Loading...
Loading...
Someone published something false about you? Choose the country that governs the publication and generate the right letter — a U.S. cease-and-desist, an Australian concerns notice, or a UK letter of claim. Free to copy, print, or download.
Build Your LetterA template and starting point, not legal advice.
This tool structures the facts you supply into a letter. It does not decide whether your statements are true, whether you have a claim, or whether sending a letter is wise. RecordingLaw.com is not a law firm. Have a lawyer review the letter before you send it, and make sure every factual statement you include is accurate.
A U.S. cease-and-desist, an Australian concerns notice (s 12A), or a UK letter of claim — each with the contents its law expects.
The tool structures your own facts into the letter. It does not give advice on them, which keeps it a self-help template.
See the full letter update live as you type, then copy the text, print it, or download a clean PDF.
Per-jurisdiction validity notes plus a "when not to send" guide covering anti-SLAPP, the Streisand effect, and truth.
A defamation demand is not one document. What it must contain — and whether it is even required — depends on where the publication is governed. This generator builds the correct version for each.
In the U.S. there is no required form for a cease-and-desist letter, and sending one is optional. It is a demand letter, not a court filing. A typical letter identifies the false statements, explains why each is false and defamatory, describes the harm, and demands that the recipient stop publishing, remove and retract the content, preserve evidence, and confirm compliance by a deadline. Some states have retraction statutes that affect the damages a plaintiff can recover, so the tool lets you add a formal demand-for-retraction paragraph.
Australia is different. Under section 12A of the Model Defamation Provisions, a concerns notice must state that it is a concerns notice, identify where the matter can be accessed, set out the defamatory imputations the aggrieved person considers are or may be carried, and give particulars of the serious harm (serious financial loss for an excluded corporation). Under section 12B, giving a valid concerns notice is a precondition to commencing defamation proceedings, and you generally cannot start a case until the applicable period (about 28 days) has passed. An incomplete notice may be invalid, so the generator is built around those required contents.
In England and Wales, the Pre-Action Protocol for Media and Communications Claims expects a claimant to send a Letter of Claim before issuing proceedings. It should name the claimant, identify the publication and the words complained of with a copy or transcript, set out the factual inaccuracies or unsupportable comment, state the defamatory meaning, explain how the publication has caused serious harm under the Defamation Act 2013, and list the remedies sought — giving the defendant a reasonable time (around 14 days) to respond. Failing to follow the protocol can carry cost consequences.
A demand letter is not always the right move. If the statement is true, you have no defamation claim — truth is a defense — and an aggressive letter can be used against you. In strong anti-SLAPP jurisdictions, bringing a weak claim can leave you paying the other side's legal fees. A letter can also trigger the Streisand effect, drawing far more attention to the statement than ignoring it would. Never threaten, exaggerate, or assert facts you cannot prove.
Yes. You pick the jurisdiction, fill in the facts, preview the full letter, and copy it, print it, or download a PDF at no cost. No account is required, and there is no paywall on the download.
It can. A clear, factual letter sometimes gets a false statement removed or corrected without a lawsuit, and in the United States it puts the recipient on notice and triggers a duty to preserve evidence. But it has no automatic legal force — it is a demand, not a court order. In Australia and the UK the equivalent letter is part of a formal pre-litigation process and is treated more seriously.
Because Australian defamation law requires it. Under section 12A of the Model Defamation Provisions (for example the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 12A) a concerns notice must state that it is a concerns notice, say where the matter can be accessed, set out the defamatory imputations the aggrieved person considers are or may be carried, and give particulars of the serious harm (serious financial loss for an excluded corporation). Under s 12B a valid concerns notice is a precondition to suing, and proceedings generally cannot start until about 28 days after it is given.
In England and Wales, the Pre-Action Protocol for Media and Communications Claims expects a claimant to send a Letter of Claim before issuing proceedings. It should identify the claimant, the publication and the words complained of (with a copy or transcript), the factual inaccuracies or unsupportable comment, the defamatory meaning, how the publication has caused serious harm, and the remedies sought — and give the defendant a reasonable time (around 14 days) to respond. Not following the protocol can have cost consequences.
No. The tool only structures the facts you provide into the right letter format for your jurisdiction; it does not assess whether the statement is actually defamatory, whether it is true, or whether you should sue. That is deliberate — it is what keeps the tool a self-help template rather than legal advice. RecordingLaw.com is not a law firm. Have a lawyer review the letter before you send it.
Yes. If the statement is true, you have no defamation claim and a threatening letter can hurt you. Many U.S. states have anti-SLAPP laws that can shift the other side’s legal fees onto you if you bring a weak claim. A letter can also trigger the "Streisand effect," drawing far more attention to the statement. And everything you write can be used against you, so never assert facts you cannot prove.
This generator provides a self-help document for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. RecordingLaw.com is not a law firm. Whether a statement is defamatory, whether you have a claim, and whether and how to send a letter all depend on your specific facts and on the law of the relevant jurisdiction, which can change. For anything serious, consult a licensed attorney.
Pick your jurisdiction, enter the facts, and download a clean PDF — free.
Get StartedKnow someone who could use this? Share this free tool: