Wyoming
Wyoming GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Wyoming takes a different path from most states. There is no standalone law against attaching a GPS tracker to someone else's car, but the state's stalking statute calls out GPS surveillance by name.
Since the legislature overhauled the law in 2019, Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506 has expressly covered using "any electronic, digital or global positioning system device" to place another person under surveillance without that person's authorization. When the tracking is done with intent to harass, it is a crime. And under the wrong circumstances, it is a felony carrying up to 10 years in prison.
This guide explains how Wyoming's stalking law applies to vehicle trackers, who can track a car legally, what the penalties look like, and what to do if you find a device on your vehicle. It is part of our GPS Tracking Laws by State series.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in Wyoming?
If the vehicle is yours, yes. You can put a tracker on a car titled in your name, and you can authorize tracking of anyone who consents.
If the vehicle belongs to someone else, Wyoming law looks at why you are tracking. The state never passed a device-placement statute, so the physical act of attaching a tracker is not, by itself, a listed crime. What the law targets is the surveillance: monitoring another person's location electronically, without their authorization, with intent to harass them.
That intent element is the dividing line. A lender tracking collateral or a parent tracking a teenager is not trying to cause anyone substantial distress or fear. A jealous ex secretly following a former partner's movements through a hidden tracker is. The first situation falls outside the statute. The second one is exactly what the legislature wrote it for.
Wyoming's Stalking Law Names GPS Surveillance (Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506)
Wyoming's stalking statute, Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506, makes it a crime to engage, with intent to harass another person, in a course of conduct reasonably likely to harass that person.
The statute then lists examples of qualifying conduct. Subsection (b)(iv) covers "using any electronic, digital or global positioning system device or other electronic means to place another person under surveillance or to surveil another person's internet or wireless activity without authorization from the other person."
That language, added in the 2019 rewrite of the statute, puts GPS trackers, AirTags, phone tracking apps, and spyware squarely inside the stalking law. Wyoming is one of the states that names GPS surveillance instead of leaving prosecutors to argue about generic terms like "following."
Two defined terms control how the statute works in practice.
"Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose. A single act is generally not enough. But a hidden tracker rarely produces a single act. Every day the device reports the victim's location is part of an ongoing pattern, and prosecutors can combine the tracking with texts, drive-bys, and unwanted appearances to build the pattern.
"Harass" means engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that the defendant knew or should have known would cause a reasonable person substantial emotional distress, substantial fear for their safety or the safety of another, or substantial fear for the destruction of their property.
Put together: secretly tracking someone's car as part of a pattern meant to intimidate, monitor, or frighten them is criminal stalking in Wyoming. Tracking with the person's authorization, or for a purpose that has nothing to do with harassing them, is not.
Who CAN Legally Track a Vehicle in Wyoming
Some tracking never gets near the stalking statute:
![]()
- Your own vehicle. A car titled in your name is yours to track, including one driven by a family member.
- Tracking with authorization. The GPS clause only applies to surveillance "without authorization from the other person." Consent takes the conduct outside the statute.
- Fleet and business vehicles. Companies can track vehicles they own or lease.
- Lenders and dealers. Financing and buy-here-pay-here agreements often include written consent to a GPS unit for repossession purposes. Wyoming has no statute regulating these devices, so the contract controls.
- Law enforcement. In United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), the Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search.
Note what is missing: Wyoming's statute has no express carve-outs for private investigators, parents, or repossession agents. Those actors are protected only by the intent-to-harass element. A parent tracking a minor child's car is on solid ground. A private investigator hired by a suspicious spouse to plant a tracker on a car the client does not own is in genuinely risky territory, because the surveillance is unauthorized and a jury decides what the intent was.
Can My Employer Track My Car in Wyoming?
Wyoming has no statute regulating employer GPS tracking. No law requires notice, consent, or any limit on when monitoring happens.
Company-owned vehicles are the straightforward case. An employer can track its own property, and the stalking statute does not reach asset tracking done for business reasons.
Your personal vehicle is different. An employer who secretly planted a tracker on an employee's own car would have a hard time calling that authorized surveillance, and it invites civil claims even if no prosecutor ever touches it. In practice, employers that want mileage or dispatch data from personal vehicles use apps installed with written consent. If your employer asks for that, get the policy in writing and confirm the tracking is limited to work time.
AirTags and Item Trackers
Apple AirTags, Tiles, and similar Bluetooth trackers are covered by the same statutory language as hardwired GPS units. Subsection (b)(iv) reaches "any electronic, digital or global positioning system device or other electronic means," which comfortably includes a coin-sized Bluetooth tag dropped in a door pocket.
Phone-level protections are often a victim's first warning. iPhones alert you when an unknown AirTag is traveling with you, and modern Android phones have built-in unknown tracker alerts. Take those alerts seriously and document them, because each alert is evidence of ongoing surveillance.
AirTag stalking can also be charged federally. The federal stalking statute, 18 U.S.C. 2261A, covers using an electronic device to surveil someone in ways that cause fear or substantial emotional distress, and federal prosecutors have used it in AirTag cases.
Penalties for GPS Stalking in Wyoming
| Offense | Statute | Level | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attaching a tracker, no harassment pattern | None | Not a standalone crime | No direct penalty |
| Stalking (including GPS surveillance) | Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506(d) | Misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in jail, fine up to $750, or both; probation may extend to 3 years |
| Felony stalking | Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506(e) | Felony | Up to 10 years in prison |
| Federal stalking | 18 U.S.C. 2261A | Federal felony | Up to 5 years (more if injury results) |
![]()
The misdemeanor-to-felony jump is steep, and the triggers matter for tracking victims. Stalking becomes a felony punishable by up to 10 years if any of the following applies:
- Repeat offense. The acts occurred within 5 years of the offender completing the sentence, including incarceration, parole, and probation, for a prior stalking conviction in Wyoming or under a substantially similar law elsewhere.
- Serious bodily harm. The defendant caused serious bodily harm to the victim or another person in conjunction with the stalking.
- Violation of supervision. The stalking violated any condition of probation, parole, or bail.
- Violation of a protection order. The stalking violated a temporary or permanent order of protection issued under W.S. 7-3-508, 7-3-509, 35-21-104, or 35-21-105, or a similar order from another state.
- Minor victim. The stalking was committed against a minor by a defendant who is at least 18 years old.
The protection order trigger is the one victims can activate themselves. Once an order is in place, continued tracking is no longer a misdemeanor question.
Civil Options and Protection Orders
Wyoming has a civil statute written for exactly this situation. W.S. 1-1-126, titled "Civil liability for stalking," lets a person who is the victim of stalking as defined by Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506 bring a civil action against the individual who engaged in that course of conduct and recover the damages it caused. The court may also award exemplary damages, reasonable attorney's fees, and the costs of the action. Because unauthorized GPS surveillance is listed conduct under 6-2-506(b)(iv), a tracking victim's claim sits inside this statute rather than in untested general tort law.
Two features make it practical. A civil action may be maintained whether or not the person has been charged or convicted under 6-2-506, so you are not waiting on a prosecutor's charging decision. And neither the pendency nor the termination of the civil case prevents a criminal prosecution, so the two tracks can run in parallel.
Common-law claims can be pleaded alongside it. Wyoming courts have had little occasion to develop the intrusion upon seclusion tort that tracking victims use in other states, but trespass to chattels remains available for hardware physically attached to your vehicle.
The practical civil tool is the stalking protection order. Under W.S. 7-3-506 through 7-3-512, a victim of conduct defined by the stalking statute can petition the circuit court for an order of protection. Key features:
- No filing fee and no charge for service of process.
- Fast hearing. The court schedules a hearing within 72 hours of filing, and it can issue an ex parte temporary order in the meantime if there is a clear and present danger of further stalking.
- You do not need a criminal case. The petition can be filed whether or not the stalker has been charged or convicted.
- Real teeth. Per the Wyoming Judicial Branch, orders can last up to 3 years and be extended. Willful violation is a crime, and stalking committed in violation of the order is felony stalking under 6-2-506(e).
Our Wyoming restraining order guide covers the process in detail.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
- Do not destroy it. The device is evidence, and its serial number can identify the buyer.
- Photograph everything. Capture the device where you found it, then its markings and serial number.
- Call local police or the county sheriff. Ask them to document the device and subpoena the account records from the manufacturer.
- Write down the pattern. Note every time the person showed up where you were or knew things they should not have known. The course-of-conduct element is built on that record.
- Petition for a stalking protection order. It is free, fast, and converts any further tracking into a felony.
- Have a mechanic sweep the vehicle. Hardwired trackers hide behind bumpers, under dashboards, and inside wheel wells.
If your situation also involves secret audio or video recording, see our Wyoming recording laws guide and our overview of surveillance camera laws.
![]()
Sources
- Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506, Stalking; penalty (Title 6, Wyoming Statutes)
- Wyo. Stat. 1-1-126, Civil liability for stalking (Title 1, Wyoming Statutes)
- Wyo. Stat. 7-3-506 through 7-3-512, Stalking Protection Orders (Title 7, Wyoming Statutes)
- Wyoming Judicial Branch, Stalking (protection order process and forms)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, Federal Stalking Statute
- 18 U.S.C. 3117, Mobile Tracking Devices
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change, and how they apply depends on your specific situation. If you are dealing with unwanted tracking or stalking, contact local law enforcement and consult a licensed Wyoming attorney.
More Wyoming Laws
- Wyoming Dashcam Laws
- Wyoming Data Privacy Laws
- Wyoming Drone Laws
- Wyoming Employee Monitoring Laws
- Wyoming Recording Laws
- Wyoming Restraining Order Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to put a GPS tracker on someone's car in Wyoming?
It is illegal when it amounts to stalking. Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506 makes it a crime to use a GPS or other electronic device to place a person under surveillance without their authorization, as part of a course of conduct carried out with intent to harass. There is no separate statute punishing the act of attaching the device by itself.
Can I put a tracker on my spouse's car in Wyoming?
If the car is titled in your name or jointly titled, tracking it is generally lawful. If it is titled solely in your spouse's name and you track them secretly, you are conducting unauthorized electronic surveillance, and if a prosecutor can show intent to harass plus a pattern of conduct, that is criminal stalking. It is also strong evidence in divorce and protection order proceedings.
Is AirTag stalking a crime in Wyoming?
Yes. The statute covers any electronic, digital or global positioning system device, which includes AirTags and other Bluetooth trackers. Using one to monitor a person without authorization as part of a harassing course of conduct is stalking under Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506, and federal charges under 18 U.S.C. 2261A are also possible.
What makes GPS stalking a felony in Wyoming?
Felony stalking, punishable by up to 10 years, applies if the conduct violated a protection order or a condition of probation, parole, or bail, caused serious bodily harm, targeted a minor when the defendant was 18 or older, or occurred within 5 years of the defendant completing a sentence for a prior stalking conviction.
Can my employer track my car in Wyoming?
Wyoming has no employer GPS statute. Employers can freely track company-owned vehicles. Tracking your personal vehicle without consent is not directly regulated, but secret tracking invites civil claims, so employers normally require written consent through a tracking app or device policy.
Do police need a warrant to put a GPS tracker on my car?
In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search. The Court did not decide whether that search could be reasonable without a warrant, because the government had not raised that argument in the lower court.
How do I get a stalking protection order in Wyoming?
File a petition in the circuit court where you live, where the stalker lives, or where the stalking happened. There is no filing fee, the court holds a hearing within 72 hours, and it can issue an ex parte temporary order immediately if there is a clear and present danger. Standard forms are available from the court clerk or the Wyoming Judicial Branch website.
Can parents legally track their children's cars in Wyoming?
Yes, in practice. Parents tracking a minor child lack the intent to harass the statute requires, and a parent typically owns or controls the vehicle. Wyoming has no statute restricting parental tracking of minors.
Updates
Corrected the description of United States v. Jones to the holding the Supreme Court actually reached: GPS installation and monitoring is a Fourth Amendment search, with the warrant question left undecided.
Corrected the civil remedies section: Wyoming does have a dedicated civil cause of action for stalking victims, W.S. 1-1-126, which reaches the unauthorized GPS surveillance covered by the stalking statute and allows damages, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees whether or not anyone is criminally charged.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wyoming Statutes, Title 6 - Crimes and Offenses - Chapter 2: Offenses Against the Person - Article 5: Assault and Battery
§ 6-2-506Stalking; penalty.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) As used in this section: (i) "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose; (ii) "Harass" means to engage in a course of conduct, including but not limited to verbal threats, written threats, lewd or obscene statements or images, vandalism or nonconsensual physical contact, directed at a specific person that the defendant knew or should have known would cause: (A) A reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress; (B) A reasonable person to suffer substantial fear for their safety or the safety of another person; or (C) A reasonable person to suffer substantial fear for the destruction of their property.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-26 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Wyoming courts have upheld and applied the stalking law. Luplow v. State (1995) held Section 6-2-506 is not void for vagueness and not unconstitutionally overbroad. Law v. State (2004) applied its elements, intent to harass plus a course of conduct reasonably likely to harass, holding knife evidence irrelevant to them but harmless.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Snow v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2009, 216 P.3d 505)✓The stalking course of conduct included a protection order violation the defendant had already been punished for; the court held that did not bar punishment for stalking under Section 6-2-506, but reversed for plain error in how the judge answered jury questions.
- Law v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2004, 98 P.3d 181)✓A jury convicted Law of stalking his ex wife for prowling her neighborhood after months of hang up calls and drive bys; under Section 6-2-506's course of conduct and harass elements, a knife found in his car was irrelevant, but the error was harmless and the conviction stood.
- Vit v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 1996, 909 P.2d 953)✓After repeated visits, a cut phone line and lurking outside the victim's home in violation of probation, Vit was convicted of felony stalking; the court rejected his vagueness and overbreadth challenge to Section 6-2-506 as resolved by Luplow and affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wyoming Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026)
Wyoming Statutes, Title 1 - Code of Civil Procedure - Chapter 1: General Provisions as to Civil Actions
§ 1-1-126Civil liability for stalking.In force
(a) A person who is the victim of stalking as defined by W.S. 6-2-506 may maintain a civil action against an individual who engages in a course of conduct that is prohibited under W.S. 6-2-506 for damages incurred by the victim as a result of that conduct. The aggrieved party may also seek and be awarded exemplary damages, reasonable attorney's fees and costs of the action. (b) A civil action may be maintained under this section whether or not the individual who is alleged to have engaged in a course of conduct prohibited under W.S. 6-2-506 has been charged or convicted under W.S. 6-2-506 for the alleged crime. (c) Neither the pendency nor the termination of a civil action under this section shall prevent the criminal prosecution of a person who violates W.S. 6-2-506.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2002
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hoblyn v. Johnson (Wyoming Supreme Court 2002, 55 P.3d 1219)“…Stat. Ann. § 6-2-506 (LexisNexis 2001) as referenced in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-1-126 (Lexis-Nexis 2001). The district court…”
- Veile v. Martinson (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2001, 258 F.3d 1180)“…ng is a statutorily defined criminal and civil offense. See Wyo. Stat. Ann. 1-1-126, 6-2-506. A person is guilty of stalkin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wyoming Statutes, Title 7 - Criminal Procedure - Chapter 3: Fugitives and Prevention of Crime - Article 5: Prevention of Crime
§ 7-3-506Definitions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) As used in W.S. 7-3-506 through 7-3-512: (i) "Court" means the circuit court in the county where an alleged victim of stalking or sexual assault resides or is found, where the alleged perpetrator of the stalking or sexual assault resides or is found or where an act of stalking or sexual assault occurred; (ii) "Order of protection" means a court order granted for the protection of a victim of stalking or a victim of sexual assault; (iii) "Sexual assault" means any act made criminal pursuant to W.S. 6-2-302 and 6-2-303 and 6-2-314 through 6-2-318 or an attempt or conspiracy to commit such act; (iv) "Stalking" means conduct as defined by W.S. 6-2-506(b).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Luplow v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 1995, 897 P.2d 463)“…criminal statute as well as the protective order statutes, Wyo.Stat. §§ 7-3-506 to -511 (Supp.1994), to this court. The…”
- Robinson v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2011, 253 P.3d 1148)“…violation of the order. (d) The remedies provided by W.S. 7-3-506 through 7-8-511 are in addition to any…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wyoming Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get an Order of Protection
§ 7-3-508Temporary order of protection; setting hearing.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Upon the filing of a petition for an order of protection, the court shall schedule a hearing on the petition to be conducted within seventy-two (72) hours after the filing of the petition, and shall cause each party to be served, either within or outside of this state, with an order to appear, a copy of the petition and a copy of the supporting affidavits. Service shall be made upon each party at least twenty-four (24) hours before the hearing. The failure to hold or complete the hearing within seventy-two (72) hours shall not affect the validity of the hearing or any order issued thereon. (b) If the court determines from the specific facts shown by the petition and supporting affidavits that there exists a clear and present danger of further stalking, sexual assault or of serious physical adverse consequences to any person, the court may grant ex parte a temporary order of protection pending the hearing, and shall cause a copy of the temporary order of protection to be served on each party, either within or outside of this state.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Luplow v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 1995, 897 P.2d 463)“…mporary or permanent order of protection issued pursuant to W.S. 7-3-508 or 7-3-509, or pursuant to a substantia…”
- Law v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2004, 98 P.3d 181)“…mporary or permanent order of protection issued pursuant to W.S. 7-3-508 or 7-3-509, or pursuant to a substantia…”
- Joyner v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2002, 58 P.3d 331)“…h the terms of any order so extended. See Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 7-3-508 through 7-3-510 (LexisNexis 2001).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 7-3-509Order of protection; contents; remedies; order not to affect title to property.In force
(a) Following a hearing under W.S. 7-3-508(a) and upon a finding that conduct constituting stalking or sexual assault has been committed, the court shall enter an order of protection ordering the respondent to refrain from any further acts of stalking or sexual assault involving the victim or any other person. As a part of any order of protection, the court may direct that the respondent: (i) Stay away from the home, school, business or place of employment of the victim or any other locations the court may describe in the order; and (ii) Refrain from contacting, intimidating, threatening or otherwise interfering with the victim of the alleged offense and any other persons, including but not limited to members of the family or household of the victim, as the court may describe in the order. Prohibited contact under this paragraph includes telephone calls, mail, e-mail, texting, fax, contacting through social media using the internet or similar technology and any other form of communication. (b) The order shall contain a notice that willful violation of any provision of the order constitutes a crime as defined by W.S. 7-3-510(c) and can result in immediate arrest.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Luplow v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 1995, 897 P.2d 463)“…ing, including but not limited to the elements described in W.S. 7-3-509(a). (c) A temporary order of pro…”
- Robinson v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2011, 253 P.3d 1148)“…(b) An order of protection granted by the court under W.S. 7-3-509 shall be effective for a fixed period o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 56 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Federal Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, GPS Tracking Laws by State: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
§ 3117Mobile tracking devicesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
If a court is empowered to issue a warrant or other order for the installation of a mobile tracking device, such order may authorize the use of that device within the jurisdiction of the court, and outside that jurisdiction if the device is installed in that jurisdiction. As used in this section, the term “tracking device” means an electronic or mechanical device which permits the tracking of the movement of a person or object.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 92 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Application for Pen Register & Trap/Trace Device With Cell Site Location Authority (District Court, S.D. Texas 2005, 396 F. Supp. 2d 747)“…of tracking devices which may move across district lines. 18 U.S.C. § 3117 (a). The ECPA was not intended to affec…”
- In Re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register & a Trap & Trace Device (District Court, E.D. New York 2005, 396 F. Supp. 2d 294)“…the rules applicable to a “tracking device” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3117 (b). That is because the additional inf…”
- In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless Telephone (District Court, D. Maryland 2011, 849 F. Supp. 2d 526)“…g device warrant pursuant to Rule 41(b) and in accord with 18 U.S.C. § 3117 . As set forth more fully below, this C…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Sources and References
- Wyo. Stat. 6-2-506, Stalking; penalty(wyoleg.gov)
- Wyo. Stat. 7-3-506 through 7-3-512, stalking protection orders(wyoleg.gov)
- Wyoming Judicial Branch, stalking protection order process(wyocourts.gov)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), slip opinion(supremecourt.gov)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, federal stalking statute(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. 3117, mobile tracking devices(law.cornell.edu)
- Wyo. Stat. 1-1-126, civil liability for stalking(wyoleg.gov)