EnglishEspañol
California flag

California

Leyes de grabación de California (2026): reglas de consentimiento de todas las partes

Asistido por IA, verificado con fuentesPor Equipo Editorial de Recording Law14 min de lectura
Leyes de grabación de California (2026): reglas de consentimiento de todas las partes

Preguntas frecuentes

¿California es un estado de consentimiento de una sola parte o de todas las partes para grabar?

California es un estado de consentimiento de todas las partes: cada participante en una conversación privada debe dar su consentimiento antes de que alguien la grabe. El estatuto que rige la materia es el Penal Code § 632, y grabar sin el consentimiento de todas las partes es a la vez un delito y un ilícito civil según el PC 637.2.

¿Puedo grabar una llamada telefónica en California?

Solo si cada persona en la llamada da su consentimiento primero. Tanto el PC 632 (comunicaciones confidenciales) como el PC 632.7 (llamadas celulares e inalámbricas) exigen el consentimiento de todas las partes. La Corte Suprema de California confirmó en Smith v. LoanMe (2021) que el PC 632.7 se aplica incluso cuando usted es un participante, no solo cuando intercepta desde afuera.

¿Es un delito grabar a alguien sin permiso en California?

Sí, si la conversación es confidencial y al menos una de las partes no dio su consentimiento. Una primera infracción según el PC 632 conlleva hasta $2,500 de multa y hasta un año en la cárcel del condado o en una prisión estatal; los reincidentes enfrentan multas de hasta $10,000.

¿Por qué puedo demandar si alguien me grabó ilegalmente en California?

Según el Penal Code § 637.2, usted puede recuperar $5,000 por infracción o tres veces sus daños reales, lo que sea mayor, sin necesidad de probar un daño económico para el mínimo de $5,000. También están disponibles las medidas cautelares para detener infracciones continuas.

¿Son legales los timbres Ring y las cámaras para niñeras en California?

Las cámaras de solo video que apuntan a su propia propiedad y a áreas visibles desde la vía pública son generalmente lícitas. Pero si la cámara graba audio de conversaciones privadas dentro del hogar sin el consentimiento de todas las partes, se aplica el PC 632, y las cámaras en baños, vestidores u otros espacios privados infringen el PC 647(j) sin importar el audio.

¿Puedo grabar a mi jefe o una reunión de recursos humanos en California?

No sin el consentimiento de todos los presentes. Incluso para documentar una mala conducta, grabar en secreto una conversación en el trabajo puede exponerlo a responsabilidad penal y civil según el PC 632. La excepción de documentación de delitos del PC 633.5 puede aplicarse si usted cree razonablemente que está grabando evidencia de un delito específico enumerado, pero consulte primero a un abogado.

¿Puedo grabar a la policía en California?

Sí. El Penal Code § 148(g) y la Primera Enmienda le otorgan el derecho a fotografiar o grabar a la policía en el desempeño de funciones públicas. Grabar no constituye obstrucción por sí mismo, y los oficiales no pueden exigirle que borre las grabaciones ni confiscar su dispositivo sin una orden judicial; usted solo debe evitar interferir físicamente.

¿La ley de grabación de California se aplica a llamadas desde otros estados?

Sí, si una parte en California participa en la llamada. En Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney (2006), la Corte Suprema de California determinó que la regla de consentimiento de todas las partes de California se aplica a las llamadas que involucran a una parte en California, incluso cuando la otra persona que llama está en un estado de consentimiento de una sola parte. Obtenga el consentimiento de todas las partes antes de grabar cualquier llamada que involucre a alguien en California.

Actualizaciones

Ley aplicable revisada en busca de cambios recientes

Ley aplicable revisada en busca de cambios recientes

Página reestructurada según la especificación de reescritura de grabación: introducción optimizada para AEO, tabla de panorama general, nuevos anclajes de sección, subsecciones federales/HIPAA/FERPA condensadas, lista de Novedades Legales Recientes, y una sección de preguntas frecuentes con 8 preguntas. Se actualizaron la imagen principal y las imágenes internas. Todos los datos fundamentales (consentimiento de todas las partes del PC 632, sanciones de $2,500/$10,000, daños de $5,000/3x del PC 637.2, voyerismo del PC 647(j), grabación policial del PC 148(g)) se reverificaron contra fuentes primarias en junio de 2026. No se requirieron correcciones factuales.

Title rewritten from 'California Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties' to 'California Recording Laws: All-Party Consent, Penalties, and 2026 Updates' to front-load primary keyword and add freshness signal. Meta rewritten: AEO declarative opener with specific penalty figures (155 chars). Kept: KeyTakeaways, PC 632 confidential-communication breakdown, phone/cell section (PC 632.7 + Smith v. LoanMe), in-person recording, penalty table, voyeurism and hidden-camera section (PC 647(j)), police-recording section (PC 148(g)), evidence admissibility, state comparison, More California Laws links, FAQ structure. Fixed: removed unsupported 'two-year bill' assertion for SB 690; corrected SB 690 section to state only confirmed facts (stalled Assembly committee July 2, 2025; 2026 session status unconfirmed). Expanded: Exceptions H2 (key ranking gap at pos 49 for 'california penal code 632 exceptions') with domestic-violence exception PC 633.6(b), PC 633.5 enumerated crimes, no-privacy-expectation rule; Workplace H2 expanded with Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (Aug. 2, 2023) standard and NLRB GC Memorandum 25-07 (June 25, 2025, Tier 2 prosecutorial guidance). Added new H2s: Federal Law Overlay (ECPA baseline, FCC 24-17 AI voice ruling operative, FCC 24-24 One-to-One rule vacated Jan. 24 2025 by 11th Cir., reinstated pre-2023 standard via DA 25-621); Special Contexts HIPAA + FERPA; Pending Legislation (SB 1130 wearable-device bill on Appropriations suspense as of May 8, 2026, hearing May 14, 2026; SB 690 CCPA carve-out, stalled Assembly July 2025); Topic Index linking all 12 California spoke pages. SourcesList and UpdatesLog added.

Se reescribieron el título y la meta descripción para AEO con cifras específicas de sanciones. Se corrigió la SB 690 para incluir únicamente hechos confirmados (estancada en un comité de la Asamblea el 2 de julio de 2025). Se ampliaron las secciones de Excepciones (violencia doméstica del PC 633.6(b), delitos enumerados del PC 633.5, regla de ausencia de expectativa de privacidad) y de Lugar de Trabajo (Stericycle, 372 NLRB No. 113; Memorando GC 25-07). Se añadió el panorama de la ley federal (ECPA, FCC 24-17, FCC 24-24 anulada por el 11.º Circuito y restablecida mediante la DA 25-621), HIPAA/FERPA, legislación pendiente (SB 1130, SB 690), y un índice de temas que enlaza las 12 páginas subordinadas de California.

Added wearable recording device guidance covering AI voice recorders (Plaud), smart glasses (Meta Ray-Bans), and California SB 1130.

La ley detrás de este artículo

Este artículo se apoya en 16 disposiciones legales conservadas en nuestro propio registro jurídico, cada una obtenida de la fuente oficial. Toque una sección para leer el texto vigente.

California Civil Code

§ 1708.8Vigentecitada en 8 de nuestros artículos
(a) A person is liable for physical invasion of privacy when the person knowingly enters onto the land or into the airspace above the land of another person without permission or otherwise commits a trespass in order to capture any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff engaging in a private, personal, or familial activity and the invasion occurs in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person. (b) A person is liable for constructive invasion of privacy when the person attempts to capture, in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person, any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff engaging in a private, personal, or familial activity, through the use of any device, regardless of whether there is a physical trespass, if this image, sound recording, or other physical impression could not have been achieved without a trespass unless the device was used. (c) An assault or false imprisonment committed with the intent to capture any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff is subject to subdivisions (d), (e), and (h).

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 17 opiniones judiciales2000s: 42010s: 22020s: 11Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc. (California Supreme Court 2009, 47 Cal. 4th 272) · Richardson-Tunnell v. Schools Insurance Program for Employees (California Court of Appeal 2007, 69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 176) · Raef v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court (California Court of Appeal 2015, 240 Cal. App. 4th 1112)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

California Government Code

§ 54953.5Vigentecitada en 2 de nuestros artículos
(a) Any person attending an open and public meeting of a legislative body of a local agency shall have the right to record the proceedings in the absence of a reasonable finding by the legislative body of the local agency that the recording cannot continue without noise, illumination, or obstruction of view that constitutes, or would constitute, a persistent disruption of the proceedings. (b) Any recording of an open and public meeting made for whatever purpose by or at the direction of the local agency shall be subject to inspection pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1), but, notwithstanding Section 34090, may be erased or destroyed 30 days after the recording. Any inspection of an audio or video recording shall be provided without charge on equipment made available by the local agency.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 1 opiniones judicialesAplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 1993

Casos destacados: Choice-In-Education League v. Los Angeles Unified School District (California Court of Appeal 1993, 17 Cal. App. 4th 415)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

California Penal Code

§ 148Vigentecitada en 3 de nuestros artículos
(a) (1) Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or an emergency medical technician, as defined in Division 2.5 (commencing with Section 1797) of the Health and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. (2) Except as provided by subdivision (d) of Section 653t, every person who knowingly and maliciously interrupts, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes with the transmission of a communication over a public safety radio frequency shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 1,008 opiniones judiciales1920s: 11930s: 01940s: 21950s: 41960s: 81970s: 451980s: 601990s: 502000s: 902010s: 3812020s: 367Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: People v. Kelly (California Supreme Court 2006, 51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 98) · People v. Smith (California Supreme Court 2013, 57 Cal. 4th 232) · City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court (California Supreme Court 1989, 49 Cal. 3d 74)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 631Vigentecitada en 9 de nuestros artículos
(a) Any person who, by means of any machine, instrument, or contrivance, or in any other manner, intentionally taps, or makes any unauthorized connection, whether physically, electrically, acoustically, inductively, or otherwise, with any telegraph or telephone wire, line, cable, or instrument, including the wire, line, cable, or instrument of any internal telephonic communication system, or who willfully and without the consent of all parties to the communication, or in any unauthorized manner, reads, or attempts to read, or to learn the contents or meaning of any message, report, or communication while the same is in transit or passing over any wire, line, or cable, or is being sent from, or received at any place within this state; or who uses, or attempts to use, in any manner, or for any purpose, or to communicate in any way, any information so obtained, or who aids, agrees with, employs, or conspires with any person or persons to unlawfully do, or permit, or cause to be done any of the acts or things mentioned above in this section, is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year,…

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 202 opiniones judiciales1970s: 211980s: 151990s: 72000s: 82010s: 112020s: 140Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Ribas v. Clark (California Supreme Court 1985, 38 Cal. 3d 355) · Warden v. Kahn (California Court of Appeal 1979, 99 Cal. App. 3d 805) · Rogers v. Ulrich (California Court of Appeal 1975, 52 Cal. App. 3d 894)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 632Vigentecitada en 39 de nuestros artículos
(a) A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-08-13 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 267 opiniones judiciales1910s: 11920s: 01930s: 01940s: 01950s: 01960s: 21970s: 121980s: 161990s: 242000s: 282010s: 822020s: 102Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Rubin v. Green (California Supreme Court 1993, 4 Cal. 4th 1187) · Kimmel v. Goland (California Supreme Court 1990, 51 Cal. 3d 202) · Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc. (California Supreme Court 1998, 74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 843)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 632.7Vigentecitada en 5 de nuestros artículos
(a) Every person who, without the consent of all of the parties to a communication, intercepts or receives and intentionally records, or assists in the interception or reception and intentional recordation of, a communication transmitted between two cellular radio telephones, a cellular radio telephone and a landline telephone, two cordless telephones, a cordless telephone and a landline telephone, or a cordless telephone and a cellular radio telephone, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has been convicted previously of a violation of this section or of Section 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 67 opiniones judiciales1990s: 12000s: 02010s: 122020s: 54Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Smith v. LoanMe, Inc. (California Supreme Court 2021, 276 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746) · People v. Chavez (California Court of Appeal 1996, 44 Cal. App. 4th 1144) · Gruber v. Yelp Inc. (California Court of Appeal 2020)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 633Vigentecitada en 3 de nuestros artículos
(a) Nothing in Section 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, or 632.7 prohibits the Attorney General, any district attorney, or any assistant, deputy, or investigator of the Attorney General or any district attorney, any officer of the California Highway Patrol, any peace officer of the Office of Internal Affairs of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, any chief of police, assistant chief of police, or police officer of a city or city and county, any sheriff, undersheriff, or deputy sheriff regularly employed and paid in that capacity by a county, police officer of the County of Los Angeles, or any person acting pursuant to the direction of one of these law enforcement officers acting within the scope of his or her authority, from overhearing or recording any communication that they could lawfully overhear or record prior to January 1, 1968. (b) Nothing in Section 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, or 632.7 renders inadmissible any evidence obtained by the above-named persons by means of overhearing or recording any communication that they could lawfully overhear or record prior to January 1, 1968.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 21 opiniones judiciales1960s: 11970s: 71980s: 51990s: 52000s: 02010s: 3Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2015

Casos destacados: People v. Ayers (California Court of Appeal 1975, 51 Cal. App. 3d 370) · People v. Chavez (California Court of Appeal 1996, 44 Cal. App. 4th 1144) · Untitled California Attorney General Opinion (California Attorney General Reports 1996)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 633.5Vigentecitada en 8 de nuestros artículos
Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not prohibit one party to a confidential communication from recording the communication for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of the crime of extortion, kidnapping, bribery, any felony involving violence against the person, including, but not limited to, human trafficking, as defined in Section 236.1, or a violation of Section 653m, or domestic violence as defined in Section 13700. Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not render any evidence so obtained inadmissible in a prosecution for extortion, kidnapping, bribery, any felony involving violence against the person, including, but not limited to, human trafficking, as defined in Section 236.1, a violation of Section 653m, or domestic violence as defined in Section 13700, or any crime in connection therewith.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 21 opiniones judiciales1970s: 51980s: 01990s: 22000s: 12010s: 32020s: 10Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: People v. Baker (California Court of Appeal 1978, 88 Cal. App. 3d 115) · Malinowski v. Martin (California Court of Appeal 2024) · Geragos v. Abelyan (California Court of Appeal 2023)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 633.6Vigente
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter, and in accordance with federal law, upon the request of a victim of domestic violence who is seeking a domestic violence restraining order, a judge issuing the order may include a provision in the order that permits the victim to record any prohibited communication made to him or her by the perpetrator. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter, and in accordance with federal law, a victim of domestic violence who is seeking a domestic violence restraining order from a court, and who reasonably believes that a confidential communication made to him or her by the perpetrator may contain evidence germane to that restraining order, may record that communication for the exclusive purpose and use of providing that evidence to the court. (c) The Judicial Council shall amend its domestic violence prevention application and order forms to incorporate the provisions of this section.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 3 opiniones judicialesAplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Malinowski v. Martin (California Court of Appeal 2024) · Andrea M. v. Paul M. CA2/3 (California Court of Appeal 2026) · Breja v. Breja CA1/5 (California Court of Appeal 2023)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 637.2Vigentecitada en 20 de nuestros artículos
(a) Any person who has been injured by a violation of this chapter may bring an action against the person who committed the violation for the greater of the following amounts: (1) Five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation. (2) Three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff. (b) Any person may, in accordance with Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 525) of Title 7 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, bring an action to enjoin and restrain any violation of this chapter, and may in the same action seek damages as provided by subdivision (a). (c) It is not a necessary prerequisite to an action pursuant to this section that the plaintiff has suffered, or be threatened with, actual damages. (d) This section shall not be construed to affect Title 4 (commencing with Section 3425.1) of Part 1 of Division 4 of the Civil Code.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 103 opiniones judiciales1970s: 41980s: 51990s: 82000s: 142010s: 392020s: 33Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Rubin v. Green (California Supreme Court 1993, 4 Cal. 4th 1187) · Ribas v. Clark (California Supreme Court 1985, 38 Cal. 3d 355) · Kimmel v. Goland (California Supreme Court 1990, 51 Cal. 3d 202)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

§ 647Vigentecitada en 15 de nuestros artículos
Except as provided in paragraph (5) of subdivision (b) and in subdivisions (k) and (l), a person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor: (a) An individual who solicits anyone to engage in or who engages in lewd or dissolute conduct in a public place or in a place open to the public or exposed to public view. (b) (1) An individual who solicits, or who agrees to engage in, or who engages in, an act of prostitution with the intent to receive compensation, money, or anything of value from another person. An individual agrees to engage in an act of prostitution when, with specific intent to so engage, the individual manifests an acceptance of an offer or solicitation by another person to so engage, regardless of whether the offer or solicitation was made by a person who also possessed the specific intent to engage in an act of prostitution. (2) An individual who solicits, or who agrees to engage in, or who engages in, an act of prostitution with another person who is 18 years of age or older in exchange for the individual providing compensation, money, or anything of value to the other person.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Citada en 593 opiniones judiciales1900s: 31910s: 11920s: 11930s: 31940s: 01950s: 161960s: 591970s: 1331980s: 931990s: 542000s: 582010s: 1002020s: 72Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Morrison v. State Board of Education (California Supreme Court 1969, 1 Cal. 3d 214) · People v. Laiwa (California Supreme Court 1983, 34 Cal. 3d 711) · In Re Cregler (California Supreme Court 1961, 56 Cal. 2d 308)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

Code of Federal Regulations Title 45

§ 164.502Uses and disclosures of protected health information: General rules.Vigentecitada en 14 de nuestros artículos
(a) Standard. A covered entity or business associate may not use or disclose protected health information, except as permitted or required by this subpart or by subpart C of part 160 of this subchapter. (1) Covered entities: Permitted uses and disclosures. A covered entity is permitted to use or disclose protected health information as follows: (i) To the individual; (ii) For treatment, payment, or health care operations, as permitted by and in compliance with § 164.506; (iii) Incident to a use or disclosure otherwise permitted or required by this subpart, provided that the covered entity has complied with the applicable requirements of §§ 164.502(b), 164.514(d), and 164.530(c) with respect to such otherwise permitted or required use or disclosure; (iv) Except for uses and disclosures prohibited under § 164.502(a)(5)(i), pursuant to and in compliance with a valid authorization under § 164.508; (v) Pursuant to an agreement under, or as otherwise permitted by, § 164.510; and (vi) As permitted by and in compliance with any of the following: (A) This section. (B) Section 164.512 and, where applicable, § 164.509. (C) Section 164.514(e), (f), or (g).

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en ecfr.gov

Citada en 290 opiniones judiciales2000s: 642010s: 922020s: 134Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2004, 362 F.3d 923) · Opis Management Resources, LLC v. Secretary, Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2013, 713 F.3d 1291) · United States ex rel. Baltazar v. Warden (District Court, N.D. Illinois 2014, 302 F.R.D. 256)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

Code of Federal Regulations Title 47

§ 64.1200Delivery restrictions.Vigentecitada en 12 de nuestros artículos
(a) No person or entity may: (1) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, initiate any telephone call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or is made with the prior express consent of the called party) using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice; (i) To any emergency telephone line, including any 911 line and any emergency line of a hospital, medical physician or service office, health care facility, poison control center, or fire protection or law enforcement agency; (ii) To the telephone line of any guest room or patient room of a hospital, health care facility, elderly home, or similar establishment; or (iii) To any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en ecfr.gov

Citada en 840 opiniones judiciales1990s: 42000s: 582010s: 2732020s: 505Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Samuel Zean v. Fairview Health Services (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2017, 858 F.3d 520) · Krakauer v. Dish Network, L. L.C. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2019, 925 F.3d 643) · ACA Int'l v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2018, 885 F.3d 687)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

United States Code Title 18

§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedVigentecitada en 397 de nuestros artículos
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-08-12 · Lea la sección completa en uscode.house.gov

Citada en 2,045 opiniones judiciales1960s: 51970s: 2581980s: 2991990s: 3792000s: 4272010s: 2972020s: 380Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511) · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297) · Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

United States Code Title 20

§ 1232gFamily educational and privacy rightsVigentecitada en 29 de nuestros artículos
No funds shall be made available under any applicable program to any educational agency or institution which has a policy of denying, or which effectively prevents, the parents of students who are or have been in attendance at a school of such agency or at such institution, as the case may be, the right to inspect and review the education records of their children. If any material or document in the education record of a student includes information on more than one student, the parents of one of such students shall have the right to inspect and review only such part of such material or document as relates to such student or to be informed of the specific information contained in such part of such material. Each educational agency or institution shall establish appropriate procedures for the granting of a request by parents for access to the education records of their children within a reasonable period of time, but in no case more than forty-five days after the request has been made.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en uscode.house.gov

Citada en 981 opiniones judiciales1970s: 251980s: 491990s: 1242000s: 2432010s: 2072020s: 333Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Goss v. Lopez (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 419 U.S. 565) · Gonzaga University v. Doe (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 536 U.S. 273) · Foster Children v. Jeb Bush, Kathleen Kearney, Chuck Bates, Robert Williams, Ester Tibbs (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2003, 329 F.3d 1255)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

United States Code Title 47

§ 227Restrictions on use of telephone equipmentVigentecitada en 36 de nuestros artículos
As used in this section— The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity— to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and to dial such numbers. The term “established business relationship”, for purposes only of subsection (b)(1)(C)(i), shall have the meaning given the term in section 64.1200 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2003, except that— such term shall include a relationship between a person or entity and a business subscriber subject to the same terms applicable under such section to a relationship between a person or entity and a residential subscriber; and an established business relationship shall be subject to any time limitation established pursuant to paragraph (2)(G)).1  So in original. Second closing parenthesis probably should not appear.

Texto oficial (extracto) · al 2026-07-28 · Lea la sección completa en uscode.house.gov

Citada en 3,209 opiniones judiciales1990s: 372000s: 3082010s: 11342020s: 1730Aplicada por un tribunal por última vez: 2026

Casos destacados: Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez (Supreme Court of the United States 2016, 577 U.S. 153) · Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci Inc (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2016, 835 F.3d 388) · Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid (Supreme Court of the United States 2021, 592 U.S. 395)

Identificado automáticamente a partir de las opiniones judiciales que citan esta sección; no es un ranking de qué caso prevalece.

Busque en nuestro registro completo de la ley de EE. UU.: 2.1 millones de secciones, todos los estados y la ley federal

Fuentes y referencias

  1. SB 1130, Sesión Legislativa de California 2025-2026 (según enmienda del 22 de abril de 2026)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  2. SB 1130, Sesión Legislativa de California 2025-2026, propuesto Pen. Code § 632.8 (según enmienda del 22 de abril de 2026)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  3. SB 1130, Sesión Legislativa de California 2025-2026 (según enmienda del 22 de abril de 2026), que modifica Pen. Code §§ 633, 633.1, 633.5(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  4. SB 690, Sesión Legislativa de California 2025-2026 (según enmienda del 29 de mayo de 2025)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  5. SB 690, Sesión Legislativa de California 2025-2026, propuesta enmienda a Pen. Code § 637.2 (según enmienda del 29 de mayo de 2025)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  6. Cal. Penal Code § 632 (última modificación Stats. 2016, Ch. 855, Sec. 1, vigente desde el 1 de enero de 2017)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  7. Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 (última modificación Stats. 2022, Ch. 27, Sec. 2 (SB 1272), vigente desde el 1 de enero de 2023)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  8. FCC, In the Matter of Implications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies on Protecting Consumers from Unwanted Robocalls and Robotexts, FCC 24-17 (emitida el 8 de febrero de 2024)(docs.fcc.gov).gov
  9. Insurance Marketing Coalition Ltd. v. FCC, 127 F.4th 303 (11th Cir. 2025); FCC 24-24 (Regla de Consentimiento Uno a Uno, 2023); FCC DA 25-621 (restablecimiento ministerial de la regla anterior, mandato emitido el 30 de abril de 2025); 47 CFR § 64.1200(f)(9)(docs.fcc.gov).gov
  10. Stericycle, Inc. and Teamsters Local 628, 372 NLRB No. 113 (2 de agosto de 2023)(nlrb.gov).gov
  11. NLRB, Consejero General Interino William B. Cowen, Memorando GC 25-07 (25 de junio de 2025)(nlrb.gov).gov
  12. 45 CFR § 164.502 (Regla de Privacidad de la HIPAA); HHS, resumen de la Regla de Privacidad de la HIPAA(ecfr.gov).gov
  13. FERPA, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99; Departamento de Educación de EE. UU., Oficina de Política de Privacidad Estudiantil, preguntas frecuentes sobre fotos y videos bajo la FERPA(ecfr.gov).gov
  14. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  15. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  16. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  17. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  18. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  19. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  20. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  21. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  22. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  23. courtlistener.com
  24. courtlistener.com
  25. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.gov
  26. law.cornell.edu
  27. law.cornell.edu
Compartir: