Alaska
Alaska Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Alaska now has one deepfake-specific criminal law, and it is narrow. HB 239, an omnibus crime bill that became law without the governor's signature on June 18, 2026 as Chapter 9, SLA 2026, added AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122, which criminalize distributing and possessing generated obscene child sexual abuse material even when no actual child was used. Those sections took effect July 1, 2026. Outside that narrow lane, no Alaska statute expressly criminalizes nonconsensual intimate deepfakes of adults, election-related synthetic media, or AI voice cloning. House Bill 47, which would create several broader deepfake crimes, passed the Alaska House unanimously in February 2026 but stalled in Senate Judiciary, so federal statutes still carry most of the weight for adult Alaskans affected by AI-generated abuse.
Is It Illegal to Make a Deepfake of Someone in Alaska?
It depends on what the deepfake shows. Since July 1, 2026, Alaska criminalizes one category outright: AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122 make it a felony to distribute or possess generated obscene child sexual abuse material, and AS 11.61.122(a)(2) applies "regardless of whether an actual child was used."
For everything else, there is no statute that directly answers the question. Alaska has no enacted law criminalizing the creation or distribution of nonconsensual intimate deepfakes of adults, no election deepfake disclosure requirement, and no right of publicity covering AI voice clones.
That broader picture may still change. HB 47 passed the Alaska House 39 to 0 with one member excused on February 27, 2026. The bill would prohibit distribution of a "generated sexual depiction" of an adult and distribution of a "forged digital likeness," which the bill defines as an AI-created or AI-altered visual or audio representation of an identifiable person that a reasonable person would believe is authentic. The bill was still in Senate Judiciary when the Legislature adjourned its regular session on May 20, 2026, so it was not enacted. Its generated child sexual abuse material provisions did pass separately inside HB 239, the omnibus crime bill that became law without the governor's signature on June 18, 2026 as Chapter 9, SLA 2026.
Separately, SB 2 (election deepfakes plus state AI disclosure rules) and SB 33 (synthetic media defamation and electioneering) remained in the 34th Legislature's Senate committees when the regular session adjourned in May 2026. Neither was signed into law.
For deepfakes of adults, which fall outside Alaska's criminal codes, victims must rely on federal law or common law tort claims until the legislature acts.
Sexual and Intimate Deepfakes
Alaska currently has no statute that expressly covers nonconsensual intimate deepfakes of adults. The state's Attorney General joined a 47-state coalition in August 2025 urging tech companies to restrict deepfake pornography, underscoring the absence of state-level criminal tools for adult victims.

What HB 47 would add (if enacted): A new offense of distribution of a generated sexual depiction would make it a Class A misdemeanor to share manipulated or AI-created sexual imagery of a real, identifiable adult without that person's consent, when distributed with reckless disregard that it may cause physical, emotional, reputational, or economic harm. Class A misdemeanors in Alaska carry up to one year in jail and a fine up to $25,000.
Minors are better protected, and AI-generated imagery of minors is now expressly covered. Alaska Statute 11.41.455 (unlawful exploitation of a minor) is a Class A felony (elevated to an unclassified felony for prior convictions or a victim under 13) covering the creation of material that visually or aurally depicts a minor in sexual conduct. AS 11.61.127 prohibits possession of child sexual abuse material.
HB 239 added two further offenses, effective July 1, 2026: distribution of generated obscene child sexual abuse material (AS 11.61.121, a Class B felony, or a Class A felony after a prior qualifying conviction) and possession of such material (AS 11.61.122, a Class C felony). AS 11.61.122(a)(2) reaches material that depicts, in a patently offensive way, a child under 18 who "by manipulation, creation, or modification, appears to be engaged in" the conduct listed in AS 11.41.455(a)(1) through (8), "regardless of whether an actual child was used." That clause is what closes the gap the older possession statute left open for AI-generated images. AS 11.61.121 also treats possession of 100 or more qualifying items as prima facie evidence of distribution.
Federal gap-filler for adults: The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12, signed May 19, 2025) is now the primary federal tool. It makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish nonconsensual intimate visual depictions of real people, expressly including AI-generated deepfakes (called "digital forgeries" in the Act). Penalties reach up to two years in prison (three years when the victim is a minor). Platforms must remove flagged intimate deepfakes within 48 hours of a victim's notice, with FTC enforcement.
Election and Political Deepfakes
Alaska has no enacted law governing deepfakes in elections or political advertising. SB 2, sponsored by Senator Shelley Hughes in the 34th Legislature, would require disclosure when election-related communications use AI-generated or significantly altered imagery. SB 33 would create civil liability for defamation claims involving synthetic media in electioneering communications and would prohibit knowingly using a deepfake in electioneering with intent to influence a vote.
Both bills were referred to Senate committees in January 2025 and had not advanced to a floor vote as of mid-2026.
The absence of a state law does not mean political deepfakes are entirely unregulated. Existing Alaska election law prohibits materially false statements about candidates. Federal election law applies where campaigns use deepfakes in coordination with federal candidates. First Amendment scrutiny of election deepfake laws is an active area of litigation nationally; a California law was struck down and permanently enjoined in 2025, which may partly explain the cautious pace in Alaska.
AI Voice Cloning and Digital Likeness
Alaska has no right of publicity statute, making it one of the states with the weakest protections for voice and likeness. No Alaska law restricts the creation or commercial use of an AI-simulated voice of a real person.
For comparison, Tennessee's ELVIS Act (Tenn. Code Ann. 47-25-1101 et seq., effective July 1, 2024) was the first state law to expressly extend right of publicity protections to AI voice clones. It has become the national reference point for what voice-cloning legislation looks like. Alaska has no equivalent.
HB 47's "forged digital likeness" provision would reach some voice-cloning scenarios: distributing an AI audio clone of a person to harass, threaten, or deceive that person would become a Class A misdemeanor if the bill becomes law. But this addresses criminal misuse, not the broader commercial right of publicity that Tennessee and a growing number of states have enacted. HB 239 did not carry any forged digital likeness or voice-cloning provision into law.
At the state level, Alaskans whose voice or image is commercially exploited by AI without consent can attempt a common law misappropriation of likeness claim. Alaska courts have not extensively developed this theory, and there is no confirmed precedent for voice-cloning cases.
For AI voice cloning used in automated phone calls, federal law already applies. The FCC ruled in February 2024 (FCC 24-17) that AI-generated voices in robocalls are "artificial" under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, making unsolicited AI voice-clone robocalls illegal nationwide, including in Alaska. This ruling was triggered by the 2024 New Hampshire fake-Biden primary robocall incident.
For a broader look at how Alaska regulates AI systems, see the Alaska AI Laws page, which covers AI use by state agencies, automated decision-making, and related statutes. That page addresses general AI regulation; this page focuses specifically on deepfakes, synthetic media, and voice cloning.
Federal Law That Applies in Alaska
Because Alaska's only enacted synthetic-media crime is limited to generated child sexual abuse material, federal law is the primary recourse for adult victims. Here is what applies right now:

TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12, enacted May 19, 2025): The first federal intimate deepfake law. It criminalizes knowing publication of nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, including AI-generated deepfakes, with penalties up to two years in prison and three years when minors are involved. Platforms must remove flagged content within 48 hours. The FTC enforces platform compliance.
Federal CSAM law ((8)(B)): Under the PROTECT Act, federal law covers computer- and AI-generated images that are "indistinguishable" from a real minor in sexual conduct. This applies in Alaska alongside the state's new AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122.
FCC AI robocall ruling (FCC 24-17, Feb. 2024): AI-generated voices in robocalls violate the TCPA. FCC enforcement applies in all states.
FTC Impersonation Rule (16 CFR Part 461, eff. April 1, 2024): Prohibits deceptive AI impersonation of government entities and businesses. A proposed extension to cover individual impersonation remains an unfinalized rulemaking as of mid-2026.
DEFIANCE Act and NO FAKES Act: These remain proposed legislation only. The DEFIANCE Act (S.1837, 119th Congress) would create a federal civil cause of action for sexual deepfake victims with liquidated damages up to $150,000. The NO FAKES Act (S.4591) would create a federal voice and likeness right against unauthorized AI replicas. The DEFIANCE Act passed the Senate by unanimous consent on January 13, 2026 but has not passed the House; the NO FAKES Act has not passed either chamber. Neither has been enacted as of mid-2026 and is not current law.
For more on Alaska's interaction with AI meeting and recording tools, see Alaska AI Meeting Recording Laws.
What Victims Can Do
If you are an Alaska victim of a deepfake or AI-generated intimate image right now, several options exist even though the state's only synthetic-media statute is limited to generated child sexual abuse material.
Federal criminal report: File a complaint with the FBI or the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (for material involving minors). The TAKE IT DOWN Act is a federal crime enforceable by the DOJ.
Alaska criminal report for material involving minors: Since July 1, 2026, distributing or possessing generated obscene child sexual abuse material is a state felony under AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122. Report it to the Alaska State Troopers or your local police department as well as to the NCMEC CyberTipline.
Platform takedown: Under the TAKE IT DOWN Act, platforms must remove intimate deepfakes within 48 hours of a victim's notice. Submit a report directly through the platform's reporting tools and reference the TAKE IT DOWN Act. The FTC oversees compliance and accepts complaints at ftc.gov.
Civil tort claims: Alaska common law allows claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy (false light or intrusion). A deepfake intimate image could support both theories, though Alaska courts have not specifically addressed AI-generated content. Damages, including emotional distress and reputational harm, are recoverable, but there is no statutory multiplier or minimum award.
Contact the Alaska AG: The Alaska Attorney General's office has publicly engaged on the NCII deepfake issue and participates in the national coalition pushing platforms to restrict deepfake pornography.
For background on how Alaska's recording and privacy laws interact with digital content, see Alaska Recording Laws and Alaska Data Privacy Laws.
Penalties at a Glance
| Conduct | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Nonconsensual intimate deepfake (adult), distribution | Federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (P.L. 119-12) | Up to 2 years federal prison |
| Nonconsensual intimate deepfake involving minor | Federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (P.L. 119-12) | Up to 3 years federal prison |
| Distribution of generated obscene child sexual abuse material (AI-generated included) | AS 11.61.121 (enacted by HB 239, eff. July 1, 2026) | Class B felony; Class A felony with a prior qualifying conviction |
| Possession of generated obscene child sexual abuse material (AI-generated included) | AS 11.61.122 (enacted by HB 239, eff. July 1, 2026) | Class C felony |
| Unlawful exploitation of a minor (incl. sexual images) | AS 11.41.455 | Class A felony (unclassified felony if prior conviction or victim under 13) |
| Possession of child sexual abuse material | AS 11.61.127 | Class C felony |
| Distribution of generated sexual depiction (adult) | HB 47 (NOT enacted, stalled in Senate Judiciary) | Class A misdemeanor if enacted |
| Distribution of forged digital likeness (harassment) | HB 47 (NOT enacted, stalled in Senate Judiciary) | Class A misdemeanor if enacted |
| AI voice robocall without consent | FCC 24-17 / TCPA | FCC enforcement; civil damages |
| AI impersonation of government/business | FTC Impersonation Rule, 16 CFR 461 | FTC enforcement |

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about Alaska deepfake and AI laws, not legal advice. Deepfake and AI legislation is moving rapidly at both the state and federal level. Laws described as pending may have changed since publication. If you are affected by a deepfake or synthetic media incident, consult a licensed Alaska attorney for advice specific to your situation.
For the full 50-state comparison, see Deepfake and AI Voice Cloning Laws by State.
More Alaska Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to make a deepfake of someone in Alaska?
It depends on the content. Since July 1, 2026, AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122 make distributing or possessing generated obscene child sexual abuse material a felony in Alaska, and those sections apply regardless of whether an actual child was used. For deepfakes of adults there is still no Alaska statute: the state has no nonconsensual intimate imagery deepfake law and no election deepfake law. Federal law under the TAKE IT DOWN Act (2025) criminalizes nonconsensual intimate deepfakes of adults. HB 47, which passed the Alaska House in February 2026, would create broader state crimes, but it did not pass the Senate before the Legislature adjourned in May 2026.
Is deepfake porn a crime in Alaska?
Deepfake pornography of adults is not a state crime under current Alaska statutes. Until the state enacts its own statute, adult victims must rely on the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12, signed May 19, 2025), which criminalizes nonconsensual intimate deepfakes and requires platforms to remove them within 48 hours of notice. Deepfake sexual imagery involving minors is a different matter: AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122, effective July 1, 2026, make distributing and possessing generated obscene child sexual abuse material a Class B felony and a Class C felony respectively, whether or not an actual child was used, and federal CSAM law also applies.
Can I sue someone for a deepfake in Alaska?
Alaska has no statutory private right of action specific to deepfakes. You can pursue common law tort claims (intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy (false light), or misappropriation of likeness) but these require proving damages under general tort principles. The pending federal DEFIANCE Act would create a federal civil cause of action with liquidated damages, but it has not been enacted as of mid-2026.
Are AI voice clones illegal in Alaska?
Alaska has no right of publicity statute and no AI voice cloning law. HB 239, the 2026 crime bill that added Alaska's generated child sexual abuse material offenses, carried no voice-cloning or forged digital likeness provision. A person who uses an AI clone of your voice to commit fraud, harassment, or threats may face criminal liability under general Alaska harassment or fraud statutes, and the unenacted HB 47 would have specifically criminalized distribution of a forged digital likeness. AI voice clones used in unsolicited robocalls are already illegal nationwide under the FCC's 2024 ruling applying the TCPA to AI-generated voices.
Does Alaska have an election deepfake law?
No. Alaska has no enacted law requiring disclosure of AI-generated content in political advertising or prohibiting election deepfakes. SB 2 and SB 33 would have added those protections, but neither passed before the 34th Legislature's regular session adjourned in May 2026. Existing Alaska election law prohibiting materially false statements about candidates may offer some parallel protection in egregious cases.
What is the TAKE IT DOWN Act and does it apply in Alaska?
The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12) is a federal law signed on May 19, 2025. It applies in all 50 states, including Alaska. It makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish nonconsensual intimate visual depictions of real people, expressly including AI-generated deepfakes. It also requires online platforms to remove flagged intimate deepfakes within 48 hours of a victim's notice. Penalties reach up to two years in prison and three years when minors are involved.
Will Alaska's HB 47 become law?
Not in its current form. HB 47 passed the Alaska House unanimously (39 to 0 with one member excused) on February 27, 2026, but it never received a Senate floor vote and was still in Senate Judiciary when the Legislature adjourned its regular session on May 20, 2026. Its generated child sexual abuse material provisions were folded into HB 239, which became law without the governor's signature on June 18, 2026 as Chapter 9, SLA 2026, and took effect July 1, 2026. Its adult deepfake provisions (distribution of a generated sexual depiction and distribution of a forged digital likeness) would need to be reintroduced in a future legislature. Monitor bill tracking at akleg.gov for current status.
How do I get a deepfake removed in Alaska?
The fastest route is the TAKE IT DOWN Act platform takedown process: report the content directly through the platform using its reporting tools and cite the TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12). Platforms are legally required to remove flagged intimate deepfakes within 48 hours. If the platform does not comply, file a complaint with the FTC at ftc.gov. For material involving minors, report to the NCMEC CyberTipline, and note that generated child sexual abuse material is now also a state felony under AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122. You can also file a federal criminal complaint with the FBI.
Updates
Corrected the page to reflect that Alaska now has a deepfake-related criminal law: HB 239 (Chapter 9, SLA 2026) added AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122 covering generated obscene child sexual abuse material, effective July 1, 2026, while the state still has no law on adult intimate deepfakes, election deepfakes, or AI voice cloning.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Updated NO FAKES Act federal bill citation to S.4591 (119th Congress, "NO FAKES Act of 2026") and current Senate Judiciary Committee status.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Alaska Statutes, Title 11: Criminal Law (Ch. 61, Offenses Against Public Order)
§ 11.61.121Distribution of generated obscene child sexual abuse materialIn force
Sec. 11.61.121. Distribution of generated obscene child sexual abuse material. (a) A person commits the crime of distribution of generated obscene child sexual abuse material if the person knowingly distributes in this state or advertises, promotes, solicits, or offers to distribute in this state any material that is proscribed under AS 11.61.122. (b) The possession of 100 or more films, audio, video, electronic, or electromagnetic recordings, photographs, negatives, slides, books, newspapers, magazines, or other materials, including a combination of these items totaling 100 or more, is prima facie evidence of distribution and intent to distribute under (a) of this section. (c) This section does not apply to an employee or contractor of an interactive computer service, Internet service pro
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 47, Chapter 25, Part 11: Protection of Personal Rights (Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024)
§ 47-25-1101Short titleIn forcecited in 50 of our articles
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024.” History Acts 1984, ch. 945, § 1; 2024, ch. 588, § 1.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 5 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2011
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts cite 47-25-1101 et seq. as the Personal Rights Protection Act of 1984. Gibbons v. Schwartz-Nobel (1996) applied a one-year limitations period because the Act supplies none, and STATE EX REL. ELVIS PRESLEY INTL. MEMORIAL FOUNDATION v. Crowell (1987) said nothing in the Act limits publicity rights vested before its effective date.
Leading cases:
- Gracey v. Maddin (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 1989, 769 S.W.2d 497)✓A widow sued her late husband's law firm under the Personal Rights Protection Act to stop its use of his surname; the Court of Appeals affirmed an injunction on partnership and name-assignment grounds, and the majority opinion never applied the Act's own provisions.
- STATE EX REL. ELVIS PRESLEY INTL. MEMORIAL FOUNDATION v. Crowell (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 1987, 733 S.W.2d 89)✓Two nonprofits fought over using Elvis Presley's name in their corporate names; the court rested his descendible right of publicity on Tennessee common law rather than the Personal Rights Protection Act, and said nothing in the Act limits rights vested before its effective date.
- State ex rel. Elvis Presley International Memorial Foundation v. Crowell (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 1987, 733 S.W.2d 89)“…General Assembly undertook to do so in 1984 when it enacted Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-25-1101 et seq. which is known as “The Person…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Tennessee Laws on Recording in Public: What You Can and Cannot Film, Tennessee Video Recording Laws: What Is Legal and What Is Not, Tennessee Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights
United States Code Title 18
§ 2256Definitions for chapterIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
For the purposes of this chapter, the term— “minor” means any person under the age of eighteen years; Except as provided in subparagraph (B), “sexually explicit conduct” means actual or simulated— sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person; For purposes of subsection 8(B) 1 So in original. Probably should be “(8)(B)”.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,142 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002) held the child pornography definitions in 2256(8)(B) and (8)(D), reaching virtual and pandered images, overbroad under the First Amendment. United States v. Williams (2008) construed sexually explicit conduct in 2256(2)(A), reading simulated to require explicit portrayal of the act.
Leading cases:
- United States v. Williams (Supreme Court of the United States 2008, 553 U.S. 285)✓Williams posted a chat-room link to photos of real children and was convicted of pandering. Upholding that ban, the Court read section 2256(2)(A)'s definition of sexually explicit conduct as tracking the one approved in Ferber, and said material must in fact meet it.
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 535 U.S. 234)✓An adult-entertainment trade group, a nudist-lifestyle publisher, a painter and a photographer challenged the CPPA. The Court held sections 2256(8)(B) and 2256(8)(D), reaching images that only appear to be of minors or are pandered that way, overbroad and unconstitutional.
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)✓A distributor sold tapes of an actress filmed before she turned 18. Besides reading 'knowingly' in section 2252 to reach the performer's age, the Court rejected as insubstantial the claim that section 2256 is vague and overbroad for setting majority at 18 and using 'lascivious.'
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Deepfake & AI Voice Cloning Laws by State (2026), Arizona Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Arkansas Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- TAKE IT DOWN Act, Public Law 119-12 (S.146, 119th Congress), signed May 19, 2025(congress.gov).gov
- Alaska HB 47, 34th Legislature (2025-2026) -- AI deepfakes, generated CSAM, forged digital likeness(akleg.gov).gov
- Alaska SB 2, 34th Legislature -- election deepfakes and AI disclosure(akleg.gov).gov
- Alaska SB 33, 34th Legislature -- synthetic media defamation and electioneering(akleg.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2256(8)(B) -- Federal CSAM law covering AI-generated images (PROTECT Act 2003)(law.cornell.edu)
- FCC Order FCC 24-17 (Feb. 2024) -- AI-generated voices in robocalls illegal under TCPA(fcc.gov).gov
- FTC Impersonation Rule, 16 CFR Part 461 (eff. April 1, 2024)(ftc.gov).gov
- Alaska HB 239, 34th Legislature -- CHAPTER 9 SLA 26; became law without the governor's signature June 18, 2026 (bill history)(akleg.gov).gov
- Enrolled Alaska HB 239 (HB0239Z), sec. 25 adding AS 11.61.121 and AS 11.61.122 (generated obscene child sexual abuse material) and sec. 94 setting a July 1, 2026 effective date(akleg.gov).gov