Florida
Florida Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Florida's trade secret protections derive from the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (FUTSA), Fla. Stat. §§ 688.001 to 688.009, enacted in 1988. Under Fla. Stat. § 688.007, a civil claim for misappropriation must be brought within three years from the date the misappropriation was discovered or, by reasonable diligence, should have been discovered.
This guide is part of our Trade Secret Laws by State series.
Information last verified on 2026-06-25. This article presents general legal information, not legal advice. For information on how the Trade Secret Laws by State framework applies in Florida, consult a licensed Florida attorney.
Does Florida Have a Trade Secret Law?
Florida enacted the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act in 1988, codified at Fla. Stat. §§ 688.001 to 688.009. FUTSA substantially follows the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) developed by the Uniform Law Commission, giving Florida businesses a dedicated statutory framework for civil trade-secret claims. The Act replaced the prior common-law approach and has been consistently interpreted by Florida courts in light of its UTSA lineage. Florida courts and federal courts applying Florida law treat decisions from other UTSA-adopting states as persuasive authority when construing FUTSA provisions. Florida businesses also benefit from the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, which took effect in 2016 and operates in parallel with FUTSA rather than replacing it. The Act covers definitions, injunctive relief, damages, attorney fees, preservation of other remedies, effect on other laws, uniformity of application, severability, and the limitations period.

What Counts as a Trade Secret and Misappropriation Under FUTSA?
Under Fla. Stat. § 688.002(4), a trade secret is information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that satisfies two requirements. First, the information must derive independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. Second, the information must be the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.
Courts evaluate reasonable measures on a case-by-case basis. Commonly accepted measures include restricting physical and electronic access to confidential files, labeling documents as proprietary, implementing confidentiality provisions in employment agreements, and conditioning third-party access on nondisclosure agreements. Perfection is not required, but consistent, identifiable protective steps are necessary for FUTSA coverage.
Misappropriation under § 688.002(2) means one of the following: acquiring a trade secret by improper means such as theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage; or disclosing or using a trade secret without consent when the person acquired it through improper means or knew or had reason to know that the secret was acquired through improper means, or acquired it under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain secrecy. Reverse engineering and independent derivation are proper means of acquiring information under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act framework FUTSA follows, so neither constitutes misappropriation under FUTSA.
Remedies and the Limitations Period Under FUTSA
A misappropriation claim under FUTSA must be filed within three years after the misappropriation was discovered or, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have been discovered (Fla. Stat. § 688.007). Continuing misappropriation does not restart the clock; the three-year period runs from when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the first misappropriation.

Available remedies include the following:
- Injunctive relief (§ 688.003): A court may enjoin actual or threatened misappropriation and may condition a future use on payment of a reasonable royalty in exceptional circumstances where an injunction would be inequitable.
- Damages (§ 688.004): The claimant may recover actual loss caused by misappropriation plus any unjust enrichment not captured in that loss figure. Where neither measure is provable, the court may award a reasonable royalty for the unauthorized use.
- Exemplary damages (§ 688.004): When misappropriation is willful and malicious, the court may award up to twice the damages calculated above.
- Attorney fees (§ 688.005): A court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party when a claim is made or defended in bad faith, or when willful and malicious misappropriation exists.
FUTSA also displaces conflicting civil claims based on the same underlying misappropriation conduct under § 688.008; a plaintiff cannot simultaneously pursue a duplicative tort claim, such as conversion or common-law unfair competition, grounded in the identical conduct.
How the Federal DTSA Applies in Florida
The Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836-1839, enacted in May 2016, gives Florida businesses a direct federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation without the need to establish diversity jurisdiction. The DTSA applies whenever the misappropriated trade secret relates to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. Because 18 U.S.C. § 1838 expressly states that the DTSA does not preempt state law, Florida litigants routinely plead both FUTSA and DTSA claims in the same action, particularly in federal district court.
Key DTSA provisions that affect Florida cases:
- Limitations: three years from discovery of the misappropriation (18 U.S.C. § 1836(d)).
- Remedies: injunctive relief that does not conflict with applicable state law, actual damages plus unjust enrichment or a reasonable royalty, exemplary damages up to twice the award for willful and malicious misappropriation, and attorney fees for willful and malicious misappropriation or bad-faith claims (§ 1836(b)(3)).
- Ex parte seizure: in extraordinary circumstances, a federal court may issue an order authorizing the seizure of property to prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret (§ 1836(b)(2)).
- Whistleblower immunity and notice: individuals who disclose a trade secret to a government official or attorney in confidence to report a suspected violation of law are immune from DTSA and state trade-secret liability (§ 1833(b)(1)). Employers who include confidentiality or nondisclosure provisions in agreements with employees, contractors, or consultants must provide notice of this immunity in those agreements if signed or updated after May 11, 2016. Failure to include the notice forfeits the right to claim exemplary damages and attorney fees in any DTSA action involving that agreement (§ 1833(b)(3)).
Florida also criminalizes theft of and trafficking in trade secrets under Fla. Stat. § 812.081, with felony classifications that increase when the offense is committed with intent to benefit a foreign government, agent, or instrumentality. Criminal prosecution for trade secret theft may also occur under the federal Economic Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831-1832, which covers both foreign-government-sponsored theft and domestic trade secret misappropriation.
This article presents general legal information as of 2026-06-25 and is not legal advice. Trade secret disputes involve detailed factual and legal analysis specific to each situation; consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice about your circumstances.
Related articles
- Trade Secret Laws by State
- Delaware Trade Secret Laws
- Georgia Trade Secret Laws
- Is AI-generated code copyright infringement?
Last updated: 2026-06-25.
Frequently Asked Questions
What qualifies as a trade secret under Florida law?
Under Fla. Stat. § 688.002(4), information qualifies as a trade secret if it derives independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable by proper means, and if the owner takes efforts reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. This covers formulas, programs, methods, devices, techniques, and processes, among other forms of information.
How long do I have to file a trade secret lawsuit in Florida?
Under Fla. Stat. § 688.007, you have three years from the date you discovered or reasonably should have discovered the misappropriation to file a civil claim under FUTSA. Waiting until after the three-year period generally bars the claim.
What remedies are available for trade secret misappropriation in Florida?
FUTSA provides injunctive relief to stop actual or threatened misappropriation, damages based on actual loss plus unjust enrichment or a reasonable royalty, up to twice the damages for willful and malicious misappropriation, and attorney fees when a claim is made or defended in bad faith or involves willful and malicious conduct (Fla. Stat. §§ 688.003-688.005).
Do nondisclosure agreements help protect trade secrets in Florida?
Yes. Florida courts consider whether the trade-secret owner took reasonable measures to maintain secrecy, and a properly drafted NDA is direct evidence of those efforts. Under the federal DTSA, any NDA or confidentiality agreement signed or updated after May 11, 2016 must include a whistleblower-immunity notice, or the employer forfeits the right to seek exemplary damages and attorney fees in a federal trade-secret action.
Can a Florida business bring both a FUTSA claim and a federal DTSA claim?
Yes. The DTSA does not preempt FUTSA (18 U.S.C. § 1838), so Florida trade-secret owners may assert both claims simultaneously, typically in federal district court. Each claim has its own three-year limitations period running from discovery, and the remedial frameworks overlap substantially while offering some complementary features.
Updates
Added Florida’s criminal trade-secret statute alongside the federal criminal-law discussion.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the Chapter 688 remedies citations, which were shifted one section low throughout the page: injunctive relief is 688.003 (not .002), damages/exemplary damages is 688.004 (not .003), and attorney's fees is 688.005 (not .004).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Florida Statutes
§ 688.003Injunctive relief.In force
(1) Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined. Upon application to the court, an injunction shall be terminated when the trade secret has ceased to exist, but the injunction may be continued for an additional reasonable period of time in order to eliminate commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation. (2) In exceptional circumstances, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time for which use could have been prohibited. Exceptional circumstances include, but are not limited to, a material and prejudicial change of position prior to acquiring knowledge or reason to know of misappropriation that renders a prohibitive injunction inequitable. (3) In appropriate circumstances, affirmative acts to protect a trade secret may be compelled by court order.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
§ 688.004Damages.In force
(1) Except to the extent that a material and prejudicial change of position prior to acquiring knowledge or reason to know of misappropriation renders a monetary recovery inequitable, a complainant is entitled to recover damages for misappropriation. Damages can include both the actual loss caused by misappropriation and the unjust enrichment caused by misappropriation that is not taken into account in computing actual loss. In lieu of damages measured by any other methods, the damages caused by misappropriation may be measured by imposition of liability for a reasonable royalty for a misappropriator’s unauthorized disclosure or use of a trade secret. (2) If willful and malicious misappropriation exists, the court may award exemplary damages in an amount not exceeding twice any award made under subsection (1).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Premier Lab Supply, Inc. v. Chemplex Industries, Inc. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2012, 94 So. 3d 640)“…l be terminated when the trade secret has ceased to exist.” Section 688.004, Florida Statutes, does not require that this period be a…”
- MAPEI CORPORATION and SOUTHEASTERN PRINTING COMPANY, INC. v. J.M. FIELD MARKETING, INC. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2020)“…breach of the confidentiality provision; (4) violation of section 688.004, Florida Statutes (2017); and (5) temporary and permanent…”
- Bateman v. Mnemonics, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1996, 79 F.3d 1532)“…d exemplary damages to them on the trade secret claim under Fla.Stat. § 688.004(2). Before addressing the many issues…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 688.002Definitions.In force
As used in ss. 688.001-688.009, unless the context requires otherwise:(1) “Improper means” includes theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage through electronic or other means. (2) “Misappropriation” means:(a) Acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means; or (b) Disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or implied consent by a person who:1. Used improper means to acquire knowledge of the trade secret; or 2. At the time of disclosure or use, knew or had reason to know that her or his knowledge of the trade secret was:a. Derived from or through a person who had utilized improper means to acquire it; b. Acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy or limit its use; or c. Derived from or through a person who owed a duty to the person seeking relief to maintain its secrecy or limit its use; or 3. Before a material change of her or his position, knew or had reason to know that it was a trade secret and that knowledge of it had been acquired by accident or mistake.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 76 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- All Pro Sports Camp, Inc. v. Walt Disney (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1999, 727 So. 2d 363)“…e secret misappropriation. § 688.008(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). Section 688.002, Florida Statutes, defines a "trade secret" as: (4) inf…”
- Liberty American Insurance Group, Inc. v. Westpoint Underwriters, L.L.C. (District Court, M.D. Florida 2001, 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271)“…le under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. Fla. Stat. § 688.002 (4). This Court adopts Judge Jen…”
- Compulife Software Inc. v. Moses Newman (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2020, 959 F.3d 1288)“…le under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. Fla. Stat. § 688.002(4). “[W]hether something is a trade sec…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 688.007Statute of limitations.In force
An action for misappropriation must be brought within 3 years after the misappropriation is discovered or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered. For the purposes of this section, a continuing misappropriation constitutes a single claim.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2011, 654 F.3d 1179)“…cise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered.” Fla. Stat. § 688.007. KAC asserts that the three-year…”
- Knights Armament Co. v. Omnitech Partners (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2011)“…cise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered.” Fla. Stat. § 688.007. KAC asserts that the three-year…”
- Abb Turbo Systems Ag v. Turbousa, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2014, 774 F.3d 979)“…claims should be dismissed because they were time-barred by Fla. Stat. § 688.007, and Hans argued for dismissal for lack…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 688.005Attorney’s fees.In force
If a claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith, a motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith, or willful and malicious misappropriation exists, the court may award reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Real-Time Laboratories, Inc. v. Predator Systems, Inc. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2000, 757 So. 2d 634)“…4th DCA 1981). We find no error. Attorney’s Fees: Section 688.005, Florida Statutes (1995) provides, in pertinent part, tha…”
- Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts B v. v. Consorcio Barr, S.A. (District Court, S.D. Florida 2003, 267 F. Supp. 2d 1268)“…arded in a case of willful and malicious misappropriation. Fla. Stat. § 688.005 . 32. The Court concludes that C…”
- Paysys International, Inc. v. Atos Se (District Court, S.D. New York 2019)“…Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”), Fla. Stat. § 688.005; 28 U.S.C. § 1927; and the Court’s inhe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 688.008Effect on other law.In force
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), ss. 688.001-688.009 displace conflicting tort, restitutory, and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret. (2) This act does not affect:(a) Contractual remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret; (b) Other civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret; or (c) Criminal remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sentry Data Sys., Inc. v. CVS Health (District Court, S.D. Florida 2018, 361 F. Supp. 3d 1279)“…g civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret." Fla. Stat. § 688.008 (1). FUTSA, however, does not preempt…”
- Rxstrategies, Inc. v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (District Court, M.D. Florida 2019, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1341)“…g civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret." Fla. Stat. § 688.008 (1). But it does not affect "[o]ther c…”
- GlobalOptions Services, Inc. v. North American Training Group, Inc. (District Court, M.D. Florida 2015, 131 F. Supp. 3d 1291)“…ng civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.” Fla. Stat. § 688.008 (1). In its response, NATG affirms that…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 688.001Short title.In force
Sections 688.001-688.009 may be cited as the “Uniform Trade Secrets Act.”
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc. (District Court, S.D. Florida 2001, 148 F. Supp. 2d 1326)“…alleging violations of Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Fla.Stat. § 688.001 et seq. On October 31, 2000, Del Monte…”
- Liberty American Insurance Group, Inc. v. Westpoint Underwriters, L.L.C. (District Court, M.D. Florida 2001, 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271)“…ny actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets. Fla. Stat. § 688.001 , et seq.; see Thomas v. Alloy F…”
- Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. Barker Boatworks, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2018, 898 F.3d 1279)“…cause of action for the misappropriation of trade secrets. Fla. Stat. §§ 688.001–009. “To prevail on a FUTSA claim, a p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 688.009Uniformity of application and construction.In force
Sections 688.001-688.009 shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this act among states enacting it.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2009
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Florida 2006, 432 F. Supp. 2d 1319)“…pect to the subject of this act among states enacting it.” Fla. Stat. § 688.009 . 34 . Texas, wher…”
- Coulter Corp. v. Leinert (District Court, E.D. Missouri 1994, 869 F. Supp. 732)“…e interpretations of states with law similar to Florida's. Fla. Stat. § 688.009 (1993). Very few courts have address…”
- Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc. (District Court, M.D. Florida 2009, 636 F. Supp. 2d 1283)“…it was identical to Florida’s UTSA); see also Fla. Stat. § 688.009 (“Sections 688.001-688.009 shall be ap…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 812.081Theft of or trafficking in trade secrets; definitions; penalties; providing to foreign entities; restitution.In force
(1) As used in this section, the term:(a) “Endeavor” means to attempt or to try. (b) “Foreign agent” means any officer, employee, proxy, servant, delegate, or representative of a foreign government. (c) “Foreign instrumentality” means any agency, bureau, ministry, component, institution, association, or any legal, commercial, or business organization, corporation, firm, or entity that is substantially owned, controlled, sponsored, commanded, managed, or dominated by a foreign government. (d) “Obtain or use” has the same meaning as provided in s. 812.012(3). (e) “Person” means a natural person, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision or agency, or any other legal or commercial entity. (f) “Trade secret” means the whole or any portion or phase of any formula, pattern, device, combination of devices, or compilation of information which is for use, or is used, in the operation of a business and which provides the business an advantage, or an opportunity to obtain an advantage, over those who do not know or use it.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Fla. Soc of Newspaper Editors, Inc. v. Fla., Psc (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1989, 543 So. 2d 1262)“…sure of public records. [4] "Trade secret" is defined in section 812.081, Florida Statutes (1987), as any compilation of informati…”
- Blackstone Pa v. Dade City Osteopathic (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1987, 511 So. 2d 1050)“…stomers of OLIVA from the offices of OLIVA" in violation of section 812.081, Florida Statutes. Alleging malicious and willful conduct…”
- Surterra Florida, LLC., Alpha Foliage etc. v. Florida Department of Health (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2017, 223 So. 3d 376)“…lications contained confidential trade secrets pursuant to section 812.081, Florida Statutes (2015), and were exempt from disclosur…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 1836Civil proceedingsIn forcecited in 56 of our articles
The Attorney General may, in a civil action, obtain appropriate injunctive relief against any violation of this chapter. An owner of a trade secret that is misappropriated may bring a civil action under this subsection if the trade secret is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. Based on an affidavit or verified complaint satisfying the requirements of this paragraph, the court may, upon ex parte application but only in extraordinary circumstances, issue an order providing for the seizure of property necessary to prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret that is the subject of the action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,770 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):First Western Capital Management Co. v. Malamed (2017) held Section 1836(b)(3)(A) authorizes but does not mandate an injunction, so irreparable harm cannot be presumed. Syntel v. TriZetto (2023) vacated an avoided-costs award, holding unjust enrichment was unavailable where actual loss already captured the gain.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun Thanoo (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2021, 999 F.3d 892)✓A drug developer alleged a departing scientist took its microsphere manufacturing processes to a competitor; the Third Circuit vacated dismissal, holding the Section 1836(b) claim was pled adequately and that lost exclusivity is harm even before a rival product launches.
- First Western Capital Management Co. v. Malamed (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2017, 874 F.3d 1136)✓A wealth manager won an injunction stopping a fired executive from soliciting clients without proving irreparable harm; the Tenth Circuit held Section 1836(b)(3)(A) authorizes but does not mandate injunctions, so irreparable harm cannot be presumed, and reversed.
- DTC Energy Grp., Inc. v. Hirschfeld (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2018, 912 F.3d 1263)✓An oil and gas staffing firm sought to enjoin a former manager who diverted contracts to a rival; the Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial, holding Section 1836(b)(3)(A) allows no presumption of irreparable harm and finding no proof the defendants still held the trade secrets.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Trade Secret Laws by State: UTSA & DTSA (2026), Alabama Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines, Alaska Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines
§ 1838Construction with other lawsIn forcecited in 56 of our articles
Except as provided in section 1833(b), this chapter shall not be construed to preempt or displace any other remedies, whether civil or criminal, provided by United States Federal, State, commonwealth, possession, or territory law for the misappropriation of a trade secret, or to affect the otherwise lawful disclosure of information by any Government employee under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts cite 18 U.S.C. 1838 to note that the Defend Trade Secrets Act does not displace state trade secret remedies. Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius, Ltd. v. the TriZetto Grp. (2023) said so while drawing on state UTSA cases for DTSA damages; Quintara Biosciences, Inc. v. Ruifeng Biztech, Inc. (2025) cited it for parallel claims.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius, Ltd. v. the TriZetto Grp. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2023, 68 F.4th 792)✓Reviewing a $285 million DTSA award for misappropriated software trade secrets, the Second Circuit cited section 1838 for the point that the DTSA does not preempt state trade secret remedies, and so read the federal damages provision alongside state UTSA cases.
- Authority to Obtain and Share Statewide Voter Roll Data (Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel 2026)“…luded a saving provision for state privacy laws, see, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 1838; 42 U.S.C. § 300jj-19(c)(4), “Congress…”
- Quintara Biosciences, Inc. v. Ruifeng Biztech, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2025)“…tate and federal trade- secret-misappropriation claims. See 18 U.S.C. § 1838 (providing that DTSA “shall not be cons…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines, Arkansas Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines, California Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines
§ 1832Theft of trade secretsIn forcecited in 29 of our articles
Whoever, with intent to convert a trade secret, that is related to a product or service used in or intended for use in interstate or foreign commerce, to the economic benefit of anyone other than the owner thereof, and intending or knowing that the offense will, injure any owner of that trade secret, knowingly— steals, or without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals, or by fraud, artifice, or deception obtains such information; without authorization copies, duplicates, sketches, draws, photographs, downloads, uploads, alters, destroys, photocopies, replicates, transmits, delivers, sends, mails, communicates, or conveys such information; receives, buys, or possesses such information, knowing the same to have been stolen or appropriated, obtained, or converted without authorization; attempts to commit any offense described in paragraphs (1) through (3); or conspires with one or more other persons to commit any offense described in paragraphs (1) through (3), and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, shall, except as provided in subsection (b), be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 260 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Nosal (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2012, 676 F.3d 854)“…Congress did just that in the federal trade secrets statute—18 U.S.C. § 1832—where it used the common law terms for…”
- United States v. Kai-Lo Hsu, A/K/A James Hsu. United States of America v. Chester S. Ho. United States of America (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1998, 155 F.3d 189)“…and a conspiracy to steal trade secrets, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1832 (a)(4) and (a)(5). B. The…”
- United States v. Martin (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2000, 228 F.3d 1)“…16- Espionage Act of 1996, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 1832(a)(5).6 In order to find a defendant g…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines, Hawaii Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines, Idaho Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines
Sources and References
- Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Fla. Stat. §§ 688.001-688.009(flsenate.gov).gov
- Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836-1839(law.cornell.edu)
- Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Uniform Law Commission)(uniformlaws.org)
- Economic Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831-1832(law.cornell.edu)
- Fla. Stat. § 812.081, theft of or trafficking in trade secrets(www.flsenate.gov).gov