South Dakota
South Dakota Identity Theft Laws: SDCL 22-40-8 Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

South Dakota classifies identity theft as a flat Class 6 felony regardless of the dollar amount involved, and its own minor credit freeze law, enacted in 2016, predates the comparable federal protection by two years. This page covers South Dakota's identity theft statute, that early minor-freeze law, what civil remedies exist for victims, and where South Dakota residents report identity theft.
This article addresses South Dakota state law on identity theft alongside the federal framework under 18 U.S.C. Section 1028 and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. For the parent overview of identity theft law generally, see our identity theft laws hub.
South Dakota's Identity Theft Statute
South Dakota's identity theft offense, S.D. Codified Laws Section 22-40-8, prohibits, without authorization or permission and with intent to deceive or defraud, either obtaining, possessing, transferring, using, attempting to obtain, or recording identifying information not lawfully issued for that person's use, or accessing or attempting to access another person's financial resources through the use of their identifying information. The companion definitions section, Section 22-40-9, defines «identifying information» broadly to cover birth certificate and passport data, driver's license numbers, Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, PINs, passwords and challenge questions, usernames, biometric data, and other data usable to access financial resources.
South Dakota does not tier the offense by dollar amount or item count. Identity theft is classified as a flat Class 6 felony. Under South Dakota's general felony classification statute, Section 22-6-1, a Class 6 felony carries up to 2 years imprisonment, a fine of up to $4,000, or both.
South Dakota's Minor Freeze Law Predates the Federal Version
South Dakota enacted its own protected-consumer security freeze law, Chapter 54-16, «Credit Reporting Security Freeze for Protected Consumers,» through 2016 Senate Bill 230, two years before Congress passed the comparable federal minor-freeze statute. Chapter 54-16 defines a «protected consumer» as a person under age 16, or an incapacitated person with a guardian or conservator. A representative acting on the protected consumer's behalf must submit proof of identity for both parties, proof of their authority to act, and pay a fee, and the credit reporting agency must place the freeze within 30 days. The fee is capped at $5 per placement or removal, and is waived entirely if a police report or identity-fraud affidavit is provided, or if the protected consumer is under 16 and the agency has no existing file on them.

Restitution and the Civil Remedy Gap
South Dakota's identity theft chapter itself, Chapter 22-40, contains no dedicated restitution clause. Instead, South Dakota's general crime-victim restitution policy, Section 23A-28-1 and the sections following it, would apply to an identity theft conviction the same as it would to any other crime.
There is also no identity-theft-specific civil claim in that chapter. Every operative section of Chapter 22-40 defines a criminal offense, and its one civil provision, Section 22-40-25, lets the attorney general pursue a civil penalty for a failure to give breach notice rather than giving a victim a claim of their own.
South Dakota's Deceptive Trade Practices Act does provide a private civil action, though not one written for identity theft. Section 37-24-31 states that any person who claims to have been adversely affected by an act or practice declared unlawful by Section 37-24-6 «shall be permitted to bring a civil action for the recovery of actual damages suffered as a result of such act or practice.» Chapter 37-24 carries related civil machinery as well, including restoration orders under Section 37-24-29 and receiver powers under Section 37-24-30. The Act separately imposes criminal penalties tiered by dollar amount: a Class 1 misdemeanor for violations under $1,000, a Class 6 felony for $1,000 to $99,999, and a Class 5 felony for $100,000 or more.
The practical limit is scope rather than the existence of a remedy. Section 37-24-31 reaches only conduct that Section 37-24-6 declares unlawful, and that section lists specific deceptive practices tied largely to the sale or advertisement of merchandise, the solicitation of charitable contributions, and other enumerated categories. Identity theft carried out in a way that does not fit one of those descriptions falls outside it. Whether a South Dakota victim has a statutory civil claim therefore depends on how the fraud was committed, and a victim weighing a lawsuit should ask a South Dakota attorney whether their facts fit Section 37-24-6 or a common-law theory such as fraud or conversion.
Reporting Identity Theft in South Dakota
South Dakota's Consumer Protection Division, part of the Office of the Attorney General, publishes both prevention guidance and a specific victim action plan for identity theft: cancel affected cards and close compromised accounts, file a police report with local police or the sheriff, contact all three credit bureaus to place fraud alerts, document all correspondence related to the theft, call the FTC's Identity Theft Hotline at 877-438-4338, check for any fraudulent driver's license issued in your name, and monitor your credit reports going forward. The division's site also provides a complaint form and directs residents to the Attorney General's office for step-by-step victim assistance.

Federal Rights That Apply Regardless of State Law
Every South Dakota identity theft victim also has rights under federal law that apply on top of the state protections above. A credit freeze and a fraud alert are both free under 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-1, added by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018. A free report at IdentityTheft.gov also unlocks the right under FCRA Section 605B, 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-2, to have fraudulent information blocked from a credit report. For the full mechanics, see our guides on how to report identity theft and credit freeze vs. fraud alert.

Keeping an Eye on Your Credit Going Forward
A credit freeze at Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion is free under federal law, and South Dakota's Consumer Protection Division also advises victims to monitor their credit reports going forward. Checking your own reports regularly does that job for many people. If you would rather get alerts, Aura offers three-bureau credit monitoring and alerts if your Social Security number is found on the dark web.
See How Aura Alerts WorkAffiliate disclosure: if you sign up through this link we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Information last verified on 2026-09-02, drawing directly on the live text of S.D. Codified Laws Sections 22-40-8, 22-40-9, 22-6-1, 37-24-6 and 37-24-31, the full section index for Chapter 22-40, and Chapter 54-16, plus South Dakota's Consumer Protection Division identity theft page. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
- Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
- How to Report Identity Theft
- Credit Freeze vs. Fraud Alert
Last updated: 2026-09-02.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for identity theft in South Dakota?
Identity theft under S.D. Codified Laws Section 22-40-8 is a flat Class 6 felony, regardless of the dollar amount or number of items involved, punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment, a fine of up to $4,000, or both.
Does South Dakota have its own minor credit freeze law?
Yes. South Dakota's Chapter 54-16, enacted in 2016, predates the comparable federal minor-freeze law by two years. It covers a protected consumer under 16 or an incapacitated person with a guardian, with a freeze fee capped at $5, waived with a police report or identity-fraud affidavit.
Can identity theft victims sue for civil damages in South Dakota?
South Dakota's identity theft chapter creates no civil claim of its own, but a victim is not necessarily without one. Section 37-24-31 of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act permits any person adversely affected by an act or practice declared unlawful by Section 37-24-6 to bring a civil action for actual damages. That route works only where the conduct fits one of the deceptive practices Section 37-24-6 lists, so it does not reach every identity theft, and common-law claims such as fraud or conversion may matter more depending on the facts.
Is restitution available to South Dakota identity theft victims?
South Dakota's identity theft statute itself contains no dedicated restitution clause, but the state's general crime-victim restitution policy applies to identity theft convictions the same as it would to any other crime.
Where do I report identity theft in South Dakota?
South Dakota's Consumer Protection Division, part of the Attorney General's office, recommends filing a police report with local police or the sheriff, contacting all three credit bureaus, and calling the FTC's Identity Theft Hotline at 877-438-4338, in addition to filing a complaint with the division directly.
Updates
Corrected the civil remedies discussion: an earlier version stated that South Dakota's Deceptive Trade Practices Act allows no private lawsuit, when SDCL 37-24-31 does let a person adversely affected by a practice declared unlawful by SDCL 37-24-6 sue for actual damages.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 22-40: IDENTITY CRIMES
§ 22-40-8Identity theft--Felony.In force
If any person, without the authorization or permission of another person and with the intent to deceive or defraud: (1) Obtains, possesses, transfers, uses, attempts to obtain, or records identifying information not lawfully issued for that person's use; or (2) Accesses or attempts to access the financial resources of that person through the use of identifying information; such person commits the crime of identity theft. Identity theft committed pursuant to this section is a Class 6 felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
§ 22-40-9Identifying information defined.In force
For the purposes of §§ 22-40-8 to 22-40-10, inclusive, identifying information includes: (1) Birth certificate or passport information; (2) Driver's license numbers or tribal identification card information; (3) Social security or other taxpayer identification numbers; (4) Checking account numbers; (5) Savings account numbers; (6) Credit card numbers; (7) Debit card numbers; (8) Personal identification numbers, passwords, or challenge questions; (9) User names or identifications; (10) Biometric data; or (11) Any other numbers, documents, or information which can be used to access another person's financial resources.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 22-6: AUTHORIZED PUNISHMENTS
§ 22-6-1Felony classes and penalties--Restitution--Habitual criminal sentences.In forcecited in 12 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided by law, felonies are divided into the following nine classes which are distinguished from each other by the following maximum penalties which are authorized upon conviction: (1) Class A felony: death or life imprisonment in a state correctional facility. A lesser sentence than death or life imprisonment may not be given for a Class A felony. In addition, a fine of fifty thousand dollars may be imposed; (2) Class B felony: life imprisonment in a state correctional facility. A lesser sentence may not be given for a Class B felony. In addition, a fine of fifty thousand dollars may be imposed; (3) Class C felony: life imprisonment in a state correctional facility. In addition, a fine of fifty thousand dollars may be imposed; (4) Class 1 felony: fifty years imprisonment in a state correctional facility. In addition, a fine of fifty thousand dollars may be imposed; (5) Class 2 felony: twenty-five years imprisonment in a state correctional facility. In addition, a fine of fifty thousand dollars may be imposed; (6) Class 3 felony: fifteen years imprisonment in a state correctional facility.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 145 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Weiker (1983) read SDCL 22-6-1 Class 1 felony penalty, then life imprisonment, as a maximum rather than a mandatory term, and struck the resulting life sentences as disproportionate under the state constitution. State v. Chipps (2016) applied the section class maximums as the yardstick in gross disproportionality review.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Moeller (South Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 548 N.W.2d 465)“…do so, the conviction for murder in the first degree under SDCL 22-6-1 would be life imprisonment in the state…”
- State v. Weiker (South Dakota Supreme Court 1983, 342 N.W.2d 7)✓A man with three prior burglary convictions drew life without parole on three drug distribution counts as a habitual offender; the court read SDCL 22-6-1(2) as fixing life as the maximum, not a mandatory, Class 1 felony penalty and struck the sentences as disproportionate.
- State v. Rice (South Dakota Supreme Court 2016, 2016 S.D. 18)✓Rice organized a robbery that ended in a fatal shooting and received 80 years with 20 suspended for first-degree manslaughter; the court used the life maximum SDCL 22-6-1 sets for a Class C felony as its yardstick and found the term not grossly disproportionate.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Dakota Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, South Dakota Expungement Laws: Arrest Records, Suspended Imposition, and What You Can Clear, How Many Years for Second Degree Murder? Sentences by State (2026)
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 37-24: DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
§ 37-24-6Deceptive act or practice--Penalty.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
It is a deceptive act or practice for any person to: (1) Knowingly act, use, or employ any deceptive act or practice, fraud, false pretense, false promises, or misrepresentation or to conceal, suppress, or omit any material fact in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise or the solicitation of contributions for charitable purposes, regardless of whether any person has in fact been misled, deceived, or damaged thereby; (2) Advertise price reductions without satisfying one of the following: (a) Including in the advertisement the specific basis for the claim of a price reduction; or (b) Offering the merchandise for sale at the higher price from which the reduction is taken for at least seven consecutive business days during the sixty-day period prior to the advertisement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Moss v. Guttormson (South Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 551 N.W.2d 14)“…be adversely affected by practices declared unlawful under SDCL 37-24-6. [¶ 12] Other courts have simila…”
- Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health System (South Dakota Supreme Court 2007, 731 N.W.2d 184)“…re premised on contract. The fourth alleged a violation of SDCL 37-24-6, part of South Dakota’s Deceptive Trad…”
- Sisney v. Best Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 2008, 754 N.W.2d 804)“…Sisney appeals only the dismissal of state law claims under SDCL 37-24-6; 20-10-1; 22-19B-4; and 20-9-32. We the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Dakota Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026), South Dakota Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Right to Sue (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- S.D. Codified Laws Section 22-40-8, Identity Theft (South Dakota Legislature)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- S.D. Codified Laws Section 22-40-9, Definitions (South Dakota Legislature)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- S.D. Codified Laws Section 22-6-1, Classification of Felonies (South Dakota Legislature)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- S.D. Codified Laws Chapter 54-16, Credit Reporting Security Freeze for Protected Consumers (South Dakota Legislature)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- S.D. Codified Laws Section 37-24-6, Deceptive Trade Practices Act (South Dakota Legislature)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- Identity Theft Fast Facts (South Dakota Consumer Protection)(consumer.sd.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-1, Identity Theft Prevention; Fraud Alerts and Active Duty Alerts (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-2, Block of Information Resulting From Identity Theft (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- S.D. Codified Laws Section 37-24-31, Action for Damages Brought by Person Adversely Affected (South Dakota Legislature)(sdlegislature.gov)
- S.D. Codified Laws Chapter 22-40, Identity Crimes, Full Section Index (South Dakota Legislature)(sdlegislature.gov)