Louisiana
Louisiana Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Louisiana is one of the toughest states on sexual deepfakes. Under La. R.S. 14:73.13, enacted in 2023, distributing a nonconsensual AI-generated sexual image of an adult or a minor carries up to 30 years imprisonment. Louisiana has no election deepfake law after Governor Jeff Landry vetoed HB 154 in 2024 on First Amendment grounds, but the Allen Toussaint Legacy Act gives every individual a statutory right of publicity covering name, voice, likeness, and digital replicas.
Is It Illegal to Make a Deepfake of Someone in Louisiana?
It depends on the type of deepfake. Louisiana law draws a clear line between sexual content and everything else. The state's deepfake statute, R.S. 14:73.13, targets three categories: nonconsensual intimate images of adults, sexual content depicting minors, and distribution of either. Outside those categories, making a deepfake is generally not a state crime under current Louisiana law.
Louisiana law does not criminalize deepfakes used for general satire, parody, news commentary, or political speech, and the statute itself carves out content that includes a clear disclosure or constitutes satire. The vetoed HB 154 would have extended the law to election-related deepfakes, but that coverage was never enacted. AI voice clones used for fraud or robocalls fall under separate federal provisions, not Louisiana's deepfake statute.
The three buckets on this page are: (1) sexual and intimate deepfakes of adults plus AI-generated child sexual abuse material, (2) election and political deepfakes (absent in Louisiana), and (3) AI voice cloning and digital likeness rights.
Sexual and Intimate Deepfakes
Louisiana enacted R.S. 14:73.13 in 2023 as a standalone deepfake criminal statute, one of the most severe in the country. The law covers audio or visual media that is created, altered, or digitally manipulated in a manner that would falsely appear to a reasonable observer to be an authentic record, which reaches AI-generated content, and that depicts a real person in sexual conduct without their consent.

For adults, the offense of distributing, advertising, or selling a nonconsensual sexual deepfake carries imprisonment at hard labor for not less than 10 nor more than 30 years, plus an optional fine of up to $50,000. A second statute, R.S. 14:73.14 (Act 142 of 2024, effective August 1, 2024), adds a misdemeanor offense for maliciously disseminating or selling an AI-created image that depicts an identifiable person nude, with intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate, punishable by up to six months in jail and a $750 fine.
For minors, the statute creates two separate crimes. Creating or possessing deepfake sexual content depicting a minor carries 5 to 20 years at hard labor, with a mandatory minimum of 5 years that must be served without parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. Distributing that same content carries 10 to 30 years, with a mandatory minimum of 10 years served without parole.
The base CSAM statute, R.S. 14:81.1, was renamed from "pornography involving juveniles" to "child sexual abuse materials" by Acts 2025, No. 261, but its definition still reaches only a reproduction of a sexual performance involving a real child under the age of seventeen and does not explicitly mention computer-generated images. R.S. 14:73.13 is the operative provision for AI-generated minor sexual content in Louisiana. Federal law under (8)(B) also covers AI-generated images indistinguishable from a real minor, so there is no practical coverage gap for that category.
The statutory definition of "deepfake" excludes media whose content, context, or clear disclosure would lead a reasonable person to understand it is not a record of a real event, along with works of political, public interest, or newsworthy value, including commentary, criticism, satire, and parody. AI-generated sexual content depicting minors remains prosecutable under federal law regardless of disclosure.
Election and Political Deepfakes
Louisiana has no enacted law prohibiting deceptive deepfakes in political advertising. HB 154, introduced during the 2024 Regular Session, would have made it illegal to distribute manipulated audio, video, or images of political candidates with intent to deceive voters within a specified window before an election. Governor Jeff Landry vetoed the bill on June 19, 2024.
In his veto message, Landry wrote: "While I applaud the efforts to prevent false political attacks, I believe this bill creates serious First Amendment concerns as it relates to emerging technologies." He noted that the law on AI and political speech remains unsettled and that more information was needed before regulations were enacted.
The veto leaves Louisiana without any election-specific deepfake restriction as of 2026. Creators and distributors of deceptive political AI content in Louisiana face no state criminal exposure under a deepfake statute, though general election law prohibiting false statements about candidates may apply in some circumstances.
Louisiana's caution reflects a broader national pattern. California's AB 2839, which targeted election deepfakes, was struck down and permanently enjoined in August 2025 on First Amendment grounds. Courts have consistently required narrow tailoring for laws regulating political speech, and the governor's concern tracks that judicial trend. For context on the national picture, see the Deepfake and AI Voice Cloning Laws by State hub.
AI Voice Cloning and Digital Likeness
Louisiana has a statutory right of publicity: the Allen Toussaint Legacy Act (La. R.S. 51:470.1 through 470.6, Act 425 of 2022, effective August 1, 2022). The Act gives every individual a property right in the use of their identity, defined to include name, voice, signature, photograph, image, likeness, and digital replica, for commercial purposes.
Using someone's identity for a commercial purpose in Louisiana without consent violates the Act. A successful plaintiff can recover the greater of $1,000 or actual damages, plus disgorgement of the defendant's profits, injunctive relief, and potentially attorney fees. The defined term "digital replica" is limited to computer-generated reproductions of a professional performer's likeness or voice, but the broader identity right, which includes voice, protects every individual. Exemptions cover news, political campaigns, commentary, criticism, parody, and other expressive works, and voice-clone abuse not tied to a commercial use may fall outside the Act.
The reference point for voice-clone legislation is Tennessee's ELVIS Act (Tenn. Code Ann. 47-25-1101 et seq., eff. July 1, 2024), the first state law to extend right-of-publicity protections expressly to AI voice simulations. Louisiana's Toussaint Act is older and not AI-specific, but its coverage of voice and digital replicas reaches much of the same conduct. A separate bill regulating AI and deepfakes in political advertising (SB 97, 2024) passed both chambers but was vetoed by Governor Landry on June 20, 2024, the day after he vetoed HB 154.
For a broader look at how Louisiana regulates AI-generated content across sectors, see Louisiana AI Laws.
Federal Law That Applies in Louisiana
Even without a state election-deepfake law, several federal provisions apply to Louisiana residents and businesses.

The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12, signed May 19, 2025) is the first federal law targeting intimate deepfakes. It criminalizes knowing publication of nonconsensual intimate visual depictions of adults or minors, expressly including AI-generated "digital forgeries," with penalties up to 2 years imprisonment (3 years for content involving minors). Critically, it requires online platforms to remove flagged content within 48 hours of a victim's notice. The FTC enforces the platform removal obligation.
The DEFIANCE Act, which would create a federal civil cause of action for sexual deepfake victims with liquidated damages up to $150,000 ($250,000 if the conduct involved actual or attempted sexual assault, stalking, or harassment), passed the Senate in the 118th Congress but died in the House. Reintroduced as S.1837 in the 119th Congress, it passed the Senate again on January 13, 2026, and is now pending in the House. It is not yet law.
The NO FAKES Act (S.4591, 119th Congress) would create a federal right of publicity covering AI voice and likeness replicas. It has not passed either chamber and is proposed only.
For AI voice cloning in robocalls, the FCC ruled in February 2024 (FCC 24-17) that AI-generated voices are "artificial" under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. AI voice-clone calls to phones without prior express consent are illegal nationwide, including in Louisiana.
Federal CSAM law ((8)(B), PROTECT Act 2003) covers computer- and AI-generated images indistinguishable from a real minor, regardless of whether any actual child was depicted. This fills any gap left by Louisiana's base CSAM statute, which does not address computer-generated imagery.
For data privacy dimensions of AI-generated content, see Louisiana Data Privacy Laws.
What Victims Can Do
If you are a victim of a sexual deepfake in Louisiana, R.S. 14:73.13 is a criminal statute, so your primary avenue is a report to local law enforcement or the Louisiana Attorney General's office. There is no private right of action written into the statute itself.
For civil remedies, victims must rely on common law tort claims: invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and potentially defamation if the image falsely portrays the person in a real situation. These claims require filing in state court and carrying the burden of proof without the benefit of statutory damages.
The TAKE IT DOWN Act (federal, effective May 2025) gives victims a direct path for platform removal: submit a notice to the platform identifying the content, and the platform must take it down within 48 hours. The FTC enforces this obligation. This is often the fastest practical remedy to stop ongoing distribution.
For AI voice-clone fraud or impersonation, file a complaint with the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov. If the fraud involved robocalls, file separately with the FCC.
For broader context on Louisiana's privacy and digital rights framework, the Louisiana recording laws page covers consent rules for audio and video recording.
Penalties at a Glance
| Conduct | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Distribute/advertise nonconsensual sexual deepfake of adult | La. R.S. 14:73.13(B)(1) | 10-30 years at hard labor; up to $50,000 fine |
| Create or possess sexual deepfake of minor | La. R.S. 14:73.13(A) | 5-20 years at hard labor; 5-year mandatory minimum (no parole); up to $10,000 fine |
| Distribute sexual deepfake of minor | La. R.S. 14:73.13(B)(2) | 10-30 years at hard labor; 10-year mandatory minimum (no parole); up to $50,000 fine |
| Maliciously disseminate AI-created nude image of another | La. R.S. 14:73.14 | Up to 6 months in jail; up to $750 fine |
| Publish nonconsensual intimate deepfake (adult or minor) | TAKE IT DOWN Act (federal) | Up to 2 years federal prison (3 years for minors) |
| AI voice clone in robocall without consent | FCC 24-17 / TCPA | FCC enforcement; civil penalties |
| AI-generated CSAM indistinguishable from real minor | 18 U.S.C. 2256(8)(B) | Federal CSAM penalties |

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information, not legal advice. Deepfake and AI laws are changing rapidly at both the state and federal level; the information here reflects the law as of 2026 but may not capture recent amendments or new court decisions. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney for advice about your specific situation.
Sources
See the source list below for primary legal citations used in this article.
More Louisiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to make a deepfake of someone in Louisiana?
It depends on the content. Louisiana law (R.S. 14:73.13) specifically criminalizes creating, possessing, or distributing deepfake sexual content. Making a deepfake for satire, parody, or general political commentary is not a state crime, though content with intent to defraud may trigger other statutes. The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act adds a layer of criminal liability for intimate deepfakes.
Is deepfake porn a crime in Louisiana?
Yes. Distributing a nonconsensual sexual deepfake of an adult is a felony under R.S. 14:73.13 carrying 10 to 30 years at hard labor and fines up to $50,000. Creating or possessing a sexual deepfake depicting a minor carries a separate felony charge with a mandatory minimum of 5 years without parole.
Can I sue someone for making a deepfake of me in Louisiana?
Not under a specific civil deepfake statute: R.S. 14:73.13 is a criminal law with no private right of action. You can sue under common law tort theories: invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, or defamation. The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act gives you a right to demand platform removal within 48 hours, enforced by the FTC. If your name, voice, or likeness was used for a commercial purpose, the Allen Toussaint Legacy Act provides a separate civil cause of action.
Are election deepfakes illegal in Louisiana?
No. Governor Landry vetoed HB 154 in June 2024, the bill that would have banned deceptive deepfakes of political candidates before an election. Louisiana currently has no state law restricting AI-generated political content, though general election laws prohibiting false statements about candidates may apply in narrow circumstances.
Are AI voice clones illegal in Louisiana?
Using an AI clone of someone's voice for a commercial purpose without consent can violate the Allen Toussaint Legacy Act (La. R.S. 51:470.1 et seq.), which gives every individual a property right in their voice and allows suits for damages, profits, and injunctive relief. AI voice clones used in robocalls without consent are also illegal under the federal FCC ruling from February 2024. Louisiana has not enacted an AI-specific law equivalent to Tennessee's ELVIS Act.
Does the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act apply in Louisiana?
Yes. The TAKE IT DOWN Act (signed May 19, 2025) is federal law that applies in all 50 states. It criminalizes knowing publication of nonconsensual intimate deepfakes and requires platforms to remove flagged content within 48 hours of a victim notice.
What is the penalty for distributing a deepfake of a minor in Louisiana?
Distributing a deepfake depicting a minor in sexual conduct carries 10 to 30 years at hard labor under R.S. 14:73.13(B)(2), with a mandatory minimum of 10 years that must be served without parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. A fine of up to $50,000 also applies. This is among the harshest deepfake penalties of any state.
Why did Governor Landry veto the Louisiana election deepfake bill?
Governor Landry vetoed HB 154 on June 19, 2024, stating the bill 'creates serious First Amendment concerns as it relates to emerging technologies' and that the law on AI and political speech remains unsettled. He indicated more information was needed before enacting regulations in this area.
Updates
Updated the Louisiana child sexual abuse materials statute to its current name under the 2025 amendment and clarified that the state deepfake law reaches AI-generated media through technology-neutral language rather than by naming artificial intelligence.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Updated NO FAKES Act federal bill citation to S.4591 (119th Congress, "NO FAKES Act of 2026") and current Senate Judiciary Committee status.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Louisiana Revised Statutes
§ 14:73.13Unlawful deepfakesIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
A. Any person who, with knowledge that the material is a deepfake depicting a minor, knowingly creates or possesses material that depicts a minor engaging in sexual conduct shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than five nor more than twenty years, or a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars, or both. At least five years of the sentence of imprisonment imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. B.(1) Except as provided in Paragraph (2) of this Subsection, any person who, with knowledge that the material is a deepfake that depicts another person, without consent of the person depicted, engaging in sexual conduct, knowingly advertises, distributes, exhibits, exchanges with, promotes, or sells any sexual material shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than ten nor more than thirty years, a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Also relied on in: Louisiana Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Louisiana Video Recording Laws: Surveillance Rules and Privacy Limits, Louisiana Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections
§ 14:73.14Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another created by artificial intelligenceIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
A. It shall be unlawful for any person, with the intent to coerce, harass, intimidate, or maliciously disseminate or sell any video or still image created by artificial intelligence that depicts another person who is totally nude or in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast, when the person disseminating the video or still image knows or has reason to know that the person is not licensed or authorized to disseminate or sell such video or still image. B. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to an interactive computer service, electronic mail service provider, or a provider of a telecommunications service or any information service as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server that was used by a person to commit any act prohibited by Subsection A of this Section. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Also relied on in: Louisiana AI Laws and Regulation (2026)
§ 51:470.1Short titleIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
This Subpart shall be known and may be cited as the "Allen Toussaint Legacy Act".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 4 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Michael Haley, Okyeame Haley and Blair Haley v. Candice Henderson and the Friends of the Freedom House (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2025)“…tly enacted Allen Toussaint Legacy Act (the “Legacy Act”), La. R.S. 51:470.1 et seq., which provides for heritable n…”
- Candice Henderson-Chandler v. City of New Orleans and the New Orleans City Council (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2026)“…on of the Allen Toussaint Legacy Act, which is codified at La. R.S. 51:470.1 - 470.6. In pertinent part, La. R.S. 51…”
- Guerra (District Court, D. Maryland 2026)“…oussaint Legacy Act was enacted in 2022 and is set forth in La. R.S. 51:470.1 through 51:470.6. See Haley v. Hender…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 14:81.1Child sexual abuse materialsIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
A.(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to produce, promote, advertise, distribute, possess, or possess with the intent to distribute child sexual abuse materials. (2) It shall also be a violation of the provision of this Section for a parent, legal guardian, or custodian of a child to consent to the participation of the child in child sexual abuse materials. B. For purposes of this Section, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "Access software provider" means a provider of software, including client or server software, or enabling tools that do any one or more of the following: (a) Filter, screen, allow, or disallow content. (b) Select, choose, analyze, or digest content. (c) Transmit, receive, display, forward, cache, search, organize, reorganize, or translate content. (2) "Cable operator" means any person or group of persons who provides cable service over a cable system and directly, or through one or more affiliates, owns a significant interest in such cable system, or who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 128 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- State v. Steines (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2017, 245 So. 3d 224)“…e count of pornography involving juveniles, in violation of La. R.S. 14:81.1, and two counts of aggravated incest, i…”
- State v. Fussell (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2008, 974 So. 2d 1223)“…peal regarding the proper interpretation and application of La. R.S. 14:81.1(A)(3), [1] relating to the intentional…”
- State v. Roberts (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2001, 796 So. 2d 779)“…mation with pornography involving juveniles, a violation of La.R.S. 14:81.1. The trial judge convicted him of the c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Louisiana Pornography Laws (2026): Legal Status & Age Verification
United States Code Title 18
§ 2256Definitions for chapterIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
For the purposes of this chapter, the term— “minor” means any person under the age of eighteen years; Except as provided in subparagraph (B), “sexually explicit conduct” means actual or simulated— sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person; For purposes of subsection 8(B) 1 So in original. Probably should be “(8)(B)”.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,142 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002) held the child pornography definitions in 2256(8)(B) and (8)(D), reaching virtual and pandered images, overbroad under the First Amendment. United States v. Williams (2008) construed sexually explicit conduct in 2256(2)(A), reading simulated to require explicit portrayal of the act.
Leading cases:
- United States v. Williams (Supreme Court of the United States 2008, 553 U.S. 285)✓Williams posted a chat-room link to photos of real children and was convicted of pandering. Upholding that ban, the Court read section 2256(2)(A)'s definition of sexually explicit conduct as tracking the one approved in Ferber, and said material must in fact meet it.
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 535 U.S. 234)✓An adult-entertainment trade group, a nudist-lifestyle publisher, a painter and a photographer challenged the CPPA. The Court held sections 2256(8)(B) and 2256(8)(D), reaching images that only appear to be of minors or are pandered that way, overbroad and unconstitutional.
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)✓A distributor sold tapes of an actress filmed before she turned 18. Besides reading 'knowingly' in section 2252 to reach the performer's age, the Court rejected as insubstantial the claim that section 2256 is vague and overbroad for setting majority at 18 and using 'lascivious.'
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Deepfake & AI Voice Cloning Laws by State (2026), Alaska Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Arizona Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 47, Chapter 25, Part 11: Protection of Personal Rights (Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024)
§ 47-25-1101Short titleIn forcecited in 50 of our articles
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024.” History Acts 1984, ch. 945, § 1; 2024, ch. 588, § 1.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 5 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2011
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts cite 47-25-1101 et seq. as the Personal Rights Protection Act of 1984. Gibbons v. Schwartz-Nobel (1996) applied a one-year limitations period because the Act supplies none, and STATE EX REL. ELVIS PRESLEY INTL. MEMORIAL FOUNDATION v. Crowell (1987) said nothing in the Act limits publicity rights vested before its effective date.
Leading cases:
- Gracey v. Maddin (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 1989, 769 S.W.2d 497)✓A widow sued her late husband's law firm under the Personal Rights Protection Act to stop its use of his surname; the Court of Appeals affirmed an injunction on partnership and name-assignment grounds, and the majority opinion never applied the Act's own provisions.
- STATE EX REL. ELVIS PRESLEY INTL. MEMORIAL FOUNDATION v. Crowell (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 1987, 733 S.W.2d 89)✓Two nonprofits fought over using Elvis Presley's name in their corporate names; the court rested his descendible right of publicity on Tennessee common law rather than the Personal Rights Protection Act, and said nothing in the Act limits rights vested before its effective date.
- State ex rel. Elvis Presley International Memorial Foundation v. Crowell (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 1987, 733 S.W.2d 89)“…General Assembly undertook to do so in 1984 when it enacted Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-25-1101 et seq. which is known as “The Person…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Tennessee Laws on Recording in Public: What You Can and Cannot Film, Tennessee Video Recording Laws: What Is Legal and What Is Not, Tennessee Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- La. R.S. 14:73.13 -- Unlawful Deepfakes (Acts 2023, No. 457)(legis.la.gov).gov
- HB 154 (2024 Regular Session) -- Vetoed by Governor Landry(legis.la.gov).gov
- TAKE IT DOWN Act, Public Law 119-12 (S.146, 119th Congress)(congress.gov).gov
- DEFIANCE Act, S.1837 (119th Congress) -- Pending(congress.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2256(8)(B) -- Federal CSAM covering AI-generated images (PROTECT Act 2003)(law.cornell.edu)
- FCC Declaratory Ruling FCC 24-17 -- AI voices in robocalls illegal under TCPA(fcc.gov).gov
- Tennessee ELVIS Act, Tenn. Code Ann. 47-25-1101 et seq. (Pub. Ch. 588, 2024) -- State voice-cloning archetype(tnsosfiles.com).gov
- Allen Toussaint Legacy Act, La. R.S. 51:470.1 et seq. (Act 425 of 2022, eff. Aug. 1, 2022)(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 14:73.14, Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another created by artificial intelligence (Acts 2024, No. 142)(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 14:81.1 -- Child sexual abuse materials (renamed by Acts 2025, No. 261)(legis.la.gov)