Australia
Recording Phone Calls in New South Wales

Recording your own phone call in New South Wales is usually governed by state law, not the federal wiretap offence. The Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) prohibits recording a call you are part of by default, but a broad exception excuses most personal recording that is never shared with anyone outside the call.
Information last verified on 22 July 2026 against the consolidated Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) and Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) text. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article addresses recording a phone call under the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) and the federal Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth). It does not address the phone-call recording rules of other Australian states or territories; for a national comparison, see can you record a phone call in Australia.
Does Federal Law Stop You Recording Your Own Call?
Usually not, and this is the point most people get wrong first. The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) makes it an offence to intercept a communication passing over a telecommunications system (s 7(1)). Section 6(1) defines interception as listening to or recording a communication "in its passage over that telecommunications system without the knowledge of the person making the communication." A person who is a party to their own call has knowledge of it by definition, and recording at the handset happens at the point of receipt, not in transit over the network. The federal offence is aimed at a third party tapping the line, not a participant recording their own end of the conversation. That means the question of whether you can record your own call in NSW turns on state law, covered below, not this federal Act.

The NSW Rule for Recording Your Own Call
The Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 7(1)(b) prohibits knowingly recording a private conversation you are a party to, without consent. On its face that would prohibit most personal call recording. Section 7(3)(b) then supplies the exception that does most of the practical work: the prohibition does not apply if all principal parties consent, or a principal party consents and the recording either protects that party's lawful interests, or is not made for the purpose of communicating or publishing it to people who were not part of the call. That third, independent basis, s 7(3)(b)(ii), is what usually covers recording a call for your own reference, such as keeping a record of a customer service dispute or a difficult family conversation, where you never intend to share it with anyone who was not on the line.
Recording a Call You're Not Part Of
A different and more exposed situation arises where you record a call between other people, without being a party to it yourself, for example recording a call on speakerphone in another room. Section 7(1)(a) prohibits that outright without the consent of every party, and the personal-use limb in s 7(3)(b)(ii) is not available, since that limb only modifies the prohibition on recording a call you are a party to under s 7(1)(b).
Sharing or Publishing a Recorded Call Is a Separate Risk
Even a call recording made entirely lawfully under s 7(3) can create fresh exposure the moment it is shared. Section 11 separately prohibits publishing or communicating a private conversation obtained in contravention of the Act's provisions, and its own exceptions at s 11(2) do not automatically extend to every lawful recording. In practice, this is the most useful thing to understand about NSW phone-call recording: making the recording and sharing it afterward are assessed separately, and a recording that was fine to make can still create liability once it leaves the hands of the person who made it, for instance by posting it online, forwarding it by text, or playing it to a third party.
Could the Recording Be Used in Court?
Recording law and evidence law are separate questions. Section 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) gives a court discretion to admit evidence obtained improperly or in contravention of an Australian law where the desirability of admitting it outweighs the undesirability of how it was obtained, weighing factors including the evidence's probative value, the gravity of the impropriety, and whether it was deliberate. No recording can be described in advance as admissible; courts weigh admissibility under the s 138 discretion on the specific facts of each case.
Newer Overlays: The Federal Tort and Doxxing Offences
Publishing a recorded call, particularly one containing sensitive personal information, can also engage newer federal law layered on top of the state rules above. The statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy (Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) sch 2), in force since 10 June 2025, is a civil action available without proof of damage for a serious, intentional or reckless invasion of privacy, and applies nationwide regardless of the state recording rule. Separately, publishing personal information via a carriage service in a way reasonable people would regard as menacing or harassing has been a federal criminal offence since 11 December 2024. Neither of these overlays changes the underlying NSW recording rule; they sit on top of it where a call recording is shared in a harmful way.
This article provides general legal information about phone-call recording law in New South Wales. It is not legal advice and does not take into account your specific circumstances. For advice about a particular recording, consult a legal practitioner admitted in the relevant Australian state or territory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to record my own phone call in NSW?
Recording is prohibited by default under the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 7(1)(b), but is commonly excused under s 7(3)(b), including where the recording is not made to share with anyone who was not on the call. This is general information about the statute, not an assessment of whether a specific recording is lawful.
Does federal law stop me recording my own phone call in NSW?
Generally no. The federal interception offence in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) s 7 targets recording a call in transit over the network without the knowledge of the person making it, not a participant recording their own call at the handset.
Can I record a call with a business or a customer service line in NSW?
That is assessed under the same Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 7(3) exceptions available for any call you are part of. Whether a specific recording qualifies depends on its purpose and whether it is shared.
Is it legal to record a phone call between two other people in NSW if I'm not on the call?
This is treated more strictly under s 7(1)(a), and the personal-use exception available to a participant does not apply, because that limb only modifies recording a call you are a party to.
Can I share a phone call recording I lawfully made in NSW?
Not automatically. Publishing or communicating a recorded call is a separate offence under s 11 of the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW), with its own limited exceptions, distinct from the rules that govern making the recording.
Will a secretly recorded phone call be allowed as evidence in an NSW court?
No recording can be guaranteed admissible in advance. Courts weigh admissibility of improperly obtained evidence under the discretion in s 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), considering factors including the gravity of any impropriety.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
s 138Exclusion of improperly or illegally obtained evidenceIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Evidence that was obtained—(a) improperly or in contravention of an Australian law, or (b) in consequence of an impropriety or of a contravention of an Australian law, is not to be admitted unless the desirability of admitting the evidence outweighs the undesirability of admitting evidence that has been obtained in the way in which the evidence was obtained. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), evidence of an admission that was made during or in consequence of questioning, and evidence obtained in consequence of the admission, is taken to have been obtained improperly if the person conducting the questioning—(a) did, or omitted to do, an act in the course of the questioning even though he or she knew or ought reasonably to have known that the act or omission was likely to impair substantially the ability of the person being questioned to respond rationally to the questioning, or (b) made a false statement in the course of the questioning even though he or she knew or ought reasonably to have known that the statement was false and that making the false statement was likely to cause the person who was being questioned to make an admission.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nsw.gov.au
Cited in 368 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Kadir v The Queen (High Court of Australia 2020, [2020] HCA 1)
- Parker v Comptroller-General of Customs (High Court of Australia 2009, [2009] HCA 7)
- Em v The Queen (High Court of Australia 2007, [2007] HCA 46)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New South Wales Recording Laws: Consent Rules, Exceptions and Penalties (2026)
Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW)
s 11Prohibition on communication or publication of private conversations or recordings of activitiesIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) A person must not publish, or communicate to any person, a private conversation or a record of the carrying on of an activity, or a report of a private conversation or carrying on of an activity, that has come to the person’s knowledge as a direct or indirect result of the use of a listening device, an optical surveillance device or a tracking device in contravention of a provision of this Part.Maximum penalty—500 penalty units (in the case of a corporation) or 100 penalty units or 5 years imprisonment, or both (in any other case). (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the following—(a) if the communication or publication is made—(i) to a party to the private conversation or activity, or (ii) with the consent, express or implied, of all the principal parties to the private conversation or activity, or (iii) for the purpose of investigating or prosecuting an offence against this section, or (iv) in the course of proceedings for an offence against this Act or the regulations, (b) if the communication or publication is no more than is reasonably necessary in connection with an imminent threat of—(i) serious violence to persons or of substantial damage to property, or (ii) com
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nsw.gov.au
Cited in 14 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases:
- Farm Transparency International Ltd v New South Wales (High Court of Australia 2022, [2022] HCA 23)
- Australian Communications and Media Authority v Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd (High Court of Australia 2015, [2015] HCA 7)
- Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Australian Communications and Media Authority (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2014, [2014] FCAFC 22)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Is It Illegal to Record Someone Without Consent in Australia?, Can You Record a Phone Call in Australia? State-by-State Rules, Can You Use a Secret Recording as Evidence in an Australian Court?
s 7Prohibition on installation, use and maintenance of listening devicesIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
(1) A person must not knowingly install, use or cause to be used or maintain a listening device—(a) to overhear, record, monitor or listen to a private conversation to which the person is not a party, or (b) to record a private conversation to which the person is a party. Maximum penalty—500 penalty units (in the case of a corporation) or 100 penalty units or 5 years imprisonment, or both (in any other case). (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the following—(a) the installation, use or maintenance of a listening device in accordance with a warrant, emergency authorisation, corresponding warrant or corresponding emergency authorisation, (b) the installation, use or maintenance of a listening device in accordance with the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, or any other law, of the Commonwealth, (c) the unintentional hearing of a private conversation by means of a listening device, (d) the use of a listening device to record a refusal to consent to the recording of an interview by a member of the NSW Police Force in connection with the commission of an offence by a person suspected of having committed the offence, (e) the use of a listening device and any
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nsw.gov.au
Cited in 53 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases:
- [2024] NSWCA 51 (NSW Court of Appeal 2024, [2024] NSWCA 51)
- [2022] NSWCCA 222 (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal 2022, [2022] NSWCCA 222)
- [2022] NSWCCA 206 (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal 2022, [2022] NSWCCA 206)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: CCTV and Home Security Camera Laws in Australia (2026), Dash Cam Laws in Australia: What's Legal to Record, Workplace Recording and Surveillance in New South Wales
Evidence Act 1995
s 138Discretion to exclude improperly or illegally obtained evidenceIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
(1) Evidence that was obtained: (a) improperly or in contravention of an Australian law; or (b) in consequence of an impropriety or of a contravention of an Australian law; is not to be admitted unless the desirability of admitting the evidence outweighs the undesirability of admitting evidence that has been obtained in the way in which the evidence was obtained. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), evidence of an admission that was made during or in consequence of questioning, and evidence obtained in consequence of the admission, is taken to have been obtained improperly if the person conducting the questioning: (a) did, or omitted to do, an act in the course of the questioning even though he or she knew or ought reasonably to have known that the act or omission was likely to impair substantially the ability of the person being questioned to respond rationally to the questioning; or (b) made a false statement in the course of the questioning even though he or she knew or ought reasonably to have known that the statement was false and that making the false statement was likely to cause the person who was being questioned to make an admission.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.gov.au
Cited in 82 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Nicholas v The Queen (High Court of Australia, [1998] HCA 9)
- Smethurst v Commissioner of Police (High Court of Australia 2020, [2020] HCA 14)
- MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (High Court of Australia 2021, [2021] HCA 17)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Northern Territory Recording Laws: When You Can Record a Private Conversation (2026), Is It Legal to Record a Conversation in Australia?, Recording the Police in Australia: What the Law Actually Says
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
s 6Interception of a communicationIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
(1) For the purposes of this Act (other than Schedule 1), but subject to this section, interception of a communication passing over a telecommunications system consists of listening to or recording, by any means, such a communication in its passage over that telecommunications system without the knowledge of the person making the communication. Communications to or from emergency service facilities (2A) An emergency service facility is premises that are declared by the Minister, by written instrument, to be an emergency service facility. (2B) The Minister may declare premises to be an emergency service facility if the Minister is satisfied that the premises are operated by: (a) a police force or service of the Commonwealth, of a State or of the Australian Capital Territory; or (b) a fire service of a State or of the Australian Capital Territory; or (c) an ambulance service of a State or of the Australian Capital Territory; or (d) a service for despatching, or referring matters for the attention of, a force or service referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c); to enable that force or service, or another force or service, to deal with a request for assistance in an emergency.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.gov.au
Cited in 3 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases:
- [2017] NSWSC 1483 (Supreme Court of New South Wales 2017, [2017] NSWSC 1483)
- [2024] NSWSC 975 (Supreme Court of New South Wales 2024, [2024] NSWSC 975)
- Voxson Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 10) (Federal Court of Australia 2018, [2018] FCA 376)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Recording Phone Calls in Queensland, Recording Phone Calls in Victoria, Australia Recording Laws: State-by-State Rules and Penalties (2026)
s 7Telecommunications not to be interceptedIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) A person shall not: (a) intercept; (b) authorize, suffer or permit another person to intercept; or (c) do any act or thing that will enable him or her or another person to intercept; a communication passing over a telecommunications system. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to or in relation to: (a) an act or thing done by an employee of a carrier in the course of his or her duties for or in connection with: (i) the installation of any line, or the installation of any equipment, used or intended for use in connection with a telecommunications service; or (ii) the operation or maintenance of a telecommunications system; or (iii) the identifying or tracing of any person who has contravened, or is suspected of having contravened or being likely to contravene, a provision of Part 10.6 of the Criminal Code; where it is reasonably necessary for the employee to do that act or thing in order to perform those duties effectively; or (aa) the interception of a communication by another person lawfully engaged in duties relating to the installation, connection or maintenance of equipment or a line, where it is reasonably necessary for the person to intercept the communication in order to pe
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.gov.au
Cited in 16 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases:
- [2019] NSWCCA 79 (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal 2019, [2019] NSWCCA 79)
- [2018] NSWCCA 109 (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal 2018, [2018] NSWCCA 109)
- [2016] NSWCCA 25 (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal 2016, [2016] NSWCCA 25)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 7, listening devices offence and personal-use exception(austlii.edu.au)
- Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) s 11, publication offence(austlii.edu.au)
- Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) s 6(1), definition of interception(austlii.edu.au)
- Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) s 7, telecommunications not to be intercepted(austlii.edu.au)
- Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 138, discretion to exclude improperly obtained evidence(legislation.nsw.gov.au).gov
- OAIC: statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy, Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) sch 2(oaic.gov.au).gov