Utah
Utah Workplace Recording Laws
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Under Utah Code Ann. 77-23a-4, Utah is a one-party consent state, so an employee may record a workplace conversation they participate in without notifying coworkers or supervisors, unless the recording is made to commit a criminal or tortious act (77-23a-4(7)(b)). Employers may still enforce no-recording policies and discipline employees who violate them, but the recording itself remains legal under state law.
Utah's one-party consent law gives employees the legal right to record workplace conversations they participate in. Under Utah Code Ann. 77-23a-4, you can record meetings with your boss, conversations with HR, interactions with coworkers, and any other workplace discussion you are part of without telling anyone, as long as you are not recording to commit a crime or tort.
This guide explains how Utah's recording laws apply in the workplace, what both employees and employers can and cannot do, and how the NLRA interacts with state law.
Employee Recording Rights
Your Right to Record at Work
As a one-party consent state, Utah allows you to record a conversation you participate in, unless you record it to commit a criminal or tortious act (77-23a-4(7)(b)). This means you can legally record:

- Meetings with supervisors about performance or assignments
- HR conversations including disciplinary meetings and grievance hearings
- Conversations with coworkers about workplace conditions
- Phone calls with clients or vendors that you participate in
- Performance reviews and training sessions
What You Cannot Record
- Conversations you are not part of, unless a participant has given prior consent (planting a hidden recorder to capture others)
- In private areas like bathrooms or locker rooms (installing a device there without consent violates Utah Code 76-12-302, and secretly recording someone's body there is recorded voyeurism under Utah Code Ann. 76-12-307)
- Electronic communications between others without any participant's consent
- A conversation you are part of, if you record it to commit a crime or a tort (the one-party exception does not apply, Utah Code 77-23a-4(7)(b))
Documenting Workplace Issues
Recording is valuable for documenting harassment, discrimination, retaliation, unsafe conditions (OSHA violations), and wage disputes.
Employer Surveillance

Video Surveillance
Permitted: Sales floors, warehouses, parking lots, lobbies, hallways, cash register areas.
Prohibited without the consent of the people entitled to privacy there: Private places such as bathrooms, locker rooms, changing areas, and nursing rooms.
Utah does not have a specific employer video surveillance statute, but Utah Code 76-12-302 makes it a crime to install a camera in a private place, such as a restroom or locker room, without the consent of the people entitled to privacy there. Utah's recorded-voyeurism law (Utah Code Ann. 76-12-307) applies to secretly recording people's bodies in such areas.
Audio Surveillance
If the employer is not a party to the recorded conversation, capturing audio could violate Utah Code Ann. 77-23a-4 (third degree felony). Many employers avoid audio recording.
Employer No-Recording Policies

Employers can adopt no-recording policies. Violating the policy can result in discipline or termination, but a recording you make as a participant remains legal under state law unless you made it to commit a crime or tort.
The NLRA protects recording that constitutes protected concerted activity, such as documenting unsafe conditions, wage violations, or union-related discussions. Blanket no-recording policies may violate Section 7. The current NLRB standard for evaluating employer work rules (including no-recording policies) is Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (2023). In GC 25-05 (Feb. 14, 2025), the NLRB's Acting General Counsel rescinded about 30 earlier General Counsel memos, including GC 23-02 on electronic monitoring of employees and memos on non-compete and stay-or-pay remedies, settlement-agreement standards, Section 10(j) injunctive relief, and full make-whole remedies. It did not reinstate the prior Boeing standard, and a General Counsel memo cannot overturn Board precedent, so Stericycle remains the Board's standard for judging workplace rules, though the current Board has signaled it may revisit it. In a June 25, 2025 memo (GC 25-07), the NLRB's Acting General Counsel told regional offices to treat secretly recording collective-bargaining sessions as a per se violation of the duty to bargain in good faith. The memo is enforcement guidance, not a Board ruling.
Using Workplace Recordings as Evidence

Recordings made under one-party consent are generally admissible in Utah courts for employment discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, wage disputes, and workers' compensation hearings. They can also be submitted to the EEOC and OSHA.
Best practices: Keep originals unedited, note date/time/participants, store on personal devices, back up immediately.
Remote Work Recording
One-party consent applies to virtual meetings (Zoom, Teams, Meet). If anyone on the call is in an all-party consent state, that state's law may apply. Courts do not agree on which state's law governs a call across state lines, and some apply the law of the place where the recording was made, so the safe practice is to get everyone's consent. Platform recording features typically notify all participants.
More Utah Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
More Utah Recording Topics
More Utah Laws
- Utah AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Utah Dashcam Laws
- Utah Data Privacy Laws
- Utah Deepfake Laws
- Utah Employee Monitoring Laws
- Utah GPS Tracking Laws
- Utah Police Bodycam Laws
- Utah Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my boss in Utah?
Yes. Utah's one-party consent law (77-23a-4) allows you to record a conversation you participate in at work without their knowledge, unless you record it to commit a crime or tort. However, your employer may have a no-recording policy that could result in disciplinary action.
Can my employer record me at work in Utah?
Employers can use video cameras in common work areas. They cannot place cameras in private places such as bathrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas without the consent of the people entitled to privacy there. Audio recording requires one-party consent from a participant in the conversation.
Can I be fired for recording at work in Utah?
A recording you make as a participant is generally legal, but your employer can fire you for violating a company no-recording policy. If your recording is protected concerted activity under the NLRA, termination could be an unfair labor practice.
Can I use a workplace recording in a lawsuit?
Yes. Recordings made under one-party consent are generally admissible in Utah employment cases. For an illegal interception, a court may award the greater of actual damages plus profits or $100 a day or $10,000 under Utah Code Ann. 77-23a-11, and the suit must be filed within two years after the recording could reasonably have been discovered.
Does my employer have to tell me about security cameras?
Utah does not require employers to notify employees about video surveillance. However, providing notice through signage or policy is a best practice.
Updates
Added the criminal-or-tortious-purpose limit to the statement that a recording made against a no-recording policy remains legal, and noted that recording a conversation you are not part of is lawful with a participant's prior consent.
We corrected the civil damages under Utah Code 77-23a-11 (discretionary, with an actual-damages alternative and a two-year filing limit, not a minimum), fixed the description of NLRB GC 25-05 (about 30 memos rescinded, including the electronic-monitoring memo GC 23-02) and GC 25-07 (enforcement guidance dated June 25, 2025), noted that Stericycle may be revisited, and replaced the claim that the stricter state law always applies with the unsettled choice-of-law picture. We added the limit that Utah's one-party rule does not cover a recording made to commit a crime or tort (77-23a-4(7)(b)) everywhere the page described the right to record, restated the bathroom and locker-room camera ban by the elements of 76-12-302, and called Stericycle the current rather than controlling NLRB standard.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Updated the voyeurism citation from a statute repealed in 2017 to Utah's current recorded-voyeurism law (76-12-307), and corrected the description of a 2025 NLRB memo that had been understated as routine housekeeping when it substantively rescinded several employee-protective enforcement memos.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Updated NLRB section: identified Stericycle (372 NLRB No. 113, 2023) as the controlling standard for employer work rules including no-recording policies. Clarified GC 25-05 is a housekeeping rescission not a Boeing reinstatement. Added GC 25-07 narrow per se bar on surreptitious bargaining-session recording. Replaced stale electronic-surveillance memo source with Stericycle guidance.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Utah Code, Title 77: Criminal Procedure
§ 77-23a-4Offenses -- Criminal and civil -- Lawful interception.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
(1) (a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, any person who violates Subsection (1)(b) is guilty of an offense and is subject to punishment under Subsection (10), or when applicable, the person is subject to civil action under Subsection (11). (b) A person commits a violation of this subsection who: (i) intentionally or knowingly intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, electronic, or oral communication; (ii) intentionally or knowingly uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication, when the device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication or when the device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of the communication; (iii) intentionally or knowingly discloses or endeavors to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Wood (2023) held a jail's recording of inmate calls fell within the consent exception in section 77-23a-4(7)(a) because the inmate impliedly consented by using phones he was told were monitored. The Quarasan Group, Inc. v. Nozani, LLC (2020) dismissed an eavesdropping claim once Utah law governed and did not bar the recording.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Wood (Utah Supreme Court 2023, 532 P.3d 997)✓A jail recorded an inmate's calls to his wife after warning him by handbook, placard and a message before each call; the Utah Supreme Court held he impliedly consented, so the interception fell within section 77-23a-4(7)(a) and suppression was denied.
- State v. Draughon (Court of Appeals of Utah 2026, 2026 UT App 52)“…rties to the call—consented to the call being recorded. See Utah Code §§ 77-23a-4(7)(b), -7. He claims Counsel should hav…”
- United States v. Maynard (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2010, 615 F.3d 544)“…ined by the police acting pursuant to a warrant. See, e.g., Utah Code Ann. §§ 77-23a-4, 77-23a-7, 77-23a-15.5; Minn Stat §§ 62…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), Utah Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Utah Audio Recording Laws
§ 77-23a-11Civil remedy for unlawful interception -- Action for relief.In forcecited in 8 of our articles
(1) Except under Subsections 77-23a-4(3), (4), and (5), a person whose wire, electronic, or oral communication is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this chapter may in a civil action recover relief as appropriate from the person or entity that engaged in the violation. (2) In an action under this section appropriate relief includes: (a) preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as is appropriate; (b) damages under Subsection (3) and punitive damages in appropriate cases; and (c) a reasonable attorney's fee and reasonably incurred litigation costs.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Also relied on in: Utah Phone Call Recording Laws, Utah AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), Utah Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
Utah Code, Title 76: Criminal Offenses
§ 76-12-307Recorded or photographed voyeurism.In forcecited in 14 of our articles
(1) (a) As used in this section, "sex-designated privacy space" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-12-309. (b) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5, 76-12-101, and 76-12-301 apply to this section. (2) An actor commits recorded or photographed voyeurism if the actor intentionally uses any type of technology to secretly or surreptitiously record, by video, photograph, or other means, an individual: (a) for the purpose of viewing any portion of the individual's body regarding which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, whether or not that portion of the body is covered with clothing; (b) without the knowledge or consent of the individual; and (c) under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy. (3) (a) Except as provided in Subsection(3)(b), a violation of Subsection (2) is a class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Also relied on in: Utah Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws, Utah Medical Recording Laws, Utah Laws on Recording in Public
Sources and References
- Utah Code Ann. 77-23a-4 -- Interception of Communications(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code Ann. 77-23a-11 -- Civil Remedy for Unlawful Interception(le.utah.gov).gov
- National Labor Relations Act(nlrb.gov).gov
- NLRB GC 25-05 (Feb. 14, 2025), rescinding GC 23-02 (electronic monitoring) and other memos(apps.nlrb.gov).gov
- OSHA(osha.gov).gov
- EEOC(eeoc.gov).gov
- NLRB GC 25-07 (June 25, 2025) -- Surreptitious Recordings of Collective-Bargaining Sessions(apps.nlrb.gov).gov
- Utah Code Ann. 76-12-302 -- Unlawful Privacy Violation (eff. May 7, 2025)(le.utah.gov).gov