New Hampshire
New Hampshire Expungement Laws: How Record Annulment Works Under RSA 651:5
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New Hampshire clears criminal records through a process called annulment, governed by RSA 651:5, with waiting periods that range from one year for a violation to ten years for a Class A felony, all measured from the completion of every term of the sentence. Two other statutes set separate bars measured from the date of conviction instead: ten years for impaired-driving convictions under RSA 265-A:21, and seven years for any felony under the Controlled Drug Act under RSA 318-B:28-a.
Information last verified on May 29, 2026. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed attorney.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers New Hampshire state law only. For a 50-state overview, see Expungement Laws by State.
What Is Annulment and How Does It Differ from Expungement?
New Hampshire does not use the word "expungement" in its criminal record statutes. The state's mechanism for clearing a criminal history is called annulment, and it operates under RSA 651:5. When a court grants an annulment, the records of the arrest, conviction, and sentence are treated by the courts, the New Hampshire State Police, and other criminal justice agencies as though the underlying event never occurred. The petitioner may lawfully deny the existence of the arrest or conviction on most employment and licensing applications, and the record is removed from standard background checks available to the public.

Annulment does not physically destroy records the way some states' expungement statutes do. The records are sealed and flagged as annulled in state and federal databases, but they remain accessible to courts, prosecutors in any new proceeding, and law enforcement for authorized purposes. Judges also retain access when imposing sentence on a future conviction, meaning an annulled prior conviction can still influence a sentencing decision. Within those limits, annulment provides substantial practical relief, particularly for employment, housing, and professional licensing purposes.
Waiting Periods by Offense Class Under RSA 651:5
The waiting period begins on the date all sentence terms are completed, which includes the end of any period of probation or parole, the discharge of any incarceration, and the full payment of all fines, fees, and restitution. No petition may be filed until both the sentence completion requirement and the offense-specific waiting period are satisfied. The waiting periods set out in RSA 651:5 are:

- Violation: 1 year after completion of sentence
- Class B Misdemeanor: 2 years after completion of sentence
- Class A Misdemeanor: 3 years after completion of sentence
- Class B Felony: 5 years after completion of sentence
- Class A Felony: 10 years after completion of sentence
- Class A misdemeanor or felony offense under RSA 318-B:26, II: 2 years after completion of sentence, under RSA 651:5, III(i). This shortened period is cross-referenced from the Class A misdemeanor, Class B felony, and Class A felony subparagraphs, so it is not limited to Class B felonies. For any felony, however, the separate 7-year bar in RSA 318-B:28-a also has to be satisfied. See the next section.
- Misdemeanor domestic violence offense under RSA 631:2-b: 10 years after completion of sentence
- Sexual assault under RSA 632-A:4: 10 years after completion of sentence
- Felony indecent exposure or lewdness under RSA 645:1, II: 10 years after completion of sentence
The person must also have a clean record during the waiting period. Any new conviction restarts the calculation and may independently create bars to eligibility.
Two Statutes Outside RSA 651:5 That Set Longer Bars
The class-based schedule above is not the whole timing picture. Paragraph III of RSA 651:5 opens with the words "Except as provided in RSA 265-A:21," and a separate provision of the Controlled Drug Act reaches a similar result for drug felonies. Both set their own bar, and both measure it from the date of conviction rather than from the completion of the sentence. Because each is written as a prohibition on the court ordering an annulment before a set date, it operates on top of the RSA 651:5 period rather than in place of it: both clocks have to have run.
Impaired driving and boating: no annulment until 10 years after the date of conviction. RSA 265-A:21, I provides that "notwithstanding the provisions of RSA 651:5, no court shall order an annulment" of a conviction for driving or attempting to drive under the influence, for aggravated drunken driving, or for operating an OHRV or a boat while under the influence, "until 10 years after the date of conviction." This is why the class of the offense does not answer the question for a DWI: an impaired-driving conviction carrying an ordinary misdemeanor waiting period of a few years still cannot be annulled for a full decade from the conviction date. RSA 265-A:21, I also directs that a record annulled after that period be retained in a permanent file, to be opened only for sentencing purposes in a later case under RSA 265-A:3.
Felonies under the Controlled Drug Act: no annulment until 7 years after the date of conviction. RSA 318-B:28-a provides that "no court shall order an annulment, pursuant to RSA 651:5 or any other provision of law, of any record of conviction for a felony under RSA 318-B until 7 years after the date of conviction." That bar reaches any felony under RSA 318-B. The practical consequence is that the 2-year period in RSA 651:5, III(i) delivers its full benefit only to a Class A misdemeanor under RSA 318-B:26, II. A person with a felony drug conviction should not read the 2-year figure as an eligibility date.
Automatic Annulment for Acquittals and Dismissals
For criminal offenses disposed on or after January 1, 2019, RSA 651:5 provides automatic annulment when a case ends in the petitioner's favor. Specifically, a record is automatically annulled 30 days after a finding of not guilty on all charges, or 30 days after a dismissal or decision not to prosecute. If the prosecution or defense appeals the favorable disposition, the 30-day clock does not begin until the final appellate decision affirming the favorable outcome is entered.

No petition, filing fee, or court appearance is required for automatic annulment of a non-conviction. Once the 30-day period runs without a stay or reversal, the court and state agencies treat the annulment as effective without further action by the defendant. Favorable dispositions before January 1, 2019 do not receive automatic treatment and must be addressed through a standard petition.
Offenses That Cannot Be Annulled
RSA 651:5 lists categories of convictions that are permanently ineligible for annulment regardless of how much time has passed. The three main bars are:
Violent crimes, defined in the statute to include: capital murder, first or second degree murder, manslaughter, and Class A felony negligent homicide (RSA 630); first degree assault (RSA 631:1); aggravated felonious sexual assault and felonious sexual assault (RSA 632-A); kidnapping and criminal restraint (RSA 633); Class A felony arson (RSA 634:1); robbery (RSA 636); incest and endangering the welfare of a child by solicitation (RSA 639:2, III and RSA 639:3, III); and any felonious offense involving child sexual abuse images (RSA 649-A).
Felony obstruction of justice, defined to include: tampering with witnesses or informants (RSA 641:5), falsifying evidence (RSA 641:6), and any felonious offense of obstructing governmental operations (RSA 642).
Extended-term imprisonment sentences: any conviction for which the court imposed an extended term of imprisonment under RSA 651:6 is permanently excluded.
If a person has multiple convictions and any one of them falls into an excluded category, RSA 651:5 VI(a) bars the entire petition: no petition for annulment may be brought and no annulment granted for any part of the record, even for counts that are not themselves excluded, until the disqualifying conviction is resolved (for example, if it is later vacated).
How to File an Annulment Petition
The petition process under RSA 651:5 involves three agencies and three separate fees. The steps are:
Step 1: File a petition in the court where the case was disposed. Each charge requires a separate petition form. The court filing fee is $125 per court location. Forms are available through the New Hampshire Judicial Branch.
Step 2: The court notifies the prosecutor. Under RSA 651:5, IX the court provides a copy of the petition to the prosecutor of the underlying offense and permits the prosecutor "to be heard regarding the interest of justice in regard to the petition." Paragraph IX sets no deadline for that response, and under paragraph I the court "may grant or deny an annulment without a hearing, unless a hearing is requested by the petitioner." So for most petitions there is no automatic hearing and no fixed objection window.
A specific 20-day objection deadline does exist, but only on the streamlined track in RSA 651:5, III(a)(2) and III(b)(2). That track covers a violation or a Class B misdemeanor with a conviction date on or after January 1, 2019 that was the highest offense of conviction. There the court sends notice of its eligibility determination to the petitioner and the prosecutor, the prosecutor has 20 days from receipt to object on the ground that the offense is not eligible or that the sentence terms are not complete, and if the prosecutor does not timely object or the court denies the objection, the court "shall annul the conviction."
Step 3: Department of Corrections investigation. After the petition is filed, the Department of Corrections contacts the petitioner to complete a questionnaire and collect a $100 investigation fee. The court will not take final action on the petition until it receives the Department of Corrections report. Prompt response to DOC contact significantly speeds up the process.
Step 4: New Hampshire State Police administrative fee. Upon a grant of annulment, the State Police charge a separate $100 administrative fee to remove the annulled criminal history record information (CHRI) from both the state database and the FBI's records. This fee is collected before the State Police update the federal record.
Step 5: Court decision. The court weighs whether annulment will assist in the petitioner's rehabilitation and is consistent with the public welfare. These are the two statutory criteria under RSA 651:5. A judge retains discretion to deny even a petition that meets all timing and eligibility requirements. If a petition is denied, the petitioner must wait at least three years before filing again. A denial costs three years, so get a free consultation with a New Hampshire criminal defense lawyer on the petition and the prosecutor's response (attorney advertising).
The full process typically takes several months from filing to a final court ruling, primarily because the Department of Corrections report introduces a significant scheduling variable.
Cannabis Possession Annulment Under RSA 651:5-b
New Hampshire has created one additional annulment pathway for cannabis-related offenses, and the legislature considered but did not enact a second. Under RSA 651:5-b (effective January 1, 2020), a person convicted of possessing three-quarters of an ounce or less of marijuana for an offense that occurred before September 16, 2017 may petition for annulment at any time, without regard to the standard waiting periods. If the prosecutor does not object within 10 days, the court grants the petition as a matter of course.
A 2025 bill, HB 196, would have created a broader anytime annulment pathway for misdemeanor and violation-level cannabis possession offenses that occurred before January 1, 2025, processed administratively by the Department of Safety and granted even with outstanding court-imposed fees or fines. The bill passed the House on February 20, 2025, but the Senate Judiciary Committee recommended it Inexpedient to Legislate and the full Senate killed it on May 22, 2025. It was never enacted, and no RSA 651:5-c exists in current New Hampshire law. A pre-2025 cannabis conviction that does not qualify under RSA 651:5-b remains subject to the standard RSA 651:5 waiting periods described above.
Disclaimer: This article describes New Hampshire criminal record annulment law as verified on May 29, 2026. It is not legal advice. Laws change, individual circumstances vary, and a court retains discretion to deny any petition. Consult a licensed New Hampshire attorney before taking any action regarding your criminal record.
Related Articles
RecordingLaw.com provides general legal information, not legal advice. Verify all details with official sources or a licensed New Hampshire attorney.
More New Hampshire Laws
- New Hampshire Self-Defense Laws
- New Hampshire Sexting Laws
- New Hampshire Statute of Limitations
- New Hampshire Warrant Search
Frequently Asked Questions
Does New Hampshire have expungement?
New Hampshire does not use the term expungement. The state's equivalent process is called annulment and is governed by RSA 651:5. Annulment seals a criminal record from public view and allows the petitioner to lawfully deny the arrest or conviction in most contexts, which is functionally similar to expungement in other states.
How do you annul your record in New Hampshire?
File a petition in the court where your case was resolved, pay a $125 court filing fee, and respond promptly to the Department of Corrections for their required $100 investigation. The prosecutor receives a copy of the petition and is permitted to be heard on the interest of justice; a fixed 20-day objection deadline applies only on the streamlined track for post-2018 violations and Class B misdemeanors that were the highest offense of conviction. If the court grants the petition, you pay a separate $100 New Hampshire State Police fee to clear the record from state and FBI databases. Each charge requires a separate petition form.
What is the New Hampshire annulment waiting period?
Waiting periods run from the date all sentence terms are completed, including the end of probation or parole and the payment of all fines. The periods are: 1 year for a violation, 2 years for a Class B misdemeanor, 3 years for a Class A misdemeanor, 5 years for a Class B felony, and 10 years for a Class A felony. Ten years also applies to misdemeanor domestic violence under RSA 631:2-b, to sexual assault under RSA 632-A:4, and to felony indecent exposure or lewdness under RSA 645:1, II. RSA 651:5, III(i) sets 2 years for a Class A misdemeanor or felony offense under RSA 318-B:26, II. Two statutes outside RSA 651:5 set longer bars that run from the date of conviction instead: RSA 265-A:21 blocks annulment of a DWI, aggravated drunken driving, OHRV or boating-under-the-influence conviction until 10 years after conviction, and RSA 318-B:28-a blocks annulment of any felony under RSA 318-B until 7 years after conviction.
What does RSA 651:5 say?
RSA 651:5 is New Hampshire's annulment statute. It authorizes courts to annul criminal records when the petitioner has completed all sentence terms and the applicable waiting period has passed, the petition will assist rehabilitation, and granting it is consistent with public welfare. It also provides for automatic annulment of acquittals and dismissals for offenses disposed on or after January 1, 2019, and lists offenses that can never be annulled, including violent crimes, felony obstruction of justice, and convictions resulting in extended-term sentences.
How long does the New Hampshire annulment process take?
From filing to a final court order, the process typically takes several months. The main delay is the Department of Corrections investigation report, which the court must receive before ruling. Responding promptly to DOC's questionnaire and fee request shortens that delay. The prosecutor receives a copy of the petition and a chance to be heard on the interest of justice, with a fixed 20-day objection window only on the streamlined track for post-2018 violations and Class B misdemeanors that were the highest offense of conviction.
What crimes cannot be annulled in New Hampshire?
RSA 651:5 permanently bars annulment for violent crimes (including murder, first degree assault, aggravated felonious sexual assault, kidnapping, robbery, Class A felony arson, and child sexual abuse image offenses), felony obstruction of justice (including witness tampering and felonious obstruction of governmental operations), and any conviction for which the court imposed an extended term of imprisonment under RSA 651:6.
Can a felony be annulled in New Hampshire?
Yes, Class B felonies are eligible after a 5-year waiting period and Class A felonies after a 10-year waiting period, both measured from completion of all sentence terms. However, felonies classified as violent crimes or felony obstruction of justice, and any felony that resulted in an extended-term sentence under RSA 651:6, cannot be annulled regardless of how much time has passed. A felony under the Controlled Drug Act, RSA 318-B, carries an additional bar: RSA 318-B:28-a prohibits any annulment until 7 years after the date of conviction.
Are dismissed charges automatically annulled in New Hampshire?
For offenses disposed on or after January 1, 2019, yes. RSA 651:5 provides that a not-guilty verdict, dismissal, or decision not to prosecute triggers automatic annulment 30 days after the favorable disposition, or after a final appellate affirmance if the outcome is appealed. No petition or fee is required for automatic annulment of a non-conviction.
Updates
Corrected the annulment timing rules: added the RSA 265-A:21 bar on annulling a DWI or other impaired-operating conviction until 10 years after conviction and the RSA 318-B:28-a bar on annulling any felony drug conviction until 7 years after conviction, added the omitted 10-year period for felony indecent exposure or lewdness, corrected the scope of the 2-year RSA 318-B:26, II period, and narrowed the 20-day prosecutor objection deadline to the streamlined track it actually governs.
Removed a fabricated statute (RSA 651:5-c) that does not exist in New Hampshire law; the article now correctly states that its enabling bill, HB 196 (2025), passed the House but was killed in the Senate on May 22, 2025 and was never enacted, and that RSA 651:5-b remains the only standing anytime cannabis annulment path.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the multi-conviction annulment rule: under RSA 651:5 VI(a), one disqualifying conviction bars a petition for the person's entire record, not just for that offense, contrary to what the article previously implied.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 651 SENTENCES
§ 651:5Annulment of Criminal Records.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
I. Except as provided in paragraphs V-VIII, the record of arrest, conviction and sentence of any person may be annulled by the sentencing court at any time in response to a petition for annulment which is timely brought in accordance with the provisions of this section if in the opinion of the court, the annulment will assist in the petitioner's rehabilitation and will be consistent with the public welfare. The court may grant or deny an annulment without a hearing, unless a hearing is requested by the petitioner. II. For an offense disposed of before January 1, 2019 and any offense not subject to paragraph II-a, any person whose arrest has resulted in a finding of not guilty, or whose case was dismissed or not prosecuted, may petition for annulment of the arrest record or court record, or both, at any time in accordance with the provisions of this section. Any person who was convicted of a criminal offense whose conviction was subsequently vacated by a court may petition for annulment of the arrest record or court record, or both, in accordance with the provisions of this section. Nothing in this paragraph shall limit the provisions of subparagraph XI(b). II-a.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Panas v. Harakis (1987) held RSA 651:5's "in all respects" language barred disclosure of annulled convictions in a civil suit, though facts underlying a conviction were not erased. Wolfgram v. New Hampshire Department of Safety (2016) held habitual offender notations revealing annulled convictions must stay off a public driving record.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Panas v. Harakis (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1987, 129 N.H. 591)✓In a false imprisonment and negligent hiring suit over a K-Mart guard whose convictions had been annulled, the court held RSA 651:5 barred even in camera review of the annulment dates, but did not bar evidence of the incident underlying an annulled conviction.
- State v. Comeau (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1997, 142 N.H. 84)✓Comeau petitioned in 1995 to annul 1991 felony convictions under the shorter old waiting period; the court held the 1994 rewrite of RSA 651:5 governs petitions filed after January 1, 1995, and its longer waiting periods are remedial, not ex post facto punishment.
- Doe v. State (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1974, 114 N.H. 714)✓An eighteen year old fined $25 in 1971 for concealing a 79 cent ping-pong ball sought annulment under RSA 651:5; the court held the statute reaches convictions predating the 1973 criminal code, covers a fine-only sentence, and does not invade the Governor's pardon power.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), New Hampshire Court Records: How to Search the Case Access Portal, What's Public, and How Annulment Works, New Hampshire DWI Laws: Penalties, BAC & License (2026)
§ 651:5-bAnnulment of Arrests and Convictions for Marijuana Possession.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any person who was arrested or convicted for knowingly or purposely obtaining, purchasing, transporting, or possessing, actually or constructively, or having under his or her control, 3/4 of an ounce of marijuana or less where the offense occurred before September 16, 2017 may, at any time, petition the court in which the person was convicted or arrested to annul the arrest record, court record, or both. The petition shall state that the amount of marijuana was 3/4 of an ounce or less. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the petition to the office of the prosecutor of the underlying offense. The prosecutor may object within 10 days of receiving a copy of the petition and request a hearing. If the prosecutor does not object within 10 days, the court shall grant the petition for annulment. If the prosecutor timely objects, the court shall hold a hearing. In a hearing on the petition for annulment, the prosecutor shall be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner knowingly or purposely obtained, purchased, transported, or possessed, actually or constructively, or had under his or her control, marijuana in an amount exceeding 3/4 of an ounce.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dan Hynes v. New Hampshire Democratic Party & a. (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2023)“…ed the reach of their laws in recent years. See, e.g., id.; RSA 651:5-b. The unambiguous language of RSA 651:5…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 651:6Extended Term of Imprisonment.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
I. A convicted person may be sentenced according to paragraph III if the jury also finds beyond a reasonable doubt that such person: (a) Based on the circumstances for which he or she is to be sentenced, has knowingly devoted himself or herself to criminal activity as a major source of livelihood; (b) Has been subjected to a court-ordered psychiatric examination on the basis of which the jury finds that such person is a serious danger to others due to a gravely abnormal mental condition; (c) Has manifested exceptional cruelty or depravity in inflicting death or serious bodily injury on the victim of the crime; (d) Has committed an offense involving the use of force against a person with the intention of taking advantage of the victim's age or physical disability; (e) Has committed or attempted to commit any of the crimes defined in RSA 631 or 632-A against a person under 13 years of age; (f) Was substantially motivated to commit the crime because of hostility towards the victim's religion, race, creed, sexual orientation as defined in RSA 21:49, national origin, sex, or gender identity as defined in RSA 21:53; (g) Has knowingly committed or attempted to commit any of the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 74 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gosselin (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1977, 117 N.H. 115)“…pursuant to the extended term of imprisonment provisions of RSA 651:6. The issues presented on this ap…”
- State v. Lavallee (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1979, 119 N.H. 207)“…the court erred by applying the extended term provision of RSA 651:6 to the facts of this case. The eviden…”
- State v. Kiewert (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1992, 135 N.H. 338)“…which he was sentenced to an extended term of imprisonment, RSA 651:6,1(c), and a shorter concurrent term. On…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE XXI MOTOR VEHICLES, CHAPTER 265-A ALCOHOL OR DRUG IMPAIRMENT
§ 265-A:21Annulment; Plea Bargaining.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
I. Notwithstanding the provisions of RSA 651:5, no court shall order an annulment of any record of conviction of driving or attempting to drive a vehicle upon any way or driving, operating, attempting to operate, or being in actual physical control of an OHRV or operating or attempting to operate a boat on the waters of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any controlled drug, prescription drug, over-the-counter drug, or any other chemical substance, natural or synthetic, which impairs a person's ability to drive or while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more or of aggravated drunken driving until 10 years after the date of conviction. Any record thus annulled shall be retained in a permanent file, to be opened only for purposes of sentencing in the case of an offense under RSA 265-A:3. II.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Timothy Bobola (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2016, 168 N.H. 771)“…RSA 651:5, III states: Except as provided in RSA 265-A:21 or in paragraphs V and VI, any pe…”
- State of New Hampshire v. Laura Williams (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2020)“…subparagraph XI(b). III. Except as provided in RSA 265-A:21 or in paragraphs V and VI, any pe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 265-A:3Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
A person shall be guilty of aggravated driving while intoxicated if the person drives, operates, or attempts to operate an OHRV, or if the person drives or attempts to drive a vehicle upon any way, or if the person operates or attempts to operate a boat: I. While under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any controlled drug, prescription drug, over-the-counter drug, or any other chemical substance, natural or synthetic, which impairs a person's ability to drive or any combination of intoxicating liquor and controlled drug or drugs, prescription drug or drugs, over-the-counter drug or drugs, or any other chemical substance or substances, natural or synthetic, which impair a person's ability to drive and, at the time alleged: (a) Drives or operates at a speed more than 30 miles per hour in excess of the prima facie limit; (b) Causes a motor vehicle, boating, or OHRV collision resulting in serious bodily injury, as defined in RSA 625:11, VI, to the person or another; (c) Attempts to elude pursuit by a law enforcement officer by increasing speed, extinguishing headlamps or, in the case of a boat, navigational lamps while still in motion, or abandoning a vehicle, boat, or OHRV…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. James Fogg (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2017, 168 A.3d 1145)“…ving while intoxicated (DWI) of which he was convicted. See RSA 265-A:3 (2014). On appeal, the defendant assert…”
- State v. Keller (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2024, 324 A.3d 973)“…causing a collision resulting in serious bodily injury. See RSA 265-A:3, I(b) (2024). The defendant argues that…”
- Dianna Rudder v. Director, New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2022)“…es of RSA 265:71, IV, RSA 265:79, RSA 265-A:2, I, and RSA 265-A:3, any public highway, street, avenue, ro…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE XXX OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS, CHAPTER 318-B CONTROLLED DRUG ACT
§ 318-B:26Penalties.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
I. Any person who manufactures, sells, prescribes, administers, or transports or possesses with intent to sell, dispense, or compound any controlled drug, controlled drug analog or any preparation containing a controlled drug, except as authorized in this chapter; or manufactures, sells, or transports or possesses with intent to sell, dispense, compound, package or repackage (1) any substance which he represents to be a controlled drug, or controlled drug analog, or (2) any preparation containing a substance which he represents to be a controlled drug, or controlled drug analog, shall be sentenced as follows, except as otherwise provided in this section: (a) In the case of a violation involving any of the following, a person shall be sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of not more than 30 years, a fine of not more than $500,000, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 95 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Cote (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1985, 126 N.H. 514)“…(RSA 637:7), possession of more than a pound of marijuana (RSA 318-B:26, 1(c)), possession of marijuana with in…”
- State v. Marshall (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2011, 162 N.H. 657)“…ove that the heroin caused Fosher’s death as required under RSA 318-B:26, IX. Subsequent to the jury finding him…”
- State v. Thorp (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1976, 116 N.H. 303)“…tion of marijuana on October 20, 1973, with intent to sell (RSA 318-B:26 I (a) (Supp. 1975)) and for unlawful po…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Are Magic Mushrooms Legal in New Hampshire? Psilocybin Laws (2026), Is Kratom Legal in New Hampshire? (2026 Law and 7-OH Status)
§ 318-B:28-aAnnulments of Criminal Records.In force
No court shall order an annulment, pursuant to RSA 651:5 or any other provision of law, of any record of conviction for a felony under RSA 318-B until 7 years after the date of conviction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2000
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Patterson (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2000, 145 N.H. 462)“…ly” for annulment after March 11, 1998. The court relied on RSA 318-B:28-a (1995), which prohibits an annulment of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 631 ASSAULT AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 631:1First Degree Assault.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class A felony if he: (a) Purposely causes serious bodily injury to another; or (b) Purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to another by means of a deadly weapon, except that if the deadly weapon is a firearm, he shall be sentenced in accordance with RSA 651:2, II-g; or (c) Purposely or knowingly causes injury to another resulting in miscarriage or stillbirth; or (d) Knowingly or recklessly causes serious bodily injury to a person under 13 years of age. II. In this section: (a) "Miscarriage" means the interruption of the normal development of the fetus other than by a live birth and not an induced abortion, resulting in the complete expulsion or extraction of a fetus; and (b) "Stillbirth" means the death of a fetus prior to complete expulsion or extraction and not an induced abortion. III.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 119 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of New Hampshire v. Justin L. Roy (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2015, 167 N.H. 276)“…3:1, I-a, II (2007), one count of first degree assault, see RSA 631:1, I(d) (2007), four counts of second deg…”
- State v. Pepin (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2007, 156 N.H. 269)“…ond degree assault and criminal restraint. See RSA 631:1, :2 (2007); RSA 633:2 (2007). We affirm…”
- State v. Beaupre (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1983, 123 N.H. 155)“…ry in Superior Court (Goode, J.) of first-degree assault, RSA 631:1 (Supp. *156 1981), and sentenced to an…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 631:2Second Degree Assault.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if he or she: (a) Knowingly or recklessly causes serious bodily injury to another; or (b) Recklessly causes bodily injury to another by means of a deadly weapon, except that if the deadly weapon is a firearm, he or she shall be sentenced in accordance with RSA 651:2, II-g; or (c) Recklessly causes bodily injury to another under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life; or (d) Purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to a child under 13 years of age; or (e) Recklessly or negligently causes injury to another resulting in miscarriage or stillbirth; or (f) Purposely or knowingly engages in the strangulation of another. II. In this section: (a) "Miscarriage" means the interruption of the normal development of the fetus other than by a live birth and not an induced abortion, resulting in the complete expulsion or extraction of a fetus. (b) "Stillbirth" means the death of a fetus prior to complete expulsion or extraction and not an induced abortion.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 132 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Shannon (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1984, 125 N.H. 653)“…ed for armed robbery, RSA 636:1, and second degree assault, RSA 631:2 (Supp. 1983). The armed robbery indictm…”
- State v. Saucier (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1986, 128 N.H. 291)“…was found guilty at a jury trial of second degree assault. RSA 631:2, III. The Superior Court (Temple, J.)…”
- State v. MacLeod (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1996, 141 N.H. 427)“…t he did so by driving at an excessive rate of speed. See RSA 631:2, I(a). Accordingly, evidence of the def…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 632-A SEXUAL ASSAULT AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 632-A:4Sexual Assault.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor under any of the following circumstances: (a) When the actor subjects another person who is 13 years of age or older to sexual contact under any of the circumstances named in RSA 632-A:2. (b) When the actor subjects another person who is 13 years of age or older and under 16 years of age to sexual contact where the age difference between the actor and the other person is 5 years or more. (c) In the absence of any of the circumstances set forth in RSA 632-A:2, when the actor engages in sexual penetration with a person who is 13 years of age or older and under 16 years of age where the age difference between the actor and the other person is 4 years or less. II. A person found guilty under subparagraph I(c) of this section shall not be required to register as a sexual offender under RSA 651-B. III.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 54 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McKeown (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2009, 159 N.H. 434)“…d guilty to two counts of misdemeanor sexual assault. See RSA 632-A:4 (1996) (currently codified as RSA 632-A…”
- State of New Hampshire v. Kurt Carpentino (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2014, 166 N.H. 9)“…ces, originally imposed in 2003, based upon an amendment to RSA 632-A:4 (Supp. 2002) (amended 2003, 2005, 2008,…”
- State v. Timothy Bobola (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2016, 168 N.H. 771)“…A felony, 10 years. (f) For sexual assault under RSA 632-A:4, 10 years. (g) For felony inde…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Age of Consent Laws: Statutes and Reporting, Age of Consent Laws by State: Statutes, Protections and Reporting
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 634 DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY
§ 634:1Arson.In force
I. A person is guilty of arson if he knowingly starts a fire or causes an explosion which unlawfully damages the property of another. II. Arson is a class A felony if the property damaged is: (a) An occupied structure and the actor knew it was an occupied structure; or (b) An historic structure. III. Arson is a class B felony if: (a) The property is either that of another or the actor's property, and the fire was started or the explosion caused for the purpose of collecting insurance on such property; or (b) The actor purposely starts a fire or causes an explosion on anyone's property and thereby recklessly places another in danger of death or serious bodily injury, or places an occupied structure of another in danger of damage; or (c) The property damaged is real estate; or (d) The pecuniary loss caused is in excess of $1,000. IV. All other arson is a misdemeanor. V.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 36 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Champagne (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1979, 119 N.H. 118)“…upon which the defendant was tried and convicted of arson, RSA 634:1, charged a class B felony or a misdemea…”
- State v. Ayotte (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2001, 146 N.H. 544)“…Superior Court {Smith, J.) on two counts of arson. See RSA 634:1, 11(a) (1996) (amended 1998). She argue…”
- State v. Marion (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1982, 122 N.H. 20)“…is also the “property of another” under the arson statute, RSA 634:1 (Supp. 1979). We hold that it is.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 639 OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY
§ 639:2Incest.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if he or she marries or engages in sexual penetration as defined in RSA 632-A:1, V, or lives together with, under the representation of being married, a person 18 years or older whom he or she knows to be his or her ancestor, descendant, brother, or sister, of the whole or half blood, or an uncle, aunt, nephew, or niece; provided, however, that no person under the age of 18 shall be liable under this section if the other party is at least 3 years older at the time of the act. The relationships referred to herein include blood relationships without regard to legitimacy, stepchildren, and relationships of parent and child by adoption. II. In cases of alleged incest where the victim is under the age of 18 when the alleged offense occurred, the statute of limitations shall run pursuant to RSA 625:8, III(d). III. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph I, a person convicted of incest where the victim is under the age of 18 shall be sentenced to a maximum sentence which is not to exceed 20 years and a minimum which is not to exceed 1/2 the maximum.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Goodrow v. Perrin (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1979, 119 N.H. 483)“…ible to marry, he marries another." (Emphasis added.) Under RSA 639:2, a person is guilty of incest if he "ma…”
- State v. Yates (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2005, 152 N.H. 245)“…1996) (prohibiting marriage to multiple spouses); “Incest,” RSA 639:2 (Supp. 2004) (prohibiting marriage, sex…”
- State v. Carroll (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1980, 120 N.H. 458)“…BROCK, J. The defendant was found guilty of incest (RSA 639:2) after a jury trial in the Rockingham C…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 639:3Endangering Welfare of Child or Incompetent.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of endangering the welfare of a child or incompetent if he knowingly endangers the welfare of a child under 18 years of age or of an incompetent person by purposely violating a duty of care, protection or support he owes to such child or incompetent, or by inducing such child or incompetent to engage in conduct that endangers his health or safety. II. In the prosecution of any person under this section, the tattooing or branding by any person of a child under the age of 18 constitutes endangering the welfare of such child. II-a. In the prosecution of any person under this section, the placement of a child for adoption or the attempt to place a child for adoption in violation of RSA 170-B:33 constitutes endangering the welfare of such child. III. In the prosecution of any person under this section, the solicitation by any person of a child under the age of 16 to engage in sexual activity as defined by RSA 649-A:2, III for the purpose of creating a visual representation as defined in RSA 649-A:2, IV, or to engage in sexual penetration as defined by RSA 632-A:1, V, constitutes endangering the welfare of such child. III-a.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Paulsen (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1999, 143 N.H. 447)“…1996), and one count of endangering the welfare of a child, RSA 639:3, III (1996). We affirm in part, reverse…”
- State v. Portigue (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1984, 125 N.H. 352)“…nor of endangering the welfare of his child in violation of RSA 639:3, I (Supp. 1983). The defendant was sent…”
- State v. Kepple (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2007, 155 N.H. 267)“…(1996) (amended 2003), endangering the welfare of a child, RSA 639:3 (1996) (amended 2002, 2003), and crimin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire AI Laws and Regulation (2026), New Hampshire Car Seat Laws (2026): Ages & Penalty
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 641 FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
§ 641:5Tampering With Witnesses and Informants.In force
A person is guilty of a class B felony if: I. Believing that an official proceeding, as defined in RSA 641:1, II, or investigation is pending or about to be instituted, he attempts to induce or otherwise cause a person to: (a) Testify or inform falsely; or (b) Withhold any testimony, information, document or thing; or (c) Elude legal process summoning him to provide evidence; or (d) Absent himself from any proceeding or investigation to which he has been summoned; or II. He commits any unlawful act in retaliation for anything done by another in his capacity as witness or informant; or III. He solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any benefit in consideration of his doing any of the things specified in paragraph I.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kilgus (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1984, 125 N.H. 739)“…nd the constitutionality, of the witness tampering statute. RSA 641:5,1(a). We affirm. The defendant was in…”
- State v. Craig (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2015, 167 N.H. 361)“…ng, RSA 631:4 (Supp. 2014); one count of witness tampering, RSA 641:5 (2007); and one count of stalking, RSA…”
- State of New Hampshire v. Colleen Carr (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2015, 167 N.H. 264)“…upp. 2014), and two counts of felony witness tampering, see RSA 641:5, I (2007). On appeal, she argues that t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 645 PUBLIC INDECENCY
§ 645:1Indecent Exposure and Lewdness.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if: (a) Such person fornicates, exposes his or her genitals, or performs any other act of gross lewdness under circumstances which he or she should know will likely cause affront or alarm; or (b) Such person knowingly transmits to another, who is 16 years of age or older, an image of himself or herself fornicating, exposing his or her genitals, or performing any other act of gross lewdness, when the recipient does not consent to receipt of the image. II. A person is guilty of a class B felony if: (a) Such person, under circumstances that may be reasonably construed as being for the purpose of sexual gratification or arousal, purposely fornicates, exposes his or her genitals, or performs any other act of gross lewdness knowing that a child who is less than 16 years of age is present. (b) Such person purposely performs any act of sexual penetration or sexual contact on himself or herself or another in the presence of a child who is less than 16 years of age.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Bergen (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1996, 141 N.H. 61)“…gen, was convicted of indecent exposure and lewdness, see RSA 645:1, I(a) (Supp. 1995), after a jury trial…”
- State v. Heidi C. Lilley The State of New Hampshire Kia Sinclair The State of New Hampshire v. Ginger M. Pierro (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2019, 171 N.H. 766)“…enact the ordinance and that the ordinance was preempted by RSA 645:1 (2016). Finally, the defendants maintai…”
- Goodrow v. Perrin (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1979, 119 N.H. 483)“…e actor] should know will likely cause affront or alarm." RSA 645:1 (emphasis added). RSA 645:3 also includ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Pornography Laws (2026): Obscenity, AV Bill, CSAM
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- RSA 651:5 Annulment of Criminal Records(gc.nh.gov)
- RSA 651:5-b Annulment of Arrests and Convictions for Marijuana Possession(gc.nh.gov)
- Annulment - District Division(courts.nh.gov)
- Criminal Record Annulments(nhsp.dos.nh.gov)
- Rule 31. Annulments(courts.nh.gov)
- HB 196 (2025), 'AN ACT relative to annulling certain cannabis possession offenses' -- killed in the Senate May 22, 2025, never enacted(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 265-A:21 Annulment; Plea Bargaining -- no annulment of a DWI, aggravated drunken driving, OHRV or boating-under-the-influence conviction until 10 years after the date of conviction(gc.nh.gov)
- RSA 318-B:28-a Annulments of Criminal Records -- no annulment of a felony conviction under RSA 318-B until 7 years after the date of conviction(gc.nh.gov)