Georgia
Bankruptcy in Georgia (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Filing for bankruptcy in Georgia is governed by federal law, but the property you can protect and the income test that applies to you are shaped by Georgia's own rules. Georgia has opted out of the federal bankruptcy exemptions, so residents must use the state exemption list in O.C.G.A. 44-13-100. This page explains Georgia's exemptions, the Chapter 7 means test, and where cases are filed, as general legal information rather than legal advice.
Does Georgia use state or federal bankruptcy exemptions?
Federal law lets each state decide whether its residents may choose the federal exemption list in 11 U.S.C. 522(d) or must use the state's own exemptions. Georgia is an opt-out state. The opt-out is in O.C.G.A. 44-13-100(b), which invokes 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(1) to bar a debtor domiciled in Georgia from applying the federal 522(d) list and limits that debtor to the exemptions available under 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(2). The state list itself is in 44-13-100(a), which applies in lieu of the general exemption from levy and sale in O.C.G.A. 44-13-1; that older section is a creditor-process exemption, not a bankruptcy provision. If you recently moved to Georgia, the federal domicile rules in 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(3) may require you to use another state's exemptions for a period, so the applicable list depends on your residency history.
Georgia homestead exemption
The homestead exemption protects equity in the home you or a dependent uses as a residence. For cases filed on or after July 1, 2026, O.C.G.A. 44-13-100(a)(1) as amended by House Bill 1024 protects up to $50,000 of equity, and qualifying married homeowners may protect up to $100,000. Cases filed before July 1, 2026 used the prior $21,500/$43,000 limits.

Georgia enacted House Bill 1024, which amends O.C.G.A. 44-13-100 to raise the homestead exemption to $50,000 effective July 1, 2026. For a residence titled in the name of one of two spouses who is a debtor, the exemption is $100,000. Beginning July 1, 2031, the amount is adjusted annually for inflation. Because the figure is changing in 2026 and will index thereafter, confirm the current amount for your filing date.
Motor-vehicle, wildcard, and personal-property exemptions
Georgia's other key exemptions under O.C.G.A. 44-13-100 include:
- Motor vehicle: up to $5,000 of equity in one or more motor vehicles.
- Wildcard: $1,200 of any property, plus up to $10,000 of any homestead exemption you do not use on a home. This lets renters and homeowners with little home equity protect cash, a vehicle, or other assets.
- Household goods and clothing: up to $5,000 total, with a $300 per-item limit on furniture, appliances, books, animals, crops, clothing, and similar items.
- Jewelry: up to $500.
- Tools of the trade: up to $1,500 in implements, books, and tools used in your work.
- Retirement, benefits, and insurance: most retirement and pension funds, Social Security and other public benefits, unemployment and veterans' benefits, and certain interests in life insurance.
Wage garnishment sits outside this list. O.C.G.A. 44-13-100 contains no exemption for current earnings, so the limit on garnishing wages comes from O.C.G.A. 18-4-5 and the federal cap in 15 U.S.C. 1673 instead.
These amounts are set by statute and are subject to amendment, so verify current figures before relying on them.
The Chapter 7 means test in Georgia
The means test determines whether your income is low enough to file Chapter 7 without a presumption of abuse. The first step compares your household's current monthly income, annualized, to the median family income for a Georgia household of your size, as published by the U.S. Trustee Program (justice.gov/ust). If you are at or below the median, you generally pass the first step. If you are above it, a more detailed calculation of allowed expenses and disposable income applies.
For cases filed on or after April 1, 2026, the U.S. Trustee Program lists Georgia's median family income as:
- 1 earner: $68,478
- 2 people: $84,965
- 3 people: $101,479
- 4 people: $123,481
- Add $11,100 for each individual in excess of four.
The U.S. Trustee Program updates these figures periodically, typically about twice a year, so check the current table for your filing date.
Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13
Chapter 7 is a liquidation: a trustee may sell non-exempt property to pay creditors, and most remaining unsecured debts are discharged, often within a few months. Because Georgia's exemptions protect a defined amount of property, many filers keep everything they own. Chapter 7 suits people with limited income and mostly unsecured debt such as credit cards and medical bills.

Chapter 13 is a reorganization for people with regular income who want to catch up on a mortgage or car loan, or whose means-test calculation raises a presumption of abuse in Chapter 7. You repay some or all of what you owe through a court-approved plan lasting three to five years, then receive a discharge of remaining eligible balances.
In both chapters, filing triggers the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. 362, which immediately halts most collection efforts, including foreclosure sales, repossessions, lawsuits, and wage garnishment, while the case proceeds. If a foreclosure sale or garnishment is already underway, ask a Georgia lawyer for a free bankruptcy evaluation on Chapter 7 versus Chapter 13 for your home and income (attorney advertising).
Where you file in Georgia
Georgia is served by three federal bankruptcy districts. You file in the district that covers the county where you have lived for the greater part of the last 180 days:
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta, Gainesville, Newnan, Rome).
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia (Macon, Columbus, Albany, Athens, Valdosta).
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia (Savannah, Augusta, Brunswick, and other southeast Georgia locations).
What bankruptcy can and cannot do
Most unsecured debts, such as credit cards, medical bills, and personal loans, are dischargeable. Some obligations generally are not, including most student loans, recent income taxes, child support and alimony, and debts from fraud. Before filing, the law requires credit counseling from an approved agency, and a debtor-education course is required before discharge. Bankruptcy has long-term effects on credit and is not the right choice for everyone, so consider consulting a licensed Georgia bankruptcy attorney about your specific situation.

Frequently Asked Questions
Does Georgia use state or federal bankruptcy exemptions?
Georgia has opted out of the federal exemptions. Residents must use Georgia's state exemptions under O.C.G.A. 44-13-100 and cannot choose the federal list in 11 U.S.C. 522(d), subject to the federal domicile rules for people who recently moved to the state.
What is the homestead exemption in Georgia?
For cases filed on or after July 1, 2026, it is $50,000 of home equity (up to $100,000 for qualifying married homeowners) under House Bill 1024, indexed for inflation annually starting July 1, 2031. Cases filed before that date used the prior $21,500/$43,000 limits. Confirm the current amount for your filing date.
What is the Georgia median income for the means test?
For cases filed on or after April 1, 2026, the U.S. Trustee Program lists Georgia's median family income as $68,478 for 1 person, $84,965 for 2, $101,479 for 3, and $123,481 for 4, adding $11,100 per additional person. These figures update periodically.
Will I lose my house or car in a Georgia bankruptcy?
Often no. Georgia's homestead exemption protects home equity up to the statutory amount, and the $5,000 motor-vehicle exemption protects car equity. If your equity is within these limits and you stay current on secured payments, you can typically keep the property. Equity above the exemption may be at risk in Chapter 7 but can often be addressed in Chapter 13.
How much can the Georgia wildcard exemption protect?
The wildcard protects $1,200 of any property plus up to $10,000 of any homestead exemption you do not use on a home, so filers with little or no home equity can protect a substantial amount of other assets.
Which bankruptcy court handles my Georgia case?
You file in the Northern, Middle, or Southern District of Georgia, depending on the county where you have lived for most of the past 180 days.
What is the automatic stay?
The automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. 362 takes effect when you file and immediately stops most collection actions, including foreclosure, repossession, lawsuits, and wage garnishment, while your case is pending.
Can bankruptcy erase all of my debts?
No. Most unsecured debts are dischargeable, but obligations such as most student loans, recent taxes, child support, alimony, and debts from fraud generally are not.
Updates
Clarified that income at or below the state median means the presumption of abuse does not arise under the Chapter 7 means test, not that a filer qualifies for Chapter 7.
Corrected the statutory citations for Georgia’s bankruptcy opt-out, which lives in O.C.G.A. 44-13-100(b) rather than jointly with the general exemption statute 44-13-1, and moved the wage-garnishment limit to the statute that actually sets it, O.C.G.A. 18-4-5 with the federal cap in 15 U.S.C. 1673.
Updated the homestead exemption to the amounts in force since July 1, 2026.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Official Code of Georgia Annotated
§ 44-13-100Exemptions for purposes of bankruptcy and intestate insolvent estates.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) In lieu of the exemption provided in Code Section 44-13-1, any debtor who is a natural person may exempt, pursuant to this article, for purposes of bankruptcy, the following property: (1)(A) The debtor's aggregate interest, not to exceed $50,000.00 in value, in real property or personal prope
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 116 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Silliman v. Cassell (Supreme Court of Georgia 2013, 292 Ga. 464)“…ing Justice. In this case involving the interpretation of OCGA § 44-13-100 (a) (2) (E) 1 and the exemption of an…”
- Mooney v. Webster (Supreme Court of Georgia 2016, 300 Ga. 283)“…lity, illness, or unemployment benefit” for the purposes of OCGA § 44-13-100 (a) (2) (C)? (2) Does a debtor’s heal…”
- Klardie v. Klardie (Supreme Court of Georgia 2010, 287 Ga. 499)“…12); [3] In re Chilton, 426 B.R. 612 (2010). See also OCGA § 44-13-100(a) (2.1). [4] *210 Nor, has he dem…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Caps, the 10-Day Repo Notice, and Debt Time Limits
§ 18-4-5Maximum part of disposable earnings subject to garnishment; adverse employment action prohibited.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a)(1) For purposes of this subsection, a "private student loan" shall be defined as an educational or student loan for postsecondary educational expenses but not a loan guaranteed under 20 U.S.C.…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gov.georgia.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- TRUIST BANK F/K/A BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. GORDON D. STARK (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2021)“…sposable earnings limitation on garnishment under former OCGA § 18-4-5 (a) (1).1 For the reasons that follow,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Debt Collection Laws by State: Garnishment, SOL, and Repossession Rules
§ 44-13-1Amount of exemption; who may claim exemption; what charges enforceable.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in this article, there shall be exempt from levy and sale by virtue of any process whatever under the laws of this state any real or personal property or both of a debtor in the amount of $5,000.00 or $21,500.00 for real or personal property that is the debtor's primary…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mikell v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2014, 329 Ga. App. 830)“…ng the sale of his residence, when such is prohibited under OCGA § 44-13-1. 18 However, Mikell did not raise this…”
- Ricky Mikell v. State of Georgia, Ex Rel, Richard A. Mallard, District Attorney, Ogeechee Judicial Circuit of Ga (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2014)“…ra (citations omitted); Buchanan, supra. 18 OCGA § 44-13-1 pertinently provides: “Except as otherw…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 11
§ 522ExemptionsIn forcecited in 54 of our articles
In this section— “dependent” includes spouse, whether or not actually dependent; and “value” means fair market value as of the date of the filing of the petition or, with respect to property that becomes property of the estate after such date, as of the date such property becomes property of the estate. Notwithstanding section 541 of this title, an individual debtor may exempt from property of the estate the property listed in either paragraph (2) or, in the alternative, paragraph (3) of this subsection. In joint cases filed under section 302 of this title and individual cases filed under section 301 or 303 of this title by or against debtors who are husband and wife, and whose estates are ordered to be jointly administered under Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, one debtor may not elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (2) and the other debtor elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (3) of this subsection. If the parties cannot agree on the alternative to be elected, they shall be deemed to elect paragraph (2), where such election is permitted under the law of the jurisdiction where the case is filed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 7,574 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (1992) held that a trustee who does not object within the 30-day period cannot later challenge an exemption claimed under 522(l), even one with no statutory basis. Owen v. Owen (1991) held that 522(f) lien avoidance is not defeated by a state exemption written to exclude lien-encumbered property.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 503 U.S. 638)✓A Chapter 7 debtor listed the entire proceeds of her TWA discrimination suit as exempt and the trustee let the 30-day objection window lapse; the Court held that under § 522(l) the property is exempt once no one objects, even absent a colorable statutory basis.
- Patterson v. Shumate (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 504 U.S. 753)✓A debtor's $250,000 ERISA pension interest was excluded from his estate under § 541(c)(2); answering a surplusage argument, the Court read § 522(d)(10)(E) as exempting a broader set of plans, and expressly declined to decide whether § 522(b)(2)(A) also applied.
- Owen v. Owen (Supreme Court of the United States 1991, 500 U.S. 305)✓An ex-wife's judgment lien attached to a Florida condo before state law made it a homestead; the Court held § 522(f) measures impairment against the exemption the debtor would have had but for the lien, so Florida's carve-out for prior liens did not defeat avoidance.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Alaska (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Arkansas (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Idaho (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 362Automatic stayIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of— the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; the enforcement, against the debtor or against property of the estate, of a judgment obtained before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate or to exercise control over property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce against property of the debtor any lien to the extent that such lien secures a claim that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 19,606 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (1988) held that an undersecured creditor gets no interest as adequate protection under 362(d)(1) for delay caused by the stay. NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984) applied 362(a) in requiring claims be pursued through bankruptcy administration, not suit.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Clinton v. Jones (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 520 U.S. 681)“…ublic interests. Brief for Petitioner 34-36. See, e. g., 11 U. S. C. § 362 (litigation against debtor stayed upon…”
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (Supreme Court of the United States 1988, 484 U.S. 365)✓An undersecured lender on a Houston apartment project sought monthly payments as the price of continuing the § 362(a) automatic stay; the Court held that 'adequate protection' under § 362(d)(1) does not entitle it to interest for the delay in foreclosing on its collateral.
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1987, 481 U.S. 1)“…if it were forced to file for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. 11 U. S. C. §362 . Texaco, or its successor in interest,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Arizona (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Alabama (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Hawaii (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
United States Code Title 15
§ 1673Restriction on garnishmentIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (b) and in section 1675 of this title, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to garnishment may not exceed 25 per centum of his disposable earnings for that week, or the amount by which his disposable earnings for that week exceed thirty times the Federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by section 206(a)(1) of title 29 in effect at the time the earnings are payable, whichever is less. In the case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, the Secretary of Labor shall by regulation prescribe a multiple of the Federal minimum hourly wage equivalent in effect to that set forth in paragraph (2). The restrictions of subsection (a) do not apply in the case of any order for the support of any person issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or in accordance with an administrative procedure, which is established by State law, which affords substantial due process, and which is subject to judicial review. any order of any court of the United States having jurisdiction over cases under chapter 13 of title 11. any debt due for any State or Federal tax.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 450 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have read the section 1673 garnishment cap narrowly. Kokoszka v. Belford (1974) held that "disposable earnings" reaches periodic compensation and not an income tax refund, so the cap did not keep a refund out of the bankruptcy estate. Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank (2015) held section 1673 creates no private right of action.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 439 U.S. 572)“…and amended § 303 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U. S. C. § 1673 (b), to pre-empt state law by limiting…”
- Kokoszka v. Belford (Supreme Court of the United States 1974, 417 U.S. 642)✓A bankrupt argued the 25 percent garnishment cap exempted 75 percent of his $250.90 income tax refund from the trustee; the Supreme Court held Section 1673's limit covers periodic compensation, not a tax refund, so the whole refund passed to the estate.
- Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank (District Court, S.D. New York 2015, 91 F. Supp. 3d 491)✓After a Florida garnishment froze a disabled borrower's bank account holding disability benefits, she sued under Section 1673; the court held the section creates no private right of action and is enforced by the Secretary of Labor, and dismissed the claim.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in South Dakota (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- U.S. Trustee Program, Census Bureau Median Family Income by Family Size (cases filed on or after April 1, 2026)(justice.gov).gov
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia(ganb.uscourts.gov).gov
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia(gamb.uscourts.gov).gov
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia(gasb.uscourts.gov).gov
- 11 U.S.C. 522 (exemptions; state opt-out under subsection (b)) via Cornell Legal Information Institute(law.cornell.edu)
- 11 U.S.C. 362 (automatic stay) via Cornell Legal Information Institute(law.cornell.edu)
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Ga. - Georgia Homestead Exemption Increase (HB 1024, effective July 1, 2026)(gamb.uscourts.gov).gov
- Georgia General Assembly, House Bill 1024 (2025-2026) - amendments to O.C.G.A. 44-13-100, bankruptcy exemptions(legis.ga.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. 1673 (federal restriction on garnishment of disposable earnings) via Cornell Legal Information Institute(law.cornell.edu)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.