Wisconsin
Wisconsin Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 16 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wisconsin protects state government employees who report law violations, mismanagement, waste, or public safety dangers under the State Employee Whistleblower Law (Wis. Stat. 230.80-230.89). The Fair Employment Act extends retaliation protections to private sector workers, and Wis. Stat. 146.997 separately shields healthcare employees.
Overview of Wisconsin Whistleblower Laws
Wisconsin is an employment-at-will state, meaning employers can generally terminate employees for any reason or no reason. However, both statutory and common law protections create important exceptions for whistleblowers.
Wisconsin's whistleblower framework includes the State Employee Whistleblower Law (Wis. Stat. 230.80 through 230.89) for government workers, the Fair Employment Act's broad anti-retaliation provisions, and several industry-specific statutes protecting healthcare workers, elder care reporters, and others. The common law public policy exception in Wisconsin is narrower than in many states.
Federal whistleblower protections also apply to all Wisconsin workers. For a complete overview, see our guide to Federal Whistleblower Laws.
Common Law Protections
Wisconsin recognizes a limited public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. However, this exception is narrower than in many other states. Wisconsin's common law protection does not broadly cover whistleblowing situations. Instead, it protects employees who:

- Refuse to violate a statute or constitutional provision
- Fulfill a statutory obligation to report wrongdoing to appropriate authorities
This narrow scope means most Wisconsin whistleblowers need to rely on the state's statutory protections rather than common law claims.
State Employee Whistleblower Law
The Wisconsin State Employee Whistleblower Law, codified at Wis. Stat. 230.80 through 230.89, provides the primary whistleblower framework for state government employees. Wis. Stat. 230.83 states the prohibition and Wis. Stat. 230.85 supplies the enforcement route. A separate statute, Wis. Stat. 230.90, adds a narrower circuit court action described below.
Who Is Protected
The law covers most state employees. However, certain positions are excluded:
- Employees of the Governor's office, the courts, the legislature, or a service agency
- Employees who are, or whose immediate supervisor is, assigned to an executive salary group or university senior executive salary group
Protected Disclosures
Under Wis. Stat. 230.83(1), no appointing authority, agent of an appointing authority, or supervisor may initiate, administer, or threaten any retaliatory action against an employee. Wis. Stat. 230.80(5) defines the protected information as information the employee reasonably believes demonstrates:
- A violation of any state or federal law, rule, or regulation
- Mismanagement or abuse of authority in state government
- A substantial waste of public funds (defined as an unnecessary expenditure of a substantial amount of money or a series of unnecessary expenditures of smaller amounts)
- A danger to public health and safety
Protection also extends to employees who the employer believes have made such disclosures, even if the employee has not actually done so.
Procedural Requirements
Wis. Stat. 230.81(1) sets the step that earns protection. Before disclosing the information to any person other than an attorney, collective bargaining representative, or legislator, the employee must do one of the following:
- Disclose the information in writing to the employee's supervisor, or
- Ask the Wisconsin Equal Rights Division which governmental unit is appropriate to receive the information, then disclose it in writing only to that unit. The division may not designate the Department of Justice, the courts, the legislature, or a legislative service agency under subch. IV of ch. 13.
Several channels are protected without that written-to-supervisor step. Under Wis. Stat. 230.81(2), an employee may disclose to an appropriate law enforcement agency, a state or federal district attorney in whose jurisdiction the crime is alleged to have occurred, a state or federal grand jury, or a judge in a proceeding commenced under Wis. Stat. 968.26, and may disclose under a lawfully issued subpoena.
Under Wis. Stat. 230.81(3), disclosure to the employee's attorney, collective bargaining representative, or legislator, or to a legislative committee or legislative service agency, is itself a lawful disclosure protected by Wis. Stat. 230.83.
Filing a Retaliation Complaint
The primary route is administrative, and its deadline is short. Under Wis. Stat. 230.85(1), an employee who believes a supervisor or appointing authority has taken or threatened retaliatory action in violation of Wis. Stat. 230.83 may file a written complaint with the Division of Equal Rights specifying the retaliatory action and the relief requested. That complaint must be filed within 60 days after the retaliatory action occurred or was threatened, or after the employee learned of it, whichever occurs last. The Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development states the same 60-day window on its whistleblower page. Sixty days passes quickly, so have a Wisconsin employment lawyer review your written complaint and the relief you request in a free case evaluation (attorney advertising).
A timing presumption can help a complainant. Under Wis. Stat. 230.85(6), a dismissal, demotion, transfer, removal of duties, refusal to restore, suspension, reprimand, harassment, or base pay reduction that occurs or is threatened within 2 years after a qualifying disclosure is presumed to be retaliatory, and the other disciplinary actions listed in Wis. Stat. 230.80(2)(b) to (d) carry the same presumption for one year. The employer may rebut it by a preponderance of the evidence. This presumption is not a filing deadline, and the 60-day complaint window still applies.
A second, narrower route runs to court. Under Wis. Stat. 230.90(2), an employee may bring an action in circuit court only where the employer or its agent retaliated because the employee exercised rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or article I, section 3, of the Wisconsin Constitution by lawfully disclosing information, or because the employer believed the employee did so. That constitutional-speech element is the gate on the section. The action must be brought within 2 years after the action occurred or after the employee learned of it, whichever occurs last.
The two routes do not run side by side to the end. Under Wis. Stat. 230.88(2)(c), once an employee commences an action in a court of record alleging matters prohibited under Wis. Stat. 230.83, the Division of Equal Rights loses jurisdiction over the complaint except to dismiss it, and the employee must notify the division no later than 10 days before the scheduled hearing.
Remedies for Government Employees
The two routes carry different remedies, and the difference matters.
If the Division of Equal Rights finds retaliation after a hearing, Wis. Stat. 230.85(3)(a) requires it to insert a copy of its findings and orders into the employee's personnel file, and allows it to take other appropriate action, including:
- Ordering reinstatement or restoration to the previous position, with or without back pay
- Ordering transfer to an available position for which the employee is qualified within the same governmental unit
- Ordering expungement of adverse material relating to the retaliatory action from the personnel file
- Ordering a governmental unit respondent to pay the employee's reasonable attorney fees
- Recommending discipline against a respondent who is a natural person, including a personnel file notation, a letter of reprimand, suspension, or termination
Wis. Stat. 230.85(3)(a) does not authorize compensatory damages, and under Wis. Stat. 230.85(3)(d) interim earnings reduce back pay otherwise allowable.
Compensatory damages appear only on the court route. If a court or jury finds retaliation in an action under Wis. Stat. 230.90, Wis. Stat. 230.90(4) allows the court to order placement in the previous position with or without back pay, transfer, expungement of adverse material, compensatory damages, reasonable attorney fees, insertion of a copy of the court order into the personnel file, and a recommendation of discipline against the employer's agent.
Fair Employment Act Protections
The Wisconsin Fair Employment Act, Wis. Stat. 111.322, provides broad retaliation protections that extend to both public and private sector employees across many employment contexts.
Anti-Discrimination Retaliation
Under Wis. Stat. 111.322(3), employers cannot retaliate against employees who:
- Oppose discriminatory practices
- File a discrimination complaint
- Testify or assist in discrimination proceedings
Wisconsin law prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, creed, color, disability, marital status, sex, national origin, ancestry, arrest record, conviction record, military service, use or nonuse of lawful products off the employer's premises during non-working hours, and declining to attend meetings about religious or political matters.
Additional Fair Employment Act Protections
Under Wis. Stat. 111.322(2m), the Fair Employment Act also prohibits retaliation against employees who file complaints, exercise rights, or participate in proceedings related to:
- Hours of labor (Wis. Stat. 103.02)
- Family or medical leave (Wis. Stat. 103.10)
- Right to inspect personnel records (Wis. Stat. 103.13)
- Minimum wage (Wis. Stat. 104.12)
- Wage claims (Wis. Stat. 109.03 and 109.07)
- Health care benefits claims (Wis. Stat. 109.075)
- Employee right to know about toxic substances (Wis. Stat. 101.58 through 101.599)
- Employment of minors (Wis. Stat. 103.64 through 103.82)
- Health care worker whistleblowers (Wis. Stat. 146.997)
Complaints under the Fair Employment Act must be filed with the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (DWD) within 300 days of the retaliatory action.
Remedies Under the Fair Employment Act
Employers who violate the Fair Employment Act may be liable for:
- Reinstatement
- For violations of the wage, leave, and health-care-worker retaliation provisions (Wis. Stat. 111.322(2m)), compensation in lieu of reinstatement ranging from 500 times to 1,000 times the hourly wage of the aggrieved employee
- Interim earnings may reduce back pay otherwise allowable
Additional Whistleblower Protections
Wisconsin has several other statutes that protect employees in specific contexts.
Health Care Employees
Under Wis. Stat. 146.997, health care facilities and providers cannot retaliate against employees who:
- Report violations of law, rules, or regulations by the facility or provider
- Report health care standards that pose a risk to public health or safety
- Testify or participate in proceedings concerning violations
- Provide information in good faith under the statute
Protection also applies if the employer merely believes the employee has engaged in these activities. Complaints must be filed with the DWD within 300 days.
Penalties for violations escalate: up to $1,000 for a first violation, up to $5,000 for a second violation within 12 months, and up to $10,000 for a third or subsequent violation within 12 months of two or more previous violations.
Elder Care Reporting
Under Wis. Stat. 46.90, certain persons, including licensed health care providers, social workers, and staff of licensed or certified facilities, must file a report if they have seen an elder adult at risk (defined as a person 60 years or older experiencing or at risk of abuse, neglect, self-neglect, or financial exploitation) in the course of their professional duties. Reports may be made to the county department, the elder-adult-at-risk agency, law enforcement, the state department, or the Board on Aging and Long-Term Care.
A reporter is not required to file if they believe doing so would not be in the elder adult's best interest, or in certain circumstances involving spiritual healing provided in place of medical care.
Migrant Workers
Under Wis. Stat. 103.96, employers and migrant labor contractors cannot retaliate against migrant workers for exercising rights under state or federal law. Remedies include reinstatement and back wages. In cases of willful violation, courts may award exemplary damages up to double the back wages, plus reasonable attorney's fees in aggravated circumstances.
Toxic Substances
Under Wis. Stat. 101.595(2)(a), no employer may discharge, discipline, or discriminate against an employee for exercising rights under Wis. Stat. 101.58 to 101.599, which include the right to request information about toxic substances, infectious agents, and pesticides in the workplace. Section 101.595 itself sets no deadline and provides no remedies.
Those are in Wis. Stat. 101.599. A complaint goes to the department within 30 days after the violation occurs or after the employee first obtains knowledge of it, whichever is later. If the department finds a violation, it may order the employer to remedy its effects, including providing the requested information, instituting an education or training program, reinstating the employee, or paying back pay.
Missing the 30-day window is not necessarily the end of the matter. Wis. Stat. 101.595(2)(b) applies Wis. Stat. 111.322(2m) to discharge and other discriminatory acts arising in connection with a proceeding under these sections, which routes that claim through the Fair Employment Act and its 300-day filing deadline under Wis. Stat. 111.39(1).
Workers' Compensation
Under Wis. Stat. 102.35(2), an employer who without reasonable cause refuses to rehire an employee injured in the course of employment, or who discriminates or threatens to discriminate against an employee because of a claim or attempted claim for compensation benefits, forfeits between $50 and $500 to the state for each offense. That forfeiture is paid to the state rather than to the worker, and the same subsection provides that no action under it may be commenced except upon request of the department, so the employee cannot bring it.
The employee's own remedy is in Wis. Stat. 102.35(3). An employer who without reasonable cause refuses to rehire an injured employee when suitable employment is available within the employee's physical and mental limitations has, upon order of the department, exclusive liability to pay the employee the wages lost during the period of that refusal, in addition to other benefits, up to a maximum of one year's wages.
Qui Tam and False Claims Provisions
Wisconsin does not currently have a state-level qui tam statute. Its former False Claims for Medical Assistance Law (formerly Wis. Stat. 20.931) was repealed in 2015 by a budget-bill rider (2015 Wisconsin Act 55), and a 2019 bill to restore it (AB 420) died without passing. That statute number now governs an unrelated subject.
Employees reporting Medicaid fraud or other fraud involving federal funds must instead rely on the federal False Claims Act, which provides whistleblower awards of 15% to 30% of recovered funds and includes comprehensive anti-retaliation protections.
How to File a Whistleblower Complaint in Wisconsin
State Employees
Disclose the information in writing to your supervisor, or ask the Wisconsin Equal Rights Division at (608) 266-3131 which governmental unit should receive it and then disclose in writing only to that unit. If retaliation follows, file a written complaint with the Equal Rights Division within 60 days under Wis. Stat. 230.85(1). A circuit court action under Wis. Stat. 230.90 remains available for 2 years, but only for retaliation against a disclosure protected by the First Amendment or article I, section 3, of the Wisconsin Constitution.
Fair Employment Act Complaints
For discrimination retaliation, health care employee retaliation, and elder care reporting retaliation, file a complaint with the DWD within 300 days of the retaliatory action.
Toxic Substances Complaints
For retaliation related to toxic substance information requests, file with the DWD within 30 days.
Practical Tips for Wisconsin Whistleblowers
- Put the disclosure in writing to your supervisor first, or ask the Equal Rights Division which unit should receive it. That step is what earns protection under Wis. Stat. 230.83.
- The 60-day Equal Rights Division deadline under Wis. Stat. 230.85(1) is the one most likely to be missed. Do not rely on the 2-year circuit court window under Wis. Stat. 230.90, which reaches only constitutionally protected disclosures.
- Toxic substance retaliation complaints carry a 30-day deadline under Wis. Stat. 101.599(1).
- Document all disclosures and communications in writing.
- Consult an employment attorney experienced in Wisconsin whistleblower law, particularly given the procedural requirements.
- Even without a broad state qui tam law, the federal False Claims Act may apply to fraud involving federal funds.
More Wisconsin Laws
- Wisconsin At-Will Employment Laws
- Wisconsin Employee Monitoring Laws
- Wisconsin Final Paycheck Laws
- Wisconsin Workers Compensation Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Wisconsin's Whistleblower Law protect private sector employees?
The State Employee Whistleblower Law (Wis. Stat. 230.80-230.89) only covers state government employees. Private sector workers may be protected under the Fair Employment Act's anti-retaliation provisions, industry-specific statutes (such as health care worker protections), or the limited common law public policy exception.
What are the procedural requirements for Wisconsin state employee whistleblowers?
Under Wis. Stat. 230.81(1), before disclosing the information to anyone other than an attorney, collective bargaining representative, or legislator, the employee must either disclose it in writing to a supervisor or ask the Equal Rights Division which governmental unit is appropriate and then disclose in writing only to that unit. Disclosures to law enforcement, a district attorney, a grand jury, a judge in a Wis. Stat. 968.26 proceeding, under a lawful subpoena, or to an attorney, union representative, legislator, legislative committee, or legislative service agency are protected under Wis. Stat. 230.81(2) and (3) without that step.
How long do I have to file a whistleblower retaliation complaint in Wisconsin?
Deadlines vary significantly, and the shortest one governs most state employees. A state employee must file a written retaliation complaint with the Division of Equal Rights within 60 days under Wis. Stat. 230.85(1). The separate circuit court action under Wis. Stat. 230.90 allows 2 years but reaches only retaliation for a constitutionally protected disclosure. Fair Employment Act and health care employee complaints have a 300-day deadline under Wis. Stat. 111.39(1). Toxic substance retaliation complaints must be filed within 30 days under Wis. Stat. 101.599(1).
Can I file a qui tam lawsuit for fraud in Wisconsin?
Not under state law. Wisconsin repealed its only state qui tam mechanism, the False Claims for Medical Assistance Law, in 2015, and a 2019 bill to restore it did not pass. You can still file a qui tam lawsuit under the federal False Claims Act for fraud involving federal funds, which provides whistleblower awards of 15% to 30% of recovered funds.
What compensation can a government employee whistleblower receive in Wisconsin?
It depends on the route. Under Wis. Stat. 230.85(3)(a), the Division of Equal Rights may order reinstatement with or without back pay, transfer, expungement of adverse material, and reasonable attorney fees, and must place its findings in the personnel file. That subsection does not provide compensatory damages. Compensatory damages are available only in a circuit court action under Wis. Stat. 230.90(4), which also allows reinstatement, transfer, expungement, attorney fees, insertion of the court order into the personnel file, and a recommendation of discipline against the retaliating agent.
Updates
Corrected the state employee whistleblower sections: added the 60-day deadline for filing a retaliation complaint with the Division of Equal Rights under Wis. Stat. 230.85(1), separated the remedies available from the division from those available only in a circuit court action under Wis. Stat. 230.90, added the constitutional-disclosure element that section requires, replaced the vague disclosure-procedure passages with the actual requirements and protected channels in Wis. Stat. 230.81, re-cited the toxic substance deadline and remedies to Wis. Stat. 101.599 and noted the Fair Employment Act alternative, and added the lost-wages remedy in Wis. Stat. 102.35(3).
Removed the claim that Wisconsin currently has a state-level Medicaid qui tam law: the False Claims for Medical Assistance Law was repealed in 2015 and a 2019 restoration bill died, so only the federal False Claims Act applies to fraud involving federal funds. Also clarified that the 500x-1,000x-hourly-wage remedy applies specifically to Fair Employment Act wage/leave/health-care-worker retaliation claims, not to all Fair Employment Act violations.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the state-employee retaliation forum and deadline (a circuit court civil action within 2 years under Wis. Stat. 230.90, not a 60-day DWD Equal Rights Division complaint) everywhere it appeared, softened the written-disclosure-first rule to what 230.90 actually supports, removed a retaliation-ban and $10,000/6-month penalty misattributed to the elder-abuse reporting statute, and narrowed 'mismanagement or abuse of authority' to state government per the statute's own scope.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 230: State Employment Relations
§ 230.83Retaliatory action prohibited.In force
(1) No appointing authority, agent of an appointing authority or supervisor may initiate or administer, or threaten to initiate or administer, any retaliatory action against an employee. (2) This section does not apply to an employee who discloses information if the employee knows or anticipates that the disclosure is likely to result in the receipt of anything of value for the employee or for the employee’s immediate family, unless the employee discloses information in pursuit of any award offered by any governmental unit for information to improve government administration or operation. (3) Nothing in this section restricts the right of an employer to take appropriate disciplinary action against an employee who knowingly makes an untrue statement or discloses information the disclosure of which is expressly prohibited by state or federal law, rule or regulation. Cross-reference: See also ch. DWD 224, Wis. adm. code.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-17 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
§ 230.90Government employer retaliation prohibited.In force
(1) In this section: (a) “Disciplinary action” means any action taken with respect to an employee which has the effect, in whole or in part, of a penalty. (b) “Employee” means any person employed by any governmental unit except: 1. A person employed by the office of the governor, the courts, the legislature or a service agency under subch. IV of ch. 13. 2. A person who is, or whose immediate supervisor is, assigned to an executive salary group under s. 20.923 or a person who has, or whose immediate supervisor has, a position specified in s. 36.115 (3m) (ae) to (f). (c) “Governmental unit” means any association, authority, board, commission, department, independent agency, institution, office, society or other body in state government created or authorized to be created by the constitution or any law, including the legislature, the office of the governor and the courts. “Governmental unit” does not mean the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority or any political subdivision of the state or body within one or more political subdivisions which is created by law or by action of one or more political subdivisions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Wisconsin Department of Justice v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2015, 365 Wis. 2d 694)“…ed slip op., ¶ 19 (Wis. Ct. App. Mar. 28, 2013) (examining Wis. Stat. § 230.90 , which provides protection from retali…”
- State v. Smith (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2006, 291 Wis. 2d 569)“…isciplinary action when an employee testifies in a trial); Wis. Stat. § 230.90 (2003-04) (formerly § 895.65) (prohibi…”
- State v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2015, 361 Wis. 2d 196)“…employee's email "lawfully disclos[ed] information" under Wis. Stat. § 230.90 , another one of Wisconsin's whistleblo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 230.80Definitions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
In this subchapter: (1) “Abuse of authority” means an arbitrary or capricious exercise of power. (1m) “Appointing authority” means the chief officer of any governmental unit unless another person is authorized to appoint subordinate staff by the constitution or any law. (2) “Disciplinary action” means any action taken with respect to an employee which has the effect, in whole or in part, of a penalty, including but not limited to any of the following: (a) Dismissal, demotion, transfer, removal of any duty assigned to the employee’s position, refusal to restore, suspension, reprimand, verbal or physical harassment or reduction in base pay. (b) Denial of education or training, if the education or training may reasonably be expected to lead to an appointment, promotion, performance evaluation or other personnel action. (c) Reassignment. (d) Failure to increase base pay, except with respect to the determination of a discretionary performance award. (3) “Employee” means any person employed by any governmental unit except: (a) A person employed by the office of the governor, the courts, the legislature or a service agency under subch. IV of ch. 13.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hutson v. State Personnel Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2003, 263 Wis. 2d 612)“…relating to *618 "mismanagement" defined in Wis. Stat. § 230.80 (7) as a "pattern of incompetent manage…”
- State of Wisconsin Department of Justice v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2015, 365 Wis. 2d 694)“…e evidence that the Department of Justice ("DOJ") violated Wis. Stat. §§ 230.80-89 (2011-12), 2 the subchapter of Wis.…”
- Asma Masri v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2014, 356 Wis. 2d 405)“…b) adopts the definition of "disciplinary action" given in Wis. Stat. § 230.80 (2), namely, "any action taken with res…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)
§ 230.81Employee disclosure.In force
(1) An employee with knowledge of information the disclosure of which is not expressly prohibited by state or federal law, rule or regulation may disclose that information to any other person. However, to obtain protection under s. 230.83, before disclosing that information to any person other than his or her attorney, collective bargaining representative or legislator, the employee shall do either of the following: (a) Disclose the information in writing to the employee’s supervisor. (b) After asking the division of equal rights which governmental unit is appropriate to receive the information, disclose the information in writing only to the governmental unit that the division of equal rights determines is appropriate. The division of equal rights may not designate the department of justice, the courts, the legislature or a service agency under subch. IV of ch. 13 as an appropriate governmental unit to receive information. Each appropriate governmental unit shall designate an employee to receive information under this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Wisconsin Department of Justice v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2015, 365 Wis. 2d 694)“…ity detail constitute "disclosure[s]" of information under Wis. Stat. § 230.81 , and whether Schigur's disclosure is p…”
- Bethards v. State Department of Workforce Development (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2017, 376 Wis. 2d 347)“…plying due weight deference to the ERD's interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 230.81 (1), we conclude the employee's interpr…”
- Hutson v. State Personnel Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2003, 263 Wis. 2d 612)“…nformation in writing, typically to his or her supervisor. Wis. Stat. § 230.81 (1)(a). "Information" is defined in Wi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 230.85Enforcement.In force
(1) An employee who believes that a supervisor or appointing authority has initiated or administered, or threatened to initiate or administer, a retaliatory action against that employee in violation of s. 230.83 may file a written complaint with the division of equal rights, specifying the nature of the retaliatory action or threat thereof and requesting relief, within 60 days after the retaliatory action allegedly occurred or was threatened or after the employee learned of the retaliatory action or threat thereof, whichever occurs last. (2) The division of equal rights shall receive and, except as provided in s. 230.45 (1m), investigate any complaint under sub. (1). In the course of investigating or otherwise processing such a complaint, the division of equal rights may require that an interview with any employee described in s. 230.80 (3), except a management or supervisory employee who is a party to or is immediately involved in the subject matter of the complaint, be conducted outside the presence of the appointing authority or any representative or agent thereof unless the employee voluntarily requests that presence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Albrechtsen v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2005, 288 Wis. 2d 144)“…tter jurisdiction over Albrechtsen's complaint pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 230.85 (1), its "subject matter jurisdiction h…”
- State v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2015, 361 Wis. 2d 196)“…probation was in violation of Wis. Stat. § 230.83 . See Wis. Stat. § 230.85 (1) (pertaining to filing complaints wi…”
- Bethards v. State Department of Workforce Development (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2017, 376 Wis. 2d 347)“…zed to administer the Whistle-blower Protection Act. See Wis. Stat. §§ 230.85 , 230.89. While this factor supports th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 230.88Payment of award, judgment or settlement; effect of order, arbitration award or commencement of court action.In force
(1) Payment. Any award, judgment or settlement obtained by an employee under this subchapter shall be paid from the funds appropriated under s. 20.865 (1) (a), (g) and (q). (2) Effect. (a) A final order issued under s. 230.85 or 230.87 which has not been appealed and for which the time of appeal has passed binds all parties who were subjected to the jurisdiction of the division of equal rights or the court and who received an opportunity to be heard. With respect to these parties, the decree is conclusive as to all issues of law and fact decided. (b) No collective bargaining agreement supersedes the rights of an employee under this subchapter. However, nothing in this subchapter affects any right of an employee to pursue a grievance procedure under a collective bargaining agreement under subch. V of ch. 111, and if the division of equal rights determines that a grievance arising under such a collective bargaining agreement involves the same parties and matters as a complaint under s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2005
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Albrechtsen v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2005, 288 Wis. 2d 144)“…accord the Commission's interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 230.88 (2)(c)? The parties agree that our revi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 111: Employment Relations
§ 111.322Discriminatory actions prohibited.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
Subject to ss. 111.33 to 111.365, it is an act of employment discrimination to do any of the following: (1) To refuse to hire, employ, admit or license any individual, to bar or terminate from employment or labor organization membership any individual, or to discriminate against any individual in promotion, compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment or labor organization membership because of any basis enumerated in s. 111.321. (2) To print or circulate or cause to be printed or circulated any statement, advertisement or publication, or to use any form of application for employment or to make any inquiry in connection with prospective employment, which implies or expresses any limitation, specification or discrimination with respect to an individual or any intent to make such limitation, specification or discrimination because of any basis enumerated in s. 111.321. (2m) To discharge or otherwise discriminate against any individual because of any of the following: (a) The individual files a complaint or attempts to enforce any right under s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Crystal Lake Cheese Factory v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2003, 264 Wis. 2d 200)“…nd that the employer took one of the actions enumerated in Wis. Stat. § 111.322 . [16] Target, 217 Wis. 2d at 9 .…”
- Wis. Bell, Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2018, 382 Wis. 2d 624)“…of the "inference method" is inconsistent with Wis. Stat. § 111.322(1) because it excuses the employee fro…”
- Coulee Catholic Schools v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2009, 320 Wis. 2d 275)“…111.322 against any individual on the basis of age.... Wis. Stat. § 111.322 Discriminatory actions prohibited. S…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Minimum Wage 2026: $7.25 an Hour Under State Law, Wrongful Termination in Wisconsin (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
§ 111.39Powers and duties of department.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
Except as provided under s. 111.375 (2), the department shall have the following powers and duties in carrying out this subchapter: (1) The department may receive and investigate a complaint charging discrimination, discriminatory practices, unfair honesty testing or unfair genetic testing in a particular case if the complaint is filed with the department no more than 300 days after the alleged discrimination, unfair honesty testing or unfair genetic testing occurred. The department may give publicity to its findings in the case. (2) In carrying out this subchapter the department and its duly authorized agents are empowered to hold hearings, subpoena witnesses, take testimony and make investigations in the manner provided in s. 103.005. The department or its duly authorized agents may privilege witnesses testifying before them under the provisions of this subchapter against self-incrimination. (3) The department shall dismiss a complaint if the person filing the complaint fails to respond within 20 days to any correspondence from the department concerning the complaint and if the correspondence is sent by certified mail to the last-known address of the person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 35 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stoughton Trailers, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2007, 303 Wis. 2d 514)“…d the "in-part" test as described in Hoell. ¶ 69 Under Wis. Stat. § 111.39 (4)(c), LIRC (or DWD) may award reinsta…”
- Aldrich v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2012, 341 Wis. 2d 36)“…Buy's motion to dismiss Ms. Aldrich's claim. The ALJ cited Wis. Stat. § 111.39 (1), which provides, in relevant part,…”
- Motola v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1998, 219 Wis. 2d 588)“…of the Department of Industry, Labor and Job Development. Wis. Stat. § 111.39 (1) provides that "the department may r…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026), Wisconsin Workplace Harassment Laws: 1-Employee Rule, 300 Days (2026)
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 146: Miscellaneous Health Provisions
§ 146.997Health care worker protection.In force
(1) Definitions. In this section: (a) “Department” means the department of workforce development. (b) “Disciplinary action” has the meaning given in s. 230.80 (2). (c) “Health care facility” means a facility, as defined in s. 647.01 (4), or any hospital, nursing home, community-based residential facility, county home, county infirmary, county hospital, county mental health complex or other place licensed or approved by the department of health services under s. 49.70, 49.71, 49.72, 50.03, 50.35, 51.08 or 51.09 or a facility under s. 45.50, 51.05, 51.06, 233.40, 233.41, 233.42 or 252.10. (d) “Health care provider” means any of the following: 1. A nurse licensed under ch. 441. 2. A chiropractor licensed under ch. 446. 3. A dentist or dental therapist who is licensed under ch. 447 or who holds a compact privilege under subch. II of ch. 447. 4. A physician, physician assistant, podiatrist, perfusionist, physical therapist, physical therapist assistant, occupational therapist, occupational therapy assistant, or genetic counselor licensed under ch. 448; a physical therapist or physical therapist assistant who holds a compact privilege under subch. XI of ch.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Asma Masri v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2014, 356 Wis. 2d 405)“…nterns are entitled to the anti-retaliation protections of Wis. Stat. § 146.997 (2007-08) 2 — Wisconsin's health care…”
- Goggins v. Rogers Memorial Hospital Inc. (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2004, 274 Wis. 2d 754)“…governed by the Department of Workforce Development under Wis. Stat. § 146.997 (2001-02), 1 which depriv…”
- Masri v. State of Labor & Industry Review (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2013, 348 Wis. 2d 1)“…and poses a potential risk to public health or safety." Wis. Stat. § 146.997 (2)(a)l., 2. & (3). The "dominant purpo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 103: Employment Regulations
§ 103.96Retaliation prohibited.In force
(1) No employer or migrant labor contractor may terminate, suspend, demote, transfer or take any action otherwise unfavorable to any migrant worker in retaliation for the exercise by such worker of any right secured under the laws and regulations of the United States or of this state or any subdivision thereof. (2) Any person aggrieved under this section may maintain an action against the employer or migrant labor contractor. In addition to any other damages awarded, an employer or migrant labor contractor found to have violated this section shall be liable to such person aggrieved for full reinstatement and for back wages accumulated during the period of such unlawful retaliation. In cases of willful violation of this section, the court may assess exemplary damages up to double the amount of back wages found due in addition to any other damages awarded. In cases of aggravated circumstances, the court may also assess reasonable attorney fees in addition to any other damages awarded.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Somers (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2026)“…Wis. Stat. §103.865 does not exist. A nearby provision, Wis. Stat. §103.96, prohibits retaliation by employers aga…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 103.02Hours of labor.In force
No person may be employed or be permitted to work in any place of employment or at any employment for such period of time during any day, night or week, as is dangerous or prejudicial to the person’s life, health, safety or welfare. The department shall investigate, ascertain, determine and fix such reasonable classification, and promulgate rules fixing a period of time, or hours of beginning and ending work during any day, night or week, which shall be necessary to protect the life, health, safety or welfare of any person, or to carry out the purposes of ss. 103.01 to 103.03. The department shall, by rule, classify such periods of time into periods to be paid for at regular rates and periods to be paid for at the rate of at least one and one-half times the regular rates. Such investigations, classifications and orders shall be made as provided in s. 103.005 and the penalties under s. 103.005 (12) shall apply to and be imposed for any violation of ss. 103.01 to 103.03. Such orders shall be subject to review in the manner provided in ch. 227. Section 111.322 (2m) applies to discharge or other discriminatory acts arising in connection with any proceeding under this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2000, 235 Wis. 2d 576)“…hority vested in the DWD under the hours and overtime law, Wis. Stat. § 103.02 , or whether this administrative code s…”
- Christopher Kieninger v. Crown Equipment Corporation (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2019)“…(2) violation of Wisconsin overtime compensation law under Wis Stat. §§ 103.02, 109.03 and Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 274.…”
- Weissman v. Tyson Prepared Foods, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2013, 350 Wis. 2d 380)“…beginning and ending work during any day, night or week." Wis. Stat. § 103.02 . ¶ 7. Wisconsin Admin. Code § DWD 27…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 103.10Family or medical leave.In force
(1) Definitions. In this section: (a) “Child” means a natural, adopted, or foster child, a stepchild, or a legal ward to whom any of the following applies: 1. The individual is less than 18 years of age. 2. The individual is 18 years of age or older and cannot care for himself or herself because of a serious health condition. (am) “Christian Science practitioner” means a Christian Science practitioner residing in this state who is listed as a practitioner in the Christian Science journal. (ar) “Domestic partner” has the meaning given in s. 40.02 (21c) or 770.01 (1). (b) Except as provided in sub. (1m) (b) 2. and s. 452.38, “employee” means an individual employed in this state by an employer, except the employer’s parent, spouse, domestic partner, or child. (c) Except as provided in sub. (1m) (b) 3., “employer” means a person engaging in any activity, enterprise or business in this state employing at least 50 individuals on a permanent basis.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2000, 235 Wis. 2d 576)“…App. 1998). In Butzlaff , the state argued that under Wis. Stat. § 103.10 (13) of the Family and Medical Leave Ac…”
- Helgeland v. Wisconsin Municipalities (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2008, 307 Wis. 2d 1)“…ee Trust Fund. It also challenges the constitutionality of Wis. Stat. § 103.10 (3)(b)3., which defines the persons wit…”
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1997, 210 Wis. 2d 26)“…leging that Miller had violated her rights under the FMLA, Wis. Stat. § 103.10 (5)(b). In order to successfully establ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 103.13Records open to employee.In force
(1) Definition. In this section, “employee” includes former employees. (2) Open records. Every employer shall, upon the request of an employee, which the employer may require the employee to make in writing, permit the employee to inspect any personnel documents which are used or which have been used in determining that employee’s qualifications for employment, promotion, transfer, additional compensation, termination or other disciplinary action, and medical records, except as provided in subs. (5) and (6). An employee may request all or any part of his or her records, except as provided in sub. (6). The employer shall grant at least 2 requests by an employee in a calendar year, unless otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement, to inspect the employee’s personnel records as provided in this section. The employer shall provide the employee with the opportunity to inspect the employee’s personnel records within 7 working days after the employee makes the request for inspection. The inspection shall take place at a location reasonably near the employee’s place of employment and during normal working hours.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Woznicki v. Erickson (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1996, 202 Wis. 2d 178)“…law are involved). The majority also seeks support from Wis. Stat. § 103.13 , which limits an employee's access to…”
- Hempel v. City of Baraboo (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2005, 284 Wis. 2d 162)“…f Lobe responded to that portion of Hempel's request under Wis. Stat. § 103.13 , forwarding all documents in Hempel's…”
- Zellner v. Cedarburg School District (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2007, 300 Wis. 2d 290)“…6, ¶ 16 . For example, Zellner has a statutory right under Wis. Stat. 103.13(4) 11 to file a response w…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 103.64Employment of minors; definitions.In force
As used in ss. 103.64 to 103.82: (1m) “Farming” has the meaning given in s. 102.04 (3). (2) “Nonprofit organization” means an organization described in section 501 (c) of the internal revenue code. (3) “Permit officer” means a person designated by the department to issue permits authorizing the employment of minors. (4) “Private school” has the meaning given in s. 115.001 (3r). (5) “Public school” has the meaning given in s. 115.01 (1). (6) “Tribal school” has the meaning given in s. 115.001 (15m).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 46: Social Services
§ 46.90Elder abuse reporting system.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Definitions. In this section: (a) “Abuse” means any of the following: 1. Physical abuse. 2. Emotional abuse. 3. Sexual abuse. 4. Treatment without consent. 5. Unreasonable confinement or restraint. (ag) “Aging unit” has the meaning given under s. 46.82 (1) (a). (aj) “Bodily harm” means physical pain or injury, illness, or any impairment of physical condition. (an) “Caregiver” means a person who has assumed responsibility for all or a portion of an individual’s care voluntarily, by contract, or by agreement, including a person acting or claiming to act as a legal guardian. (ar) “Case management” means an assessment of need for direct services, development of a direct service plan and coordination and monitoring of the provision of direct services. (bm) “Direct services” includes temporary shelter, relocation assistance, housing, respite care, emergency funds for food and clothing and legal assistance. (br) “Elder adult at risk” means any person age 60 or older who has experienced, is currently experiencing, or is at risk of experiencing abuse, neglect, self-neglect, or financial exploitation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 101: Department Of Safety And Professional Services — Regulation Of Industry, Buildings And Safety
§ 101.595Employee rights.In force
(1) Not to work with toxic substance, infectious agent or pesticide. Except as provided in ss. 101.589 (3) and 101.592, if an employee has requested information about a toxic substance, infectious agent or pesticide under s. 101.583, 101.585 or 101.586 and has not received the information required to be provided under s. 101.583, 101.585, 101.586 or 101.589 (1) or (2), the employee may refuse to work with or be exposed to the toxic substance, infectious agent or pesticide until such time as the employer or agricultural employer supplies the information under s. 101.583, 101.585 or 101.586 to the employee who has made the request. (2) Retaliation prohibited. (a) No employer or agricultural employer may discharge or otherwise discipline or discriminate against any employee because the employee has exercised any rights under ss. 101.58 to 101.599. (b) Section 111.322 (2m) applies to discharge and other discriminatory acts arising in connection with any proceeding under ss. 101.58 to 101.599. (3) Waiver prohibited. No person may request or require any employee to waive any rights under ss. 101.58 to 101.599. Cross-reference: See also ch. SPS 335, Wis. adm. code.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
§ 101.58Employees’ right to know.In force
(1) Short title. Sections 101.58 to 101.599 shall be known as the “Employees’ Right to Know Law”. (2) Definitions. In ss. 101.58 to 101.599: (a) “Agricultural employer” means any person, including the state and its political subdivisions, who engages the services of any employee to perform agricultural labor. If any employee is present at the workplace of an agricultural employer under an agreement between that agricultural employer and another agricultural employer or employer, “agricultural employer” means the agricultural employer with control or custody of a pesticide. An agricultural employer who engages some employees to perform agricultural labor and other employees for other purposes is only an agricultural employer with respect to the employees engaged to perform agricultural labor. (b) “Agricultural labor” has the meaning provided in s. 108.02 (2). (c) “Employee” means any person whose services are currently or were formerly engaged by an employer or an agricultural employer, or any applicant at the time an employer or agricultural employer offers to engage his or her services.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
§ 101.599Remedies; civil forfeitures.In force
(1) Complaint. An employee or employee representative who has not been afforded his or her rights by an employer or agricultural employer in violation of s. 101.583, 101.585, 101.586, 101.595 (1), (2) (a) or (3) or 101.597 (1) or (2) may, within 30 days after the violation occurs or the employee or employee representative first obtains knowledge of the violation, whichever is later, file a complaint with the department alleging the violation. The department shall investigate the complaint and shall attempt to resolve the complaint by conference, conciliation or persuasion. If the complaint is not resolved and the department finds probable cause to believe a violation has occurred, the department shall proceed with notice and a hearing on the complaint as provided in ch. 227. The hearing shall be held within 60 days after receipt by the department of the complaint. (2) Remedies. The department shall issue its decision and order within 30 days after the hearing. If the department finds that an employer or agricultural employer has violated s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 102: Worker’s Compensation
§ 102.35Penalties.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Every employer and every insurance company that fails to keep the records or to make the reports required by this chapter or that knowingly falsifies such records or makes false reports shall pay a work injury supplemental benefit surcharge to the state of not less than $10 nor more than $100 for each offense. The department may waive or reduce a surcharge imposed under this subsection if the employer or insurance company that violated this subsection requests a waiver or reduction of the surcharge within 45 days after the date on which notice of the surcharge is mailed to the employer or insurance company and shows that the violation was due to mistake or an absence of information. A surcharge imposed under this subsection is due within 30 days after the date on which notice of the surcharge is mailed to the employer or insurance company. Interest shall accrue on amounts that are not paid when due at the rate of 1 percent per month. All surcharges and interest payments received under this subsection shall be deposited in the fund established under s. 102.65.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- DeBoer Transportation, Inc. v. Swenson (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2011, 335 Wis. 2d 599)“…whether, under Wisconsin's worker's compensation statute, Wis. Stat. § 102.35 (3) (2009-10), 3 deBoer refused to reh…”
- Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2001, 250 Wis. 2d 246)“…ad previously ordered Beverly Enterprises to pay her under Wis. Stat. § 102.35 (3) (1997-98) for wrongful refusal to r…”
- Byers v. Labor & Industry Review Commission (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1997, 208 Wis. 2d 388)“…to rehire based on an injury in the course of employment, Wis. Stat. § 102.35 (3), and that the WCA provides the excl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 104: Minimum Wage Law
§ 104.12Complaints.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any person may register with the department a complaint that the wages paid to an employee for whom a minimum wage has been established under s. 104.035 are less than that minimum wage, and the department shall investigate the matter and take all proceedings necessary to enforce the payment of that minimum wage. Section 111.322 (2m) applies to discharge and other discriminatory acts arising in connection with any proceeding under this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 109: Wage Payments, Claims And Collections
§ 109.03When wages payable; pay orders.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Required frequency of payments. Every employer shall as often as monthly pay to every employee engaged in the employer’s business, except those employees engaged in logging operations and farm labor, all wages earned by the employee to a day not more than 31 days prior to the date of payment. Employees engaged in logging operations and farm labor shall be paid all earned wages no less often than at regular quarterly intervals. Any employee who is absent at the time fixed for payment or who for any other reason is not paid at that time shall be paid thereafter at any time upon 6 days’ demand. The required frequency of wage payments provided in this subsection does not apply to any of the following: (a) Employees covered under a valid collective bargaining agreement establishing a different frequency for wage payments, including deferred payments exercised at the option of employees.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 75 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation held the right of action in Wis. Stat. 109.03(5) lets employees bring wage claims in circuit court without prior administrative review. Hubbard v. Messer held no civil penalty attaches where wages missed the 109.03(1) deadline but were fully paid before suit.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hubbard v. Messer (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2003, 267 Wis. 2d 92)✓An employer paid an employee's overdue wages in full fourteen months before he sued for a penalty; the court held that missing the section 109.03(1) payment deadline does not support increased wages when the wages are fully paid before the circuit court action begins.
- German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2000, 235 Wis. 2d 576)✓State Patrol officers sued for pay for on-duty lunch breaks; the court held section 109.03(5) lets an employee bring a wage claim in circuit court without first seeking administrative review, and that chapter 109 waives the state's sovereign immunity for such claims.
- Christopher Kieninger v. Crown Equipment Corporation (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2019)✓Forklift technicians wanted pay for driving a tool-stocked company van between home and their first and last service calls; the court held that commute is not wages earned under Wis. Stat. section 109.03(1) and reversed, granting the employer summary judgment.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Final Paycheck Laws: No Acceleration, Tiered Penalties
§ 109.075Cessation of health care benefits affecting employees, retirees and dependents; advance notice required.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) In this section: (a) “Affected employee, retiree or dependent” means an employee, retired employee or a surviving covered dependent of an employee or retired employee who loses, or may reasonably be expected to lose, his or her health care benefits provided by an employer who is required to give notice under sub. (2) because the employer has decided to cease providing health care benefits. (b) “Employee benefit plan” means a plan as defined in 29 USC 1002 (3). (c) “Employer” means any business enterprise that employs 50 or more persons in this state. (d) “Health care benefits” means coverage of health care expenses under an employee benefit plan. (2) Subject to sub. (5) or (6), an employer who has decided to cease providing health care benefits in this state shall promptly notify any affected employee, retiree or dependent and any collective bargaining representative of any affected employee, retiree or dependent in writing of such action no later than 60 days prior to the date that the cessation of health care benefits takes place. This subsection does not apply to a cessation of health care benefits that is caused by a strike or lockout.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Byrne v. Aurora Health Care Inc (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2019)“…and for cessation of health care benefits in violation of Wis. Stat. § 109.075. Aurora now moves to dismiss pursuant t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Severance Pay Laws (2026): Is Severance Required?
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 20: Appropriations And Budget Management
§ 20.931Prohibited boycotts.In force
(1) Definitions. In this section: (a) “Local governmental unit” means a political subdivision of this state, a special purpose district in this state, an agency or corporation of a political subdivision or special purpose district, or a combination or subunit of any of the foregoing. (b) “Prohibited boycott” means a refusal to deal with or a termination of business relations with Israel or a person doing business in Israel or in a territory under Israeli jurisdiction, if the refusal or termination is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with Israel or the territory. “Prohibited boycott” does not include an action taken for ordinary business purposes. (c) “State agency” means an association, authority, board, department, commission, independent agency, institution, office, society, or other body in state government created or authorized to be created by the constitution or any law. (2) Prohibition of boycotting and other actions. No state agency and no local governmental unit may adopt a rule, ordinance, policy, or procedure that involves the state agency or local governmental unit in a prohibited boycott.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 968: Commencement Of Criminal Proceedings
§ 968.26John Doe proceeding.In force
(1b) In this section: (a) “Crime” means any of the following: 1. Any Class A, B, C, or D felony under chs. 940 to 948 or 961. 2. A violation of any of the following if it is a Class E, F, G, H, or I felony: a. Section 940.04, 940.11, 940.22 (2), 940.225 (3), 940.29, 940.302 (2) (c), 940.32, 940.60 (2) or (3), 940.61, 940.62, 940.65 (2) or (3), 940.66 (2) (b) or (c) or (3), 941.32, 941.38 (2), 942.09 (2), 942.095, 943.10, 943.205, 943.32 (1), 946.43, 946.44, 946.47, 946.48, 947.016, 948.02 (3), 948.03 (2) (b) or (c), (3), or (4), 948.04, 948.055, 948.095, 948.10 (1) (a), 948.11, 948.13 (2) (a), 948.14, 948.20, 948.23 (1), (2), or (3) (c) 2. or 3., or 948.30 (1) or s. 940.19 (2), 2023 stats., s. 940.19 (4), 2023 stats., s. 940.19 (5), 2023 stats., s. 940.19 (6), 2023 stats., s. 940.195 (2), 2023 stats., s. 940.195 (4), 2023 stats., s. 940.195 (5), 2023 stats., s. 940.195 (6), 2023 stats., s. 940.198 (2) (b), 2023 stats., s. 940.198 (2) (c), 2023 stats., s. 940.198 (3), 2023 stats., s. 940.20, 2023 stats., s. 940.201, 2023 stats., s. 940.203, 2023 stats., s. 940.204, 2023 stats., s. 940.205, 2023 stats., s. 940.207, 2023 stats., or s. 940.208, 2023 stats. b.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 36 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Cummings (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1996, 199 Wis. 2d 721)“…ctively address questions concerning the interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 968.26 (1993-94), [1] the statute authorizin…”
- State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane County (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1997, 214 Wis. 2d 605)“…has been committed within that judge's jurisdiction, does Wis. Stat. § 968.26 1 (1995-96) 2…”
- Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. State (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2004, 272 Wis. 2d 208)“…appeal arises out of a John Doe investigation, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.26 (2001-02), [1] of certain legislators…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Wis. Stat. 230.90 - State Employee Whistleblower Protection(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wisconsin DWD - Protection from Retaliation: Whistleblower Law(dwd.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 111.322 - Fair Employment Act retaliation protections(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 146.997 - Health Care Employee whistleblower protections(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 46.90 - Elder Care abuse reporting protections(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 103.96 - Migrant Worker protections(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 101.595 - Toxic Substances employee protections(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 102.35 - Workers' Compensation retaliation protections(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wisconsin DWD - Information for Retaliation Protection(dwd.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 20.931 - current text (former Medicaid false claims provision, repealed 2015)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 111.39 - Fair Employment Act remedies(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 230.83 - Retaliatory action prohibited (State Employee Whistleblower Law)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 230.85 - Enforcement; 60-day complaint to the Division of Equal Rights and available remedies(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 230.81 - Employee disclosure; written-to-supervisor step and protected channels(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 230.80 - Definitions (employee, information, retaliatory action)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 101.599 - Remedies; civil forfeitures (30-day toxic substance complaint deadline)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.