Eviction Grounds and Notice Periods in Australia by State and Territory

A landlord ending an Australian tenancy must follow the notice rules of that state or territory's own Residential Tenancies Act. The grounds available, the notice period for each, and the tribunal that decides a dispute all differ by jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction scope: This page compares landlord termination grounds, notice periods and the tribunal or court that decides a dispute across all eight Australian states and territories. It is general legal information, verified 19 July 2026, not legal advice on your own tenancy. For whether a no-reason ending is available at all in your jurisdiction, see the no-grounds eviction ban across Australia.

How Does an Eviction Actually Work in Australia?

In every Australian jurisdiction, eviction is a two-step process, not a single notice. First, the landlord serves a written termination notice that states the required period and, in most jurisdictions now, the ground relied on. Second, if the tenant does not leave by the date on the notice, the landlord must apply to the jurisdiction's tribunal, or in Western Australia and Tasmania a court, for a possession order. A tenant can generally contest the application at that hearing, arguing the ground is not made out or the notice was defective. Only once the tribunal or court makes a possession order, and in most cases only after a further compliance period, can enforcement (a warrant for eviction, executed by police or a bailiff) occur. A landlord who changes locks or removes belongings without a valid possession order is acting unlawfully everywhere in Australia, regardless of what the termination notice said.

Which Jurisdictions Require a Ground, and Which Still Allow None?

Six jurisdictions require a landlord to state and, if challenged, prove a specific ground. The ACT (from 1 April 2023), South Australia (1 July 2024), New South Wales (19 May 2025), Victoria (fully, from 25 November 2025) and Queensland have all abolished the lessor's no-grounds option. Tasmania requires every notice to cite a paragraph of section 42(1) of the Residential Tenancy Act 1997 (Tas), so there is no bare no-reason ground for a periodic tenancy, though a fixed-term agreement can still be ended under section 42(1)(d) simply because it is due to expire within 60 days. Western Australia (section 64) and the Northern Territory (section 89) are the only two jurisdictions that still allow a landlord to end a periodic tenancy without stating any reason, both on 60 days' notice. The full mechanics and dates of each jurisdiction's position are set out in our no-grounds eviction guide; this page focuses on the grounds and notice periods that apply once a ground is required, or in the two jurisdictions where it is not.

Landlord Grounds and Notice Periods by Jurisdiction

Notice periods above are indicative for the grounds shown; several jurisdictions set a different period for other grounds such as serious breach, rent arrears or anti-social behaviour, which typically run much shorter, sometimes only days. Always check the specific ground stated on your notice against the current Act.

Which Tribunal or Court Decides an Eviction Dispute?

Most Australian jurisdictions route tenancy disputes, including eviction applications, to a dedicated civil and administrative tribunal rather than a general court. New South Wales uses NCAT, Victoria uses VCAT (with a new pre-VCAT pathway, Residential Dispute Resolution Victoria, defined in section 3(1) of the Victorian Act since 2026), Queensland uses QCAT, South Australia uses SACAT, the ACT uses ACAT (its exclusive jurisdiction under section 76), and the Northern Territory uses NTCAT. Western Australia and Tasmania are the two real outliers. Western Australia sends tenancy matters to the Magistrates Court under section 12A of its Act; the State Administrative Tribunal has no role in residential tenancies at all, and since 28 March 2026 first-instance bond, pet and minor-modification disputes go to a Commissioner for Consumer Protection determination, with a 7-day appeal to the Magistrates Court. Tasmania splits jurisdiction: the Residential Tenancy Commissioner and the Magistrates Court (Civil Division) handle bonds, rent, repairs, termination and possession, while TASCAT has heard pet-consent disputes only since 20 March 2026, under Part 3C of the Act. There is an active but unenacted push to give TASCAT a wider role in Tasmania; it is not law yet.

What a Tenant Can Do When Served With a Notice

A tenant who receives a termination notice should first check that the notice is in the correct form, states a valid ground where one is required, and gives at least the minimum notice period for that ground. Most tribunals publish the correct forms and current notice periods on their websites, and several, including NCAT, VCAT and QCAT, run online eligibility or notice-checking tools. If the ground is disputed, for example a claimed sale that does not proceed, or renovations that are not genuinely significant, the tenant can generally raise that at the tribunal hearing rather than simply vacating. Where no ground is required, in Western Australia and the Northern Territory, the tenant's practical options are narrower: confirming the notice period was correctly calculated, and, in Western Australia, applying to the Magistrates Court within 7 days for additional time. In every jurisdiction, a tenant does not have to leave on the date stated in a notice alone; only a tribunal or court possession order, followed where necessary by a warrant for eviction, can compel a tenant to vacate against their will.

Retaliatory and Defective Notices

Several jurisdictions build anti-retaliation protection into specific grounds. Queensland's end-of-fixed-term ground under section 291, for example, cannot be used where giving the notice would amount to retaliatory action against a tenant who has exercised a right, such as requesting repairs or complaining to a government entity. Other jurisdictions handle the same concern through their tribunal's general discretion to refuse an order it considers unreasonable in the circumstances, rather than a standalone statutory bar. A notice that is not in the prescribed form, that understates the required period, or that omits a ground where one is legally required, can generally be challenged as defective at the tribunal, independent of whether the underlying reason for wanting possession is genuine.

This page provides general legal information about eviction grounds, notice periods and tenancy tribunals across Australia, verified 19 July 2026. It is not legal advice and does not tell you whether a notice you have received is valid. For advice about your own tenancy, consult a legal practitioner admitted in the relevant Australian state or territory, or your state or territory's tenancy authority or tribunal.

For the full no-grounds picture, see no-grounds eviction in Australia. For tenant-initiated termination, see breaking a lease in Australia. For the complete jurisdiction comparison, see the Australia tenant rights hub, or go directly to New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the ACT or the Northern Territory.