EnglishEspañol
Florida flag

Florida

Leyes de Protección al Denunciante de Florida: Protecciones y Cómo Denunciar

Por Equipo Editorial de Recording LawRevisado 9 de agosto de 202615 min de lectura
Leyes de Protección al Denunciante de Florida: Protecciones y Cómo Denunciar

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Me pueden despedir por denunciar a mi empleador en Florida?

No necesariamente. La Ley de Denunciantes del Sector Privado de Florida (Fla. Stat. 448.102) protege a los empleados de empresas con diez o más empleados contra represalias por denunciar violaciones de leyes federales, estatales o locales. Desde el 1 de julio de 2025, la ley cubre explícitamente la denuncia de cualquier violación legal, no solo aquellas que crean un peligro público inminente.

¿Cuál es el plazo de prescripción para un reclamo de represalia por denuncia en Florida?

Para los empleados del sector público, la queja debe presentarse dentro de los 60 días posteriores a la acción de represalia. Para los empleados del sector privado, una demanda debe presentarse dentro de los 2 años posteriores a descubrir la represalia o dentro de los 4 años del acto de represalia, lo que ocurra primero.

¿Los empleados del sector privado deben notificar a su empleador antes de presentar una queja de denunciante?

Sí. Bajo el Fla. Stat. 448.102, los empleados del sector privado primero deben informar la violación a un supervisor o empleador por escrito y darle una oportunidad razonable de corregir el problema. Este requisito no aplica cuando el empleado está testificando en una investigación gubernamental o se niega a participar en una actividad ilegal.

¿Los denunciantes de Florida pueden recibir recompensas económicas por denunciar fraude?

Sí. Bajo la Ley de Reclamos Falsos de Florida (Fla. Stat. 68.081-68.09), los denunciantes que presentan demandas qui tam exitosas pueden recibir entre el 15% y el 30% de los fondos recuperados por el estado. Las disposiciones qui tam federales bajo la Ley Federal de Reclamos Falsos y el Programa de Denunciantes de la SEC también ofrecen recompensas económicas.

¿Qué remedios están disponibles para los denunciantes de Florida que enfrentan represalias?

Los tribunales pueden otorgar la reincorporación al puesto anterior, el pago de salarios atrasados, los beneficios perdidos, daños compensatorios, honorarios de abogados y costas judiciales. Los empleados del sector público también pueden recibir la reincorporación temporal mientras su caso está pendiente. Los denunciantes de salario mínimo pueden buscar una multa de $1,000 por infracción contra el empleador.

Actualizaciones

Fixed the SOX whistleblower-retaliation description, which had conflated the civil OSHA-complaint protection (18 U.S.C. 1514A, 180-day deadline) with a criminal 10-year prison exposure that actually comes from a different statute, 18 U.S.C. 1513(e).

La ley detrás de este artículo

Este artículo se apoya en 10 disposiciones legales conservadas en nuestro propio registro jurídico, cada una obtenida de la fuente oficial. Toque una sección para leer el texto vigente.

United States Code Title 18

§ 1513Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informantVigente
Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person with intent to retaliate against any person for— the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or providing to a law enforcement officer any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings, shall be punished as provided in paragraph (2). The punishment for an offense under this subsection is— in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in sections 1111 and 1112; and in the case of an attempt, imprisonment for not more than 30 years.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en uscode.house.gov

Citada en 564 opiniones judiciales1980s: 241990s: 892000s: 1622010s: 1372020s: 152Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers (Supreme Court of the United States 2018, 583 U.S. 149) · United States v. Anthony Gadson (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2014, 763 F.3d 1189) · United States v. Alfonso Velasquez, Ramon Dominguez, Esmerido Galvan Olamendi, Ramon Gomez, and Armando Gomez (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1985, 772 F.2d 1348)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 1514ACivil action to protect against retaliation in fraud casesVigentecitada en 2 de nuestros artículos
No company with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 l), or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 o (d)) including any subsidiary or affiliate whose financial information is included in the consolidated financial statements of such company, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization (as defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c),1  So in original. Another closing parenthesis probably should precede the comma.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en uscode.house.gov

Citada en 500 opiniones judiciales2000s: 762010s: 2272020s: 197Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2006, 464 F.3d 951) · Grissom v. the Mills Corp. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2008, 549 F.3d 313) · Van Asdale v. International Game Technology (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2009, 577 F.3d 989)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

United States Code Title 29

§ 660Judicial reviewVigentecitada en 4 de nuestros artículos
Any person adversely affected or aggrieved by an order of the Commission issued under subsection (c) of section 659 of this title may obtain a review of such order in any United States court of appeals for the circuit in which the violation is alleged to have occurred or where the employer has its principal office, or in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, by filing in such court within sixty days following the issuance of such order a written petition praying that the order be modified or set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith transmitted by the clerk of the court to the Commission and to the other parties, and thereupon the Commission shall file in the court the record in the proceeding as provided in section 2112 of title 28.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en uscode.house.gov

Citada en 1,040 opiniones judiciales1970s: 2161980s: 2651990s: 1732000s: 1292010s: 1142020s: 143Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: National Realty and Construction Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Secretary of Labor, Party (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1973, 489 F.2d 1257) · Michael P. Gaffney, Thomas Bell, Edward Anderson v. Riverboat Services of Indiana, Incorporated, Riverboat Services, Incorporated, Robert Heitmeier v. Showboat Marina Casino Partnership, Showboat, Incorporated, Showboat Indiana, Incorporated (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2006, 451 F.3d 424) · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1995, 514 U.S. 122)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

United States Code Title 31

§ 3730Civil actions for false claimsVigentecitada en 3 de nuestros artículos
The Attorney General diligently shall investigate a violation under section 3729. If the Attorney General finds that a person has violated or is violating section 3729, the Attorney General may bring a civil action under this section against the person. A person may bring a civil action for a violation of section 3729 for the person and for the United States Government. The action shall be brought in the name of the Government. The action may be dismissed only if the court and the Attorney General give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting. A copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the Government pursuant to Rule 4(d)(4) 1  So in original. Probably should be a reference to Rule 4(i). of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The Government may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after it receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en uscode.house.gov

Citada en 3,695 opiniones judiciales1980s: 361990s: 4342000s: 7332010s: 11382020s: 1354Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: United States v. Halper (Supreme Court of the United States 1989, 490 U.S. 435) · Timson v. Sampson (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2008, 518 F.3d 870) · City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2011, 645 F.3d 114)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

Florida Statutes

§ 112.3187Adverse action against employee for disclosing information of specified nature prohibited; employee remedy and relief.Vigentecitada en 3 de nuestros artículos
(1) SHORT TITLE.—Sections 112.3187-112.31895 may be cited as the “Whistle-blower’s Act.” (2) LEGISLATIVE INTENT.—It is the intent of the Legislature to prevent agencies or independent contractors from taking retaliatory action against an employee who reports to an appropriate agency violations of law on the part of a public employer or independent contractor that create a substantial and specific danger to the public’s health, safety, or welfare. It is further the intent of the Legislature to prevent agencies or independent contractors from taking retaliatory action against any person who discloses information to an appropriate agency alleging improper use of governmental office, gross waste of funds, or any other abuse or gross neglect of duty on the part of an agency, public officer, or employee.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leg.state.fl.us

Citada en 94 opiniones judiciales1980s: 31990s: 162000s: 152010s: 252020s: 35Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Arrow Air, Inc. v. Walsh (Supreme Court of Florida 1994, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 592) · Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2003, 853 So. 2d 1125) · Hastings v. Demming (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1996, 682 So. 2d 1107)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 440.205Coercion of employees.Vigentecitada en 2 de nuestros artículos
No employer shall discharge, threaten to discharge, intimidate, or coerce any employee by reason of such employee’s valid claim for compensation or attempt to claim compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leg.state.fl.us

Citada en 105 opiniones judiciales1980s: 161990s: 192000s: 232010s: 212020s: 26Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Piezo Technology v. Smith (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1982, 413 So. 2d 121) · Chase v. Walgreen Co. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1999, 750 So. 2d 93) · Otis Elevator Co. v. Scott (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1989, 551 So. 2d 489)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 448.102Prohibitions.Vigentecitada en 4 de nuestros artículos
An employer may not take any retaliatory personnel action against an employee because the employee has:(1) Disclosed, or threatened to disclose, to any appropriate governmental agency, under oath, in writing, an activity, policy, or practice of the employer that is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation. However, this subsection does not apply unless the employee has, in writing, brought the activity, policy, or practice to the attention of a supervisor or the employer and has afforded the employer a reasonable opportunity to correct the activity, policy, or practice. (2) Provided information to, or testified before, any appropriate governmental agency, person, or entity conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry into an alleged violation of a law, rule, or regulation by the employer. (3) Objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leg.state.fl.us

Citada en 112 opiniones judiciales1990s: 72000s: 292010s: 322020s: 44Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Walsh v. Arrow Air, Inc. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1993, 629 So. 2d 144) · Arrow Air, Inc. v. Walsh (Supreme Court of Florida 1994, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 592) · Diaz v. Impex of Doral, Inc. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2009, 7 So. 3d 591)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 448.103Employee’s remedy; relief.Vigentecitada en 3 de nuestros artículos
(1)(a) An employee who has been the object of a retaliatory personnel action in violation of this act may institute a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction for relief as set forth in subsection (2) within 2 years after discovering that the alleged retaliatory personnel action was taken, or within 4 years after the personnel action was taken, whichever is earlier. (b) Any civil action authorized under this section may be brought in the county in which the alleged retaliatory personnel action occurred, in which the complainant resides, or in which the employer has its principal place of business. (c) An employee may not recover in any action brought pursuant to this subsection if he or she failed to notify the employer about the illegal activity, policy, or practice as required by s. 448.102(1) or if the retaliatory personnel action was predicated upon a ground other than the employee’s exercise of a right protected by this act. (2) In any action brought pursuant to subsection (1), the court may order relief as follows:(a) An injunction restraining continued violation of this act.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leg.state.fl.us

Citada en 23 opiniones judiciales1990s: 52000s: 92010s: 12020s: 8Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Arrow Air, Inc. v. Walsh (Supreme Court of Florida 1994, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 592) · HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA v. Hillman (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2004, 906 So. 2d 1094) · O'Neal v. Fla. a & M University Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2008, 989 So. 2d 6)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 448.109Notification of the state minimum wage.Vigente
(1) As used in this section, the terms:(a) “Employer,” “employee,” and “wage” have the meanings as established under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and its implementing regulations. (b) “Florida minimum wage” means the wage that an employer must, at a minimum, pay an employee pursuant to s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution and implementing law. (2) Each employer who must pay an employee the Florida minimum wage shall prominently display a poster substantially similar to the one made available pursuant to subsection (3) in a conspicuous and accessible place in each establishment where such employees are employed. (3)(a) Each year the Department of Commerce shall, on or before December 1, create and make available to employers a poster in English and in Spanish which reads substantially as follows:NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES The Florida minimum wage is $ (amount) per hour, with a minimum wage of at least $ (amount) per hour for tipped employees, in addition to tips, for January 1, (year) , through December 31, (year) . The rate of the minimum wage is recalculated yearly on September 30, based on the Consumer Price Index.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leg.state.fl.us

Citada en 2 opiniones judicialesAplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Salces (District Court, S.D. Florida 2026) · Pastrana v. Level Up Fitness LLC (District Court, S.D. Florida 2021)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 68.081Florida False Claims Act; short title.Vigente
Sections 68.081-68.092 may be cited as the “Florida False Claims Act.”

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leg.state.fl.us

Citada en 19 opiniones judiciales1990s: 12000s: 52010s: 52020s: 8Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: United States v. Gold Star Medical Services (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1999) · Angela Ruckh v. Salus Rehabilitation, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2020, 963 F.3d 1089) · United States Ex Rel. Foster v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (District Court, E.D. Texas 2008, 587 F. Supp. 2d 805)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

Busque en nuestro registro completo de la ley de EE. UU.: 2.1 millones de secciones, todos los estados y la ley federal

Fuentes y referencias

  1. Estatutos de Florida Sección 112.3187 - Ley de Denunciantes (Sector Público)(leg.state.fl.us).gov
  2. Estatutos de Florida Sección 448.102 - Protecciones para Denunciantes del Sector Privado(leg.state.fl.us).gov
  3. Estatutos de Florida Sección 448.103 - Remedios por Represalia contra Denunciantes del Sector Privado(flsenate.gov).gov
  4. Ley de Reclamos Falsos de Florida - Fla. Stat. 68.081(flsenate.gov).gov
  5. Comisión de Florida sobre Relaciones Humanas - Quejas de Represalia contra Denunciantes(fchr.myflorida.com).gov
  6. Oficina del Inspector General en Jefe de Florida - Denunciar Fraude(floridaoig.com).gov
  7. Estatutos de Florida Sección 440.205 - Represalia por Compensación Laboral(leg.state.fl.us).gov
  8. Estatutos de Florida Sección 448.109 - Represalia por Salario Mínimo(leg.state.fl.us).gov
  9. Programa de Protección al Denunciante de OSHA(osha.gov).gov
  10. Programa de Denunciantes de la SEC(sec.gov).gov
  11. Ley Federal de Reclamos Falsos - 31 U.S.C. 3730(govinfo.gov).gov
Compartir: