EnglishEspañol
Arkansas flag

Arkansas

Arkansas Phone Call Recording Laws: Landline, Cell, and VoIP Rules (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arkansas Phone Call Recording Laws: Landline, Cell, and VoIP Rules (2026)

Updates

We added Nevada (all-party for phone calls) to the interstate table, removed an unsupported claim that Arkansas courts have applied the recording law to VoIP calls, described federal Wiretap Act damages as discretionary rather than a $10,000 minimum, and clarified that courts decide case by case which state's law governs an interstate call. Renamed a heading that implied a "stricter law applies" rule the section itself says does not exist.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Corrected the Oregon entry in the interstate calls table: Oregon allows a participant to record phone calls, but every participant must be informed before an in-person conversation or a video call is recorded.

Corrected the description of Dunlap v. McCarty: the Arkansas Supreme Court listed intrusion among the actionable privacy torts but decided the case on statute-of-limitations grounds without ruling on an intrusion claim.

Corrected the FCC order number for the vacated one-to-one robocall consent rule (it is FCC 23-107, not 'FCC Order 24-24'), removed an unrelated and outdated CFR citation that did not belong in the discussion, and added Delaware and Oregon to the all-party-consent-states table with precise, sourced phrasing reflecting each state's actual nuance.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Spoke propagation: Swapped Justia AR statute links to arkleg.state.ar.us. Added civil route clarification: Chapter 60 is criminal-only; civil plaintiffs may pursue federal ECPA § 2520 and Arkansas common-law invasion of privacy (see Dunlap v. McCarty, which lists intrusion among the actionable privacy torts but decided the case on limitations grounds). Added FCC 23-107 vacated notice (11th Cir. 2025). Added [TAKE IT DOWN Act](/us-laws/take-it-down-act) federal overlay.

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Ark. Code 5-60-120 - Interception and Recording(law.justia.com)
  2. 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
  3. 18 U.S.C. 2520 - Civil Remedies for Wiretap Violations(law.cornell.edu)
  4. FCC - Telemarketing and Robocalls(fcc.gov).gov
  5. Arkansas Department of Human Services(humanservices.arkansas.gov).gov
  6. Arkansas General Assembly(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
  7. Act 600 of 2025 - Tracking Device Harassment Amendment(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
  8. Ark. Code 5-60-120 - Interception and Recording(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
  9. TAKE IT DOWN Act, Pub. L. No. 119-12 (May 19, 2025) - NCII and deepfake platform takedown duty(congress.gov).gov
  10. Insurance Marketing Coalition Ltd. v. FCC, 127 F.4th 303 (11th Cir. 2025) - FCC 23-107 vacated(docs.fcc.gov).gov
  11. Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 165, ORS 165.535 and 165.540 (Oregon State Legislature)(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
Share: