Schulden und Insolvenz in Deutschland: The Complete Debt Law Hub

Schulden, debt, is one of the most searched legal problems in Germany, and most people who search it are already frightened before they read a single word about what the law actually says. The single fact that reorients almost everyone's situation is simple: a creditor cannot take anything from you, no wages, no bank balance, no property, without first obtaining a court title. A collection agency's letter, however official it looks, is not a court title, and it does not create one on its own.

This hub maps the whole path German debt law follows, from the first collection letter through the court process that turns a claim into something enforceable, the limits on what wage garnishment can actually reach, the credit record consequences, and the three year route out of debt entirely through personal insolvency. Each numbered section below routes to a dedicated page with the full detail and worked examples. For the wider picture of German law, courts, and other legal topics, see German law explained.

Information last verified on 20 July 2026. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice in an individual case.

The fact that reorients most people's situation

When a collection letter arrives threatening account freezes or wage deductions, it is describing a step that has not happened and, if the debt is genuinely disputed, may never happen. German enforcement law reserves the power to actually seize anything to the courts and the Gerichtsvollzieher, the court bailiff, acting on an enforceable title such as a judgment or a Vollstreckungsbescheid. A collection agency, an Inkassounternehmen, has no seizure power of its own, whatever its letterhead implies.

That does not mean a genuine, undisputed debt can simply be ignored forever. It means the sequence matters: a creditor has to get a title first, through a court, before enforcement becomes possible at all. Understanding that sequence, rather than reacting to the tone of a letter, is the single most useful thing a reader in this situation can do. See Inkasso in Germany for exactly what a collection agency can and cannot do, what it can lawfully charge, and how to dispute a claim you do not recognise or believe is too old to collect.

How a creditor actually gets a court title

Most German consumer debts that end up enforced get there through the Mahnverfahren, a court payment order procedure that is fast and largely automatic precisely because nobody at the court checks whether the underlying claim is actually valid before issuing the first document. A creditor applies to a central Mahngericht under § 690 ZPO, and the court sends out a Mahnbescheid without examining the claim's merits.

From service, the debtor has two weeks to pay or to file a written Widerspruch, an objection that does not need to give reasons, and the creditor cannot move to the next step until that fortnight has run (§§ 692, 699 ZPO). The fortnight is not a guillotine: a Widerspruch filed after it still counts for as long as no Vollstreckungsbescheid has been ordered (§ 694 Abs. 1 ZPO), and a late one is treated as an Einspruch (§ 694 Abs. 2 ZPO). A missed deadline here is not automatically the end of the road. Do nothing, and the creditor can apply for a Vollstreckungsbescheid, a second document with the legal standing of a default judgment, carrying its own separate two week deadline to object, the Einspruch. Miss both deadlines, and the creditor holds a genuine, enforceable court title, obtained without ever having to prove the claim to anyone.

The consequence of missing both windows is larger than it looks. Under § 794 ZPO a Vollstreckungsbescheid is treated as its own category of enforceable title, and § 197 BGB fixes its limitation period at thirty years, compared with the ordinary three year period under § 195 BGB that applies to an unlitigated contractual debt. See the Mahnbescheid and Vollstreckungsbescheid process for the full timeline, worked through with actual dates, and why objecting, even without a fully prepared defence, is almost always better than silence when a debt is genuinely disputed.

What garnishment can actually reach once a title exists

Once a creditor holds an enforceable title, the next real question is how much of a debtor's income or account balance it can actually reach. German law does not allow a creditor to take everything. § 850c ZPO sets a protected minimum that a creditor cannot touch regardless of the debt, currently 1.587,40 EUR a month for someone with no dependants, rising with each dependant actually supported, and reset on an annual cycle each July under a fresh Pfändungsfreigrenzenbekanntmachung.

A separate mechanism, the Pfändungsschutzkonto or P-Konto, extends similar protection to a bank balance, though unlike wage protection it has to be actively requested from the bank rather than applying automatically. And a claim for unpaid maintenance, child or spousal support, runs under a materially harsher regime than an ordinary debt, one where a court can reach further into a debtor's income than almost any commercial creditor could. See wage garnishment for the full current figures, the P-Konto process, and why the maintenance exception catches so many people by surprise.

What a debt does to your credit record, and what does not follow automatically

A debt that goes unpaid, or an insolvency proceeding, affects a person's SCHUFA record, and how long that record stays visible is a separate question from what is still legally owed. The most useful and least publicised fact here is that a Datenkopie, a full copy of everything a credit bureau holds on you, is completely free under Art. 15 DSGVO, and it is the starting point for correcting anything actually wrong, distinct from an entry that is simply unwelcome but accurate. See SCHUFA deletion for what can actually be corrected, what the retention periods really are once a debt is settled, and the free Ombudsmann route for a dispute a written request does not resolve.

The route out: Privatinsolvenz and Restschuldbefreiung

Where debts across several creditors have become unmanageable, German law provides a structured route to a genuine fresh start: Privatinsolvenz, formally the Verbraucherinsolvenzverfahren. After a mandatory, certified attempt to settle out of court first under § 305 InsO, a debtor who opens the court procedure assigns their attachable income to a trustee for three years under § 287 InsO, at the end of which the remaining debt is discharged. That three year period, shortened from six years by a 2020 reform, is settled, ongoing law rather than a temporary measure, confirmed as such by a 2024 government evaluation delivered to the Bundestag.

Discharge is broad but not absolute. § 302 InsO keeps certain debts alive regardless of how the rest of the procedure goes: criminal fines, and any claim a creditor formally registered during the case as arising from an intentional tort, an intentionally withheld maintenance obligation, or certain tax offences. An ordinary contractual debt, however large, is not in that protected category. See Privatinsolvenz for the full sequence, the duties a debtor has during the three years, and the narrow grounds on which a court can refuse discharge.

Start with the free route, not the paid one

Before anything that costs money, two free resources exist and should generally come first. A Datenkopie under Art. 15 DSGVO costs nothing and shows exactly what a credit bureau actually holds. And Schuldnerberatung, non-profit debt counselling, operates in every Bundesland, funded by the Länder or local authorities rather than charging the people it helps, and it is also the body that issues the certified out of court settlement attempt Privatinsolvenz requires before a court petition can even be filed. A reader weighing a paid debt management or credit repair product should generally talk to a Schuldnerberatungsstelle first.

Find your situation