Wisconsin Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)

Under Wisconsin's one-party consent law, Wis. Stat. 968.31, employees may record any workplace conversation they participate in without notifying coworkers or supervisors. Employers cannot criminally prohibit that recording, but they may enforce no-recording policies through disciplinary action or termination under Wisconsin's at-will employment rules.

Wisconsin's workplace recording rules are shaped by the intersection of three areas of law: the state's one-party consent wiretapping statute, privacy protections for employees, and federal labor law. Under Wis. Stat. 968.31, any employee can record conversations they participate in at work. At the same time, employers have broad authority to conduct video surveillance in common areas, though significant restrictions apply to private spaces.

This guide covers what employees and employers can and cannot record, how no-recording policies interact with federal labor law, and what protections exist for workers who document workplace conditions.

Employee Recording Rights

Can You Record at Work in Wisconsin?

Yes. Wisconsin's one-party consent law allows you to record any conversation you are part of, including conversations at work. You can legally record:

• Meetings with your supervisor or manager
• Performance reviews and disciplinary hearings
• Conversations with HR representatives
• Discussions with coworkers
• Phone calls with clients, vendors, or customers (if you are a participant)
• Training sessions you attend

You do not need to inform anyone that you are recording. The one-party consent exception under Wis. Stat. 968.31(2)(b) applies as long as you are a participant in the conversation.

What You Cannot Record at Work

Even under one-party consent, certain workplace recordings are illegal:

• Conversations you are not part of. You cannot leave a recording device in a conference room, break room, or office to capture conversations among other people when you are not present.
• Recording for criminal or tortious purposes. If your intent in recording is to commit blackmail, extortion, harassment, or another crime, the recording is illegal regardless of your participation.
• Private areas. You cannot place recording devices in bathrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas, even in your own workplace.

The Criminal or Tortious Purpose Limitation

Wisconsin's criminal or tortious purpose exception is especially relevant in the workplace. Courts distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate reasons for recording:

Legitimate purposes include:

• Documenting sexual harassment or hostile work environment
• Recording evidence of wage theft or labor law violations
• Preserving verbal agreements about job duties, pay, or benefits
• Documenting unsafe working conditions
• Recording discriminatory statements for use in an EEOC or ERD complaint

Potentially illegitimate purposes include:

• Recording to embarrass or humiliate a coworker
• Gathering information for corporate espionage
• Recording trade secrets or confidential business information for personal gain
• Recording to facilitate a harassment campaign against another employee

Employer Surveillance Rights

Video Surveillance in the Workplace

Wisconsin employers have broad authority to monitor their workplaces with video cameras. Employers can legally place cameras in:

• Sales floors, retail areas, and service counters
• Warehouses, production floors, and manufacturing areas
• Hallways, lobbies, and reception areas
• Parking lots and building exteriors
• Loading docks and shipping areas
• Open office areas

Where Employers Cannot Place Cameras

Employers face strict restrictions under Wis. Stat. 942.08 regarding camera placement in private areas:

• Bathrooms and restrooms are always off limits
• Locker rooms and changing areas cannot be recorded
• Nursing rooms for lactating employees (also protected under federal law)
• Break rooms designated as private may be restricted depending on the expectation of privacy
• Individual offices with closed doors may have limited privacy expectations, though this varies

Violation of these rules can result in criminal charges under Wis. Stat. 942.08 (Class A misdemeanor, up to 9 months in jail and $10,000 fine) and civil liability for invasion of privacy.

Audio Surveillance by Employers

Employer audio surveillance is governed by Wis. Stat. 968.31. An employer cannot simply record all workplace conversations with hidden microphones. Audio recording requires at least one-party consent.

In practice, this means:

• An employer can record business phone calls if an employee participant consents
• An employer cannot install hidden microphones in common areas to capture employee conversations without any participant's knowledge
• If a surveillance camera also records audio, the audio component is subject to wiretapping rules
• Employers who use call recording systems should provide notice (such as "this call may be recorded")

Employer No-Recording Policies

Can Your Employer Ban Recording?

Many Wisconsin employers maintain policies that prohibit employees from recording in the workplace. While recording is legal under state criminal law, an employer can establish workplace rules that restrict recording as a condition of employment.

If you violate a no-recording policy, the consequences are employment-related, not criminal:

• Written warning
• Suspension
• Termination

Wisconsin is an at-will employment state, meaning employers can generally terminate employees for any lawful reason, including violating a workplace policy.

NLRA Protections for Employee Recording

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has placed important limits on employer no-recording policies. Under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, employees have the right to engage in "concerted activity" for mutual aid and protection, which can include recording workplace conditions.

The NLRB's current standard -- established in Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (2023) -- evaluates employer workplace rules by asking whether the rule has a reasonable tendency to chill employees exercising Section 7 rights. Under Stericycle, the burden shifts to the employer to justify a rule that could plausibly be read to restrict protected activity. NLRB General Counsel Memorandum GC 25-05 (Feb. 2025) addressed housekeeping matters but did not rescind Stericycle or change this standard; Stericycle remains controlling.

The NLRB has ruled that overly broad no-recording policies can violate Section 7 because they chill employees' exercise of protected rights. An employer's no-recording policy may be unlawful if:

• It applies to all recordings at all times without exception
• It could reasonably be interpreted to prohibit recording evidence of unsafe conditions, labor violations, or union-related activity
• It was implemented in response to employees engaging in protected concerted activity
• It does not include exceptions for legally protected recording activity

Crafting a Lawful No-Recording Policy

Employers who want to restrict workplace recording should:

• Clearly state the business justification (protecting trade secrets, client confidentiality, patient privacy, etc.)
• Include exceptions for protected concerted activity under the NLRA
• Specify which areas or situations the policy covers
• Avoid blanket prohibitions that cover all recording in all circumstances
• Communicate the policy clearly to all employees

Attorney Recording Ethics in Wisconsin

State Bar Ethics Opinion EF-24-01 (2024)

In February 2024, the State Bar of Wisconsin issued Formal Ethics Opinion EF-24-01, which addresses when attorneys may record conversations without disclosing that recording is taking place. Key holdings:

• An attorney who is a party to a conversation may record it under Wisconsin's one-party consent law (Wis. Stat. 968.31) without disclosing the recording, unless the attorney is recording a person represented by counsel on the subject of the representation.
• Recording an opposing party who is represented by counsel without that counsel's knowledge may violate SCR 20:4.2 (no-contact rule) as applied through the ethics opinion.
• Surreptitious recording by an attorney of witnesses or unrepresented parties is permitted under Wisconsin law but remains subject to honesty and candor obligations under SCR 20:8.4.
• The 2024 opinion supersedes the 1994 State Bar ethics opinion on this topic.

Attorneys, HR professionals, and employment counsel working in Wisconsin should review EF-24-01 before deploying recording practices in the context of litigation preparation, workplace investigations, or client counseling.

Whistleblower Protections

Wisconsin Whistleblower Law

Wisconsin's whistleblower protection statute (Wis. Stat. 230.80-230.89) protects state employees who report violations of law, mismanagement, or waste of public funds. For private sector employees, protections are more limited but still significant.

Recording evidence of illegal activity may be protected under:

• State whistleblower statutes for public employees
• OSHA whistleblower protections for employees reporting workplace safety violations (29 U.S.C. 660(c))
• Title VII anti-retaliation provisions for employees documenting discrimination or harassment
• NLRA Section 7 for employees recording evidence related to working conditions

Retaliation Claims

If you are fired for recording evidence of illegal workplace activity, you may have a retaliation claim. Under Wisconsin law and federal statutes, employers cannot retaliate against employees for:

• Filing a workers' compensation claim
• Reporting OSHA violations
• Filing a discrimination complaint with the Wisconsin Equal Rights Division
• Participating in a union-related investigation
• Reporting fraud against the government (qui tam actions)

While recording itself is not always protected from employer discipline, using recordings to report illegal activity triggers anti-retaliation protections.

Specific Workplace Recording Scenarios

Recording Harassment

Recording evidence of sexual harassment, racial discrimination, or hostile work environment is one of the most common reasons employees record at work. In Wisconsin:

• You can legally record harassing statements, inappropriate comments, or threatening behavior as long as you are present
• These recordings can serve as evidence in complaints to the Wisconsin Equal Rights Division or the EEOC
• Courts and administrative agencies generally accept legally obtained recordings as evidence in harassment cases
• Even if recording violates a company policy, the recording itself is still legal under state law and may still be admissible as evidence

Recording Wage and Hour Discussions

Employees have the right to discuss wages with coworkers under the NLRA. Recording these discussions may be protected concerted activity. Employers cannot prohibit employees from discussing pay rates, and a no-recording policy that chills such discussions may violate federal labor law.

Recording Safety Concerns

Employees who record evidence of unsafe working conditions may be protected under OSHA whistleblower provisions. This includes:

• Documenting exposure to hazardous materials
• Recording evidence of safety equipment not being provided
• Preserving evidence of management ignoring safety complaints
• Documenting conditions that violate OSHA standards

Union Workplaces

Collective Bargaining Agreement Provisions

In unionized workplaces in Wisconsin, the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) may address recording. Some CBAs:

• Explicitly permit recording of grievance meetings
• Require employer notification before recording disciplinary hearings
• Address the use of surveillance cameras in bargaining unit work areas
• Include provisions about the use of recordings in arbitration

Recording During Union Activity

Recording during union organizing, meetings, or grievance proceedings may be protected under the NLRA. The NLRB has recognized that employees have the right to document their working conditions, and this right can extend to recording conversations related to union activity.

Using Workplace Recordings as Evidence

In Employment Litigation

Recordings made legally under Wisconsin's one-party consent law can be powerful evidence in:

• Wrongful termination lawsuits
• Discrimination and harassment claims
• Wage theft cases
• Workers' compensation disputes
• Unemployment insurance hearings
• EEOC and ERD administrative proceedings

Authentication and Admissibility

To use a workplace recording as evidence, you must be able to authenticate it. Best practices include:

• Preserving the original, unedited file
• Noting the date, time, location, and participants immediately after recording
• Backing up the recording in multiple locations
• Not sharing the recording on social media before legal proceedings
• Being prepared to testify about the circumstances of the recording

More Wisconsin Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording

Back to Wisconsin Recording Laws

More Wisconsin Recording Topics

• Wisconsin Biometric Privacy Laws
• Surveillance Camera Laws

More Wisconsin Laws

• Wisconsin Employee Monitoring Laws
• Wisconsin Whistleblower Laws
• Wisconsin At-Will Employment Laws