EnglishEspañol

Personal Injury Settlement Amounts: What Injuries Are Worth

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 5, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Updates

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Added sourced sections explaining what comes out of a settlement before you are paid, covering Medicare's statutory right to reimbursement under 42 U.S.C. Section 1395y(b) and the tax treatment of settlement proceeds under IRC Section 104(a)(2). Corrected the contributory-negligence discussion: D.C.'s Motor Vehicle Collision Recovery Act (D.C. Code Section 50-2204.52) applies a comparative standard to pedestrians and cyclists in motor-vehicle collisions, and the last clear chance doctrine can defeat the defense in all five contributory-negligence jurisdictions. Distinguished the 50 percent and 51 percent modified-comparative bar rules with statutory examples (Kansas and Wisconsin), restored the sourced medical-malpractice damages-cap pattern citing NCSL and California Civil Code Section 3333.2, and replaced a mirror citation for the Medicare statute with the official U.S. Code text.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Sources and References

  1. Comparative Negligence, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (pure vs modified comparative negligence; 50% and 51% bar rules; the four states and D.C. that follow contributory negligence)(law.cornell.edu)
  2. Contributory Negligence, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (a plaintiff who is at all negligent cannot recover; Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia)(law.cornell.edu)
  3. 42 U.S.C. Section 1395y(b), Medicare as Secondary Payer, official U.S. Code, Office of the Law Revision Counsel (conditional payments, reimbursement of the Trust Fund, demonstration of responsibility by compromise, waiver or release, double damages, subrogation)(uscode.house.gov).gov
  4. D.C. Code Section 50-2204.52, Contributory negligence limitation (Motor Vehicle Collision Recovery Act of 2016: comparative standard for pedestrians and vulnerable users in motor-vehicle collisions; expressly preserves the last clear chance doctrine)(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
  5. Last Clear Chance, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (a negligent plaintiff may recover if the defendant had the last clear chance to avoid the accident; treated as an exception to contributory negligence)(law.cornell.edu)
  6. K.S.A. 60-258a, Kansas comparative negligence (recovery only if the claimant's negligence was less than the causal negligence of the parties claimed against: the 50 percent bar rule)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
  7. Wis. Stat. Section 895.045(1), Wisconsin contributory negligence (recovery allowed if the plaintiff's negligence was not greater than the defendant's: the 51 percent bar rule)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
  8. National Conference of State Legislatures, Medical Liability/Medical Malpractice Laws (37 states and four U.S. territories have enacted limitations or caps on at least one type of damages in medical liability cases)(ncsl.org)
  9. California Civil Code Section 3333.2 (MICRA noneconomic damages cap in professional-negligence actions against health care providers: $350,000 as of January 1, 2023, $500,000 in wrongful-death cases, with annual statutory increases)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  10. Internal Revenue Service, Tax Implications of Settlements and Judgments (IRC Section 104(a)(2) exclusion, punitive damages, emotional distress, non-physical-injury claims)(irs.gov).gov
  11. IRS Publication 4345, Settlements: Taxability (treatment of settlement proceeds, including interest)(irs.gov).gov
Share:

Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.