of information which antedates the report by more than seven years. (7) Eviction records sealed pursuant to section 16 of chapter 239.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1991
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- New Bedford Standard-Times Publishing Co. v. Clerk of the Third District Court (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1979, 377 Mass. 404)“…come less accessible through the chronological records. Cf. G.L.c. 93, § 52( a )(5) (stale criminal records in cons…”
- Patrick Catrone v. Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North America, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 1991, 929 F.2d 881)“…But cf. 15 U.S.C. § 1681c; Mass.G.L. ch. 93 § 52. 12 . Each credit…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 6
§ 172Maintenance of criminal offender record information in electronic format; accessibility via world wide web; eligibility for access to database; use and dissemination of criminal offender record informationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Section 172. (a) The department shall maintain criminal offender record information in a database, which shall exist in an electronic format and be accessible via the world wide web. Except as provided otherwise in this chapter, access to the database shall be limited as follows: (1) Criminal justice agencies may obtain all criminal offender record information, including sealed records, for the actual performance of their criminal justice duties. Licensing authorities, as defined in section 121 of chapter 140, may obtain all criminal offender record information, including sealed records, for the purpose of firearms licensing in accordance with sections 121 to 131P, inclusive, of chapter 140. The criminal record review board may obtain all criminal offender record information, including sealed records, for the actual performance of its duties. (2) A requestor authorized or required by statute, regulation or accreditation requirement to obtain criminal offender record information other than that available under clause (3) may obtain such information to the extent and for the purposes authorized to comply with said statute, regulation or accreditation requirement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Hampton (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2010, 457 Mass. 152)“…B, and B’s husband, obtained by the prosecutor pursuant to G. L. c. 6, § 172, were marked for identification and cop…”
- New Bedford Standard-Times Publishing Co. v. Clerk of the Third District Court (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1979, 377 Mass. 404)“…ant to the Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) Act, G.L.c. 6, § 172, as amended through St. 1977, c. 841, t…”
- Commonwealth v. Pon (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2014, 469 Mass. 296)“…a broader group, creating several tiers of access. See G. L. c. 6, § 172; St. 2010, c. 256, § 21; 803 Code Mass.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Massachusetts Warrant Search: How to Check If You Have a Warrant (2026)
§ 171ARight of applicant to criminal history record prior to questioning or adverse decision; penalties for failure to provide applicant with criminal history information; maintenance of written criminal offender record information policyIn force
Section 171A. In connection with any decision regarding employment, volunteer opportunities, housing or professional licensing, a person in possession of an applicant's criminal offender record information shall provide the applicant with the criminal history record in the person's possession, whether obtained from the department or any other source prior to questioning the applicant about his criminal history. If the person makes a decision adverse to the applicant on the basis of his criminal history, the person shall also provide the applicant with the criminal history record in the person's possession, whether obtained from the department or any other source; provided, however, that if the person has provided the applicant with a copy of his criminal offender record information prior to questioning the person is not required to provide the information a second time in connection with an adverse decision based on this information. Failure to provide such criminal history information to an applicant pursuant to this section may subject the offending person to investigation, hearing and sanctions by the board.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 276
§ 100ARequests to seal files; conditions; application of section; effect of sealing of recordsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Section 100A. Any person having a record of criminal court appearances and dispositions in the commonwealth on file with the office of the commissioner of probation may, on a form furnished by the commissioner and signed under the penalties of perjury, request that the commissioner seal the file. The commissioner shall comply with the request provided that: (1) the person's court appearance and court disposition records, including any period of incarceration or custody for any misdemeanor record to be sealed occurred not less than 3 years before the request; (2) the person's court appearance and court disposition records, including any period of incarceration or custody for any felony record to be sealed occurred not less than 7 years before the request; (3) the person had not been found guilty of any criminal offense within the commonwealth in the case of a misdemeanor, 3 years before the request, and in the case of a felony, 7 years before request, except motor vehicle offenses in which the penalty does not exceed a fine of $50; (4) the form includes a statement by the petitioner that he has not been convicted of any criminal offense in any other state, United States possession…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Commonwealth v. Vickey (1980) held that a full pardon does not bring a conviction within section 100A and that courts may not use inherent power to bypass its waiting period. Rzeznik v. Chief of Police of Southampton (1978) held that sealing does not erase a conviction; police, courts and appointing authorities keep access.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Police Commissioner v. Municipal Court of Dorchester District (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1978, 374 Mass. 640)✓After a juvenile's delinquency complaint was dismissed, a judge ordered police to expunge his arrest records; the court read § 100A as covering court and probation records, found no statutory right to expunge police records, and rested that power on the court's own jurisdiction.
- Commonwealth v. Vickey (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1980, 381 Mass. 762)✓A man pardoned for a false bomb report asked a judge to seal his conviction record although he did not qualify under § 100A; the court held the sealing statutes plainly list the qualifying dispositions and a pardon is not among them, and affirmed the refusal to seal.
- Commonwealth v. Pon (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2014, 469 Mass. 296)✓While a driver's appeal from a denied discretionary sealing petition was pending, the Commissioner of Probation sealed his OUI record under § 100A; the court held that mooted his petition and declined to reach the Commonwealth's claim that § 100A is unconstitutional.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Massachusetts Court Records: How to Search, What's Public, and How to Seal Them, Massachusetts Expungement and Record Sealing Laws (M.G.L. c. 276)
§ 100CSealing of records or files in certain criminal cases; effect upon employment reports; enforcementIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Section 100C. In any criminal case wherein the defendant has been found not guilty by the court or jury, or a no bill has been returned by the grand jury, or a finding of no probable cause has been made by the court, the commissioner of probation shall seal said court appearance and disposition recorded in his files and the clerk and the probation officers of the courts in which the proceedings occurred or were initiated shall likewise seal the records of the proceedings in their files. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply if the defendant makes a written request to the commissioner not to seal the records of the proceedings. In any criminal case wherein a nolle prosequi has been entered, or a dismissal has been entered by the court, and it appears to the court that substantial justice would best be served, the court shall direct the clerk to seal the records of the proceedings in his files. The clerk shall forthwith notify the commissioner of probation and the probation officer of the courts in which the proceedings occurred or were initiated who shall likewise seal the records of the proceedings in their files.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 32 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Pon (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2014, 469 Mass. 296)“…r, amici curiae, submitted a brief. CORDY, J. Under G. L. c. 276, § 100C, second par., inserted by St. 1973, c.…”
- Commonwealth v. Doe (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1995, 420 Mass. 142)“…the record in criminal cases pursuant to the provisions of G. L. c. 276, § 100C, second par. (1992 ed.). 2 The charges…”
- Commonwealth v. Boe (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2010, 456 Mass. 337)“…order that such a defendant’s record be sealed pursuant to G. L. c. 276, § 100C. 2 1. Backgroun…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 100KExpungement of record resulting from false identification, an offense no longer a crime at time of expungement, error or fraudIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Section 100K. (a) Notwithstanding the requirements of section 100I and section 100J, a court may order the expungement of a record created as a result of criminal court appearance, juvenile court appearance or dispositions if the court determines based on clear and convincing evidence that the record was created as a result of: (1) false identification of the petitioner or the unauthorized use or theft of the petitioner's identity; (2) an offense at the time of the creation of the record which at the time of expungement is no longer a crime, except in cases where the elements of the original criminal offense continue to be a crime under a different designation. (3) demonstrable errors by law enforcement; (4) demonstrable errors by civilian or expert witnesses; (5) demonstrable errors by court employees; or (6) demonstrable fraud perpetrated upon the court. (b) The court shall have the discretion to order an expungement pursuant to this section based on what is in the best interests of justice. Prior to entering an order of expungement pursuant to this section, the court shall hold a hearing if requested by the petitioner or the district attorney.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Atif H. Ray. (Massachusetts Appeals Court 2026)“…efendant moved to expunge his criminal record pursuant to G. L. c. 276, § 100K. A judge denied the motion…”
- Commonwealth v. Deidania Brown. (Massachusetts Appeals Court 2025)“…ealth v. K.W., 490 Mass. 619, 624 (2022). Pursuant to G. L. c. 276, § 100K, a judge has discretion to expunge a c…”
- Commonwealth v. Jeffrey Rivard. (Massachusetts Appeals Court 2025)“…or "demonstrable fraud perpetrated upon the court." See G. L. c. 276, §§ 100K (a) (3), (5). "In reviewing a decisio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 1681cRequirements relating to information contained in consumer reportsIn forcecited in 61 of our articles
Except as authorized under subsection (b), no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information: Cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years. Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. Paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years. Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than seven years. Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more than seven years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 383 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (2017) addressed the FACTA truncation rule in 1681c(g) and affirmed dismissal for lack of Article III standing, treating material risk of harm as a fact question. Edward Seamans v. Temple University (2014) held the seven-year window in 1681c(a)(4) is extended for an education loan only until that loan is repaid.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2017, 872 F.3d 114)✓A shopper sued two stores whose receipts printed the first six digits of his credit card number; the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of standing, seeing no clear error in the finding that those digits show only the card issuer, not a material risk of identity theft.
- Edward Seamans v. Temple University (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2014, 744 F.3d 853)✓A defaulted university loan kept appearing on a borrower's credit reports after he repaid it because the school never reported the delinquency date; the Third Circuit held the Higher Education Act suspends section 1681c(a)(4)'s aging-off rule only until repayment.
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2011, 660 F.3d 1055)✓A debt buyer offered to settle health club debts over seven years old, saying that if it was reporting the account the bureaus would be told it was settled; the Ninth Circuit, treating those debts as unreportable under section 1681c(a)(4), called that implication misleading.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Does a Felony Stay on Your Record? (2026), Background Check Laws by State (2026 Guide), Alabama Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Sources and References
- Massachusetts Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI)(mass.gov).gov
- Levels of Name-Based Criminal Record Check Access(mass.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 151B, Section 4 - Unlawful Practices(malegislature.gov).gov
- Guide to Criminal Records in Employment and Housing(mass.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 276, Section 100A - Record Sealing(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 276, Section 100C - Automatic Sealing(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 276, Section 100K - Expungement(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 6, Section 171A - CORI Access(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 6, Section 172 - CORI Dissemination(malegislature.gov).gov
- DCJIS Model CORI Policy(mass.gov).gov
- Criminal Record Discrimination in the Workplace(mass.gov).gov
- Governor Healey Marijuana Pardon Announcement(mass.gov).gov
- Seal Your Criminal Record(mass.gov).gov
- Expunge Your Criminal Record(mass.gov).gov
- Sealing Eviction Records: Coming in May 2025(mass.gov).gov
- Criminal Record Checks in Massachusetts(mass.gov).gov
- Request CORI as an Individual(mass.gov).gov
- Marijuana Pardon Certificate Application(mass.gov).gov
- CORI Frequently Asked Questions(mass.gov).gov
- AG Healey Cites Employers for Violating State CORI Law(mass.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 93, Section 52 - Obsolete Information in Consumer Reports(malegislature.gov)
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c - Requirements Relating to Information Contained in Consumer Reports(law.cornell.edu)