EnglishEspañol
Wisconsin flag

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for All Call Types (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wisconsin Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for All Call Types (2026)

Updates

Corrected the description of Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney (California law was applied only to future calls; Georgia law governed the firm's past conduct) and fixed a sentence about restraining-order hearings.

Corrected the page to describe interstate calls as unsettled rather than governed by the stricter state, added Nevada and Delaware to the all-party table, explained that recorded phone calls are generally inadmissible in Wisconsin civil actions under Wis. Stat. 885.365 and that lawful one-party tapes generally cannot be used as evidence in chief (State v. Waste Management, 1978), added the 'any other injurious act' limit, and described federal Wiretap Act damages accurately. We corrected statements that a recording notice ensures compliance in all-party states (a notice reduces risk but is not consent everywhere), and replaced advice that a recorded call can serve as restraining-order evidence, since Wisconsin bars recorded phone calls in civil actions such as injunction hearings; reporting the calls to police remains an option. Clarified that announcing a recording is not treated as consent in every all-party state, and tightened the explanation of why recorded calls are generally barred at Wisconsin restraining-order hearings.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the statute cited for Wisconsin's private-citizen phone-call consent rule from Wis. Stat. 968.31(2)(b), which actually governs law-enforcement recording, to the correct 968.31(2)(c); removed an unsupported 'FCC 24-24' call-recording claim; and clarified that Connecticut's all-party rule is a civil statute, not the state's one-party criminal wiretap law.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Wis. Stat. 968.31 - Interception and Disclosure(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
  2. Wis. Stat. 968.31(2m) - Civil Remedies(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
  3. Wis. Stat. 968.27 - Definitions(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
  4. 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
  5. FCC(fcc.gov).gov
  6. Wisconsin DOR(revenue.wi.gov).gov
  7. Wisconsin DOT - DMV(wisconsindot.gov).gov
  8. Wisconsin State Law Library(wilawlibrary.gov).gov
Share: