Personal Injury and Work Injury Claims in Singapore

Personal injury claims in Singapore split into two routes that work very differently. If you were hurt at work, the Work Injury Compensation Act 2019 (WICA) offers a fast, no-fault claim through the Ministry of Manpower (MOM). If you were hurt outside work, you bring a common-law negligence claim in the courts and must prove fault. This page explains both, and the important choices between them.

This is general legal information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate and solicitor about your situation. Figures are current as of 2026.

The no-fault route: WICA

WICA is the modern successor to Singapore's older workmen's compensation scheme. Its central feature is that it is no-fault: an injured employee does not have to prove the employer was negligent. If the injury arose out of and in the course of employment, compensation is worked out by a formula and paid through an administrative process at MOM, which is generally faster than a court case.

The trade-off for that speed and certainty is that the compensation is capped. WICA does not award the open-ended damages a court can order in a negligence claim; it pays fixed amounts calculated under the Act's schedule.

The WICA compensation limits (from 1 November 2025)

MOM raised the WICA limits with effect from 1 November 2025. The current caps are:

These replaced the earlier caps of S$225,000 for death, S$289,000 for total permanent incapacity, and S$45,000 for medical expenses. Because MOM reviews these figures periodically, always confirm the current limit rather than relying on a fixed number, and note the effective date when you quote one.

Who WICA covers

WICA applies to employees under a contract of service, regardless of nationality. It covers all employees doing manual work whatever their salary, and non-manual employees earning up to a monthly salary threshold that MOM sets and reviews from time to time. It does not cover independent contractors or the genuinely self-employed, and certain categories of worker are dealt with under separate arrangements. If you are unsure whether your role is covered, MOM's work-injury pages state the current coverage rules.

The section 63 election: WICA or sue the employer, not both

The most important choice under WICA is set by section 63. For the same injury, you cannot both claim WICA compensation and sue your employer in court for damages. It is an election: you pick one route.

The practical trigger points matter. Once you have recovered WICA compensation, or a notice of computation or assessment has taken effect and you have not objected within the 28-day window the Act allows, you generally lose the right to sue the employer at common law for that injury. So the choice between the capped, no-fault WICA route and an uncapped, fault-based court claim should be made early and with advice, not assumed to be reversible.

WICA suits most workplace injuries where fault would be hard to prove or the employer clearly carries insurance. A common-law claim can be worth more where the employer was plainly negligent and the losses exceed the WICA caps, but it is slower, costs more, and carries the risk of losing.

The section 64 exception: a negligent third party

Section 64 covers the situation where someone other than your employer caused your work injury, for example a delivery rider hit by another motorist while working. Here you may claim WICA compensation from your employer and separately sue the negligent third party for damages.

The limit is that you cannot recover twice for the same loss. Whichever compensation is paid, the party who paid it has a right to be reimbursed out of what the third party owes, apportioned by the third party's share of the blame. So section 64 is not a way to double your money; it is a way to make sure the person actually at fault ultimately bears the cost while you are still compensated promptly.

General personal-injury claims outside work

An injury that has nothing to do with employment, such as a fall in a shopping centre or an accident in a public place, is a common-law negligence claim. You sue the party responsible in the courts and must prove they were negligent and that their negligence caused your injury.

The deadline is the same 3-year period that applies to road-accident injuries: section 24A of the Limitation Act 1959, running from the accident or from the date of knowledge, whichever is later. If your injury came from a road accident, see the page on motor-accident claims for the pre-action protocol and court structure, and the accidents and personal injury section for how the routes fit together. If your injury happened at work through a foreign-worker employer, the employment law section covers the wider employment relationship.