Australia
Notice of Termination in Australia: The NES Scale and the Over-45 Extra Week

Notice of termination under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) is a National Employment Standards minimum, from 1 week up to 4 weeks based on length of service, plus an extra week if the employee is over 45 with at least 2 years' service, and it can be paid in lieu.
This article addresses notice of termination under s 117 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), one of the National Employment Standards, current as at 19 July 2026. It does not address redundancy pay, a separate entitlement covered on recordinglaw.com's redundancy pay guide, or unfair dismissal, covered on recordinglaw.com's unfair dismissal guide.
What Notice of Termination Means
Section 117(1) of the Fair Work Act requires an employer to give an employee written notice of the day their employment will end before terminating it, and that notice cannot specify a day earlier than the day the notice is actually given. Section 117(2) then requires that the gap between giving that notice and the termination date be at least the minimum period worked out under the statutory scale, or that the employer instead pay the employee an amount in lieu of notice at least equal to what the employee would have earned at their full rate of pay for the hours they would have worked during that minimum notice period had employment continued. Notice of termination exists to give an employee either practical warning to find alternative work, or the financial equivalent of that warning period, before their job ends.
The NES Notice Scale
Section 117(3)(a) sets the minimum notice period by an employee's period of continuous service with the employer at the end of the day the notice is given. As with redundancy pay, periods of casual employment do not count toward this continuous service calculation (s 117(4)).

| Period of continuous service | Minimum notice |
|---|---|
| Not more than 1 year | 1 week |
| More than 1 year but not more than 3 years | 2 weeks |
| More than 3 years but not more than 5 years | 3 weeks |
| More than 5 years | 4 weeks |
The Extra Week for Employees Over 45
Section 117(3)(b) adds a further week to the period worked out from the table above if the employee is over 45 years old and has completed at least 2 years of continuous service with the employer, both assessed as at the end of the day the notice is given. This means an employee aged over 45 with, for example, 6 years' service is entitled to 4 weeks under the base scale plus the additional week, 5 weeks in total, rather than 4. The age and service conditions are both assessed together at the same point in time, the day notice is given, not separately at different dates.
Payment in Lieu of Notice
An employer does not have to have the employee physically work out the notice period. Section 117(2)(b) allows the employer to instead pay an amount in lieu of notice, calculated at the employee's full rate of pay for the hours the employee would have worked had they worked through to the end of the minimum notice period. This is common where an employer wants an employee to leave immediately rather than continue attending work during a notice period, for example for confidentiality or workplace management reasons; the employee is paid out the equivalent value rather than physically serving the notice. A payment in lieu must reflect the full minimum period the employee was entitled to, including the extra week for employees over 45 where it applies.
Notice and Redundancy Pay Are Separate Entitlements
Notice of termination and redundancy pay are assessed under different provisions of the National Employment Standards and generally both apply together where a position is made redundant. An employer ending employment because a role is genuinely redundant must still give the correct notice (or pay in lieu of it) under s 117, in addition to any redundancy pay owed under s 119, calculated on the entirely separate scale covered on recordinglaw.com's redundancy pay guide. Neither entitlement substitutes for the other, and a business that pays redundancy pay but skips notice, or vice versa, has not met its full NES obligations.

Summary Dismissal for Serious Misconduct
Section 123 of the Fair Work Act sets out situations in which the notice requirement under s 117 does not apply, the most significant being summary dismissal for serious misconduct. Where an employee is dismissed for conduct serious enough to justify immediate dismissal without notice, such as theft, fraud, or conduct that causes serious and imminent risk to the health and safety of a person or to the reputation, viability or profitability of the employer's business, the employer is generally not required to give notice or pay in lieu of it. Whether particular conduct meets that threshold is assessed on the facts and is a common area of dispute; simply labelling a dismissal as being "for serious misconduct" does not by itself establish that the s 123 exception applies.
The NES Notice Period Is a Minimum
Section 117 sets the floor. A modern award, enterprise agreement or individual employment contract can specify a longer notice period than the NES minimum, and where one does, the more generous provision generally applies instead of the bare statutory scale. It is worth checking any applicable award, agreement or written contract before assuming the NES table above is the final word on the notice owed in a specific case.
Using the Notice Period Calculator
recordinglaw.com's Australia notice period calculator applies the s 117(3) scale above, including the extra week for employees over 45 with at least 2 years' service, to estimate the minimum notice period from a length of service and age. Its output is an estimate of the statutory minimum only; an applicable award, enterprise agreement or contract may provide for longer notice, and the summary dismissal exception under s 123 may mean no notice is required at all in a specific case.

This article provides general legal information about the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and, where noted, state and territory long service leave legislation, current as at 19 July 2026. It is not legal advice and does not account for your individual circumstances. Figures are stated for the 2026-27 financial year and are re-indexed on 1 July each year; the applicable figure for a dismissal or termination is usually the one in force on the date it took effect, not the date you read this article. For advice about a specific situation, consult a legal practitioner admitted in the relevant Australian state or territory.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much notice does my employer have to give me in Australia?
The National Employment Standards minimum runs from 1 week for up to 1 year of service, to 4 weeks for more than 5 years of service, under section 117(3) of the Fair Work Act. An extra week applies if you are over 45 with at least 2 years' service. An applicable award, agreement or contract can require more.
Do I get an extra week of notice if I am over 45?
Yes, if you also have at least 2 years of continuous service with the employer at the date notice is given. Both conditions, age and length of service, are assessed together at that date under section 117(3)(b) of the Fair Work Act.
Can my employer just pay me instead of giving me notice?
Yes. Section 117(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act allows an employer to pay an amount in lieu of notice, equal to what you would have earned at your full rate of pay for the hours you would have worked during the minimum notice period, instead of requiring you to work it out.
Is notice of termination the same as redundancy pay?
No. They are separate National Employment Standards entitlements calculated on different scales. An employee whose role is made redundant is generally entitled to both, not one instead of the other.
Does my employer have to give me notice if I am dismissed for misconduct?
Not always. Section 123 of the Fair Work Act removes the notice requirement for summary dismissal for serious misconduct, such as theft, fraud, or conduct that creates a serious and imminent risk to health and safety or to the employer's business. Whether specific conduct meets that threshold is assessed on the facts.
Does casual employment count toward my notice entitlement?
No. Section 117(4) of the Fair Work Act excludes periods of employment as a casual employee from the continuous service calculation used to work out the minimum notice period.
Can my employment contract give me more notice than the Fair Work Act minimum?
Yes. Section 117 sets a legal minimum. A modern award, enterprise agreement or individual employment contract can specify a longer notice period, and the more generous term generally applies.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 3 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Fair Work Act 2009
s 117Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieuIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Notice specifying day of termination (1) An employer must not terminate an employee’s employment unless the employer has given the employee written notice of the day of the termination (which cannot be before the day the notice is given). Note 1: Section 123 describes situations in which this section does not apply. Note 2: Sections 28A and 29 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 provide how a notice may be given. In particular, the notice may be given to an employee by: (a) delivering it personally; or (b) leaving it at the employee’s last known address; or (c) sending it by pre‑paid post to the employee’s last known address.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-08-14 · Read the full section at legislation.gov.au
Cited in 49 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases: Tattsbet Limited v Morrow (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2015, [2015] FCAFC 62) · Murphy v Chapple (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2022, [2022] FCAFC 165) · Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2015, [2015] FCAFC 20)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Australian Employment Law: Fair Work Act Guide by Topic (FY2026-27), Redundancy Pay in Australia: The Full NES Scale Explained (Including the Drop at 10 Years)
s 119Redundancy payIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Entitlement to redundancy pay (1) An employee is entitled to be paid redundancy pay by the employer if the employee’s employment is terminated: (a) at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour; or (b) because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer. Note: Sections 121, 122 and 123 describe situations in which the employee does not have this entitlement. Amount of redundancy pay (2) The amount of the redundancy pay equals the total amount payable to the employee for the redundancy pay period worked out using the following table at the employee’s base rate of pay for his or her ordinary hours of work: Redundancy pay period Employee’s period of continuous service with the employer on termination Redundancy pay period 1 At least 1 year but less than 2 years 4 weeks 2 At least 2 years but less than 3 years 6 weeks 3 At least 3 years but less than 4 years 7 weeks 4 At least 4 years but less than 5 years 8 weeks 5 At least 5 years but less than 6 years 10 weeks 6 At least 6 years but less than 7 years 11 weeks 7 At least 7 ye
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-08-14 · Read the full section at legislation.gov.au
Cited in 40 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Delta FM Australia Pty Ltd (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2021, [2021] FCAFC 107) · Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd v United Voice (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2020, [2020] FCAFC 113) · United Workers Union v Compass Group Healthcare Hospitality Services Pty Ltd (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2023, [2023] FCAFC 92)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s 123Limits on scope of this DivisionIn force
Employees not covered by this Division (1) This Division does not apply to any of the following employees: (a) an employee employed for a specified period of time, for a specified task, or for the duration of a specified season; (b) an employee whose employment is terminated because of serious misconduct; (c) a casual employee; (d) an employee (other than an apprentice) to whom a training arrangement applies and whose employment is for a specified period of time or is, for any reason, limited to the duration of the training arrangement; (e) an employee prescribed by the regulations as an employee to whom this Division does not apply. (2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not prevent this Division from applying to an employee if a substantial reason for employing the employee as described in that paragraph was to avoid the application of this Division.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-08-14 · Read the full section at legislation.gov.au
Cited in 12 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases: Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd v United Voice (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2020, [2020] FCAFC 113) · Republic of Italy (Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation - Adelaide Consulate) v Benvenuto (Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 2018, [2018] FCAFC 64) · [2024] NSWSC 556 (Supreme Court of New South Wales 2024, [2024] NSWSC 556)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 117, notice of termination or payment in lieu, NES scale(austlii.edu.au)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 119, NES redundancy pay scale(austlii.edu.au)
- Fair Work Commission, Notice of termination entitlements(fwc.gov.au).gov
- Fair Work Commission, Unfair Dismissal Benchbook(fwc.gov.au).gov
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 123, situations in which the notice requirement does not apply, including termination for serious misconduct(austlii.edu.au)
- Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) reg 1.07, meaning of serious misconduct(austlii.edu.au)