South Dakota
South Dakota DUI Laws: Penalties, BAC & License (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In South Dakota the offense is called driving under the influence (DUI), and SDCL 32-23-1 makes it unlawful to drive or be in actual physical control of a vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or more. A first DUI is a Class 1 misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in county jail, a fine of up to $2,000, and a mandatory license revocation of at least 30 days under SDCL 32-23-2, which the court may extend by a further period of up to one year.
This guide is part of our DUI Laws by State series.
What counts as a DUI in South Dakota
South Dakota's core DUI statute, SDCL 32-23-1, makes it unlawful to drive or be in actual physical control of a vehicle in several ways. The per se rule prohibits driving with a BAC of 0.08 percent or more by weight of alcohol as shown by a chemical analysis of breath, blood, or other bodily substance. The statute also covers driving while under the influence of alcohol, marijuana, or any controlled drug or substance, or any combination, to a degree that makes safe driving impossible. Because the impairment prongs do not require a specific number, a driver can be charged below 0.08 if alcohol or drugs impaired the ability to drive safely. Commercial drivers face a 0.04 percent limit, and drivers under 21 fall under the zero-tolerance law in SDCL 32-23-21, which makes it a Class 2 misdemeanor to drive with a BAC of 0.02 percent or more. The 0.08 figure is the federal benchmark adopted by every state except Utah, which uses 0.05 percent, as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration describes.
First-offense DUI penalties in South Dakota (jail, fines, suspension)
A first DUI under SDCL 32-23-2 is a Class 1 misdemeanor. Under South Dakota's general misdemeanor penalty rule, a Class 1 misdemeanor is punishable by up to one year in county jail, a fine of up to $2,000, or both. The DUI statute itself requires the court to revoke the driver license for not less than 30 days on a first offense. That 30 days is a floor, not a ceiling: the same section separately allows the court to order revocation "for a further period not to exceed one year" or to restrict the driving privilege for up to a year, so total exposure can run past one year. The statute also authorizes the court to grant a limited driving privilege during that period for purposes such as work, school, treatment, and medical or court appointments, upon proof of financial responsibility. Courts commonly impose probation with conditions in place of the maximum jail term for a first-time offender. If the driver's BAC is 0.17 percent or higher, the law directs a mandatory chemical dependency evaluation. A driver who refuses chemical testing faces a separate one-year revocation regardless of the criminal outcome.

| First-offense item | South Dakota rule (statute) |
|---|---|
| Offense level | Class 1 misdemeanor (SDCL 32-23-2) |
| Jail | Up to 1 year (Class 1 misdemeanor) |
| Fine | Up to $2,000 (Class 1 misdemeanor) |
| License revocation | At least 30 days, plus a possible further period of up to 1 year (SDCL 32-23-2) |
| Limited (work) permit | Available during revocation (SDCL 32-23-2) |
| Refusal revocation | 1 year (SDCL 32-23-11) |
| Look-back period | 10 years, tolled by incarceration (SDCL 32-23-4.1) |
| Felony threshold | 3rd offense (Class 6 felony, SDCL 32-23-4) |
Watch out: The license revocation that follows a DUI conviction and the separate revocation for refusing a chemical test are not the same thing. You can resolve the criminal case and still lose your license through the implied consent refusal action, and a first refusal carries a full one-year revocation.
Ignition interlock requirements in South Dakota
South Dakota does not impose an automatic statewide ignition interlock mandate on every first DUI in the way some states do. The interlock device, which requires a breath sample before the engine starts and at random points during a trip, is most often used as a condition tied to the 24/7 sobriety program or to a court-granted driving privilege, and it is more commonly required for higher-BAC and repeat cases. A first offender who wants to keep driving during the revocation period generally seeks a limited driving privilege under SDCL 32-23-2, which the court may grant for work, school, treatment, and similar essential purposes after proof of financial responsibility. South Dakota is also known for its statewide 24/7 sobriety program, under which many DUI defendants submit to twice-daily breath tests or wear a continuous alcohol-monitoring device as a condition of bond or probation.
License revocation and the administrative process in South Dakota
A South Dakota DUI affects the driving privilege in two ways. The criminal conviction under SDCL 32-23-2 carries a mandatory license revocation of at least 30 days for a first offense, and the sentencing court may order a further revocation period of up to one year on top of that minimum. Separately, after an officer serves a notice of intent to revoke under SDCL 32-23-19, the secretary of public safety revokes the license of a driver who refuses a chemical test for one year under SDCL 32-23-11, independent of the criminal case. A driver who wants to contest that revocation must request a hearing within 120 days of arrest. During a first-offense revocation, the court may issue a limited driving privilege so the person can continue to get to work, school, treatment, and medical or court appointments. To restore full driving privileges after the revocation, a driver must serve the revocation period, satisfy any treatment or evaluation conditions, and pay reinstatement fees. Drivers should keep all arrest and court paperwork because the deadlines on each track are firm.
Repeat offenses and the South Dakota look-back period
South Dakota counts prior DUIs within a 10-year look-back window under SDCL 32-23-4.1, so penalties escalate sharply for offenses inside that period. Two carve-outs make the real window longer than ten calendar years for some drivers. The section excludes "any period of time during which the defendant was incarcerated for a previous violation" from the calculation, so the clock tolls while a person is serving time. And the ten-year rule applies only "except as authorized under" SDCL 32-23-4.9, which makes a violation a Class 4 felony where the driver has at least five prior DUI convictions within 25 years and at least two of those within ten years. A second DUI within 10 years is a Class 1 misdemeanor under SDCL 32-23-3 with a license revocation of at least one year. The felony threshold is the third offense: under SDCL 32-23-4, a third DUI within 10 years is a Class 6 felony, punishable by up to two years in the state penitentiary and a fine of up to $4,000, with a revocation of at least one year. A fourth offense is a Class 5 felony under SDCL 32-23-4.6, and that statute sets a floor, not just a ceiling: the court must sentence the person to at least two years in a state correctional facility, one year of which must be served on parole, and must revoke the license for at least two years. A fifth or subsequent offense is a Class 4 felony under SDCL 32-23-4.7, carrying a mandatory minimum of at least four years in a state correctional facility on the same parole terms. In both cases the court may suspend that prison sentence only if it orders the person to participate in and complete a drug court, DUI court, veterans treatment court, or mental health court program as a condition of probation. A DUI that causes injury or death can be charged as vehicular battery or vehicular homicide, which are felonies regardless of offense number.

Watch out: Refusing the breath or blood test does not protect your license. A first refusal triggers a one-year revocation under the implied consent law, the refusal can be used as evidence in court, and officers may seek a warrant to draw blood.
Refusing a breath or blood test in South Dakota
South Dakota's implied consent law, in SDCL 32-23-10, provides that anyone who operates a vehicle in the state is considered to have consented to the withdrawal and chemical analysis of blood, breath, or other bodily substance, and it lets the arresting officer require that sample after an arrest under SDCL 32-23-1. Section 32-23-10 does not itself revoke anything. If you refuse, the officer serves a notice of intent to revoke on behalf of the Department of Public Safety under SDCL 32-23-19 and takes your South Dakota license, and that notice then works as a temporary license for 120 days. You have 120 days from arrest to request a hearing, and if the secretary of public safety finds the officer complied with the law and that you refused, the secretary revokes your license for one year under SDCL 32-23-11. Because the refusal revocation is a full year, refusing rarely helps a driver keep the license, and officers can apply for a warrant to obtain a blood sample, particularly in cases involving an accident with injuries. The refusal revocation is administrative and applies on top of any penalties from the criminal DUI case.
Can you expunge or seal a DUI in South Dakota
A DUI conviction in South Dakota generally cannot be expunged. The state's expungement scheme in SDCL chapter 23A-3 reaches arrest records rather than convictions: SDCL 23A-3-27 lets a person apply to expunge the record of an arrest one year after an arrest where no accusatory instrument was filed, one year after the prosecuting attorney formally dismisses the entire criminal case, or at any time after an acquittal. None of those describe a person who was convicted.
The one automatic route in the chapter does not reach a DUI either. SDCL 23A-3-34 removes a charge or conviction from the public record after five years, but only in a case where "a petty offense, municipal ordinance violation, or a Class 2 misdemeanor was the highest charged offense." A DUI is a Class 1 misdemeanor, so it sits above that ceiling.
What does exist is a sealing route that runs through sentencing rather than expungement. If the court grants a suspended imposition of sentence and the person completes every condition imposed, the case is discharged and dismissed under SDCL 23A-27-14 without an adjudication of guilt, and SDCL 23A-27-17 then directs the court to seal the official records of the arrest, charge, trial, and finding of guilt. That relief is available only once per person for a suspended imposition of sentence under SDCL 23A-27-13. Sealing also does not take the offense out of the DUI enhancement count: SDCL 32-23-4.1 counts a previous "conviction for, or plea of guilty to" a DUI, and a suspended imposition of sentence follows a guilty plea. A South Dakota attorney can tell you which of these routes, if any, is open in your case.
What to do after a DUI arrest in South Dakota
A South Dakota DUI generates two related matters: the criminal case in circuit or magistrate court and, if you refused testing, an implied consent license action. The deadlines are short, so people often act quickly to understand both the criminal charge under SDCL 32-23-2 and any refusal-based revocation. The criminal case proceeds on its own schedule from initial appearance through pretrial and resolution, while the license consequences follow the conviction or the refusal finding. General information cannot tell you how your case will come out, because the outcome depends on the specific facts, the evidence, and your record. To apply that to your own facts, ask a South Dakota DUI lawyer for a free consultation on the charge, any refusal revocation, and a limited driving privilege (attorney advertising). Keep the arrest paperwork, any test results, and all court notices in a safe place.

More South Dakota Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the BAC limit in South Dakota?
The per se limit is 0.08 percent BAC under SDCL 32-23-1. Commercial drivers are limited to 0.04 percent, and drivers under 21 face a 0.02 percent zero-tolerance limit under SDCL 32-23-21, which is a Class 2 misdemeanor.
How long do you lose your license for a first DUI in South Dakota?
A first DUI conviction carries a mandatory license revocation of at least 30 days under SDCL 32-23-2, and the court may order a further revocation period of up to one year on top of that minimum. The court may grant a limited driving privilege for work, school, treatment, and similar needs during the revocation period.
Is a first DUI a felony in South Dakota?
No. A first DUI is a Class 1 misdemeanor. A DUI becomes a felony at the third offense within 10 years, which is a Class 6 felony under SDCL 32-23-4. A DUI causing injury or death can be a felony regardless of offense number.
Do you need an interlock for a first DUI in South Dakota?
Not automatically. South Dakota does not mandate an ignition interlock on every first DUI. The device is more often tied to the 24/7 sobriety program, a court-granted driving privilege, higher-BAC cases, or repeat offenses.
What happens if you refuse a breathalyzer in South Dakota?
Refusing a chemical test leads to a one-year license revocation, separate from the criminal case. SDCL 32-23-10 is the consent provision itself and imposes no revocation; the revocation is ordered by the secretary of public safety under SDCL 32-23-11, after the officer serves a notice of intent to revoke under SDCL 32-23-19. The refusal can be used as evidence, and officers may seek a warrant for a blood draw.
How long does a DUI stay on your record in South Dakota?
A DUI counts as a prior under the SDCL 32-23-4.1 look-back for at least 10 years, and longer for anyone who served time, because a period of incarceration for a previous violation is excluded from that calculation. The conviction itself does not expire, and it generally cannot be expunged.
Can you get a DUI expunged in South Dakota?
Generally no. The SDCL chapter 23A-3 expungement statutes reach arrest records, not convictions, and the automatic five-year removal in SDCL 23A-3-34 applies only where a petty offense, municipal ordinance violation, or Class 2 misdemeanor was the highest charged offense, which excludes a Class 1 misdemeanor DUI. The realistic route is a suspended imposition of sentence: on successful completion the case is discharged and dismissed under SDCL 23A-27-14 and the records are sealed under SDCL 23A-27-17.
What is the look-back period for DUI in South Dakota?
South Dakota generally uses a 10-year look-back under SDCL 32-23-4.1, with offense levels set by SDCL 32-23-3 and 32-23-4. Two things stretch it: time spent incarcerated for a previous violation is excluded from the calculation, and SDCL 32-23-4.9 reaches priors within 25 years for a sixth or subsequent offense charged as a Class 4 felony.
Updates
Corrected the expungement section, which had described a ten-year conviction-expungement petition and a 75-year-old exception that do not exist in South Dakota law, and added the mandatory minimum prison terms for fourth and fifth DUI offenses, the incarceration tolling and 25-year carve-out in the look-back period, and the correct statute for the one-year refusal revocation.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Re-anchored South Dakota's 10-year DUI look-back claim to the statute that actually sets it (SDCL 32-23-4.1) instead of the offense-classification sections (32-23-3, 32-23-4), which contain no time limit.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 32-23: DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
§ 32-23-1Driving or control of vehicle prohibited with alcohol in blood or while under influence of alcohol, drug, or intoxicant.In force
No person may drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle while: (1) There is 0.08 percent or more by weight of alcohol in that person's blood as shown by chemical analysis of that person's breath, blood, or other bodily substance; (2) Under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, marijuana, or any controlled drug or substance not obtained pursuant to a valid prescription, or any combination of an alcoholic beverage, marijuana, or such controlled drug or substance; (3) Under the influence of any controlled drug or substance obtained pursuant to a valid prescription, or any other substance, to a degree which renders the person incapable of safely driving; (4) Under the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage and or any controlled drug or substance obtained pursuant to a valid prescription, or any other substance, to a degree which renders the person incapable of safely driving; or (5) Under the influence of any substance ingested, inhaled, or otherwise taken into the body as prohibited by § 22-42-15.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-05 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 164 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Michalek (South Dakota Supreme Court 1987, 407 N.W.2d 815)“…ing While Intoxicated (DWI), Third Offense, in violation of SDCL 32-23-1. His first trial resulted in a hung jur…”
- Peterson v. State (South Dakota Supreme Court 1977, 261 N.W.2d 405)“…Respondent Peterson was arrested for DWI, in violation of SDCL 32-23-1, in Sturgis, on February 2, 1976, at 7:…”
- Honomichl v. State (South Dakota Supreme Court 1983, 333 N.W.2d 797)“…Dakota, for driving while intoxicated (DWI) in violation of SDCL 32-23-1(2). Appellant, without representation b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-2Punishment for prohibited driving--First offense--Limited driving privilege.In force
If conviction for a violation of § 32-23-1 is for a first offense, the person is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor, and the court must revoke the person's driver license for not less than thirty days. The court may, in its discretion, issue an order, upon proof of financial responsibility pursuant to § 32-35-113, permitting the person to operate a vehicle for purposes of employment, 24/7 sobriety testing, attendance at school, child care delivery or pickup, health appointments, attendance at court or probation appointments, or attendance at counseling programs, treatment, or aftercare. The court may also order the revocation of the person's driving privilege for a further period not to exceed one year or restrict the privilege in any manner it sees fit for a period not to exceed one year.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Maas v. Department of Commerce & Regulation (South Dakota Supreme Court 2003, 661 N.W.2d 726)“…trial court under] the mandatory [revocation] provisions of SDCL 32-23-2 to 4." This authority, under SDCL 32-12…”
- State v. Huettl (South Dakota Supreme Court 1985, 379 N.W.2d 298)“…he sentence. He points out that the legislature by enacting SDCL 32-23-2, -3, and -4, provided automatic enhance…”
- Horne v. Crozier (South Dakota Supreme Court 1997, 565 N.W.2d 50)“…ne year in jail, in addition to a fine and loss of license. SDCL 32-23-2. Although the circuit court incorrectly…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-3Punishment for second offense--Revocation of driving privilege--Jail sentence for driving while privilege revoked--Limited driving privilege.In force
If conviction for a violation of § 32-23-1 is for a second offense, the person is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor, and the court must revoke the person's driver license for a period of not less than one year. Upon the successful completion of a court-approved chemical dependency program, and proof of financial responsibility pursuant to § 32-35-113, the court may permit the person to drive for the purposes of employment, 24/7 sobriety testing, attendance at school, child care delivery or pickup, health appointments, attendance at court or probation appointments, or attendance at counseling programs, treatment, or aftercare. If the person is convicted of driving without a license during that period, the court must sentence the person to the county jail for not less than three days, which sentence may not be suspended.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Dufault (South Dakota Supreme Court 2001, 628 N.W.2d 755)“…ter than one year exceeds the trial court's authority under SDCL 32-23-3. He did not raise this issue before the…”
- State v. Gehrke (South Dakota Supreme Court 1991, 474 N.W.2d 722)“…ause the statutory scheme of the DWI repeat offender law at SDCL §§ 32-23-3 to 32-23-4.6 differs from the felony ha…”
- State v. Horst (South Dakota Supreme Court 1993, 504 N.W.2d 862)“…cted of SDCL 32-23-1. The offense is a Class 1 misdemeanor. SDCL 32-23-3. Circuit Judge Judith K. Meierhenry p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-4Punishment for third offense--Revocation of driving privilege--Jail sentence for driving while privilege revoked--Limited driving privilege.In force
If conviction for a violation of § 32-23-1 is for a third offense, the person is guilty of a Class 6 felony, and the court must revoke the person's driver license for a period of not less than one year from the date sentence is imposed or one year from the date of initial release from imprisonment, whichever is later. If the person is returned to imprisonment prior to the completion of the period of driver's license revocation, time spent imprisoned does not count toward fulfilling the period of revocation. If the person is convicted of driving without a license during that period, the court must sentence the person to the county jail for not less than ten days, which sentence may not be suspended. Notwithstanding § 23A-27-19, the court retains jurisdiction to modify the conditions of the license revocation for the term of the revocation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. King (South Dakota Supreme Court 1987, 400 N.W.2d 878)“…irmities. Enhancement of his punishment is made possible by SDCL 32-23-4, which provides: If conviction for a…”
- State v. Myers (South Dakota Supreme Court 1987, 411 N.W.2d 402)“…der the influence (DUI) in violation of SDCL 32-23-1(2) and SDCL 32-23-4. A presen-tence investigation was order…”
- State v. Rederth (South Dakota Supreme Court 1985, 376 N.W.2d 579)“…time in the South Dakota State Penitentiary as felons under SDCL 32-23-4 in discriminately higher numbers than w…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-4.1Calculation of number of offenses.In force
Except as authorized under § 32-23-4.9, no previous conviction for, or plea of guilty to, a violation of § 32-23-1, 22-18-36, or 22-16-41 occurring more than ten years prior to the date of the violation being charged may be used to determine that the violation being charged is a second, third, or subsequent offense. Any period of time during which the defendant was incarcerated for a previous violation may not be included when calculating if the time period provided in this section has elapsed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Heinrich (South Dakota Supreme Court 1989, 449 N.W.2d 25)“…convictions were within the five year period required under SDCL 32-23-4.1; and further, that the convictions were…”
- State v. Nilson (South Dakota Supreme Court 1985, 364 N.W.2d 532)“…82 Appellant convicted D.W.I., Hughes County. July 1,1983 SDCL 32-23-4.1 amended to five-year limit. January 2…”
- State v. Gehrke (South Dakota Supreme Court 1991, 474 N.W.2d 722)“…nse[.]" The particular statute construed in Myers was SDCL 32-23-4.1, which excluded from consideration sta…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-4.6Punishment for fourth offense--Revocation of driving privilege--Jail sentence for driving while privilege revoked--Limited driving privilege--Mandatory sentence--Suspension of sentence.In force
If a conviction for a violation of § 32-23-1 is for a fourth offense, the person is guilty of a Class 5 felony, and the court must revoke the person's driver license for a period of not less than two years from the date sentence is imposed or two years from the date of initial release from imprisonment, whichever is later. If the person is returned to imprisonment prior to the completion of the period of driver's license revocation, time spent imprisoned does not count toward fulfilling the period of revocation. If the person is convicted of driving without a license during that period, the court must sentence the person to the county jail for not less than twenty days, which sentence may not be suspended. Notwithstanding § 23A-27-19, the court retains jurisdiction to modify the conditions of the license revocation for the term of the revocation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Davis (South Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 598 N.W.2d 535)“…ge of fourth offense DUI in this case was filed pursuant to SDCL 32-23-4.6 which provides in pertinent part:…”
- State v. Flegel (South Dakota Supreme Court 1992, 485 N.W.2d 210)“…s charged in a Part II information with fourth offense DWI (SDCL 32-23-4.6). Prior to trial, Flegel filed a motion…”
- State v. Sickler (South Dakota Supreme Court 1992, 488 N.W.2d 70)“…r was subsequently convicted for violating SDCL 32-23-1 and SDCL 32-23-4.6 (fourth conviction of SDCL 32-23-1). Si…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-4.9Punishment for sixth or subsequent offense--Mandatory sentence--Revocation of driving privilege--Jail sentence for driving while privilege revoked--Limited driving privilege--Supervision.In force
If a conviction for a violation of § 32-23-1 is for a sixth or subsequent offense, and the person had at least five convictions of § 32-23-1 occurring within twenty-five years of the violation being charged, and at least two of those prior convictions occurred within ten years, the violation is an aggravated offense and the person is guilty of a Class 4 felony. If a person is convicted of an aggravated offense and the person has at least five convictions of § 32-23-1 occurring within fifteen years of the violation being charged, the court must sentence the person to at least six years in a state correctional facility, one year of which must be served on parole, unless refused pursuant to § 24-15A-15. Any term of parole must include at least one of the following: enrollment in an alcohol or drug accountability program, an ignition interlock, a breath alcohol interlock, an alcohol monitoring bracelet, or another enhanced monitoring tool. The court may suspend this sentence only if the court orders the person to participate in and complete a drug court program, DUI court program, veterans treatment court program, or mental health court program, as a condition of probation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
§ 32-23-21Driver under age of twenty-one operating vehicle after alcohol or drug consumption--Misdemeanor--Suspension of license--Restricted driving privilege.In force
It is a Class 2 misdemeanor for any person under the age of twenty-one to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of any vehicle: (1) If there is physical evidence of 0.02 percent or more by weight of alcohol in the person's blood as shown by a chemical analysis of the person's breath, blood, or other bodily substance; or (2) After having consumed marijuana or any controlled drug or substance, other than a controlled drug or substance lawfully prescribed for the person, for as long as physical evidence of the consumption remains present in the person's body. If a person is found guilty of or adjudicated for a violation of this section, the Unified Judicial System shall notify the Department of Public Safety. Upon conviction or adjudication, the court shall suspend that person's driver's license or operating privilege for a period of thirty days for a first offense, one hundred eighty days for a second offense, and one year for any third or subsequent offense.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Bettelyoun, Ehret, Osborne (South Dakota Supreme Court 2022, 2022 S.D. 14)“…ed for driving while under the influence (DUI) pursuant to SDCL 32-23-21, often called the “zero tolerance” DUI…”
- Webb v. South Dakota Department of Commerce & Regulation (South Dakota Supreme Court 2004, 680 N.W.2d 661)“…consumption of alcohol while under age 21 (see SDCL 32-23-21) 1 and for driving with a…”
- State v. Mundy-Geidd (South Dakota Supreme Court 2014, 2014 S.D. 96)“…s under the influence of alcohol from operating aircraft); SDCL 32-23-21 (prohibiting minors from operating vehi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-10Operation of vehicle as consent to withdrawal of bodily substances and chemical analysis--Submission to withdrawal or analysis following arrest.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any person who operates any vehicle in this state is considered to have given consent to the withdrawal of blood or other bodily substance and chemical analysis of the person's blood, breath, or other bodily substance to determine the amount of alcohol in the person's blood and to determine the presence of marijuana or any controlled drug or substance or any substance ingested, inhaled, or otherwise taken into the body as prohibited by § 22-42-15 or any other substance that may render a person incapable of safely driving. The arresting law enforcement officer may, subsequent to the arrest of any operator for a violation of § 32-23-1, require the operator to submit to the withdrawal of blood or other bodily substances as evidence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 66 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Fierro (South Dakota Supreme Court 2014, 2014 S.D. 62)“…ling, the [c]ourt finds that the State’s interpretation of SDCL 32-23-10 in this particular case requiring a ma…”
- Peterson v. State (South Dakota Supreme Court 1977, 261 N.W.2d 405)“…submit to a chemical analysis of the type authorized under SDCL 32-23-10; and (3) that the officer properly advi…”
- State v. Hartman (South Dakota Supreme Court 1977, 256 N.W.2d 131)“…fendant of his right to refuse to give a blood sample under SDCL 32-23-10, [1] 32-23-11, [2] and 32-23-12 [3]…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Dakota Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do
§ 32-23-11Request for hearing on revocation of license for refusal to submit to chemical analysis--Eligibility to drive for purpose of employment--Rules for restricted licenses.In force
Any person subject to license revocation for failure to submit to the withdrawal and chemical analysis pursuant to § 32-23-18 who wants to contest the revocation, shall request a hearing, pursuant to chapter 1-26, within one hundred twenty days of arrest. If the secretary of public safety finds that the law enforcement officer complied with the law and the refusal was made by the person, the secretary shall revoke that person's license to drive and any nonresident operating privileges for one year. The secretary shall determine if the person is eligible to drive for the purpose of employment and may promulgate rules, pursuant to chapter 1-26, for determining that eligibility. The secretary of public safety may promulgate rules for restricted licenses as follows: (1) Eligibility; (2) Application; (3) Determination; (4) Limitations; and (5) Grounds for revocation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1995
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Peterson v. State (South Dakota Supreme Court 1977, 261 N.W.2d 405)“…of his rights, under our law the test "shall not be given." SDCL 32-23-11. [5] (But for the right to refuse give…”
- State v. Hartman (South Dakota Supreme Court 1977, 256 N.W.2d 131)“…32-23-10 is given, the vehicle operator is empowered, under SDCL 32-23-11, to refuse the chemical test. If the ri…”
- State v. Bunnell (South Dakota Supreme Court 1982, 324 N.W.2d 418)“…1 , 5 N.W.2d 729 (1942). When the legislature amended SDCL 32-23-11 in 1980 it clearly intended to encourag…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-23-19Law enforcement officer to serve notice of intent to revoke--License confiscated--Notice as temporary license.In force
A law enforcement officer shall serve the notice of intent to revoke, on behalf of the Department of Public Safety and shall take possession of any driver's license issued by this state held by the person if the arrested driver refuses to submit to a chemical analysis as directed by the officer pursuant to § 32-23-10. A copy of the completed notice of intent to revoke form, and any South Dakota driver's license taken into possession shall be forwarded to the department by the officer. If a valid South Dakota driver's license is surrendered, the notice of intent to revoke shall function as a temporary license which is valid for one hundred twenty days. Upon receipt of a petition for a hearing, the department may extend the temporary license thirty days following the scheduled date of the hearing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
§ 32-23-4.7Punishment for fifth or subsequent offense--Revocation of driving privilege--Jail sentence for driving while privilege revoked--Limited driving privilege--Mandatory sentence.In force
If a conviction for violation of § 32-23-1 is for a fifth or subsequent offense, the person is guilty of a Class 4 felony and the court must revoke the person's driver license for a period of not less than three years from the date sentence is imposed or three years from the date of initial release from imprisonment, whichever is later. If the person is returned to imprisonment prior to the completion of the period of driver's license revocation, time spent imprisoned does not count toward fulfilling the period of revocation. If the person is convicted of driving without a license during that period, the court must sentence the person to the county jail for not less than twenty days, which sentence may not be suspended. Notwithstanding § 23A-27-19, the court retains jurisdiction to modify the conditions of the license revocation for the term of the revocation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Powers (South Dakota Supreme Court 2008, 758 N.W.2d 918)“…enced as a fifth offender, which is a Class 4 felony under SDCL 32-23-4.7. 2 If the 1996 conviction had been exc…”
- State v. Yuel (South Dakota Supreme Court 2013, 840 N.W.2d 680)“…fense of driving while under the influence, in violation of SDCL 32-23-4.7. Yuel pleaded not guilty to the charge…”
- State v. Hernandez (South Dakota Supreme Court 2014, 845 N.W.2d 21)“…ithin a ten-year period in violation of SDCL 32-23-1(1) and SDCL 32-23-4.7, and in the alternative, driving under…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 23A-27: SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT
§ 23A-27-14Discharge and dismissal of probationer on completion of conditions--No judgment entered--Limitation.In force
Upon completion of the observance of all conditions imposed pursuant to § 23A-27-12.2 or 23A-27-13, the court services officer assigned to the defendant's case or the defendant shall bring the matter to the attention of the court, whereupon the defendant shall be discharged by the court. A formal entry of the discharge shall be entered by the clerk of courts. Discharge and dismissal under this section shall be without court adjudication of guilt and shall not be deemed a conviction for purposes of disqualifications or disabilities imposed by law upon conviction of a crime. Discharge and dismissal under this section may occur only once with respect to any person for a suspended imposition of sentence under § 23A-27-13 and only once with respect to any person for a suspended imposition of sentence under § 23A-27-12.2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re the Discipline of Weisensee (South Dakota Supreme Court 1980, 296 N.W.2d 717)“…the proceedings against him by the trial court pursuant to SDCL 23A-27-14 in effect vitiated the disciplinary pro…”
- State v. Winchester (South Dakota Supreme Court 1989, 438 N.W.2d 555)“…der SDCL 23A-27-13 there is no adjudication of guilt. Under SDCL 23A-27-14, upon completion of the terms of probat…”
- Jans v. Department of Public Safety (South Dakota Supreme Court 2021, 2021 S.D. 51)“…y his CDL once his case was dismissed and discharged under SDCL 23A-27-14. We affirm. F…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 23A-27-17Sealing of records on discharge of probationer--Effect of order--Future statements by defendant as to conviction.In force
Upon the discharge and dismissal of a person pursuant to § 23A-27-14, a court shall order that all official records, other than the nonpublic records to be retained by the Division of Criminal Investigation, be sealed along with all records relating to the person's arrest, indictment or information, trial, finding of guilt, and dismissal and discharge. The effect of such order is to restore such person, in the contemplation of the law, to the status he occupied before his arrest or indictment or information. No person as to whom such order has been entered shall be held thereafter under any provision of any law to be guilty of perjury or of giving a false statement by reason of his failure to recite or acknowledge such arrest, indictment or information, or trial in response to any inquiry made of him for any purpose.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jans v. Department of Public Safety (South Dakota Supreme Court 2021, 2021 S.D. 51)“…27-14; and the record of the offense was sealed pursuant to SDCL 23A-27-17. Upon discharge, he claimed he was no l…”
- Matter of Reinstatement of Husby (South Dakota Supreme Court 1988, 426 N.W.2d 27)“…27-13 and complied with the conditions of probation. See SDCL 23A-27-17. .This Justice was not a member o…”
- Rapid City Journal v. Callahan (South Dakota Supreme Court 2022, 2022 S.D. 38)“…t discharge the defendant and seal the file in accord with SDCL 23A-27-17. [¶20.] Here, Judge Callahan sus…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 23A-3: (RULE 4.1) ARREST
§ 23A-3-27Motion for expungement of arrest record.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
An arrested person may apply to the court that would have jurisdiction over the crime for which the person was arrested, for entry of an order expunging the record of the arrest: (1) After one year from the date of any arrest, if no accusatory instrument was filed; (2) After one year from the date the prosecuting attorney formally dismisses the entire criminal case on the record; (3) At any time after an acquittal; or (4) Within one year from the date the prosecuting attorney formally dismisses the entire criminal case on the record upon a showing of compelling necessity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re the Expungement of Records Related to Oliver (South Dakota Supreme Court 2012, 810 N.W.2d 350)“…D. 1984). [¶7.] The parties dispute the meaning of SDCL 23A-3-27. The statute, titled “Motion for expun…”
- In Re the Expungement of the Record Concerning Taliaferro (South Dakota Supreme Court 2014, 2014 S.D. 82)“…petition for expungement of all seven charges pursuant to SDCL 23A-3-27. Citing SDCL 23A-3-27(2), the State ref…”
- Record Expungement of Jones (South Dakota Supreme Court 2025, 2025 S.D. 54)“…unging the record of his arrest and subsequent trial under SDCL 23A-3-27(3). The court held an evidentiary hear…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Dakota Expungement Laws: Arrest Records, Suspended Imposition, and What You Can Clear, South Dakota Court Records: How to Search, What's Public, and How to Seal Them (2026), South Dakota Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 23A-3-34Defendant's public record--Automatic removal of non-felony charges or convictions--Case record available to authorized personnel--Use as enhancement.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
Any charge or conviction resulting from a case where a petty offense, municipal ordinance violation, or a Class 2 misdemeanor was the highest charged offense shall be automatically removed from a defendant's public record after five years if all court-ordered conditions on the case have been satisfied and the defendant has not been convicted of any further offenses within those five years. However, the case record remains available to court personnel or as authorized by order of the court and may be used as an enhancement in the prosecution of subsequent offenses as provided by law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-1, DUI offense and 0.08% per se BAC limit(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-2, first-offense DUI punishment (Class 1 misdemeanor, license revocation)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-3, second-offense DUI penalties(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-4, third-offense DUI as a Class 6 felony(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Law Chapter 32-23, DUI (implied consent 32-23-10 and under-21 zero tolerance 32-23-21)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Law Chapter 23A-3, expungement of criminal records(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- NHTSA, drunk driving and the 0.08% federal BAC standard(nhtsa.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-4.1, calculation of number of offenses (10-year look-back period)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-4.6, fourth-offense DUI as a Class 5 felony with a mandatory minimum of at least two years in a state correctional facility(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-4.7, fifth or subsequent DUI as a Class 4 felony with a mandatory minimum of at least four years in a state correctional facility(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-4.9, aggravated sixth or subsequent DUI reaching prior convictions within twenty-five years(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-10, implied consent to withdrawal and chemical analysis(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-11, secretary of public safety's one-year license revocation for refusal and the 120-day hearing request(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-19, officer's notice of intent to revoke for refusal and 120-day temporary license(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 32-23-21, under-21 zero tolerance at 0.02 percent BAC as a Class 2 misdemeanor(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 23A-3-27, motion for expungement of an arrest record(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 23A-3-34, automatic five-year removal limited to cases where a petty offense, ordinance violation, or Class 2 misdemeanor was the highest charged offense(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 23A-27-14, discharge and dismissal after a suspended imposition of sentence, without adjudication of guilt(sdlegislature.gov)
- South Dakota Codified Law 23A-27-17, sealing of records upon discharge and dismissal(sdlegislature.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.