North Dakota
North Dakota Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited November 1, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of November 1, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

North Dakota homeowners and businesses can install security cameras on their own property without permits or registration. Silent video surveillance is legal; audio recording follows one-party consent rules under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-15-02. North Dakota does not ban cameras by location, but secretly recording into a place where people reasonably expect privacy, with intent to intrude on their privacy, is a crime.
North Dakota does not have a specific statute regulating the installation of security cameras. Residents and businesses can install surveillance systems without permits or government registration. Privacy limits on where a camera may be aimed do come from statute, however: under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31-14, surreptitiously installing or using a device to observe or record events from a place where a reasonable individual would have an expectation of privacy, with intent to intrude upon or interfere with an occupant's privacy, is a class B misdemeanor. If it is done for sexual gratification where people undress, N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-12.2 makes it a class A misdemeanor, or a class C felony for a repeat offense, an offender with a prior indecent-exposure conviction (12.1-20-12.1), an offender required to register as a sex offender, or a minor victim, and a conviction carries sex-offender registration under § 12.1-32-15. Secretly creating a nude or sexual image of someone without written consent is also a class A misdemeanor under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-27.1-03.3, which lets an identifiable person depicted who is harmed sue when the image was produced, possessed, or shared for sexual arousal or gratification, humiliation, degradation, or monetary or commercial gain, for up to $10,000 in statutory damages per defendant. A civil lawsuit for invasion of privacy is less certain: the North Dakota Supreme Court has not decided whether that claim exists in the state (Hougum v. Valley Memorial Homes, 1998). Separately, if footage capturing an intimate image were later distributed without consent, that distribution could be covered by North Dakota's intimate-images statute, N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-07.2.
This guide covers residential camera rules, business surveillance, audio recording by security cameras, HOA restrictions, neighbor disputes, and smart camera technology in North Dakota.
Residential Security Cameras
Your Right to Install Cameras
North Dakota homeowners can install security cameras on their own property without government permission. You can place cameras on exterior walls, covering entry points, driveways, and yards.

Where You Cannot Aim Cameras
Avoid aiming cameras directly into neighbors' windows, bedrooms, bathrooms, or enclosed private areas. Secretly recording into a place where others reasonably expect privacy, with intent to intrude on their privacy, can be charged under § 12.1-31-14. A civil invasion-of-privacy claim is uncertain in North Dakota because the state Supreme Court has not decided whether that lawsuit exists, so the criminal statutes and remedies such as nuisance or a harassment restraining order are the firmer routes.
Nanny Cams
Nanny cameras are generally lawful in common areas of your own home (living rooms, kitchens, playrooms). Keep them out of bathrooms and guest bedrooms: secretly recording a guest or caregiver in a space where they reasonably expect privacy, with intent to intrude on that privacy, can be a crime under § 12.1-31-14, and audio of conversations you are not part of raises the wiretap issue below.
Audio Recording
Security camera audio recording follows North Dakota's one-party consent rules. A recording is lawful for conversations you take part in, or where a participant has given prior consent, unless it is made to commit a crime or other unlawful harm (§ 12.1-15-02(3)(c)). If the camera captures private conversations between other people when you are not part of them and no participant has consented, the recording can be a class C felony under § 12.1-15-02.
Business Security Cameras

Businesses can install cameras in lobbies, sales floors, warehouses, parking lots, and hallways. No statute lists forbidden locations, but secretly recording into bathrooms, locker rooms, changing areas, or nursing rooms, where people reasonably expect privacy, with intent to intrude on that privacy, is a crime under § 12.1-31-14, so lawful business cameras stay out of those spaces.
HOA and Community Rules

HOAs can establish rules about camera placement, size, and aesthetics. Review your CC&Rs before installing exterior cameras.
Neighbor Disputes

Resolve security camera disputes by talking to the neighbor, reviewing local ordinances, requesting mediation, or consulting the North Dakota Attorney General.
Smart Cameras and Law Enforcement
Ring doorbells, Nest cameras, and similar devices are legal. Law enforcement can request footage, but cannot require you to hand it over without legal process such as a warrant, subpoena, or court order. Review your device manufacturer's privacy policy for law enforcement data request procedures.
More North Dakota Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to North Dakota Recording Laws
More North Dakota Recording Topics
See Also
- North Dakota Surveillance Camera Laws covers home, HOA, neighbor, workplace, and landlord camera rules in North Dakota.
More North Dakota Laws
- North Dakota AI Meeting Recording Laws
- North Dakota Dashcam Laws
- North Dakota Data Privacy Laws
- North Dakota Deepfake Laws
- North Dakota Employee Monitoring Laws
- North Dakota GPS Tracking Laws
- North Dakota Police Bodycam Laws
- North Dakota Smart Glasses Recording Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a permit for security cameras in North Dakota?
No. North Dakota does not require permits or registration for residential or commercial security cameras.
Can my neighbor point a security camera at my house in North Dakota?
A neighbor's camera may incidentally capture your property. Secretly recording into your home with intent to intrude on your privacy can be a crime under N.D.C.C. 12.1-31-14. A civil invasion-of-privacy lawsuit is uncertain, because the North Dakota Supreme Court has not decided whether that claim exists.
Do security cameras with audio violate North Dakota wiretapping laws?
Security camera audio follows one-party consent rules. Recording conversations you take part in, or where a participant has consented in advance, is legal unless you record to commit a crime or other unlawful harm. Capturing private conversations between others when you are not part of them and no one has consented can be a class C felony.
Can my landlord install cameras inside my apartment in North Dakota?
Not secretly. A landlord who secretly installs a camera or recording device inside your unit to intrude on your privacy can be charged under N.D.C.C. 12.1-31-14, and under 12.1-20-12.2 if it is done for sexual gratification. North Dakota has no statute written specifically about landlord cameras, so a visible camera you agreed to is a lease and privacy question rather than a clear crime. Landlords commonly use cameras in shared areas such as hallways and parking lots.
Can police access my security camera footage without a warrant in North Dakota?
Police can request footage voluntarily, but you are not required to provide it without legal process such as a warrant, subpoena, or court order.
Updates
We added that a prior indecent-exposure conviction also makes North Dakota surreptitious intrusion (12.1-20-12.2) a class C felony.
Completed the purposes that support a civil claim over a sexual image and the circumstances that make the sexual surreptitious-intrusion offense a felony.
Aligned the page on what police need to compel camera footage (a warrant, subpoena, or court order) and added the conditions for suing over a secretly created sexual image.
We replaced statements that North Dakota bans cameras in certain places with the actual hidden-camera crimes and their elements, added the higher penalties and sex-offender registration under N.D.C.C. 12.1-20-12.2 and the 12.1-27.1-03.3 offense, noted that the state Supreme Court has not decided whether an invasion-of-privacy lawsuit exists, and corrected the audio-consent rule.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the explanation of camera-placement limits to cite North Dakota's surreptitious intrusion statute, N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31-14, instead of attributing them only to common law.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the source of camera-aiming privacy limits: N.D.C.C. 12.1-17-07.2 is a distribution-of-intimate-images offense, not a camera-placement or window-peeping statute; privacy limits on where a camera may be aimed come from common-law invasion-of-privacy principles.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Dakota Century Code
§ 12.1-15-02Interception of wire or oral communications - EavesdroppingIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
A person is guilty of a class C felony if he: Intentionally intercepts any wire or oral communication by use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device; or Intentionally discloses to any other person or intentionally uses the contents of any wire or oral communication, knowing that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire or oral communication. A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if he secretly loiters about any building with intent to overhear discourse or conversation therein and to repeat or publish the same with intent to vex, annoy, or injure others. It is a defense to a prosecution under subsection 1 that: The actor was authorized by law to intercept, disclose, or use, as the case may be, the wire or oral communication. The actor was: A person acting under color of law to intercept a wire or oral communication, and He was a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication had given prior consent to such interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Fargo Women's Health Organization, Inc. v. Larson (1986) applied the subsection 3(c) defense to this section and held that recordings of calls were properly admitted because the callers knew of and consented to the recording of their own conversations.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Fargo Women's Health Organization, Inc. v. Larson (North Dakota Supreme Court 1986, 391 N.W.2d 627)✓A private investigator hired by an abortion clinic recruited callers to phone a rival anti-abortion clinic and recorded the calls with the callers' consent; the court held that consent triggered the defense in section 12.1-15-02(3)(c), so the tapes were admitted.
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514)“…Ann. § 30-12-1 (1994); N. C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287 (1999); N. D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02 (1997); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2933.52…”
- American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. Alvarez (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2012, 679 F.3d 583)“…55 § 750.539c; N.D. Cent. Code. Ann. § 12.1-15-02. The Cali- fornia statute is illustrat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Dakota Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), North Dakota Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, North Dakota Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
§ 12.1-17-07.2Distribution of intimate images without or against consent - PenaltyIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
As used in this section: "Distribute" means selling, exhibiting, displaying, wholesaling, retailing, providing, giving, granting admission to, providing access to, or otherwise transferring or presenting an image to another individual, with or without consideration. "Hosting company" means a person that provides services or facilities for storing or distributing content over the internet without editorial or creative alteration of the content. "Intimate image" means any visual depiction, photograph, film, video, recording, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, that depicts: Exposed human male or female genitals or pubic area, with less than an opaque covering; A female breast with less than an opaque covering, or any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; or The individual engaged in any sexually explicit conduct. "Service provider" means an internet service provider, including a person who leases or rents a wire or cable for the transmission of data.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Also relied on in: North Dakota Video Recording Laws: Surveillance, Filming, and Privacy Rules (2026), North Dakota Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026), North Dakota Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Sources and References
- N.D.C.C. § 12.1-15-02(ndlegis.gov).gov
- ND Attorney General(attorneygeneral.nd.gov).gov
- FTC Home Security(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-07.2 - Intimate Images(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. Chapter 12.1-31, § 12.1-31-14 (Surreptitious intrusion or interference with privacy)(ndlegis.gov).gov