North Dakota
North Dakota Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

When a person in North Dakota dies because of someone else's wrongful act, neglect, or default, state law lets the family pursue a wrongful death claim for the losses the death causes them. The claim is created by N.D.C.C. chapter 32-21, and unlike many states, North Dakota names a specific list of family members in order of priority who may bring the single action. The deadline is generally two years from the date of death under N.D.C.C. 28-01-18(4).
Losing a loved one to another person's conduct is painful, and the legal rules can feel cold by comparison. This guide explains how North Dakota's wrongful death statute works in plain terms. It is general information, not legal advice. This guide is part of our Wrongful Death Laws by State series.
The deadline to file (statute of limitations)
North Dakota's wrongful death chapter does not state its own limitations period, so the general civil limitations statute applies. N.D.C.C. 28-01-18(4) sets a two-year period for an action for injuries done to the person of another when death ensues. In a wrongful death case, that two-year clock generally runs from the date of death. Because deadlines in injury and death cases can turn on the specific facts, including when an injury was discovered, families often confirm the exact date early. Missing the deadline usually ends the claim regardless of its merits.
Who may file a wrongful death claim in North Dakota
North Dakota uses an unusual structure. Rather than routing every claim through the estate, N.D.C.C. 32-21-03 lists the persons who may bring the action in a fixed order:
- The surviving husband or wife, if any.
- The surviving children, if any.
- The surviving mother or father.
- A surviving grandparent.
- The personal representative.
- A person who had primary physical custody of the decedent before the wrongful act.
The statute adds that if a person entitled to bring the action refuses or neglects to do so for 30 days after a demand by the next person in order, the next person may sue instead. Only one wrongful death action exists, so the person who brings it does so on behalf of all the heirs who will share the recovery. North Dakota courts treat this priority list as controlling who has standing to file. If a family member ahead of you in that order has not sued, get a free consultation with a North Dakota wrongful death lawyer on making the 30-day demand that lets the next person file (attorney advertising).
Wrongful death vs. survival action in North Dakota
North Dakota recognizes both kinds of claim. The wrongful death action under chapter 32-21 compensates the survivors for the loss the death causes them. A separate survival claim continues the legal claim the deceased person could have brought for their own injuries, such as pre-death pain and suffering and medical expenses. North Dakota's survival statute, N.D.C.C. 28-01-26.1, provides that no action or claim for relief abates by the death of a party, with limited exceptions, so the decedent's own claim survives to the estate. The two claims address different losses and are commonly pursued together.

Damages recoverable in a North Dakota wrongful death case
The damages standard is broad and left largely to the jury. Under N.D.C.C. 32-21-02, the jury gives such damages as it finds proportionate to the injury resulting from the death to the persons entitled to the recovery. In practice this allows the survivors to recover for losses such as:
- The financial support and contributions the decedent would have provided.
- The value of the decedent's household services and care.
- Reasonable funeral and burial expenses.
- The loss of the decedent's society, companionship, comfort, and guidance.
The survival claim, brought separately, is what captures the decedent's own pre-death losses. Together the two actions are designed to address both the family's loss and the decedent's losses up to the moment of death.
Damage caps in North Dakota wrongful death cases
North Dakota does not impose a general statutory cap on compensatory damages in an ordinary wrongful death case, so there is no fixed dollar ceiling on the survivors' compensatory recovery. North Dakota does limit noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases under a separate statute, which can apply when a wrongful death arises from medical negligence. Outside that context, the recovery is governed by what the jury finds proportionate to the loss rather than a statutory cap.
Punitive damages
Punitive damages in North Dakota are governed by N.D.C.C. 32-03.2-11, which allows exemplary damages when the defendant has been found guilty, by clear and convincing evidence, of oppression, fraud, or malice, and requires advance court permission to add such a claim. Malice is defined at N.D.C.C. 32-03.2-01(2) as either a direct intention to injure another or a reckless disregard of the rights of another and any consequences, so the standard is not limited to an intent to harm. The same section caps any exemplary damages award at two times the compensatory damages awarded or $250,000, whichever is greater, and no exemplary award is allowed unless the claimant also recovers compensatory damages. Whether punitive damages are available in a particular wrongful death matter depends on the conduct and on how the claim is framed, so this is a point to confirm with counsel for a specific case.

Comparative or contributory fault
North Dakota follows modified comparative fault under N.D.C.C. 32-03.2-02. Contributory fault does not bar recovery unless that fault was as great as the combined fault of all other persons who contributed to the injury. In other words, if the decedent's share of fault is 50 percent or more, recovery is barred; if it is less, the recovery is reduced in proportion to the decedent's share of fault. This is a more forgiving rule than the pure contributory negligence used in a handful of states.
How proceeds are distributed
Under N.D.C.C. 32-21-04, the amount recovered is not liable for the debts of the decedent. Instead it goes to the exclusive benefit of the decedent's heirs at law, in shares that the judge who tried the case fixes in the order for judgment. The judge may make any investigation needed to set those shares. This means a North Dakota wrongful death recovery is generally protected from the decedent's creditors and is divided among the heirs by the court rather than passing through ordinary estate administration.
How to evaluate a wrongful death claim in North Dakota
The two-year deadline is strict, and North Dakota's priority list means the right to file may shift among family members if the person first in line does not act. Keeping records such as the death certificate, any accident or incident reports, medical records, and correspondence can help when reviewing the situation. Most wrongful death attorneys offer a free initial consultation and work on a contingency fee, meaning a fee only if there is a recovery. No general guide can predict the outcome of a specific case, and nothing here is a promise of compensation. A licensed North Dakota attorney can explain how the priority list, the survival claim, and the comparative fault rule apply to a particular set of facts.

Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to file a wrongful death claim in North Dakota?
Generally two years from the date of death. Chapter 32-21 does not state its own limitations period, so the general statute, N.D.C.C. 28-01-18(4), supplies the two-year period for an action for injuries causing death. Because timing can turn on specific facts, families often confirm the exact date early.
Who can file a wrongful death lawsuit in North Dakota?
N.D.C.C. 32-21-03 sets a priority order: the surviving spouse, then surviving children, then a surviving parent, then a grandparent, then the personal representative, then a person who had primary physical custody of the decedent. If the person first in line refuses or neglects to sue for 30 days after demand, the next person in order may bring the single action on behalf of all the heirs.
What damages can be recovered in a North Dakota wrongful death case?
Under N.D.C.C. 32-21-02 the jury awards damages proportionate to the injury the death causes the survivors. That typically includes lost financial support, the value of the decedent's services, funeral expenses, and the loss of society, companionship, and guidance. The decedent's own pre-death losses are pursued through a separate survival claim under N.D.C.C. 28-01-26.1.
Is there a cap on wrongful death damages in North Dakota?
Not on compensatory damages. North Dakota places no general statutory dollar cap on compensatory damages in an ordinary wrongful death case. Exemplary (punitive) damages are capped by N.D.C.C. 32-03.2-11 at two times compensatory damages or $250,000, whichever is greater, and a separate noneconomic damages limit applies to medical malpractice cases, which can reach a wrongful death arising from medical negligence.
Updates
Corrected the punitive damages standard to match N.D.C.C. 32-03.2-11: oppression, fraud, or malice proven by clear and convincing evidence, with malice defined to include reckless disregard as well as intent to injure.
Added the punitive-damages cap under N.D.C.C. 32-03.2-11 (limited to two times compensatory damages or $250,000, whichever is greater), which the page previously omitted.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Dakota Century Code
§ 32-21-01When action for death by wrongful act maintainableIn force
Whenever the death of a person shall be caused by a wrongful act, neglect, or default, and the act, neglect, or default is such as would have entitled the party injured, if death had not ensued, to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, then and in every such case the person who, or the corporation, limited liability company, or company which, would have been liable if death had not ensued, shall be liable to an action for damages, notwithstanding the death of the person injured or of the tort-feasor, and although the death shall have been caused under such circumstances as amount in law to felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Weigel v. Lee (North Dakota Supreme Court 2008, 752 N.W.2d 618)“…ailure to distinguish between a wrongful death action under N.D.C.C. § 32-21-01 and a survival action under N.D.C.C. §…”
- James S. Gerrard v. William G. Larsen, Special Administrator of the Estate of Jack K. Gibbens, Deceased (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1975, 517 F.2d 1127)“…er the provisions of North Dakota’s wrongful death statute. N.D.Cent.Code §§ 32-21-01 to -06 (1960). The trial commenc…”
- Kenna v. So-Fro Fabrics, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1994, 18 F.3d 623)“…f society, comfort, companionship and mental anguish. See N.D.Cent.Code §§ 32-21-01 & -02 (1976 & Supp.1993); Hopkins v.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-21-03Who may bring actionIn force
The action shall be brought by the following persons in the order named: The surviving husband or wife, if any. The surviving children, if any. The surviving mother or father. A surviving grandparent. The personal representative. A person who has had primary physical custody of the decedent before the wrongful act. If any person entitled to bring the action refuses or neglects so to do for a period of thirty days after demand of the person next in order, that person may bring the action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2010
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Goodleft v. Gullickson (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 556 N.W.2d 303)“…ckson for the wrongful death of Dustin. We hold that, under N.D.C.C. § 32-21-03, Goodleft was not entitled to bring a w…”
- R.F. v. M.M. (North Dakota Supreme Court 2010, 789 N.W.2d 723)“…he appropriate party to bring a wrongful death action under N.D.C.C. § 32-21-03, but the court failed to give her reaso…”
- Weigel v. Lee (North Dakota Supreme Court 2008, 752 N.W.2d 618)“…l likely exist between plaintiffs bringing the action under N.D.C.C. § 32-21-03 and those entitled to any damages. Howe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-21-02Measure of recoveryIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
In an action brought under the provisions of this chapter, the jury shall give such damages as it finds proportionate to the injury resulting from the death to the persons entitled to the recovery.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Zander v. Morsette (North Dakota Supreme Court 2021, 959 N.W.2d 838)“…ng from the death to the persons entitled to the recovery.” N.D.C.C. § 32-21-02. [¶12] The Plaintiffs claim the method…”
- Brauer v. James J. Igoe & Sons Construction, Inc. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1971, 186 N.W.2d 459)“…eath. In discussing damages for wrongful death under N.D.C.C. Sec. 32-21-02, this court, in Quam v. Wengert, 86 N.W…”
- Goodleft v. Gullickson (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 556 N.W.2d 303)“…ay award damages “to the persons entitled to the recovery,” N.D.C.C. § 32-21-02, and the amount recovered shall not be…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Dakota Punitive (Exemplary) Damages: Cap and Rules (2026)
§ 32-21-04Recovery exempt from decedent's debtsIn force
The amount recovered shall not be liable for the debts of the decedent, but shall inure to the exclusive benefit of the decedent's heirs at law in such shares as the judge before whom the case is tried shall fix in the order for judgment, and for the purpose of determining such shares, the judge after the trial may make any investigation which the judge deems necessary.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2002
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Goodleft v. Gullickson (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 556 N.W.2d 303)“…e benefit of the decedent’s heirs at law” for their losses. N.D.C.C. § 32-21-04; Broderson; Satter-berg. T…”
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Stegman (North Dakota Supreme Court 2002, 647 N.W.2d 133)“…a hospital lien under the facts in this case would violate N.D.C.C. § 32-21-04, which provides that in a wrongful deat…”
- Sistrunk v. Circle Bar Drilling Co. (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1985, 770 F.2d 455)“…over if decedent survived by spouse and issue or by issue); N.D.Cent.Code §§ 32-21-04, 30.1-04-02, 30.1-04-03 (1976) (parents…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 28-01-18Actions having two-year limitationsIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
Except as provided in section 28-01-25.2, the following actions must be commenced within two years after the claim for relief has accrued: An action for libel, slander, assault, battery, or false imprisonment. An action upon a statute for a forfeiture or penalty to the state. An action for the recovery of damages resulting from malpractice; provided, however, that the limitation of an action against a physician or licensed hospital will not be extended beyond six years of the act or omission of alleged malpractice by a nondiscovery thereof unless discovery was prevented by the fraudulent conduct of the physician or licensed hospital. This limitation is subject to the provisions of section 28-01-25. An action for injuries done to the person of another, when death ensues from such injuries, and the claim for relief must be deemed to have accrued at the time of the death of the party injured; provided, however, that when death ensues as the result of malpractice, the claim for relief is deemed to have accrued at the time of the discovery of the malpractice.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Diocese of Bismarck Trust v. Ramada, Inc. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 553 N.W.2d 760)“…or the two-year statute of limitations for malpractice in N.D.C.C. § 28-01-18(3) governed an action against attorneys…”
- Kuntz v. Muehler (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 603 N.W.2d 43)“…fraud and deceit, and their negligence claim was barred by N.D.C.C. § 28-01-18, the professional malpractice statute o…”
- Schanilec v. Grand Forks Clinic, Ltd. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 599 N.W.2d 253)“…ars of discovery of the alleged malpractice, as required by N.D.C.C. § 28-01-18(3). The district court had jurisdiction…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Dakota Defamation Laws: Libel & Slander (2026), Medical Malpractice Laws in North Dakota (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Motorcycle Accident Laws in North Dakota (2026): Deadlines
§ 28-01-26.1Survival of claims for reliefIn force
No action or claim for relief, except for breach of promise, alienation of affections, libel, and slander, abates by the death of a party or of a person who might have been a party had such death not occurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. Herzig (North Dakota Supreme Court 2010, 785 N.W.2d 863)“…aracterizes these sanctions as a “penalty” and asserts that N.D.C.C. § 28-01-26.1 does not address whether a cause of act…”
- Mertz v. 999 QUEBEC, INC. (North Dakota Supreme Court 2010, 780 N.W.2d 446)“…ive of the appeal. [¶ 8] The relevant survival statute is N.D.C.C. § 28-01-26.1: “No action or claim for relief, exce…”
- Albrecht v. Albrecht (North Dakota Supreme Court 2014, 856 N.W.2d 755)“…t the death of a party did not abate a divorce action under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-26.1, which provides that “[n]o action or cl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 32-03.2-02Modified comparative faultIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Contributory fault does not bar recovery in an action by any person to recover damages for death or injury to person or property unless the fault was as great as the combined fault of all other persons who contribute to the injury, but any damages allowed must be diminished in proportion to the amount of contributing fault attributable to the person recovering. The court may, and when requested by any party, shall direct the jury to find separate special verdicts determining the amount of damages and the percentage of fault attributable to each person, whether or not a party, who contributed to the injury. The court shall then reduce the amount of such damages in proportion to the amount of fault attributable to the person recovering.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 59 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hurt v. Freeland (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 589 N.W.2d 551)“…Hurt argues the Olsons are jointly liable with Meyer under N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02, which deals with comparative fault and…”
- Stewart v. Ryan (North Dakota Supreme Court 1994, 520 N.W.2d 39)“…incorporated the modified comparative “fault” provisions of N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02. The effect of the enactment of the com…”
- McLean v. Kirby Co. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1992, 490 N.W.2d 229)“…fault" both "negligence" and "reckless or willful conduct." NDCC 32-03.2-02. That statute, however, "applies only t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Dakota Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, North Dakota Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim, North Dakota Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
§ 32-03.2-11When court or jury may give exemplary damagesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
In any action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, when the defendant has been guilty by clear and convincing evidence of oppression, fraud, or malice, the court or jury, in addition to the actual damages, may give damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant. Upon commencement of the action, the complaint may not seek exemplary damages. After filing the suit, a party may make a motion to amend the pleadings to claim exemplary damages. The motion must allege an applicable legal basis for awarding exemplary damages and must be accompanied by one or more affidavits or deposition testimony showing the factual basis for the claim. The party opposing the motion may respond with affidavit or deposition testimony. If the court finds, after considering all submitted evidence, that there is sufficient evidence to support a finding by the trier of fact that a preponderance of the evidence proves oppression, fraud, or malice, the court shall grant the moving party permission to amend the pleadings to claim exemplary damages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 38 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McLean v. Kirby Co. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1992, 490 N.W.2d 229)“…30, 1993. S.L. 1987, Ch. 404, § 15. During that suspension, NDCC 32-03.2-11 (S.L.1987, Ch. 404, § 11) is in effect.…”
- Ehrman v. Feist (North Dakota Supreme Court 1997, 568 N.W.2d 747)“…act by making a promise with no intention of performing it. NDCC 32-03.2-11 authorizes an award of exemplary damage…”
- McCormick v. Fredericks (North Dakota Supreme Court 2020, 2020 ND 161)“…mplary damages because of Fredericks’ fraud. However, under N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-11(1), in an action for the breach of an o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): North Dakota Century Code § 32-03.2-01 (Definition) · North Dakota Century Code § 30.1-04-01 ((2-101) Intestate estate)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Sources and References
- N.D.C.C. chapter 32-21, Death by Wrongful Act: when maintainable (32-21-01), measure of recovery (32-21-02), priority list of who may bring the action and the 30-day demand rule (32-21-03), and recovery exempt from decedent's debts and distributed to heirs by the judge (32-21-04)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. 28-01-18(4), two-year limitations period for an action for injuries to the person causing death; and N.D.C.C. 28-01-26.1, survival of causes of action (no abatement by death)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. chapter 32-03.2, modified comparative fault: 32-03.2-02 (recovery barred only if the claimant's fault is as great as the combined fault of others) and 32-03.2-11 (exemplary/punitive damages standard)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D.C.C. chapter 30.1-04, intestate succession, the framework for the heirs at law who share a wrongful death recovery(ndlegis.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.