South Dakota
South Dakota Workers' Compensation Laws: Benefits, Deadlines, and Your Rights

South Dakota is one of the few states that does not require employers to carry workers' compensation insurance. The state Department of Labor and Regulation says so plainly: there is no law in South Dakota requiring any employer to carry coverage. Most employers carry it anyway, because insuring under the Act is what buys an employer immunity from being sued over a work injury. If your employer did secure coverage, you receive medical care and partial wage replacement without having to prove fault, and in exchange you generally give up the right to sue your employer in civil court. If your employer did not, you keep that right, plus a second option that is often worth more.
Is workers' comp required in South Dakota?
No. South Dakota is one of a small number of elective states. The South Dakota Department of Labor and Regulation (DLR), Division of Labor and Management, states on its workers' compensation page that there is no law in South Dakota requiring any employer to carry workers' compensation insurance.
The statute works by presumption and election rather than by mandate. SDCL 62-3-3 presumes that every employer and employee has accepted Title 62. But SDCL 62-3-5 provides that no private employer may be deemed to have accepted the title unless it has complied with SDCL 62-5-1 to 62-5-5, the sections that require an employer to secure payment of compensation through an insurer or approved self-insurance. An employer that has not complied is deemed under SDCL 62-5-7 to have elected not to operate under the title.
In practice most South Dakota employers buy coverage voluntarily, because operating under the Act is what gives an employer the exclusive-remedy protection described below. An employer that goes without it keeps full exposure to a civil suit. Coverage is written through private insurers or approved self-insurance plans; South Dakota has no state monopoly fund.
Where the Act does apply, coverage is broad, including part-time and seasonal employees, but Title 62 carries express exclusions. Under SDCL 62-3-15 the title does not apply to farm or agricultural laborers, to work activity participants, or to domestic servants unless they work for an employer more than twenty hours in a calendar week and more than six weeks in a thirteen-week period. Independent contractors who are genuinely self-employed also fall outside the system, though misclassified workers who are economically dependent on the employer may still qualify. If you are unsure whether you are covered, the DLR can help you determine your status.
Benefits you can receive
Workers' compensation in South Dakota covers the full cost of reasonable and necessary medical treatment for a work-related injury or illness, including doctor visits, hospitalization, surgery, physical therapy, and prescription drugs. There are no co-pays or deductibles for authorized medical care.

If your injury keeps you out of work, you are entitled to Temporary Total Disability (TTD) benefits equal to 66 2/3% of your pre-injury average weekly wage, up to a maximum the state agency sets each year. There is a 7-day waiting period before TTD payments begin. If your total disability lasts beyond 7 days, that first week is paid retroactively, so you do not permanently lose it.
South Dakota also provides Temporary Partial Disability (TPD) benefits when you return to lighter duty at reduced pay, Permanent Partial Disability (PPD) benefits for lasting impairment (often calculated from a schedule tied to specific body parts), and Permanent Total Disability (PTD) benefits if you can never return to any gainful work. Death benefits, including burial expenses and wage-replacement payments for dependents, are payable when a work injury is fatal. Vocational rehabilitation is available when a permanent impairment prevents you from returning to your prior occupation.
Deadlines: reporting your injury and filing a claim
South Dakota has several separate deadlines that are easy to confuse, and the most important one does not start on the day you are hurt.
The first clock is the report-to-employer deadline. SDCL 62-7-10 requires written notice of the injury to your employer no later than three business days after it occurs, telling the employer when, where, and how you were hurt. No particular form is required; an email, a text, or a signed form all work. This is one of the shortest reporting windows in the nation, so report even if the injury seems minor at first, because some conditions worsen over days or weeks.
The second clock is the deadline to file a written petition for hearing with the Division of Labor and Management. Under SDCL 62-7-35, the right to compensation is barred unless that petition is filed within two years after the insurer or self-insurer notifies you and the department, in writing, that it intends to deny coverage in whole or in part. Those two years run from the written denial, not from the date of injury. If the denial is only partial, the bar applies only to the denied part. A claim that is still being paid is not running against this clock at all, so a worker whose benefits were paid for three years and then denied is not automatically too late.
A third clock applies once benefits have been paid. Under SDCL 62-7-35.1, where any benefits have been tendered for an injury, a claim for additional compensation is barred unless you file a written petition for hearing within three years from the date of the last payment of benefits. This is the deadline that ends most South Dakota claims, which is why the date of your final check matters.
Occupational disease claims run on a notice deadline of their own. SDCL 62-8-29 forever bars all rights to compensation for disability from an occupational disease unless the worker gives the employer written notice within six months after the employment in which the disease is claimed to have been contracted has ceased. In the case of death from an occupational disease, written notice must be given within ninety days after the death. Both are notice-to-employer deadlines, not deadlines to file with the department.
Choosing your doctor
South Dakota gives injured workers the initial choice of treating physician, and it gives it from the start. SDCL 62-4-1 provides that the employee has the initial selection to secure the employee's own physician, surgeon, or hospital services at the employer's expense, and SDCL 62-4-43 provides that the employee may make that initial selection from among all licensed medical practitioners or surgeons in the state. There is no window during which your employer directs your care. If your employer sends you to a company clinic, you may choose to go, but you are not obliged to treat there.
Two conditions come with that choice. You must tell your employer which practitioner you selected, before treatment or as soon as reasonably possible afterward. And if you later want to change practitioners, SDCL 62-4-43 requires you to obtain approval in writing from your employer first; the employer is not liable for services from a practitioner selected in violation of that section. You may seek a second opinion without your employer's approval, but at your own expense.
If your employer refuses approval for a change you believe is medically necessary, document the request and the refusal in writing and consider consulting a workers' compensation attorney.
Can you sue your employer? The exclusive-remedy rule
Workers' compensation is built on a trade-off. Where an employer operates under Title 62, you receive guaranteed, no-fault benefits, and in exchange that employer is shielded from civil lawsuits arising from the same injury. South Dakota's version of the rule is unusually broad. SDCL 62-3-2 excludes all other rights and remedies not only against the employer but against any employee, partner, officer, or director of the employer, except rights and remedies arising from intentional tort. A negligent co-worker, foreman, or company officer is therefore not a suable third party in South Dakota.

That leaves three routes around the rule. First, an intentional tort is carved out of SDCL 62-3-2 by its own terms, so an employer or co-worker who acted with actual intent to injure you can be sued.
Second, a genuine third party outside the employer's organization can be sued in a personal injury case alongside your workers' comp claim. Think of a negligent equipment manufacturer, a driver who hit you while you were making deliveries, or an unrelated contractor on a jobsite. The immunity above means the third party has to be outside the employer, not a fellow employee or officer of it.
Third, if your employer is deemed not to operate under Title 62 because it never secured coverage, SDCL 62-3-11 gives you an election. You may proceed against the employer in an action at law to recover damages for personal injury or death, or you may proceed against the employer in circuit court under Title 62 as if it had complied, in which case the measure of benefits is that provided by SDCL 62-4-1 plus twice the amount of other compensation allowable under the title. You cannot recover under both. The doubled statutory route does not require you to prove the employer was at fault, which a damages suit at law would, so it is worth pricing both before choosing.
In any situation where you think the exclusive-remedy rule does not apply, speak with a workers' compensation attorney before acting, because the legal standards are fact-specific.
If you were hurt at work in South Dakota
If you suffer a work injury in South Dakota, take these steps immediately.
Report in writing to your supervisor or HR department within 3 business days. Do not rely on a verbal report alone. A written notice (an email, a text, or a signed form) creates a record and protects your claim from a timeliness challenge.
Seek medical care promptly, and remember that the initial choice of practitioner is yours. Tell your employer who you selected as soon as you reasonably can. If you need emergency care, go directly to the nearest emergency room. Do not change practitioners later without getting your employer's written approval first.
File a written petition for hearing with the South Dakota DLR, Division of Labor and Management if your employer or its insurer denies your claim or stops paying. Note the date of the written denial and the date of your last benefit payment, because those two dates start the deadlines that matter. Keep copies of all medical records, treatment bills, communications with the insurer, and any time-loss records from your employer.
If your claim is denied or you are offered a lump-sum settlement, have a South Dakota workers' comp lawyer check your petition deadline and the offer in a free case evaluation (attorney advertising). For a rough number before that call, try our South Dakota workers' comp settlement calculator. Most workers' comp attorneys in South Dakota work on a contingency basis, so there is no upfront cost to get legal advice.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Workers' compensation rules vary by state and change, and benefit amounts and deadlines depend on the specific facts. For advice about a specific claim, consult a licensed workers' compensation attorney in South Dakota.
Related
- Workers' Compensation Laws by State: full 50-state hub

More South Dakota Laws
- South Dakota At-Will Employment Laws
- South Dakota Car Accident Laws
- South Dakota Final Paycheck Laws
- South Dakota Slip and Fall Laws
- South Dakota Statute of Limitations
Frequently Asked Questions
Is workers' comp required in South Dakota?
No. The South Dakota Department of Labor and Regulation states that there is no law in South Dakota requiring any employer to carry workers' compensation insurance. The system is elective: SDCL 62-3-5 says an employer is not deemed to have accepted Title 62 unless it secures coverage under SDCL 62-5-1 to 62-5-5, and SDCL 62-5-7 deems an employer that has not complied to have elected not to operate under the title. Most employers insure anyway, because that is what earns the exclusive-remedy protection. An employer that goes uninsured can be sued at law, or pursued under SDCL 62-3-11 for benefits plus twice the other compensation the title allows.
How long does workers' comp last in South Dakota?
Temporary Total Disability benefits continue as long as you are medically unable to work, subject to ongoing verification of your condition. If you reach maximum medical improvement with a lasting impairment, benefits convert to Permanent Partial or Permanent Total Disability payments. There is no single fixed end date; the duration depends on your medical condition.
How much does workers' comp pay in South Dakota?
TTD benefits pay 66 2/3% of your pre-injury average weekly wage, up to a maximum the state sets each year. The maximum changes annually, so check with the South Dakota DLR or your attorney for the current figure.
Can I be fired while on workers' comp in South Dakota?
South Dakota law prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for filing a workers' compensation claim. If you are fired or demoted shortly after filing a claim, that timing can be evidence of unlawful retaliation. You may have a separate legal claim against your employer in addition to your workers' comp benefits.
Can I choose my own doctor for a workers' comp injury in South Dakota?
Yes, from the beginning. SDCL 62-4-1 gives the employee the initial selection of physician, surgeon, or hospital services at the employer's expense, and SDCL 62-4-43 lets you make that selection from among all licensed practitioners in the state. There is no period during which your employer directs your treatment. You do have to tell your employer who you chose, and SDCL 62-4-43 requires written approval from your employer before you change practitioners.
How long do I have to file a workers' comp claim in South Dakota?
Under SDCL 62-7-35 you have two years to file a written petition for hearing, measured from the day the insurer or self-insurer notifies you and the department in writing that it intends to deny coverage, not from the date of injury. If benefits were paid and then stopped, SDCL 62-7-35.1 bars a claim for additional compensation more than three years after the last payment. Separately, you must report the injury to your employer in writing within 3 business days, and for an occupational disease you must give the employer written notice within six months after that employment ended (ninety days after a death from the disease).
Can I sue my employer for a work injury in South Dakota?
Usually no, if the employer secured coverage. SDCL 62-3-2 makes workers' compensation the exclusive remedy against the employer and also against any employee, partner, officer, or director of the employer, so a negligent co-worker or supervisor cannot be sued either. Intentional torts are excepted. You can still sue a genuine outside third party, such as an equipment manufacturer or another driver, and if your employer never secured coverage, SDCL 62-3-11 lets you elect between an action at law for damages and a Title 62 proceeding for double compensation.
Updates
Corrected this page against the South Dakota statutes: workers' compensation is elective in South Dakota rather than mandatory, the two-year deadline runs from written notice of denial rather than the date of injury (with the separate three-year deadline after the last benefit payment now covered), there is no 45-day employer-directed medical care period, and the exclusive-remedy, uninsured-employer and coverage-exclusion rules were corrected.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 62-5: INSURANCE AND SECURITY FOR PAYMENTS
§ 62-5-1Methods of securing payment of compensation.In force
Except as otherwise provided in §§ 62-5-5 and 62-5-6, any employer, coming within the compensation provisions of this title, shall secure the payment of compensation to the employer's employees in one of the ways provided by § 62-5-2 or 62-5-3. If the payment of compensation is so secured, the employer is liable to any employee for injury or death arising out of and in the course of the employment only as specified by this title.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
§ 62-5-7Failure to secure payment as election not to operate under title.In force
Any employer other than the state, a municipality, or other political subdivision of this state, who has failed to comply with the provisions of §§ 62-5-1 to 62-5-5, inclusive, shall be deemed to have elected not to operate under the provisions of this title.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ries v. Jm Custom Homes, LLC (South Dakota Supreme Court 2022, 2022 S.D. 52)“…ed not to operate under” the workers’ compensation system. SDCL 62-5-7. [¶24.] Thus, JM is incorrect wh…”
- Castro v. Alpine ITW BCG Inc. (District Court, D. South Dakota 2025)“…rate under’ the workers’ compensation system.” Id. (quoting SDCL § 62-5-7). Asa result, an employee “who is emp…”
- Ruiz Carreon v. Alpine ITW BCG Inc. (District Court, D. South Dakota 2025)“…ate under’ the workers’ compensation system.” Id. (quoting SDCL § 62-5-7). Asa result, an employee “who is em…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 62-3: COVERED EMPLOYMENT AND EMPLOYER'S RESPONSIBILITY
§ 62-3-11Election to proceed against employer--Options.In force
Any employee, who is employed by an employer who is deemed not to operate under this title in accordance with § 62-5-7, or the dependents of such deceased employee, may elect to proceed against the employer in any action at law to recover damages for personal injury or death; or may elect to proceed against the employer in circuit court under the provisions of this title, as if the employer had elected to operate thereunder by complying with §§ 62-5-1 to 62-5-5, inclusive. The measure of benefits shall be that provided by § 62-4-1 plus twice the amount of other compensation allowable under this title. However, no employee nor any dependent of the employee may recover from both actions. 62-3-11.1, 62-3-11.2. Repealed by SL 1977, ch 421, § 6.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Canal Insurance Co. v. Abraham (South Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 598 N.W.2d 512)“…es. Abraham had remedy choices under worker’s compensation. SDCL 62-3-11 states: Any employee, who is employed…”
- Keil v. Nelson (South Dakota Supreme Court 1984, 355 N.W.2d 525)“…on appellants’ behalf to recover double damages pursuant to SDCL 62-3-11 and are appellants entitled to assert a…”
- Jackson v. Lee's Travelers Lodge, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1997, 563 N.W.2d 858)“…Lee’s and entitled to workers’ compensation benefits under SDCL 62-3-11 or, alternatively, tort damages for neg…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-3-15Exemption of domestics, agricultural laborers or workfare participants.In force
Except as provided in §§ 28-1-59, 62-3-16, and 62-3-17, this title does not apply to: (1) Domestic servants unless working for an employer for more than twenty hours in any calendar week and for more than six weeks in any thirteen-week period; or (2) Farm or agricultural laborers; or (3) Work activity participants.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jackson v. Lee's Travelers Lodge, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1997, 563 N.W.2d 858)“…overage under the workers’ compensation act? [¶ 16.] SDCL 62-3-15(1) specifically exempts domestic servan…”
- Hofer v. Redstone Feeders, LLC (South Dakota Supreme Court 2015, 870 N.W.2d 659)“…t held that Hofer was a farm or agricultural laborer under SDCL 62-3-15(2), and thus exempt from workers’ comp…”
- Keil v. Nelson (South Dakota Supreme Court 1984, 355 N.W.2d 525)“…t from mandatory worker’s compensation coverage pursuant to SDCL 62-3-15(2); (II) must appellee prove actual fau…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-3-2Rights and remedies of employees limited.In force
The rights and remedies granted to an employee subject to this title, on account of personal injury or death arising out of and in the course of employment, shall exclude all other rights and remedies of the employee, the employee's personal representatives, dependents, or next of kin, on account of such injury or death against the employer or any employee, partner, officer, or director of the employer, except rights and remedies arising from intentional tort.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 32 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Champion v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1987, 399 N.W.2d 320)“…USF & G seeks to invoke the exclusive remedy provisions of SDCL 62-3-2 or SDCL 62-8-6, the result under either…”
- VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood Products (South Dakota Supreme Court 1983, 334 N.W.2d 874)“…noted that the intentional tort exception was not added to SDCL 62-3-2 until 1977. See 1977 S.D.Sess.Laws, c…”
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans Affairs (South Dakota Supreme Court 2000, 607 N.W.2d 596)“…ept those injuries intentionally inflicted by the employer. SDCL 62-3-2; 2 Harn v. Continental…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-3-3Employer and employee bound by provisions of title--Exceptions.In force
Every employer and employee shall be presumed to have accepted the provisions of this title, and shall be thereby bound, whether injury or death resulting from such injury occurs within this state or elsewhere, except as provided by §§ 62-3-4 to 62-3-5.1, inclusive.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Knapp v. Hamm & Phillips Service Co. (South Dakota Supreme Court 2012, 824 N.W.2d 785)“…occurs within this state or elsewhere.... ” The language of SDCL 62-3-3 demonstrates the Legislature’s intent t…”
- Anderson v. Tri State Construction (South Dakota Supreme Court 2021, 2021 S.D. 50)“…ing to: (1) assume jurisdiction under the plain language of SDCL 62-3-3; and (2) find a substantial connection…”
- Niesent v. Homestake Mining Co. of California (South Dakota Supreme Court 1993, 505 N.W.2d 781)“…er has assumed for injuries to or death of any employee. SDCL 62-3-3: Every employer and employee shall be p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-3-5Security required for acceptance of title.In force
No employer other than the state, a municipality, or other political subdivision of this state may be deemed to have accepted the provisions of this title unless the employer has complied with the provisions of §§ 62-5-1 to 62-5-5, inclusive.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sioux Falls School District v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund (South Dakota Supreme Court 1993, 504 N.W.2d 107)“…62-1-2. District argues that when read in conjunction with SDCL 62-3-5, 5 the statutes establish that Distric…”
- Ries v. Jm Custom Homes, LLC (South Dakota Supreme Court 2022, 2022 S.D. 52)“…ance contract, or complying with self-insurance rules. See SDCL 62-3-5; SDCL 62-5-2 to -3, -5. An employer who…”
- Castro v. Alpine ITW BCG Inc. (District Court, D. South Dakota 2025)“…ct, or complying with self- insurance rules.” Id. (quoting SDCL § 62-3-5; SDCL § 62-5-2, -3, -5). A general con…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 62-4: COMPENSATION FOR INJURY OR DEATH
§ 62-4-1Medical and hospital expense.In force
The employer shall provide necessary first aid, medical, surgical, and hospital services, or other suitable and proper care including medical and surgical supplies, apparatus, artificial members, and body aids during the disability or treatment of an employee within the provisions of this title. Repair or replacement of damaged prosthetic devices is compensable and is considered a medical service under this section if the devices were damaged or destroyed in a work related accident. Repair or replacement of damaged hearing aids, dentures, prescription eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, or contact lenses is considered a medical service under this section if the hearing aids, dentures, prescription eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, or contact lenses were damaged or destroyed in an accident which also causes another injury which is compensable under this law. The employee shall have the initial selection to secure the employee's own physician, surgeon, or hospital services at the employer's expense.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Johnson v. Skelly Oil Co. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1984, 359 N.W.2d 130)“…pensation and medical expenses, pursuant to SDCL 62-4-3 and SDCL 62-4-1; said benefits to accrue as of the date…”
- Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1988, 425 N.W.2d 396)“…ive physician fees or compensation. Thereafter, pursuant to SDCL 62-4-1, employer must provide all necessary or…”
- Rank v. Lindblom (South Dakota Supreme Court 1990, 459 N.W.2d 247)“…that they were necessary and properly incurred pursuant to SDCL 62-4-1, [3] in order to provide the claimant…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-4-43Selection of medical practitioner or surgeon by employee.In force
The employee may make the initial selection of the employee's medical practitioner or surgeon from among all licensed medical practitioners or surgeons in the state. The employee shall, prior to treatment, notify the employer of the choice of medical practitioner or surgeon or as soon as reasonably possible after treatment has been provided. The medical practitioner or surgeon selected may arrange for any consultation, referral, or extraordinary or other specialized medical services as the nature of the injury shall require. The employer is not responsible for medical services furnished or ordered by any medical practitioner or surgeon or other person selected by the employee in disregard of this section. If the employee is unable to make the selection, the selection requirements of this section do not apply as long as the inability to make a selection persists. If the injured employee unreasonably refuses or neglects to avail himself or herself of medical or surgical treatment, the employer is not liable for an aggravation of the injury due to the refusal and neglect and the Department of Labor and Regulation may suspend, reduce, or limit the compensation otherwise payable.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gilchrist v. Trail King Industries, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 2000, 612 N.W.2d 1)“…ht rotator cuff and carpal tunnel surgeries. [¶ 28.] SDCL 62-4-43 states, in pertinent part: If th…”
- Kendall v. John Morrell & Co. (South Dakota Supreme Court 2012, 809 N.W.2d 851)“…its arguments under SDCL 62-4-43.5 Kendall points out that SDCL 62-4-43 only authorizes benefit modifications f…”
- Dittman v. Rapid City School District (South Dakota Supreme Court 2022, 2022 S.D. 34)“…derau as Dittman’s initial treating physician under SDCL 62-4-43.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 62-7: CLAIMS PROCEDURE
§ 62-7-10Notice to employer of injury--Condition precedent to compensation.In force
An employee who claims compensation for an injury shall immediately, or as soon thereafter as practical, notify the employer of the occurrence of the injury. Written notice of the injury shall be provided to the employer no later than three business days after its occurrence. The notice need not be in any particular form but must advise the employer of when, where, and how the injury occurred. Failure to give notice as required by this section prohibits a claim for compensation under this title unless the employee or the employee's representative can show: (1) The employer or the employer's representative had actual knowledge of the injury; or (2) The employer was given written notice after the date of the injury and the employee had good cause for failing to give written notice within the three business-day period, which determination shall be liberally construed in favor of the employee.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2013
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Schuck v. John Morrell & Co. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1995, 529 N.W.2d 894)“…WHETHER SCHUCK COMPLIED WITH THE NOTICE REQUIREMENT OF SDCL 62-7-10? Morrell contended and the Depar…”
- Loewen v. Hyman Freightways, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1997, 557 N.W.2d 764)“…ewen had failed to provide Employer with notice pursuant to SDCL 62-7-10 and that he had failed *766 to establi…”
- Harden v. South Dakota Credit Union League, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1973, 87 S.D. 433)“…ontend proper notice of injury was not given as required by SDCL 62-7-10 and the compensation claim is barred by…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-7-35Limitation of action on claim for compensation.In force
The right to compensation under this title shall be forever barred unless a written petition for hearing pursuant to § 62-7-12 is filed by the claimant with the department within two years after the self-insurer or insurer notifies the claimant and the department, in writing, that it intends to deny coverage in whole or in part under this title. If the denial is in part, the bar shall only apply to such part.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 2000, 620 N.W.2d 198)“…laim. The employer contends that the two-year limitation in SDCL 62-7-35 pertains because the employer gave writ…”
- West v. John Morrell & Co. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1990, 460 N.W.2d 745)“…(October 10, 1978) governs. On the date West was injured, SDCL 62-7-35 provided: The right to compensation u…”
- Moody v. LW Tyler, Custom Combiners (South Dakota Supreme Court 1980, 297 N.W.2d 179)“…ose acts that are tantamount to the filing of a claim under SDCL 62-7-35. We conclude that the filing of the e…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-7-35.1Time limitation for claiming additional compensation--Application of limit.In force
In any case in which any benefits have been tendered pursuant to this title on account of an injury, any claim for additional compensation shall be barred, unless the claimant files a written petition for hearing pursuant to § 62-7-12 with the department within three years from the date of the last payment of benefits. The provisions of this section do not apply to review and revision of payments or other benefits under § 62-7-33.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 2000, 620 N.W.2d 198)“…on the other hand, contends that the three-year period in SDCL 62-7-35.1 applies because the employer previously…”
- Waterman v. Morningside Manor (South Dakota Supreme Court 2013, 839 N.W.2d 567)“…ernatively, Waterman argued that she had three years under SDCL 62-7-35.1, rather than two years under SDCL 62-7-…”
- Schuelke v. Belle Fourche Irrigation District (South Dakota Supreme Court 2013, 840 N.W.2d 669)“…nd that the three-year statute of limitations set forth in SDCL 62-7-35.1 barred Schuelke’s claim. The Sixth Circ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 62-8: OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE DISABILITY
§ 62-8-29Notice of disease or death required for compensation.In force
Unless written notice of an occupational disease is given by the worker to the employer within six months after the employment has ceased in which it is claimed that the disease was contracted, and, in case of death, unless written notice of such death is given within ninety days after the occurrence, all rights to compensation for disability, or death, from an occupational disease are forever barred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2002
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Heupel v. Imprimis Technology, Inc. (South Dakota Supreme Court 1991, 473 N.W.2d 464)“…to timely file written notice pursuant to SDCL 62-8-13 and SDCL 62-8-29, set forth infra. Without specificall…”
- St. Luke's Midland Regional Medical Center v. Kennedy (South Dakota Supreme Court 2002, 653 N.W.2d 880)“…L's decision by ruling that the specific notice statutes in SDCL 62-8-29 and 13 applied over the general notice…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- South Dakota DLR, Division of Labor and Management — Workers' Compensation(dlr.sd.gov).gov
- S.D. Codified Laws Title 62 (Workers' Compensation Act)(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- SDCL 62-5-7 (failure to secure payment is an election not to operate under Title 62)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-3-5 (security required for acceptance of Title 62)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-3-2 (exclusive remedy; extends to any employee, partner, officer, or director)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-3-11 (election to proceed against an employer that did not secure coverage; double compensation)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-3-15 (exemption of domestics, agricultural laborers, and work activity participants)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-4-1 (medical expense; employee has the initial selection of physician)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-4-43 (employee selection of practitioner; written employer approval required to change)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-7-10 (written notice of injury to the employer within three business days)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-7-35 (two years to petition, running from written notice of denial)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-7-35.1 (three years from the last payment of benefits for additional compensation)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 62-8-29 (occupational disease: six-month written notice to employer, ninety days on death)(sdlegislature.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.