Arkansas
Arkansas Laws on Recording in Public: Your Complete Guide (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Recording in public places in Arkansas is broadly legal. Arkansas has no statute prohibiting video recording in public spaces where people have no reasonable expectation of privacy, and the First Amendment protects that activity. Audio recording of conversations you are part of is permitted under Ark. Code Ann. 5-60-120, but recording other people's conversations without a participant's consent can violate that same law, even in public.
Recording in public places in Arkansas is broadly legal. No statute bars filming what is visible in public, and the First Amendment protects gathering information in public. Audio is different: Ark. Code 5-60-120 bars recording a conversation you are not part of without a participant's consent, even in public. Whether you are filming on a sidewalk, recording a protest, capturing a government meeting, or photographing a building, Arkansas law is generally permissive.
This guide covers every major aspect of recording in public in Arkansas, including the legal basis, the limits, private property considerations, and how to handle situations where someone objects to being recorded.
The Legal Basis for Recording in Public
No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
The foundation of public recording rights is the principle that people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in public spaces. When you are on a public street, in a park, at a public event, or in any other area open to the general public, anything visible to passersby can generally be photographed or filmed. Audio of other people's conversations is a separate question, covered below.

This principle is well established in American law and applies in Arkansas through both state common law and federal constitutional protections.
First Amendment Protections
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the right to gather information in public. Federal courts have recognized that recording in public, including photography, videography, and audio recording, is a form of expression and information gathering protected by the First Amendment.
Multiple federal circuits have recognized First Amendment protection for recording in public. Arkansas is in the Eighth Circuit. The Eighth Circuit has addressed the right to record police more cautiously than other circuits. A divided 2-1 panel in Molina v. Book, 59 F.4th 334 (8th Cir. 2023), held the right was not clearly established for qualified-immunity purposes as of a 2015 incident, though the dissenting judge argued that earlier Eighth Circuit cases had already clearly established a First Amendment right to observe police. The court did allow one of the three plaintiffs, Peter Groce, to proceed against the individual officers in the armored vehicle on a First Amendment retaliation claim based on his verbal criticism of the officers, not on recording. However, the broader principle that recording the police is constitutionally protected activity is well supported nationally, including in Turner v. Driver, 848 F.3d 678 (5th Cir. 2017) (a persuasive authority from a neighboring circuit), which held that the First Amendment protects the right to record the police, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions, and in DOJ guidance.
Arkansas State Law
No Arkansas statute specifically grants a right to record in public; the limits come from:
- Ark. Code 5-60-120 (wiretapping): One-party consent for audio recording
- Ark. Code 5-16-101 (voyeurism): Prohibits secret recording in private areas
- Ark. Code 25-19-106 (FOIA): Requires government meetings to be open; the right to video record them comes from Attorney General guidance (Op. Att'y Gen. 2012-022)
- Ark. Code 5-60-103(e) (drones): Bars using a drone to capture images of a person or private property in order to surveil them
- General privacy principles: People in public have reduced privacy expectations
Where You Can Record in Arkansas

Public Streets, Sidewalks, and Parks
You can freely record on any public street, sidewalk, park, plaza, or other public right-of-way in Arkansas. No consent is needed. No notification is required. You can photograph or film anything visible from these locations, and audio record conversations you take part in.
Government Buildings and Public Property
You can generally record inside government buildings that are open to the public, including:
- County courthouses (in public areas, not courtrooms without permission)
- City halls
- State Capitol building
- Public libraries
- DMV offices
- Post offices (subject to federal regulations)
Individual buildings may have specific rules about recording in certain areas. Courtrooms, for example, typically require the judge's permission before recording. The Arkansas Judiciary sets rules for electronic devices in courtrooms.
Public Transportation
You can record on public transportation systems in Arkansas, including buses and transit stations. These are public spaces where passengers have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their visible activity.
Public Events and Gatherings
Public events such as festivals, parades, rallies, demonstrations, concerts in public parks, and sporting events in public venues can all be recorded. If the event is in a public space and open to the general public, recording is permitted.
Government Meetings
The Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (Ark. Code 25-19-106) requires that meetings of public bodies be open to the public. Act 310 of 2021 amended the FOIA's public-records section, Ark. Code 25-19-105, so that copying a public record includes "copying through image capture, including still and moving photography and video and digital recording." It did not change the open-meetings section. The right to record a meeting comes instead from the Attorney General, who has said citizens may videotape a public meeting "as long as the videotaping does not disrupt the meeting," subject to reasonable limitations (Op. Att'y Gen. 2012-022).
Public meetings you can record include:
- City council meetings
- County quorum court meetings
- School board meetings
- State agency board meetings
- Public hearings and planning commission meetings
- Meetings of any organization supported by public funds
Enforcement: Any citizen denied the rights the FOIA grants, such as access to an open meeting, may appeal immediately to circuit court under Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-107, and the court must set a hearing within seven days of the application. Those who refuse to comply with the court's orders are guilty of contempt of court under § 25-19-107(c). Because the right to video record rests on an Attorney General opinion rather than the statute's text, it is less certain how a court would treat a denial of recording alone. Public bodies must also record each public meeting themselves and keep the recording for at least one year under § 25-19-106(d)(3), as amended by Act 505 of 2025. The Arkansas Attorney General provides FOIA guidance, and the 2025 FOIA Handbook details public recording rights.
Where Recording May Be Restricted

Private Property Open to the Public
Businesses and other private properties that are open to the public can restrict recording on their premises. Even though you are invited in as a customer, the property owner retains the right to set rules about photography and filming.
Common examples of private properties that may restrict recording:
- Retail stores and shopping malls
- Restaurants and bars
- Movie theaters
- Private museums and galleries
- Hospitals and medical facilities
- Houses of worship
- Private schools and universities
If a business asks you to stop recording and you refuse, you can be asked to leave. Remaining after being told to leave can result in trespassing charges under Ark. Code 5-39-203.
Courtrooms
Recording in Arkansas courtrooms is subject to the discretion of the presiding judge. The Arkansas Supreme Court has established guidelines for electronic devices in courtrooms. Judges may permit recording of proceedings, but you must obtain permission before bringing cameras or recording equipment into a courtroom.
Polling Places
Arkansas law may restrict recording inside polling places during elections. Voters should check current election guidelines from the Arkansas Secretary of State before attempting to record inside a polling location.
Military Installations
Recording on federal military installations within Arkansas (such as Little Rock Air Force Base or Fort Chaffee) is subject to federal regulations. Photography and filming may be restricted or prohibited in certain areas for national security reasons.
Audio Recording in Public

One-Party Consent in Public Spaces
Audio recording in public follows the same one-party consent rule that applies everywhere in Arkansas under Ark. Code 5-60-120. If you are part of a conversation in public, you can record it.
Recording Conversations You Are Not Part Of
Arkansas's wiretap law, Ark. Code 5-60-120, makes it a crime to intercept and record an oral communication unless you are a party to it or a party has given prior consent. Unlike the federal Wiretap Act, it does not say that only conversations held with an expectation of privacy are protected, and Arkansas does not define "oral communication" by statute.
Arkansas courts have not settled whether a conversation held openly in public is covered. Deliberately recording other people's conversations, even outdoors, therefore carries legal risk.
As a practical matter, ambient audio captured by a camera filming a public scene is rarely a legal concern. The issue arises when someone deliberately targets a specific private conversation for interception.
Street Performers, Speeches, and Public Announcements
You can record anyone who is performing, speaking, or making announcements in a public space. Street musicians, public speakers, protesters with megaphones, and anyone else who is intentionally projecting their voice to a public audience can be recorded. Recording a public speech, performance or announcement made to an audience is very low risk.
Recording Protests and Demonstrations
Your Right to Record
Recording protests and demonstrations in public is a core First Amendment activity. You can record:
- Protesters and their signs, chants, and speeches
- Counter-protesters
- Police officers and their actions
- The general scene and crowd activity
Interactions with Law Enforcement at Protests
If police are present at a protest, you can generally record their activity from a lawful position. Recording police is widely protected, but the Eighth Circuit, which covers Arkansas, has not decided whether the First Amendment protects it, so an order to stop can be hard to challenge in court. Officers may hold a phone they believe contains evidence while they seek a warrant, but under Riley v. California (2014) they generally need a warrant to search it. No law gives police authority to make you delete a recording. For detailed information, see our page on recording police in Arkansas.
If an Unlawful Assembly Is Declared
If police declare an unlawful assembly and order the crowd to disperse, you must comply with the dispersal order. However, you can continue recording while leaving the area. Journalists and legal observers are generally permitted to remain in the vicinity, though this is subject to law enforcement discretion.
Protecting Your Footage
When recording at protests:
- Livestream to a cloud platform for real-time backup
- Use a passcode lock on your phone (not just biometric)
- Consider using a dedicated camera separate from your phone
- Enable automatic cloud backup for photos and videos
Recording in Stores and Restaurants
General Rule
You can generally take photos or record video inside stores and restaurants unless the business has a policy prohibiting it. Many businesses allow casual photography (such as taking a photo of a product) but may restrict filming with professional equipment or for commercial purposes.
When the Business Says No
If a business asks you to stop recording:
- You should comply with the request
- If you refuse, the business can ask you to leave
- If you refuse to leave, you may be trespassing
- You can continue recording once you are back on public property (the sidewalk outside the store)
Recording Disputes and Confrontations
If you are involved in a dispute with a business (a customer service issue, a return disagreement, etc.), you can record your own conversation under one-party consent. This is your interaction, and you are a party to it.
Photography and Filming for Commercial Use
Public Spaces
Commercial photography and filming in public spaces is generally permitted in Arkansas. However, some municipalities may require permits for large-scale commercial productions that use public resources (blocking streets, using public utilities, etc.).
Likeness and Consent
While you can photograph or film people in public, using someone's likeness for commercial purposes (advertising, product promotion, etc.) may require their consent. This falls under publicity rights, which are separate from recording law. If you plan to use images of identifiable individuals for commercial purposes, obtain a signed release.
Drone Filming
Commercial drone filming in Arkansas is subject to FAA regulations. Commercial operators must hold a Remote Pilot Certificate under 14 CFR Part 107. Separately, Ark. Code 5-60-103 makes it unlawful to use a drone to surveil critical infrastructure, such as power plants, refineries, chemical facilities, communication towers, and correctional facilities, without the owner's written consent. This is a Class B misdemeanor for a first offense and a Class A misdemeanor for a second or subsequent offense, and it does not apply to a person surveilling their own or leased property, insurance investigations, law enforcement officers on duty, or highway and public-works agencies and their contractors. Since Act 597 of 2025, the same section also makes it a Class C misdemeanor to purposely use a drone to capture an image of a person or private property in order to conduct surveillance on them (5-60-103(e)). These offenses do not apply to a drone operated for a commercial purpose in compliance with FAA regulations, authorizations, or exemptions, which the statute excludes from its definition of an unmanned aircraft system (5-60-103(a)(3)(B)(iv)), and an image captured lawfully under Ark. Code 27-118-101 is a defense to the image offense. Possessing, sharing, or distributing such an image is a separate offense under 5-60-126, and the owner or tenant of the property can sue under the civil action Act 597 of 2025 enacted as Ark. Code 16-118-119 (Act 827 of 2025 also enacted a section numbered 16-118-119, so the codified number may differ) for $5,000 for the images captured in a single episode or $10,000 for disclosing or distributing them, within two years; the court awards costs and attorney's fees to the prevailing party. Using a drone to secretly photograph or record someone in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy can also fall under the state's voyeurism statute, Ark. Code 5-16-101.
Can Someone Demand You Delete a Recording?
No Legal Obligation to Delete
In Arkansas, a private citizen generally cannot compel you to delete a recording made in a public place. You have no legal obligation to delete photos or videos of events or people in public simply because someone asks you to.
Exceptions
There are limited exceptions:
- A court order may require deletion or surrender of recordings
- If the recording captures content that is illegal to possess (such as child sexual exploitation material), possession itself is a crime
- If you obtained the recording through trespassing or other illegal means, the recording may need to be surrendered as part of legal proceedings
Practical Considerations
Even though you are not legally required to delete a recording, consider the situation. If someone is genuinely distressed about being recorded and the recording serves no important purpose, voluntary courtesy may be appropriate. However, this is a personal choice, not a legal obligation.
Using Public Recordings as Evidence
Admissibility
Recordings made legally in public spaces are generally admissible as evidence in Arkansas courts. The proponent must authenticate the recording and establish its relevance.
Common Evidentiary Uses
Public recordings are commonly used as evidence in:
- Car accident cases
- Slip and fall incidents on public property
- Assault and battery cases
- Police misconduct claims
- Property disputes
- Insurance claims
Explore More Arkansas Recording Law Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Arkansas Recording Laws
More Arkansas Recording Topics
More Arkansas Laws
- Arkansas AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Arkansas Dashcam Laws
- Arkansas Data Privacy Laws
- Arkansas Deepfake Laws
- Arkansas Employee Monitoring Laws
- Arkansas GPS Tracking Laws
- Arkansas Police Bodycam Laws
- Arkansas Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need permission to record video in public in Arkansas?
No. Arkansas has no law requiring permission to record video in public spaces. You can freely film on public streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public areas. People in public have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their visible activity.
Can a store owner tell me to stop recording in their business?
Yes. Private businesses open to the public can restrict recording on their premises. If a store owner or employee asks you to stop recording, you should comply. Refusing to leave after being asked can result in trespassing charges. You can resume recording once you are on public property outside the business.
Can I record a government meeting in Arkansas?
Generally, yes. Arkansas's FOIA requires meetings of public bodies, such as city councils, school boards, and county quorum courts, to be open (Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-106), and the Arkansas Attorney General has said private citizens may videotape an open meeting as long as the videotaping does not disrupt it, subject to reasonable limitations (Op. Att'y Gen. 2012-022). No statute expressly grants the right; Act 310 of 2021 covers copying public records by photo or video, not meetings. A citizen denied rights under the FOIA may appeal to circuit court under § 25-19-107. Public bodies must also keep their own recording of each public meeting for at least one year.
Can someone make me delete a recording taken in public in Arkansas?
No. You have no legal obligation to delete a recording made in a public place simply because someone asks you to. A court order can require you to surrender recordings. No law gives police authority to order you to delete a recording, although officers may hold a phone they believe contains evidence while they seek a warrant to search it.
Can I livestream in public in Arkansas?
Yes. Livestreaming in public spaces is legal in Arkansas and is protected under the same First Amendment principles that protect recording. You can livestream on social media platforms from any public location where you have a right to be.
Updates
We corrected this page to explain that Arkansas's right to video record public meetings comes from an Attorney General opinion rather than a statute (Act 310 of 2021 covers copying public records), added the 2025 drone-surveillance offense and civil action, stated that the wiretap law has no expectation-of-privacy test for other people's conversations, and clarified that the Eighth Circuit has not decided whether recording police is protected. Corrected the introduction, which said no Arkansas statute restricts audio recording in public (Ark. Code 5-60-120 bars recording others' conversations without a participant's consent), added that Arkansas's drone-surveillance offenses exclude FAA-compliant commercial drone operations and list further exemptions, flagged that the drone civil-action section number is shared with another 2025 act, and relabeled the 25-19-107 citation as an appeal provision.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Corrected the descriptions of Molina v. Book (one plaintiff's retaliation claim was allowed to proceed, not won) and Turner v. Driver (a right to record the police, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions) to what the courts actually held.
Corrected the citation for the FOIA one-year meeting-recording retention rule from Ark. Code section 25-19-106(c)(2) to the correct section 25-19-106(d)(2); softened an overstated description of a contested, divided Eighth Circuit ruling on recording police; and rewrote our description of Arkansas's drone-surveillance statute, which covers critical infrastructure only (not general images of people or private property) and does not include the defenses we previously described. Also repaired dead government citation links.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Corrected the FOIA enforcement mechanism: Ark. Code Ann. 25-19-107(c) makes noncompliance with a court order contempt of court, not a 'Class C misdemeanor' as previously stated in the KeyTakeaways, body text, and FAQ.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the Ark. Code 5-60-103 drone-surveillance description: the current statute's images-related offense is purposeful image capture with the purpose of conducting surveillance, not a 'highly offensive to a reasonable person' tort-style standard, which appears nowhere in the text.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Spoke propagation: Corrected circuit: AR is in the 8th Circuit (not 5th). Added 8th Circuit framing for right-to-record police per Molina (2023). Expanded FOIA recording section: added Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-107 enforcement (appeal to circuit court, contempt of court). Added the § 25-19-106(d) one-year retention requirement. Added Act 310 of 2021 (SB 194) as the image-capture amendment to the FOIA copy definition.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated
§ 5-60-120Interception and recording.In forcecited in 18 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to intercept a wire, landline, oral, telephonic communication, or wireless communication, and to record or possess a recording of the communication unless the person is a party to the communication or one (1) of the parties to the communication has given prior…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Lewis v. State (1999) applied Section 5-60-120(a) to a man who taped his ex-wife's calls without being a party or having consent, affirming revocation. Elliott v. State (1998) held that while such recording by a private citizen is unlawful, the statute does not bar the tape from evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lewis v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1999, 336 Ark. 469)✓A man on probation admitted attaching a recorder to the telephone box outside his ex-wife's house and taping her calls; the court found that violated Section 5-60-120(a) because he was not a party and no party consented, and affirmed the revocation.
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 1998)“…consented to the recording. This provision is set forth in A.C.A. § 5-60-120 , as follows: 5-60-120 . Interceptio…”
- King v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2019, 571 S.W.3d 476)✓A friend's phone app secretly recorded a murder suspect's call with a detective; the court held that although Section 5-60-120 makes such a recording by a non-party unlawful, it does not bar admissibility, and affirmed the refusal to exclude the tape.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), Arkansas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Arkansas Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
§ 25-19-106Open public meetings. [Effective when emergency ends or on December 31, 2020.]In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided by law, all meetings, formal or informal, special or regular, of the governing bodies of all municipalities, counties, townships, and school districts and all boards, bureaus, commissions, or organizations of the State of Arkansas, except grand juries,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 112 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bryant v. Weiss (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1998, 335 Ark. 534)“…all be furnished to anyone who requests the information." Ark.Code Ann. § 25-19-106(b)(1)(Repl.1996)(emphasis added). That…”
- City of Fort Smith v. Wade (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2019, 578 S.W.3d 276)“…ning bodies of municipalities, are required to be public. Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-106 (a) (Repl. 2014). We have held that FO…”
- City of Greenwood v. Shadow Lake Ass'n (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2015, 459 S.W.3d 291)“…tings provision of the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (A.C.A. § 25-19-106) and whether or not there was a violati…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits (2026), Arkansas School Recording Laws: Student Privacy, FERPA, and Classroom Rules (2026), Arkansas Video Recording Laws: Public Filming, Private Property, and Consent (2026)
§ 25-19-107Appeal from denial of rights — Attorney's fees.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Any citizen denied the rights granted to him or her by this chapter may appeal immediately from the denial to the Pulaski County Circuit Court or to the circuit court of the residence of the aggrieved party, if the State of Arkansas or a department, agency, or institution of the state is involve
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harris v. City of Fort Smith (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2006, 366 Ark. 277)“…es under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) set forth in Ark.Code Ann. § 25-19-107 (Repl.2002). We affirm the circuit cour…”
- Orsini v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2000, 340 Ark. 665)“…ring within seven days of her FOIA request, as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-107 (b) (Repl. 1996). We agree that Orsini…”
- Depoyster v. Cole (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1989, 298 Ark. 203)“…at he is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs. Ark.Code Ann. § 25-19-107(d) (Supp.1987) provides that in any act…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Freedom of Information Act: Deadlines, Fees, and Appeals
§ 5-16-101Crime of video voyeurism.In forcecited in 15 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to use a camera, videotape, photo- optical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of secretly observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping another person who is present in a residence, place of business, school, or other structu
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied the video voyeurism statute in Devries (2019), where children had a reasonable expectation of privacy behind closed bedroom and bathroom doors in a parent's home, and in Powell (2020), holding the crime is complete on using a camera for the prohibited purpose even if the images are never viewed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 2001)“…tice of the surveillance would also negate any violation of A.C.A. § 5-16-101 , which criminalizes "video voyeurism."…”
- Bruce Wayne Devries v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2019, 2019 Ark. App. 478)✓One adopted daughter testified she caught Devries watching her through the bathroom window and found a baby monitor in her bathroom and bedroom; another caught him filming under her door. The court affirmed the video voyeurism convictions, rejecting his no-privacy-at-home claim.
- Robert Powell v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2020, 605 S.W.3d 532)✓Powell hid a camera in a fake outlet in a cabin he rented to a family and argued he could not be guilty because police took the SD card before he viewed the footage; the court held the statute punishes using a camera for that secret purpose, so never watching is no defense.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Audio, and Privacy Rights (2026), Arkansas Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules (2026), Arkansas Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Defenses (2026)
§ 5-39-203Criminal trespass.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) A person commits criminal trespass if he or she purposely enters or remains unlawfully in or upon: (1) A vehicle of another person; (2) The premises owned or leased by another person; or (3) Critical infrastructure. (b) Criminal trespass is a: (1) Class D felony if: (A) The person h
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Polk v. State (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 1989, 28 Ark. App. 282)“…llant might have been charged with criminal trespass under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-39-203 (1987) (formerly Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-…”
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 2011)“…property where complete exclusion is intended. See, e.g. , A.C.A. §§ 5-39-203 (Repl. 2006) (criminal trespass), 5-39…”
- Yocum v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1996, 325 Ark. 180)“…ass for remaining unlawfully on his mother’s premises. See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-39-203 (Repl. 1993). 4. Overly Broad Ju…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Disorderly Conduct Laws: Penalties, Trespass and Purple Paint
§ 5-60-103Unlawful use of an unmanned aircraft system related to infrastructure — Unlawful use of an unmanned aircraft system related to images.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) As used in this section: (1) “Critical infrastructure” means: (A) An electrical power generation or delivery system; (B) A petroleum refinery; (C) A chemical or rubber manufacturing facility; (D) A petroleum or chemical storage facility; (E) A railroad operating facility; (F) A co
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Also relied on in: Arkansas Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Hunting & Shoot-Down Rules, Arkansas Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Sources and References
- Ark. Code 5-60-120 - Interception and Recording(law.justia.com)
- Ark. Code 25-19-106 - FOIA Open Public Meetings(law.justia.com)
- Arkansas Freedom of Information Act - Attorney General(arkansasag.gov).gov
- 2025 FOIA Handbook (21st Edition)(healthy.arkansas.gov).gov
- Arkansas Judiciary - Court Information(arcourts.gov).gov
- Arkansas Secretary of State - Elections(sos.arkansas.gov).gov
- FAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)(faa.gov).gov
- Ark. Code 25-19-107 - Appeal from denial of FOIA rights(law.justia.com)
- Act 310 of 2021 (SB 194) - Enrolled Act PDF - Image Capture Amendment to FOIA(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov