Missouri
Missouri Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Missouri protects whistleblowers through both common law and statutory provisions. The public policy exception allows employees discharged for reporting a legal violation to seek legal recourse, and Mo. Rev. Stat. § 105.055 shields public employees from retaliation for disclosing misconduct or illegal activity.
A Summary of Missouri Whistleblower Laws
Missouri is an at-will employment state. Therefore, employers can discharge their employees for any reason or no reason. However, employees who have been discharged from work can still seek protection under the state's common law protections and statutory protections. Common law protections are laws that are created by courts to address areas that are not covered by the enacted laws, whereas statutory protections are laws that are enacted by the state's legislature to address specific subject areas, e.g., workers' compensation.

This is a summary of Missouri Whistleblower Laws, make sure to check out the Federal Whistleblower Laws as well.
Missouri Whistleblower Laws
Common Law Protections for Whistleblowers in Missouri
Missouri recognizes a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. This means it is unlawful for employers to discharge an employee for reasons that violate public policy. To determine if an employee's case is eligible for protection under the state's public policy, Missouri courts look at the state's statutes, regulations, and constitutional provisions. So if an employee is discharged for engaging in an activity and can point to a statute that was violated by the employer, e.g., filing a workers' compensation claim, there is a high chance the employee will be protected under the state's public policy. Generally, under Missouri's public policy, some activities are considered protected activities. Some of these activities include:
- Reporting a violation of a law, rule, or regulation.
- Exercising a legal right.
- Refusing to participate in illegal activities.
However, the Missouri whistleblower act, which was enacted in 2017, covers most of these activities and therefore limits the use and expansion of the state's public policy. This general Act applies only to private employers with 6 or more employees for 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding year, and it expressly excludes the state of Missouri, its agencies, and other public employers, who are covered separately under § 105.055 above. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 285.575(3) also states that the Act, together with chapter 213 (discrimination) and chapter 287 (workers' compensation), provides the exclusive remedy for claims of unlawful employment practices.
Statutory Protections for Whistleblowers in Missouri
Public Employees
No supervisor or appointing authority is allowed to take any disciplinary action against a public employee in retaliation for:
- Disclosing a violation of a law, rule, or regulation.
- Disclosing an abuse of authority, mismanagement, waste of funds, violation of a policy, waste of public resources, alteration of technical findings or communication of scientific opinion, breaches of professional ethical canons, or a substantial danger to public health and safety.
Supervisors and appointing authorities are also not allowed to require their employees to give notice to the supervisor before making disclosures under this statute and to prevent employees from testifying before an administrative body or legislative body investigating the violation of a law or illegal activities. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 105.055.
Discrimination
It is considered unlawful for an employer to in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for:
- Opposing discriminatory practices forbidden under this statute.
- Filing a complaint under this statute.
- Testifying or participating in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this statute.
Under this statute, discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, ancestry, age, disability, or familial status is forbidden. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.070.
Health Care Fraud
Employers are not allowed to discharge, threaten, harass, alter terms of employment, or in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for assisting or participating in a proceeding concerning fraudulent healthcare claims. Mo. Rev. Stat. §191.908.
Nursing Care Workers
No employee of a nursing home district with authority is allowed to harass or in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for reporting a violation or suspected violation of a law, ordinance, or regulation concerning the facility. Mo. Rev. Stat. §198.301.
Municipal police (repealed in 2025)
Missouri formerly made it unlawful for an employee or a representative of a municipal police force to discharge, alter the terms of employment of, or in any way discriminate against an employee of the police force in retaliation for reporting another employee's illegal conduct in good faith to the press or a government agency. That provision, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 84.342, was repealed in 2025 by House Bill 495. The revisor's page for the section now carries only the notation "(Repealed L. 2025 H.B. 495)," and chapter 84 contains no successor retaliation provision.
Police force employees are still public employees. Section 105.055 defines a "public employer" to include "any unit or political subdivision of the state," so an employee of a city police department is covered by the public employee protections described above. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 84.342 (repealed 2025).
Abuse of offenders in Correctional Facilities
Persons with authority in correctional centers that are funded or operated by the state are not allowed to discharge, harass or in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for reporting a violation or suspected violation of laws, ordinances, or regulations that apply to the correctional center. Under this statute, employees with knowledge of abuse of an offender in a correctional center which is funded or operated by the state are required to report the abuse in writing to the director. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 217.410.
Workers' Compensation
Employers are not allowed to discharge or in any way discriminate against an employee in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.780.
Whistleblower Hotlines in Missouri
To file a complaint under the public employees statute, call the State of Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission at (573) 751-2422.
To file a complaint under the discrimination statute, call the Missouri Commission on Human Rights at 1-877-781-4236.
Whistleblower Retaliation Claims in Missouri
Unless stated otherwise by a statute, retaliation claims should be filed within 5 years of the retaliation.
Public Employees
Retaliation claims under this statute should be filed with the administrative commission within 1 year of the retaliatory action.
Discrimination
Complaints under this statute should be filed with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights (MCHR) within 180 days of the retaliation. If MCHR is unable to resolve the complaint within 180 days, the aggrieved individual can request a 'right to sue letter'. Upon the receipt of the letter, the individual then has 90 days to file a lawsuit. The 180-day MCHR filing and the 90-day lawsuit window are separate deadlines, so have a Missouri employment lawyer check your retaliation complaint against both deadlines in a free case evaluation (attorney advertising).
Whistleblower Retaliation and Violation Penalties in Missouri
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 285.575, Missouri's general Whistleblower's Protection Act, applies only to private employers with 6 or more employees and expressly excludes the state of Missouri and its agencies (covered separately above under Public Employees). It states that the only remedies available in a private right of action under the Act are:
- Back pay.
- Reimbursement of medical bills directly related to the violation.
- If the employee proves by clear and convincing evidence that the employer's conduct was outrageous because of evil motive or reckless indifference, double the amount of the above two remedies as liquidated damages.
The court may also award the prevailing party court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
Public Employees
The court may award a complainant actual damages and also all or a portion of the litigation costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. Also, violators of this statute may receive the following punishments:
- Suspension without pay for not more than 30 days.
- In the case of willful and repeated violations, the violator may be discharged from his or her job position and be banned from working as a state employee for not more than 2 years.
Discrimination
On a finding of an unlawful discriminatory practice the commission may order relief from the list below, matched to the kind of violation. The housing, public accommodation and real estate entries belong to housing and real estate cases; an employment retaliation claim draws on the back pay, reinstatement and actual damages entries.
- Payment of back pay.
- Reinstatement to the previous job position or hiring to the applied position.
- Extension of full, equal, and unsegregated housing.
- Extension of full, equal, and unsegregated public accommodations.
- Extension of a commercial real estate loan or other financial assistance.
- Extension or restoration of membership or participation in any multiple listing service or other real estate service organization or facility.
- Payment of actual damages.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.075 also lets the commission assess a civil penalty, but only where the respondent violated section 213.040, 213.045 or 213.050, or violated section 213.070 "to the extent that the alleged violation of section 213.070 relates to or involves a violation of one or more of such other sections." Those three sections cover housing discrimination, commercial real estate loans, and selling or renting by real estate agencies, so a freestanding employment retaliation claim under section 213.070 carries no civil penalty. Where the penalty does apply, it is:
- Not more than $2,000 if the respondent has not been adjudged to have violated one or more of those sections within the 5 years before the complaint was filed.
- Not more than $5,000 if the respondent has been adjudged to have committed one other violation within the 5 years before the complaint was filed.
- Not more than $10,000 if the respondent has been adjudged to have committed 2 or more other violations within the 7 years before the complaint was filed.
Any penalty is paid to the human rights fund, not to the complainant. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.075.
Health Care Fraud
Employers who carry out unlawful retaliation against an employee may be liable to the aggrieved employee for:
- Reinstatement to previous job position without loss of seniority.
- Two times the amount of lost pay.
- Interest on back pay at a rate which is 1% over the prime rate.
Abuse of offenders in Correctional Facilities
Employees who fail to make a report as required by this statute within a reasonable time may be found guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
Workers' Compensation
An aggrieved employee under this statute can file a civil action for damages against his or her employer. Section 287.780 provides only this civil remedy and carries no criminal penalty. Chapter 287's general catch-all penalty at Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.790, a fine of $50 to $500 or imprisonment in the county jail for 1 week to 1 year, or both, applies only to chapter 287 violations for which no specific penalty is otherwise provided, so it does not apply to a Section 287.780 violation.
More Missouri Laws
Updates
Corrected the municipal police section, which described a whistleblower statute (Mo. Rev. Stat. 84.342) that Missouri repealed in 2025, and clarified that the 213.075 civil penalties of $2,000 to $10,000 apply to housing and real estate discrimination rather than to a standalone employment retaliation claim.
Clarified that Missouri's general Whistleblower's Protection Act (285.575) covers only private employers with 6 or more employees and does not apply to the state or public agencies, corrected a criminal penalty wrongly attributed to the workers'-compensation retaliation statute (287.780 provides only a civil remedy; the fine/jail language belongs to the unrelated chapter 287 catch-all and does not apply here), and added the correct citation for the discrimination-retaliation civil penalty tiers (213.075).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the general remedies list to match Mo. Rev. Stat. 285.575's actual 'only remedies available' clause (back pay, medical-bill reimbursement, and possible liquidated doubling, not injunctive relief or reinstatement), and added that the Act makes itself, chapter 213, and chapter 287 the exclusive remedy for claims of unlawful employment practices.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XVIII (LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS), Chapter 285
§ 285.575Citation of law — definitions — at-will employment doctrine codified — protected persons, prohibited discharge — action for damages, when, remedies.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
1. This section shall be known and may be cited as the "Whistleblower's Protection Act". 2. As used in this section, the following terms shall mean: (1) "Because" or "because of", as it relates to the adverse decision or action, the person's status as a protected person was the motivating factor; (2) "Employer", an entity that has six or more employees for each working day in each of twenty or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year. "Employer" shall not include the state of Missouri or its agencies, instrumentalities, or political subdivisions, including but not limited to any public institution of higher education, a corporation wholly owned by the state of Missouri, an individual employed by an employer, or corporations and associations owned or operated by religious or sectarian organizations; (3) "Proper authorities", a governmental or law enforcement agency, an officer of an employee's employer, the employee's supervisor employed by the employer, or the employee's human resources representative employed by the employer; (4) "Protected person", an employee of an employer who has reported to the proper authorities an unlawful act of his or her…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hazel Erby v. St. Louis County (Missouri Court of Appeals 2025)“…e Whistleblower’s Protection Act for non-public entities in § 285.575, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2018). 3 Unless otherwise…”
- Trina Dorsey v. JPAM Consulting, Inc. (Missouri Court of Appeals 2022)“…lized Dorsey 2 Section 213.010, RSMo. 2000, et seq. 3 Section 285.575, RSMo. 2000, et seq. 4 See Mo. R. Civ. P. 5…”
- Mitchell v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2024)“…under Missouri’s Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), Mo. Rev. Stat. § 285.575, alleging that her employer, defendant…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Missouri Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights, Missouri At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights, Wrongful Termination in Missouri (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title VIII (PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, BONDS AND RECORDS), Chapter 105
§ 105.055Reporting of mismanagement or violations of agencies, discipline of employee prohibited — appeal by employee from disciplinary actions, procedure — violation, penalties — civil action, when — auditor to investigate, when.In force
1. As used in this section, the following terms mean: (1) "Disciplinary action", any dismissal, demotion, transfer, reassignment, suspension, reprimand, warning of possible dismissal or withholding of work, regardless of whether the withholding of work has affected or will affect the employee's compensation; (2) "Public employee", any employee, volunteer, intern, or other individual performing work or services for a public employer; (3) "Public employer", any state agency or office, the general assembly, any legislative or governing body of the state, any unit or political subdivision of the state, or any other instrumentality of the state. 2. No supervisor or appointing authority of any public employer shall prohibit any employee of the public employer from discussing the operations of the public employer, either specifically or generally, with any member of the legislature, state auditor, attorney general, a prosecuting or circuit attorney, a law enforcement agency, news media, the public, or any state official or body charged with investigating any alleged misconduct described in this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Colleen Spurlock v. City of Columbia, Missouri (Missouri Court of Appeals 2023)“…ef under Missouri’s public-employee whistleblower statute, section 105.055, RSMo.1 We reverse and remand for further pr…”
- Hazel Erby v. St. Louis County (Missouri Court of Appeals 2025)“…RA) and protections for public-entity whistleblowers under § 105.055, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2018), the Public Employee…”
- Jim Marcantonio v. The Board of Curators of Lincoln University A/K/A Lincoln University (Missouri Court of Appeals 2024)“…tion of the Missouri state-employee whistleblower statute, § 105.055, RSMo. Marcantonio later voluntarily dismiss…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XII (PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE), Chapter 213
§ 213.070Additional unlawful discriminatory practices.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer, employment agency, labor organization, or place of public accommodation: (1) To aid, abet, incite, compel, or coerce the commission of acts prohibited under this chapter or to attempt to do so; (2) To retaliate or discriminate in any manner against any other person because such person has opposed any practice prohibited by this chapter or because such person has filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in any investigation, proceeding or hearing conducted pursuant to this chapter; (3) For the state or any political subdivision of this state to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, ancestry, age, as it relates to employment, disability, or familial status as it relates to housing; or (4) To discriminate in any manner against any other person because of such person's association with any person protected by this chapter. 2. This chapter, in addition to chapter 285 and chapter 287, shall provide the exclusive remedy for any and all claims for injury or damages arising out of an employment relationship.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 72 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State ex rel. Jim Swoboda v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights, Alisa Warren, and Armstrong Teasdale, LLP (Supreme Court of Missouri 2022)“…ut of an employment relationship.” (emphasis added)), with section 213.070, RSMo 2016 (lacking any language regarding an…”
- Missouri Commission on Human Rights v. Red Dragon Restaurant, Inc. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1999, 991 S.W.2d 161)“…gon argues that associational discrimination as embodied in § 213.070, RSMo Supp.1992, was not effective when the d…”
- Sloan v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1999, 1 S.W.3d 555)“…eding or hearing conducted pursuant to this chapter. § 213.070, RSMo 1994. Under the MHRA, an “employer” is…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Missouri Workplace Harassment Laws: 6-Employee Rule, 180 Days (2026)
§ 213.075Complaints to commission, how filed, when — filing with federal agencies, effect — duties of executive director — respondents — hearing, notice, procedure — attorney general to represent commission — appeal, discovery — effect of orders of commission.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
1. As a jurisdictional condition precedent to filing a civil action under this chapter, any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice shall make, sign and file with the commission a verified complaint in writing, within one hundred eighty days of the alleged act of discrimination, which shall state the name and address of the employer, employment agency, labor organization, or place of public accommodation alleged to have committed the unlawful discriminatory practice and which shall set forth the particulars thereof and such other information as may be required by the commission. The complainant's agent, attorney or the attorney general may, in like manner, make, sign and file such complaint. The failure to timely file a complaint with the commission shall deprive the commission of jurisdiction to investigate the complaint. The commission shall make a determination as to its jurisdiction with respect to all complaints. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter to the contrary, if a complaint is not filed with the commission within one hundred eighty days of the alleged act of discrimination, the commission shall lack jurisdiction to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 81 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- G. Steven Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc. (Supreme Court of Missouri 2015)“…his claim to the Missouri Commission on Human Rights under § 213.075, RSMo 2000. Because Cox presented the Commiss…”
- Hill v. John Chezik Imports (Missouri Court of Appeals 1990, 797 S.W.2d 528)“…souri Commission on Human Rights (“Commission”) pursuant to Section 213.075, RSMo 1986. On September 23, 1987, she receiv…”
- Keeney v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission (Missouri Court of Appeals 2002, 70 S.W.3d 597)“…le procedures discussed in Ham-by refer to § 213.075, RSMo 1994. The pro *601 c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XVIII (LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS), Chapter 287
§ 287.780Discrimination because of exercising compensation rights prohibited — civil action for damages — motivating factor defined.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
No employer or agent shall discharge or discriminate against any employee for exercising any of his or her rights under this chapter when the exercising of such rights is the motivating factor in the discharge or discrimination. Any employee who has been discharged or discriminated against in such manner shall have a civil action for damages against his or her employer. For purposes of this section, "motivating factor" shall mean that the employee's exercise of his or her rights under this chapter actually played a role in the discharge or discrimination and had a determinative influence on the discharge or discrimination.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 110 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hansome v. Northwestern Cooperage Co. (Supreme Court of Missouri 1984, 679 S.W.2d 273)“…e principal opinion indicates, recovery is authorized under § 287.780, RSMo 1978, only if an exclusive causal relat…”
- John Templemire v. W&M Welding, Inc. (Supreme Court of Missouri 2014, 433 S.W.3d 371)“…rt’s prior decisions in Hansome and Crabtree . Section 287.780, RSMo 2000, permits an employee to bring a ci…”
- Arie v. Intertherm, Inc. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1983, 648 S.W.2d 142)“…Mrs. Arie’s petition is based upon an alleged violation of § 287.780 RSMo.1978, an action under the statute lies…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Missouri Workers' Compensation Laws: Benefits, Deadlines, and Your Rights
§ 287.790Penalty not specifically provided — misdemeanor.In force
Any person, corporation, his or its directors, officers or agents, or any other person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter for which a penalty has not herein been specifically provided, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment in the county jail for not less than one week and not more than one year or both such fine and imprisonment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XII (PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE), Chapter 198
§ 198.301Whistleblower protection for employees — availability of information on rights of persons retaliated against.In force
No employee of a nursing home district who directs or exercises any authority in a facility shall evict, harass, dismiss, or retaliate against a resident or employee because such resident or employee or any member of such resident's or employee's family has made a report of any violation or suspected violation of laws, ordinances, or regulations applying to the facility which the resident, the resident's family, or an employee has reasonable cause to believe has been committed or has occurred. Through the existing department information and referral telephone contact line, residents, their families, and employees of a facility shall be able to obtain information about their rights, protections, and options in cases of eviction, harassment, dismissal, or retaliation due to a report being made pursuant to this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XII (PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE), Chapter 191
§ 191.908Whistleblower protections — violations, penalty.In force
1. An employer shall not discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or otherwise discriminate against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment because the employee initiates, assists in, or participates in a proceeding or court action under sections 191.900 to 191.910. Such prohibition shall not apply to an employment action against an employee who: (1) The court finds brought a frivolous or clearly vexatious claim; (2) The court finds to have planned, initiated, or participated in the conduct upon which the action is brought; or (3) Is convicted of criminal conduct arising from a violation of sections 191.900 to 191.910. 2. An employer who violates this section is liable to the employee for all of the following: (1) Reinstatement to the employee's position without loss of seniority; (2) Two times the amount of lost back pay; (3) Interest on the back pay at the rate of one percent over the prime rate.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dopplick v. Ortheco LLC (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2023)“…1.900 to 191.910. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 191.908.1.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XIII (CORRECTIONAL AND PENAL INSTITUTIONS), Chapter 217
§ 217.410Abuse of offender, duty to report, penalty — confidentiality of report, immunity from liability — harassment prohibited.In force
1. When any employee of the department has reasonable cause to believe that an offender in a correctional center operated or funded by the department has been abused, he shall immediately report it in writing to the director. 2. The written report shall contain the name and address of the correctional center; the name of the offender; information regarding the nature of the abuse; the name of the complainant; and any other information which might be helpful in an investigation. 3. Any person required by subsection 1 of this section to report or cause a report to be made, but who fails to do so within a reasonable time after the act of abuse or neglect is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. 4. In addition to those persons required to report under subsection 1 of this section, any other person having reasonable cause to believe that an offender has been abused may report such information to the director. 5. Upon receipt of a report, the department shall initiate an investigation within twenty-four hours.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dean v. Bearden (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2019)“…acterize the foregoing acts as “ministerial” by relying on Mo. Rev. Stat. § 217.410 (2019), which concerns the reporting o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Sources and References
- Mo. Rev. Stat. § 285.575: Whistleblower's Protection Act(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Mo. Rev. Stat. § 84.342 (repealed by L. 2025 H.B. 495)(revisor.mo.gov)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.075: Commission procedures, remedies and civil penalties(revisor.mo.gov)
- Mo. Rev. Stat. § 105.055: Public employee whistleblower protections(revisor.mo.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.