Oregon
Oregon Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Oregon regulates background checks through ORS 659A.360, which bars employers from asking about criminal convictions before an initial interview, and through the federal FCRA, which limits reporting of non-conviction records to seven years. Landlords and professional licensing boards face separate statutory requirements under Oregon Revised Statutes.
Last verified: March 2026. This page reflects current Oregon Revised Statutes including ORS 659A.360, ORS 137.225, ORS 659A.320, ORS 90.295, ORS 90.303, and ORS 90.304.
Table of Contents
- Overview of Oregon Background Check Laws
- Ban the Box: Oregon's Statewide Law
- Portland's Criminal History Ordinance
- FCRA and Oregon: How Federal and State Law Interact
- Lookback Periods and Reporting Limits
- Employer Background Checks
- Credit History Restrictions for Employers
- Housing and Tenant Screening
- Professional Licensing Background Checks
- Oregon Expungement and Record Sealing
- Oregon State Police Criminal Records Process
- Recent Changes to Oregon Background Check Laws
- Penalties and Enforcement
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Sources and References
Overview of Oregon Background Check Laws
Oregon has built one of the more comprehensive frameworks in the country for regulating how criminal history information is used in employment, housing, and professional licensing decisions. The state combines its own statutes with federal protections under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to create layered safeguards for individuals with past criminal records.
At the center of this framework is ORS 659A.360, Oregon's Ban the Box law, which restricts when employers can ask about criminal convictions during the hiring process. Complementing this statute are protections against credit history discrimination (ORS 659A.320), detailed tenant screening rules under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (ORS Chapter 90), and one of the most progressive expungement laws in the nation (ORS 137.225).
The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) enforces the employment-related provisions. Workers and applicants who believe an employer violated these laws can file a complaint with BOLI's Civil Rights Division.
Ban the Box: Oregon's Statewide Law
Oregon's Ban the Box law took effect in 2016. Under ORS 659A.360, it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to exclude an applicant from an initial interview solely because of a past criminal conviction.

The statute defines "exclusion" broadly. An employer violates the law if it:
- Requires an applicant to disclose a criminal conviction on an employment application
- Requires disclosure of a criminal conviction before an initial interview
- Requires disclosure before making a conditional offer of employment (when no interview is conducted)
This means that the checkbox asking "Have you ever been convicted of a crime?" cannot appear on job applications in Oregon, and an employer cannot require an applicant to disclose a conviction before the initial interview.
Note what the statute does and does not reach. ORS 659A.360 governs what an employer may require the applicant to disclose. Nothing in the section bars an employer from independently obtaining criminal records on its own, and BOLI describes the rule the same way. Employers inside Portland face a stricter local rule that does restrict accessing criminal history before a conditional offer, covered in the next section.
What Employers Can Still Do
The law does not prevent employers from considering criminal history altogether. Subsection (3) states expressly that nothing in the section prevents an employer from considering an applicant's conviction history when making a hiring decision. After an initial interview (or after a conditional job offer when no interview takes place), employers retain full discretion to evaluate an applicant's conviction record as part of the hiring decision.
Exceptions to Ban the Box
Oregon's Ban the Box law does not apply to:
- Employers in the criminal justice system
- Employers seeking nonemployee volunteers
- Situations where federal, state, or local law requires consideration of criminal history
- Law enforcement agencies
These exceptions are relatively narrow. Most private and public employers in Oregon are covered by the statute.
Portland's Criminal History Ordinance
Portland goes beyond state law with its own criminal history ordinance (City Code 23.10.030). This local law, amended by Ordinance 191973 effective January 1, 2025, imposes stricter requirements on employers operating within city limits.
Under the Portland ordinance, an employer may only consider an applicant's criminal history after making a conditional offer of employment. This is a higher bar than the state law, which permits inquiry after the initial interview.
Who the Portland Ordinance Covers
The Portland ordinance applies to any employer with six or more employees when the position involves work performed a majority of the time within Portland. The ordinance does not apply to:
- The United States government
- The State of Oregon and its agencies
- Political subdivisions of Oregon other than the City of Portland
- Employers with fewer than six employees
Rescinding a Conditional Offer
An employer may rescind a conditional offer based on criminal history only after a good-faith determination that a specific offense is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Blanket policies that automatically disqualify applicants with any criminal record are not permitted.
Limited Exceptions
Portland allows earlier inquiry into criminal history for positions involving:
- Direct access to children, seniors, or persons with disabilities
- Increased public safety concerns
- Roles specifically designed to encourage employment of individuals with criminal histories
FCRA and Oregon: How Federal and State Law Interact
When an Oregon employer uses a consumer reporting agency (CRA) to conduct a background check, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Section 1681) applies alongside Oregon state law. The FCRA creates baseline protections that employers cannot override, while Oregon law adds additional restrictions on top.

FCRA Requirements for Oregon Employers
Before running a background check through a CRA, employers in Oregon are required to:
- Provide the applicant with a clear, standalone written disclosure that a background check will be conducted
- Obtain written consent from the applicant before the check begins
- Provide a copy of the applicant's rights under the FCRA
The Adverse Action Process
If an employer decides not to hire someone based on information in a background report, the FCRA requires a two-step adverse action process:
- Pre-adverse action notice: The employer sends the applicant a copy of the report and a summary of their FCRA rights before making a final decision
- Final adverse action notice: After allowing the applicant a reasonable opportunity (generally five to seven business days) to review and dispute the report, the employer can proceed with the final decision and notify the applicant
Skipping either step exposes the employer to liability under federal law.
Lookback Periods and Reporting Limits
One of the most common questions about Oregon background checks involves how far back a report can go. The answer depends on the type of record and the salary level of the position.
FCRA Seven-Year Rule
Under the FCRA, consumer reporting agencies cannot report the following records if they are more than seven years old:
- Arrests that did not result in a conviction
- Civil suits and civil judgments
- Paid tax liens
- Collection accounts
No State Limit on Convictions
Oregon does not impose its own limit on how far back criminal convictions can be reported. Felony and misdemeanor convictions can appear on a background check indefinitely, consistent with the FCRA's general rule that convictions have no time limit for reporting purposes.
The $75,000 Salary Exception
The FCRA's seven-year limit on non-conviction records does not apply to positions with an annual salary of $75,000 or more. For these higher-paying positions, a CRA may report older records that would otherwise be excluded.
| Record Type | Lookback Period | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Criminal convictions | No limit | Reported indefinitely under FCRA and Oregon law |
| Arrests (no conviction) | 7 years | FCRA limit; does not apply to jobs paying $75,000+ |
| Civil judgments | 7 years | FCRA limit |
| Bankruptcy | 10 years | FCRA limit |
| Collection accounts | 7 years | FCRA limit |
| Credit history (employment) | 7 years | For positions under $75,000 |
Oregon State Police Records
Arrest records obtained through Oregon State Police (OSP) background checks may be limited to arrests within the past year that have not been dismissed or resulted in acquittal. Convictions, court dispositions, sentencing, probation, and parole information are retained for 30 years or more.
Employer Background Checks
Oregon employers conducting background checks need to navigate both state and federal requirements. Here is a step-by-step overview of the lawful process.
Step 1: No Criminal History Questions on the Application
Under ORS 659A.360, the job application cannot include questions about criminal convictions, and the employer cannot require the applicant to disclose a conviction before the initial interview. Employers whose positions are based in Portland face the stricter city rule and must wait for a conditional offer before accessing criminal history at all.
Step 2: Conduct the Interview First
The employer conducts an initial interview without reference to criminal history. In Portland, the employer must go even further and extend a conditional job offer before any inquiry.
Step 3: Disclose and Obtain Consent
Before running a background check through a CRA, the employer provides a written disclosure and obtains written consent from the applicant, as required by the FCRA.
Step 4: Review Results Carefully
If the background check reveals criminal history, the employer should evaluate whether the specific offense is relevant to the position. Blanket disqualification policies carry legal risk.
Step 5: Follow Adverse Action Procedures
If the employer decides not to hire based on the results, the FCRA's two-step adverse action process applies. The applicant receives a copy of the report and has time to dispute inaccurate information before a final decision.
Credit History Restrictions for Employers
Oregon restricts employer use of credit history more than many other states. Under ORS 659A.320, it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to obtain or use information contained in the credit history of an applicant or employee for employment purposes.

This prohibition covers hiring, firing, demoting, suspending, and all other terms and conditions of employment. An employer cannot refuse to hire, discharge, or retaliate against someone based on credit history information.
Exceptions to the Credit History Restriction
The credit history restriction does not apply when:
- The employer is a federally insured bank or credit union
- State or federal law requires the use of credit history for that position
- The position involves public safety officer duties
- The credit information is substantially job-related and the employer discloses the reasons for its use in writing
The "substantially job-related" exception typically covers positions with significant financial responsibilities, such as those involving access to large amounts of cash, financial account information, or trade secrets with monetary value.
Filing a Complaint
Workers who believe an employer violated ORS 659A.320 can file a complaint under ORS 659A.820 or bring a civil action for damages under ORS 659A.885.
Housing and Tenant Screening
Oregon regulates how landlords use criminal history in tenant screening decisions. Senate Bill 291, which took effect on January 1, 2022, significantly changed the rules for residential tenant screening throughout the state. Its operative provisions are codified in the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act at ORS 90.303, which governs how a landlord may evaluate an applicant, and ORS 90.304, which governs the written statement of reasons for a denial.
Key Requirements Under ORS 90.303 and ORS 90.304
Landlords in Oregon are now required to:
- Conduct an individualized assessment before denying any applicant based on criminal history
- Consider the nature and severity of the offense and the applicant's age at the time
- Provide an opportunity for the applicant to submit supplemental evidence to explain or negate potentially disqualifying information
- Issue a written statement of one or more reasons for denial within 14 days of the denial, under ORS 90.304
Blanket policies that automatically deny every applicant with a criminal conviction are not permitted. Landlords must assess each applicant on a case-by-case basis, denying only when the applicant demonstrates a risk to the safety of other residents or the property.
Limitations on What Landlords Can Consider
Under ORS 90.303, landlords cannot consider:
- Arrest records that did not result in a conviction
- Convictions based solely on the use or possession of marijuana
- An applicant's possession of a medical marijuana card or status as a medical marijuana patient
Screening Fees
Under ORS 90.295, landlords can charge applicants a screening fee, but it cannot exceed the landlord's actual average screening cost or the customary amount charged by screening companies. A landlord may only require one screening fee from an applicant within any 60-day period, regardless of how many units the applicant applies for.
Before accepting the fee, the landlord must disclose the screening criteria, the process, the applicant's right to dispute accuracy, the rent amount, and any required deposits or insurance.
Professional Licensing Background Checks
Many professional licenses in Oregon require criminal background checks. These are handled through the Oregon State Police Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) division and often involve fingerprint-based checks.
How the Process Works
Licensing boards request that the Oregon Department of State Police conduct a state and nationwide criminal records check using fingerprint identification. Applicants submit fingerprints on the standard blue applicant fingerprint card (FD-258).
The check typically returns:
- Felony arrest and conviction records
- Sex and drug misdemeanor records
- Court dispositions and sentencing information
- Probation and parole information
Expunged, sealed, and juvenile records are generally excluded from the results.
Evaluation Standards
Licensing boards cannot deny an application based solely on a juvenile record that has been expunged or set aside under ORS 419A.260 to 419A.262. Each board maintains its own standards for evaluating criminal history, but the general principle requires a connection between the criminal conduct and the duties of the licensed profession.
Common Licensed Professions Requiring Background Checks
Professions requiring criminal background checks in Oregon include:
- Real estate agents and brokers (Oregon Real Estate Agency)
- Healthcare workers and caregivers (Oregon Department of Human Services)
- Pharmacy professionals (OAR 855-010-0100)
- Educators and school employees
- Law enforcement officers and security professionals
Oregon Expungement and Record Sealing
Oregon's expungement law, codified at ORS 137.225, allows individuals to petition the court to set aside certain criminal convictions and arrest records. Senate Bill 397, which took effect on January 1, 2022, significantly expanded eligibility and reduced waiting periods.
Eligibility and Waiting Periods After SB 397
| Record Type | Waiting Period | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Acquittals and dismissals | Immediate | No waiting period required |
| Arrests with no charges filed | 60 days | Reduced from one year by SB 397 |
| Class C felony convictions | 5 years | No convictions during waiting period |
| Non-person Class B felony convictions | 7 years | No convictions during waiting period |
| Class A misdemeanor convictions | 3 years | Full compliance with sentence required |
| Class B or Class C misdemeanor convictions, or a violation | 1 year | Also the period for most contempt findings |
The one-year tier is easy to miss and it matters: only a Class A misdemeanor carries the three-year wait. A Class B or Class C misdemeanor, a violation, and a contempt finding other than one for violating an abuse or person-crime order all become eligible one year from the date of conviction or finding, or from release from imprisonment, whichever is later.
To be eligible, the applicant must have fully complied with and performed the sentence of the court. A person cannot apply for expungement while still on probation, parole, or post-prison supervision.
What Cannot Be Expunged
Certain offenses are not eligible for expungement in Oregon, including:
- Most person-to-person Class B felonies
- Class A felonies
- Sex offenses requiring registration
- Certain traffic offenses including DUII (in most cases)
Effect of Expungement
Once a conviction is set aside, it is removed from the public record.
A 2025 Oregon Court of Appeals decision, Mohiadeen v. Washington County Sheriff's Office, 338 Or App 29, addressed how a set-aside interacts with Oregon's concealed handgun license statute, ORS 166.291. The court read the phrase "record expunged under the laws of this state" in that statute to mean a record set aside under ORS 137.225. But the decision narrowed relief rather than expanding it: an expungement granted by another state counts only if that state's law includes the same essential features as Oregon's, and a person convicted of an offense that was a felony where it occurred remains "convicted of a felony" even if the offense was later reduced to a misdemeanor. The petitioner, whose California felony had been reduced and expunged in California, lost. The Oregon Supreme Court denied review.
Expunged records generally do not appear on background checks conducted by consumer reporting agencies. However, some government agencies with direct database access may still see sealed records for specific purposes authorized by law.
Oregon State Police Criminal Records Process
The Oregon State Police CJIS division maintains the state's computerized criminal history database and processes background check requests for employment, licensing, and other authorized purposes.
Types of Checks Available
- Name-based checks: Searched against the state criminal history database
- Fingerprint-based checks: Searched against both the Oregon State Police database and the FBI's national database for a more comprehensive result
Processing Time and Access
Processing generally takes 7 to 10 business days, not including mail time. The public can request their own records through the OSP Open Records portal.
Fingerprinting services are available at OSP General Headquarters (3565 Trelstad Avenue SE, Building 1, Salem, OR 97317) on a walk-in basis Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM.
Law Enforcement Data System (LEDS)
Oregon's Law Enforcement Data System (LEDS), established by the 1969 Oregon Legislature and now codified at ORS 181A.280, serves as the state's police information network. LEDS connects law enforcement agencies across Oregon and provides access to state and national criminal justice databases. The statutes that originally created and later transferred the system were renumbered into ORS chapter 181A in 2015, so older references to a chapter 181 section number no longer resolve in current law.
Recent Changes to Oregon Background Check Laws
Several recent legislative and regulatory changes affect background checks in Oregon.
Senate Bill 397 (Effective January 1, 2022)
This legislation overhauled Oregon's expungement law, reducing waiting periods for most offenses and expanding the types of convictions eligible for set-aside. The bill made non-person Class B felonies eligible for expungement after seven years and reduced the waiting period for uncharged arrests from one year to 60 days.
Senate Bill 291 (Effective January 1, 2022)
SB 291 reformed tenant screening practices across Oregon, requiring landlords to conduct individualized assessments before denying applicants based on criminal history and prohibiting consideration of marijuana-related convictions for currently legal conduct. Its requirements now sit in ORS 90.303 and ORS 90.304.
Portland Ordinance 191973 (Effective January 1, 2025)
Portland amended its criminal history hiring ordinance to strengthen protections for job applicants, requiring a conditional job offer before any criminal history inquiry.
HB 2677A (2025)
This bill further amended the automatic expungement procedure for juvenile records in Oregon, streamlining the process for young people to clear eligible offenses from their records.
Mohiadeen v. Washington County Sheriff's Office (2025)
The Oregon Court of Appeals confirmed that the expungement Oregon's concealed handgun license statute recognizes is a set-aside under ORS 137.225, but it narrowed relief for people holding out-of-state expungements: another jurisdiction's expungement qualifies only if that jurisdiction's law shares the same essential features as Oregon's. Anyone relying on relief granted outside Oregon should not assume it carries the same effect here.
Penalties and Enforcement
Violations of Oregon's background check and anti-discrimination laws carry real consequences for employers and landlords.
Employment Violations
The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) investigates complaints of discrimination related to criminal history and credit history in employment. BOLI has one year from receipt of a signed complaint to complete its investigation.
Corrective actions can include:
- Revision of company policies and practices
- Payment of back wages
- Civil penalties
- Signed compliance agreements
Workers can also file civil lawsuits under ORS 659A.885, which provides for compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees.
Housing Violations
Landlords who violate tenant screening requirements under ORS Chapter 90 may face claims for actual damages and may be required to offer the denied applicant a lease. The individualized assessment and written-denial requirements in ORS 90.303 and ORS 90.304 are actively enforced.
FCRA Violations
Employers who fail to follow FCRA requirements face potential liability under federal law, including statutory damages of $100 to $1,000 per violation in cases of willful noncompliance, plus attorney fees and potential punitive damages.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an Oregon employer ask about criminal history on a job application?
No. Under ORS 659A.360, Oregon's Ban the Box law, employers cannot require applicants to disclose criminal convictions on job applications. They also cannot require disclosure of criminal history before an initial interview. If no interview is conducted, they must wait until extending a conditional job offer. The statute governs what the employer can require the applicant to disclose and does not by its terms bar the employer from independently obtaining records. In Portland, City Code 23.10.030 is stricter: employers with six or more employees must wait until a conditional job offer before accessing criminal history at all.
How far back do background checks go in Oregon?
Criminal convictions can be reported indefinitely on Oregon background checks. However, under the federal FCRA, non-conviction records (such as arrests that did not lead to a conviction) cannot be reported if they are more than seven years old, unless the position pays $75,000 or more per year. Oregon State Police arrest records may be limited to within the past year for arrests that were dismissed or resulted in acquittal.
Can a landlord in Oregon deny a rental application based on criminal history?
A landlord can consider criminal history but cannot use blanket denial policies. Under ORS 90.303 and ORS 90.304 (added by Senate Bill 291, effective January 1, 2022), landlords must conduct an individualized assessment, considering the nature and severity of the offense and the applicant's age at the time, and must give a written statement of reasons for a denial within 14 days. Landlords cannot consider arrests that did not result in a conviction or convictions based solely on the use or possession of marijuana.
How long does it take to get a criminal record expunged in Oregon?
Waiting periods depend on the type of record. Acquittals and dismissals can be expunged immediately. Uncharged arrests require a 60-day wait. Class A misdemeanor convictions require three years, but Class B and Class C misdemeanors and violations require only one year. Class C felonies require five years, and non-person Class B felonies require seven years. The applicant must have no other convictions during the waiting period and must have completed all terms of the sentence, including probation and parole.
Can Oregon employers check credit history when hiring?
Generally, no. ORS 659A.320 prohibits employers from obtaining or using credit history for employment decisions. Exceptions apply for federally insured banks and credit unions, positions where state or federal law requires credit checks, public safety officers, and situations where credit information is substantially job-related and the employer provides written disclosure of the reasons.
Updates
Corrected the expungement waiting-period table and FAQ to show the one-year tier for Class B and C misdemeanors and violations alongside the three-year Class A tier, rewrote the Mohiadeen discussion to reflect that the decision narrowed relief for out-of-state expungements rather than broadly restoring firearm rights, narrowed the Ban the Box description to what ORS 659A.360 actually restricts, replaced the defunct ORS 181.710 reference for the Law Enforcement Data System with the current ORS 181A.280, and anchored the tenant-screening section to ORS 90.303 and ORS 90.304.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A: Unlawful Discrimination in Employment, Public Accommodations and Real Property Transactions; Administrative and Civil Enforcement
§ 659A.360Restricting criminal conviction inquiries; exceptionsIn force
(1) It is an unlawful practice for an employer to exclude an applicant from an initial interview solely because of a past criminal conviction. (2) An employer excludes an applicant from an initial interview if the employer: (a) Requires an applicant to disclose on an employment application a criminal conviction; (b) Requires an applicant to disclose, prior to an initial interview, a criminal conviction; or (c) If no interview is conducted, requires an applicant to disclose, prior to making a conditional offer of employment, a criminal conviction. (3) Subject to subsections (1) and (2) of this section, nothing in this section prevents an employer from considering an applicant’s conviction history when making a hiring decision. (4) Subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not apply: (a) If federal, state or local law, including corresponding rules and regulations, requires the consideration of an applicant’s criminal history; (b) To an employer that is a law enforcement agency; (c) To an employer in the criminal justice system; or (d) To an employer seeking a nonemployee volunteer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 659A.320Discrimination based on information in credit history prohibited; exceptions; remedies for violationIn force
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to obtain or use for employment purposes information contained in the credit history of an applicant for employment or an employee, or to refuse to hire, discharge, demote, suspend, retaliate or otherwise discriminate against an applicant or an employee with regard to promotion, compensation or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment based on information in the credit history of the applicant or employee.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 659A.820ComplaintsIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
(1) As used in this section, for purposes of a complaint alleging an unlawful practice under ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or discrimination under federal housing law, “person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful practice” includes, but is not limited to, a person who believes that the person: (a) Has been injured by an unlawful practice under ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or a discriminatory housing practice; or (b) Will be injured by an unlawful practice under ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or a discriminatory housing practice that is about to occur. (2) Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful practice may file with the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries a verified written complaint that states the name and address of the person alleged to have committed the unlawful practice. The complaint must be signed by the complainant. The complaint must set forth the acts or omissions alleged to be an unlawful practice. The complainant may be required to set forth in the complaint such other information as the commissioner may require.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Portland State University Chapter of the American Ass'n of University Professors v. Portland State University (Oregon Supreme Court 2012, 352 Or. 697)“…to, filing a discrimination 11 complaint with BOLI. See ORS 659A.820 (regarding the filing of complaints wit…”
- Hatkoff v. Portland Adventist Medical Center (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2012, 252 Or. App. 210)“…mination complaint with the Bureau of Labor and Industries, ORS 659A.820, or in state court, ORS 659A.875.…”
- Fenimore v. Blachly-Lane Cnty. C.E.A. (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2019, 297 Or. App. 47)“…s right to file a formal complaint with BOLI is provided by ORS 659A.820(2), under which "[a]ny person claiming…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights, Oregon Jury Duty Laws: Pay, Excuses and Employer Rules, Oregon Minimum Wage 2026: $15.55 Standard, $16.80 Portland Metro
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 137: Judgment and Execution; Parole and Probation by the Court
§ 137.225Order setting aside conviction, contempt finding or record of criminal charge; fees; prerequisites; limitationsIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
137.225 Order setting aside conviction, contempt finding or record of criminal charge; fees; prerequisites; limitations. (1)(a) At any time after the person becomes eligible as described in paragraph (b) of this subsection, any person convicted of an offense, or found in contempt of court, who has fully complied with and performed the sentence of the court for the offense or contempt finding, and whose conviction or finding is described in subsection (5) of this section, by motion may apply to the court where the conviction or finding was entered for entry of an order setting aside the conviction or finding. A person who is still under supervision as part of the sentence for the offense that is the subject of the motion has not fully complied with or performed the sentence of th
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Also relied on in: Oregon Court Records: OJCIN, the Free Alternative, and Setting Aside a Conviction, Oregon DUII Laws: Penalties, BAC Limit & License (2026), Expungement Laws by State: How to Clear Your Record (2026)
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 166
§ 166.291Issuance of concealed handgun license; application; fees; liabilityIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) The sheriff of a county, upon a person’s application for an Oregon concealed handgun license, upon receipt of the appropriate fees and after compliance with the procedures set out in this section, shall issue the person a concealed handgun license if the person: (a)(A) Is a citizen of the United States; or (B) Is a legal resident noncitizen who can document continuous residency in the county for at least six months and has declared in writing to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services the intent to acquire citizenship status and can present proof of the written declaration to the sheriff at the time of application for the license; (b) Is at least 21 years of age; (c) Is a resident of the county; (d) Has no outstanding warrants for arrest; (e) Is not free on any form of pretrial release; (f) Demonstrates competence with a handgun by any one of the following: (A) Completion of any hunter education or hunter safety course approved by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife or a similar agency of another state if handgun safety was a component of the course; (B) Completion of any National Rifle Association firearms safety or training…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 28 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Willis v. Winters (Oregon Supreme Court 2011, 350 Or. 299)“…s of persons, including “a[ny] person who is licensed under ORS 166.291 and ORS 166.292 to carry a concealed ha…”
- State v. Williams (Court of Appeals of Oregon 1999, 161 Or. App. 111)“…ithout having a license to carry the firearm as provided in ORS 166.291 and 166.292; “(b) Carries concealed…”
- State v. Vinge (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2025, 337 Or. App. 621)“…however, does not apply to someone who is “licensed under ORS 166.291 and 166.292 to carry a concealed handgu…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026)
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 419A: Juvenile Code: General Provisions and Definitions
§ 419A.260Expunction; definitionsIn force
(1) As used in ORS 419A.260 to 419A.271: (a) “Contact” means any instance in which a person’s act or behavior, or alleged act or behavior, which could result in a referral to a juvenile department or a juvenile court’s assumption of jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100 (1)(a) to (c) and (f) or 419C.005 comes to the attention of an agency specified in paragraph (e) of this subsection. (b) “Expunction” means: (A) The removal by destruction of a judgment or order related to a contact and all records and references associated with a subject person; (B) The removal by sealing of a judgment or order related to a contact and all records and references associated with a subject person; (C) The removal by redaction of a subject person’s name and all personal identifiers and all references to the subject person within a record; or (D) If a record is kept by the Department of Human Services the department’s affixing to the front of the file containing the record a stamp or statement identifying the name of the individual, the date of expunction and instruction that no further reference may be made to the record that is subject to the expunction notice or order.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gustafson (Oregon Supreme Court 2002, 333 Or. 468)“…the juvenile records that were subject to expunction under ORS 419A.260 and ORS 419A.262. ORS 419A.260 a…”
- State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Dreyer (Oregon Supreme Court 1999, 328 Or. 332)“…rgued, would contravene the legislative intent expressed in ORS 419A.260(1)(d)(J) that adjudications like the on…”
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Tyree (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2001, 177 Or. App. 187)“…on, which is prohibited by other statutes. See ORS 419A.260; 3 ORS 419A.262. *…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 181A: State Police; Crime Reporting and Records; Public Safety Standards and Training; Private Security
§ 181A.195Criminal records check; authorized agencies; retention of fingerprint cards by FBI and Department of State Police; fitness determinations; rules; feeIn force
(1) As used in this section: (a) “Authorized agency” means state government as defined in ORS 174.111, the Oregon State Bar or a municipal tax collection agency in a city with a population of 250,000 or more. “Authorized agency” does not include: (A) The Oregon State Lottery Commission or the Oregon State Lottery; or (B) A criminal justice agency, as defined in ORS 181A.010, that is authorized by federal law to receive fingerprint-based criminal records checks from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. (b) “Subject individual” means a person from whom an authorized agency may require fingerprints pursuant to statute for the purpose of enabling the authorized agency to request a state or nationwide criminal records check. (2)(a) An authorized agency may request that the Department of State Police conduct a criminal records check on a subject individual for noncriminal justice purposes.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Anderson v. Department of Human Services ex rel. Background Check Unit (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2017, 286 Or. App. 27)“…1, 2016, former ORS 181.534 was amended and renumbered as ORS 181A.195. Or Laws 2015, ch 758, § 6. For…”
- Johnson v. Oregon Department of Revenue (District Court, D. Oregon 2020)“…ed order, DOR explicitly addressed the factors laid out in ORS 181A.195(10)(c) in their amended proposed order.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- ORS 659A.360 - Restricting Criminal Conviction Inquiries; Exceptions(oregon.public.law)
- BOLI: Hiring Discrimination and Ban the Box(oregon.gov).gov
- Portland City Code 23.10.030 - Use of Criminal History in Employment Decisions(portland.gov).gov
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Section 1681)(ftc.gov).gov
- ORS 659A.320 - Discrimination Based on Credit History Prohibited(oregon.public.law)
- Oregon Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (ORS Chapter 90)(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 137.225 - Order Setting Aside Conviction or Record of Criminal Charge(oregon.public.law)
- Oregon State Police Criminal History Record Checks(oregon.gov).gov
- Oregon State Police Law Enforcement Data Systems(oregon.gov).gov
- Senate Bill 397 (2021 Session) - Expungement Reform(olis.oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- BOLI: File a Complaint(oregon.gov).gov
- Oregon Real Estate Agency Background Check and Fingerprinting(oregon.gov).gov
- ORS 181A.195 - Criminal Records Check; Authorized Agencies(oregon.public.law)
- Oregon DHS Background Checks Rules and Policies(oregon.gov).gov
- Oregon DHS Fingerprinting for Background Checks(oregon.gov).gov
- ORS 659A.885 - Civil Action and Remedies for Discrimination(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 181A.280 - Law Enforcement Data System Established; Duties; Rules(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 90.303 - Evaluation of Applicant(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 90.304 - Statement of Reasons for Denial; Remedy(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 166.291 - Issuance of Concealed Handgun License; Application; Fees; Liability(oregon.public.law)
- Oregon Revised Statutes Annotations to ORS Chapter 166 (holdings of Mohiadeen v. Washington County Sheriff's Office, 338 Or App 29 (2025))(oregonlegislature.gov)
- ORS Chapter 137 - Judgment and Execution (ORS 137.225 set-aside eligibility periods)(oregonlegislature.gov)