Noise and Quiet Hours in Switzerland: Art. 684 ZGB and Your Rights

Noise between neighbours is one of the most common sources of legal conflict in Switzerland, and the rules are not where most people look for them. There is no single nationwide quiet-hours law. Instead a general standard in the Zivilgesetzbuch governs when one property owner's effects on another cross the line, and the specific night-time hours are left to each canton and commune.

This page explains the standard in Art. 684 ZGB, the claims an owner can actually bring under Art. 679 ZGB, the different route a tenant takes through the landlord, and how communal quiet hours and federal environmental-noise rules fit around all of it. It is part of our wider Swiss neighbour law coverage, itself part of the broader guide to Swiss law.

Information last verified on 22 July 2026. This page provides general legal information about Swiss law and does not constitute legal advice in an individual case.

The core rule: Art. 684 ZGB and excessive effects

Swiss neighbour law starts from Art. 684 ZGB. It obliges every property owner to refrain from all excessive effects, übermässige Einwirkungen, on a neighbour's property when using their own. The provision names the categories expressly: air pollution, bad smell, noise and sound, vibration, radiation, and the removal of sunlight or daylight.

Noise is only one item on that list, but it is the one that generates most disputes. The key word is übermässig, excessive. Art. 684 does not set a decibel limit or a fixed time. It asks whether the effect is unjustified given the location and nature of the properties and the local custom, the Ortsgebrauch.

That contextual test is the whole doctrine, and it cuts both ways. Noise from a workshop can be perfectly lawful in an industrial zone and clearly excessive in a quiet residential lane. A regular late-night party in a family apartment building is judged differently from occasional noise in a mixed-use city centre. Context and evidence, not a single number, decide the case.

What an owner can actually claim: Art. 679 ZGB

Art. 684 states the duty, but it is Art. 679 ZGB that gives a wronged owner something to sue for. Where a property owner exceeds their ownership rights and harms a neighbour or threatens harm, the neighbour can bring three distinct claims.

The first is Beseitigung, the removal of the existing harm. The second is Schutz gegen drohenden Schaden, protection against threatened harm, which is the injunction that orders the disturbance to stop or not to recur. The third is Schadenersatz, damages for loss already suffered.

One limit is worth knowing where the complaint is about a building blocking light rather than noise. Under Art. 679 Abs. 2 ZGB, where a structure or installation deprives a neighbouring property of certain characteristics, such as sunlight, those claims exist only if the building broke the rules in force when it was built. A neighbour whose new but fully compliant building overshadows yours generally cannot be forced to remove it on this basis.

Liability under Art. 679 attaches to the excess of ownership itself rather than to fault. An owner does not have to prove that the neighbour acted carelessly or deliberately, only that the effect crossed the Art. 684 threshold. That makes it a strong tool for a persistent problem, though it is a civil action and therefore slower and more costly than a call to the police.

The tenant's different route: Art. 257f OR

If you rent your home, the picture changes, and this is where many readers go wrong. A tenant troubled by another tenant in the same building generally does not sue that neighbour under Art. 679. The effective route runs through the landlord.

Under Art. 257f OR a tenant of immovable property must show consideration for the other occupants and neighbours. If a tenant keeps breaching that duty despite a written warning from the landlord, and continuing the tenancy becomes unreasonable for the landlord or the other occupants, the landlord can terminate the lease. For residential and commercial premises that termination runs with at least 30 days' notice to the end of a month.

The practical consequence is simple. As a tenant, your first step is not the court but your landlord. Document the disturbance with dates and details and report it, because the landlord holds the lever that Art. 257f provides. Keeping a record also helps if the landlord later needs to justify a warning or a termination.

Quiet hours are communal, not federal

People often ask for the legal quiet time in Switzerland as though a national statute set it. None does. Night quiet, Nachtruhe, and any midday or Sunday quiet are fixed by cantonal and communal police regulations, and they differ from commune to commune.

The common convention is night quiet from about 22:00, frequently extended on Sundays and public holidays, and in many communes a midday Mittagsruhe as well. Those figures are a widespread pattern, not a binding nationwide rule. The only reliable source for your own address is your Gemeinde's police regulation, the Polizeireglement.

For a single late-night disturbance that breaches those hours, the fast and inexpensive route is the police or the commune, who enforce the local regulation directly. That is usually more proportionate than launching a civil action over one loud evening, and it can run alongside a civil claim if the problem is also persistent.

When it is a building site: Art. 679a ZGB

A lawful, permitted construction site next door is a special case, and a counterintuitive one. Where the excessive effect is temporary, unavoidable, and arises from the lawful use of the land, typically building work, Art. 679a ZGB limits the neighbour to Schadenersatz.

In plain terms, you cannot force a properly permitted building site to go silent simply because it is loud. The remedy the law gives you there is compensation for the loss, not an order to stop the work. If the site breaches its permit conditions, or the noise is not genuinely temporary and unavoidable, the ordinary Art. 679 claims can return.

Installation and traffic noise: a separate regime

Not all noise is private neighbour noise. A one-off human disturbance, a party, a barking dog, a loud stereo, is governed by Art. 684 and Art. 679 ZGB and the communal quiet-hours regulation.

Noise from a fixed installation, a business, a shooting range, a road or a railway is governed instead by federal environmental law, the Umweltschutzgesetz and the Lärmschutz-Verordnung, which work through measured exposure limits rather than a private civil claim. A permanent heat pump or air-conditioning unit can raise both tracks at once. Which rules govern your situation depends on whether the source is a person's behaviour or a fixed installation, so it is worth identifying the source before deciding where to complain.