Wisconsin
Wisconsin Phone Call Recording Laws: Consent Rules for All Call Types (2026)

Wisconsin is a one-party consent state, meaning you may legally record any phone call you are a party to without notifying the other participants. Wis. Stat. 968.31 governs this rule and applies to landline calls, cell calls, and VoIP conversations alike.
Recording phone calls in Wisconsin is straightforward under the state's one-party consent law. Wis. Stat. 968.31 allows you to record any telephone call, video call, or VoIP conversation you participate in without telling the other party. This applies to personal calls, business calls, and calls with government agencies.
This guide covers every aspect of phone call recording in Wisconsin, including interstate calls, business call recording, VoIP and video conferencing, and the penalties for illegal interception.
The Basic Rule: One-Party Consent
How It Applies to Phone Calls
Under Wis. Stat. 968.31(2)(b), it is legal to intercept a wire, electronic, or oral communication if one party to the communication consents. For phone calls, this means:
- You can record any call you are on. You are the consenting party.
- You do not need to announce you are recording. No verbal notice, beep tone, or written agreement is required.
- You cannot record other people's calls. Installing software or hardware to intercept calls between other people is illegal.
- Your intent matters. You cannot record for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act.
Types of Calls Covered
Wisconsin's one-party consent rule applies to all forms of telephone communication:
| Call Type | Covered by Wis. Stat. 968.31? | One-Party Consent Applies? |
|---|---|---|
| Landline calls | Yes | Yes |
| Cell phone calls | Yes | Yes |
| VoIP calls (Skype, WhatsApp, Signal) | Yes | Yes |
| Video calls (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet) | Yes (audio portion) | Yes |
| Cordless phone calls | Yes | Yes |
| Conference calls | Yes | Yes (if you are a participant) |
Recording Personal Phone Calls

Everyday Scenarios
Wisconsin residents commonly record personal phone calls for many practical reasons:
- Customer service calls. Recording calls with insurance companies, utility providers, banks, and other businesses helps preserve details of promises, agreements, or disputes.
- Calls with contractors or service providers. If a plumber, electrician, or contractor makes verbal promises about pricing or timelines, a recording provides documentation.
- Calls with government agencies. Recording calls with the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, DMV, or other state agencies can help you keep an accurate record of instructions or decisions.
- Legal consultations. You can record calls with your own attorney (though attorneys may have their own policies about recording).
- Personal disputes. Recording threatening or harassing phone calls can provide evidence for a restraining order or criminal complaint.
Recording Apps and Tools
Several methods exist for recording phone calls on your personal device:
- Built-in phone recording features. Some Android phones include native call recording functionality.
- Third-party recording apps. Apps available for both iOS and Android can record calls, though iOS restrictions may limit some functionality.
- External recording devices. Standalone digital voice recorders with phone adapters can capture both sides of a conversation.
- VoIP service features. Many VoIP services include built-in recording options.
Regardless of the method you use, ensure the recording captures both sides of the conversation clearly for it to be useful as evidence.
Recording Business Phone Calls

Employer Rights and Obligations
Wisconsin businesses can record phone calls under the one-party consent rule. Common business uses include:
- Quality assurance. Monitoring customer service calls to evaluate employee performance.
- Training. Using recorded calls as training materials for new employees.
- Compliance. Recording calls to ensure regulatory compliance in industries like financial services, healthcare, and insurance.
- Dispute resolution. Preserving records of verbal agreements, orders, and customer complaints.
- Legal protection. Documenting conversations that may be relevant to potential litigation.
Best Practices for Business Call Recording
While Wisconsin law does not require businesses to announce call recording, many businesses choose to provide notice for several reasons:
- Interstate compliance. If the business receives calls from two-party consent states, providing notice ensures compliance with the stricter law.
- Customer trust. Informing callers builds trust and transparency.
- Regulatory requirements. Certain industries (such as financial services under SEC and FINRA rules) may have separate recording notification requirements.
Common methods of providing notice include:
- Automated announcement at the beginning of the call ("This call may be recorded for quality assurance and training purposes")
- Written disclosure in contracts or terms of service
- Website privacy policy disclosures
The Business Extension Exception
Federal law under 18 U.S.C. 2510(5)(a) includes an exception for telephone equipment used "in the ordinary course of business." This allows businesses to monitor calls on their own phone systems when done for legitimate business purposes. This exception works alongside Wisconsin's one-party consent rule to give businesses broad authority to record business calls.
Interstate Phone Call Recording

The Interstate Call Problem
One of the most important considerations for Wisconsin residents is what happens when you call someone in a state with stricter recording laws. When a call crosses state lines, the recording laws of both states may apply.
States With Stricter Laws
If you are calling someone in any of these states, the stricter all-party consent law typically applies:
| State | Consent Requirement | Key Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Illinois (Wisconsin's neighbor) | All-party | 720 ILCS 5/14-2 |
| California | All-party | Cal. Penal Code 632 |
| Connecticut | All-party | Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-570d |
| Florida | All-party | Fla. Stat. 934.03 |
| Maryland | All-party | Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402 |
| Massachusetts | All-party | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, 99 |
| Montana | All-party | Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213 |
| New Hampshire | All-party | N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 570-A:2 |
| Pennsylvania | All-party | 18 Pa.C.S. 5704 |
| Washington | All-party | Wash. Rev. Code 9.73.030 |
The Illinois Border Issue
Because Wisconsin shares a long border with Illinois, the interstate recording issue comes up frequently. Illinois is an all-party consent state under 720 ILCS 5/14-2, which means recording a call with someone in Illinois without their knowledge could violate Illinois law, even if you are calling from Wisconsin.
Best practice for Wisconsin-Illinois calls: Inform the Illinois party that you are recording, or get their explicit consent before beginning the recording.
Which State's Law Controls?
There is no definitive federal rule about which state's law applies to interstate calls. Courts have taken different approaches:
- Some courts apply the law of the state where the recording is made
- Some courts apply the law of the state where the non-consenting party is located
- Some courts apply the stricter of the two states' laws
The safest approach is always to comply with the stricter state's requirements when making interstate calls.
VoIP and Video Call Recording
How Wisconsin Law Applies to VoIP
VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) calls are treated the same as traditional phone calls under Wisconsin law. Wis. Stat. 968.27 defines "electronic communication" broadly enough to encompass VoIP transmissions. The one-party consent rule applies.
This covers calls made through:
- Zoom
- Microsoft Teams
- Google Meet
- Skype
- FaceTime (audio)
- Discord
- Slack calls
- Any other internet-based calling platform
Video Conferencing With Multiple Participants
When recording a video conference with participants from multiple states, the recording laws of all participants' states may apply. If any participant is in a two-party consent state, you should either:
- Announce at the beginning of the call that the session will be recorded
- Use the platform's built-in recording notification (Zoom, Teams, and Meet all notify participants when recording begins)
- Obtain consent from all participants before activating recording
Most business video conferencing platforms now include automatic notification features that alert all participants when recording is active. Using these features helps ensure compliance across state lines.
Platform-Specific Recording Features
Most major video conferencing platforms have built-in recording features:
- Zoom notifies all participants when recording starts and provides a consent prompt for cloud recordings
- Microsoft Teams displays a recording banner visible to all participants
- Google Meet announces when recording begins and requires the host to start recording
- Webex provides recording notifications and can restrict recording to hosts only
Using these built-in features provides an additional layer of compliance because all participants receive notice.
Federal Law and Phone Call Recording
The Federal Wiretap Act
The federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. 2511) follows a one-party consent standard, consistent with Wisconsin law. Under federal law, it is legal to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication if one party to the communication consents, unless the interception is for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act.
Federal penalties for illegal wiretapping include up to five years in prison. Civil remedies under 18 U.S.C. 2520 provide statutory damages of $10,000 per violation, actual damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees.
FCC Regulations
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has issued guidance on phone call recording. Note: 47 C.F.R. § 64.501, which formerly required carriers to inform customers of call recording, was removed from the Code of Federal Regulations in 2017 and is no longer in force. The FCC's current call-recording guidance (FCC 24-24) governs beep-tone and disclosure requirements at the carrier level and does not override Wisconsin's one-party consent law for individual callers or businesses.
Penalties for Illegal Phone Call Recording
Criminal Penalties
Illegally intercepting phone calls in Wisconsin is a Class H felony under Wis. Stat. 968.31:
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Illegal interception of phone calls | Class H Felony | 6 years prison, $10,000 fine |
| Disclosing illegally intercepted calls | Class H Felony | 6 years prison, $10,000 fine |
| Using content of illegally intercepted calls | Class H Felony | 6 years prison, $10,000 fine |
Civil Liability
Under Wis. Stat. 968.31(2m), victims of illegal phone call interception can sue for actual damages (minimum $100 per day or $1,000, whichever is higher), punitive damages, and attorney fees.
Using Phone Call Recordings as Evidence
Admissibility in Wisconsin Courts
Phone call recordings made legally under one-party consent are generally admissible in Wisconsin courts. To use a recording as evidence:
- Authenticate the recording by testifying about when, where, and how it was made
- Demonstrate that the recording has not been altered
- Show that the recording is relevant to the matter at issue
- Be prepared to address hearsay objections (many exceptions apply to recorded statements)
Preserving Phone Call Recordings
For maximum evidentiary value:
- Save the original file without editing
- Note the date, time, and participants immediately after the call
- Back up the recording to cloud storage and a separate device
- Do not share the recording on social media before legal proceedings
- Keep a log of all recorded calls with dates and summaries
More Wisconsin Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Wisconsin Recording Laws
More Wisconsin Recording Topics
More Wisconsin Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record a phone call in Wisconsin without telling the other person?
Yes. Wisconsin is a one-party consent state under Wis. Stat. 968.31. You can record any phone call you participate in without informing the other party. This applies to landline calls, cell phone calls, VoIP calls, and video calls.
Can I record a call with someone in Illinois from Wisconsin?
Wisconsin law allows it, but Illinois is an all-party consent state. When calling across state lines, the stricter law typically applies. The safest approach is to inform the Illinois party that you are recording or get their explicit consent before beginning the recording.
Can my employer record my phone calls at work in Wisconsin?
Yes. Under Wisconsin's one-party consent law, an employer can record business calls when an employee participant consents. Many employers use automated announcements to notify callers. The federal business extension exception also allows monitoring calls on business phone systems for legitimate business purposes.
Is it legal to record a Zoom call in Wisconsin?
Yes. VoIP and video calls are covered by the same one-party consent rule as traditional phone calls. If you are a participant, you can record. However, if participants are in two-party consent states, you should use the platform's recording notification feature or announce the recording to ensure compliance.
What happens if I illegally record a phone call in Wisconsin?
Illegal phone call interception is a Class H felony under Wis. Stat. 968.31, punishable by up to 6 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The victim can also sue for civil damages including a minimum of $100 per day or $1,000 (whichever is higher), punitive damages, and attorney fees.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 3 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 365 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov
Also relied on in: US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, Alabama Audio Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties, Alabama Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 968: Commencement Of Criminal Proceedings
§ 968.27Definitions.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
In ss. 968.28 to 968.375: (1) “Aggrieved person” means a person who was a party to any intercepted wire, electronic or oral communication or a person against whom the interception was directed. (2) “Aural transfer” means a transfer containing the human voice at any point from the point of origin to the point of reception. (3) “Contents,” when used with respect to any wire, electronic, or oral communication, includes any information concerning the substance, purport, or meaning of that communication. (4) “Electronic communication” means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature wholly or partially transmitted by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photooptical system. “Electronic communication” does not include any of the following: (a) The radio portion of a cordless telephone communication that is transmitted between the cordless telephone handset and the base unit. (b) Any wire or oral communication. (c) Any communication made through a tone-only paging device. (d) Any communication from a tracking device.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Wisconsin Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026, Wisconsin Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 968.31Interception and disclosure of wire, electronic or oral communications prohibited.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in ss. 196.63 or 968.28 to 968.30, whoever commits any of the acts enumerated in this section is guilty of a Class H felony: (a) Intentionally intercepts, attempts to intercept or procures any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept, any wire, electronic or oral communication. (b) Intentionally uses, attempts to use or procures any other person to use or attempt to use any electronic, mechanical or other device to intercept any oral communication. (c) Discloses, or attempts to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, electronic or oral communication in violation of this section or under circumstances constituting violation of this section. (d) Uses, or attempts to use, the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, electronic or oral communication in violation of this section or under circumstances constituting violation of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Also relied on in: One-Party Consent States: Complete 2026 Guide, Wisconsin Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), Wisconsin Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Surveillance, and Privacy (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 1.79 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Wis. Stat. 968.31 - Interception and Disclosure(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 968.31(2m) - Civil Remedies(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 968.27 - Definitions(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
- FCC(fcc.gov).gov
- Wisconsin DOR(revenue.wi.gov).gov
- Wisconsin DOT - DMV(wisconsindot.gov).gov
- Wisconsin State Law Library(wilawlibrary.gov).gov