Tinder Age-Based Pricing Settlement: Approved, Not Yet Paid
At a glance
- Status
- Approved, awaiting payment
- Defendant
- Tinder, Inc. (Match Group)
- Settlement fund
- $60,500,000
- Claim deadline
- August 18, 2026
- No-proof cash option
- Yes — pro rata cash; class members choose PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, ACH, or mailed check; no receipts required
- Estimated payout
- pro rata cash; class members choose PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, ACH, or mailed check; no receipts required
- Official site
- www.tindercalclassaction.com
- Court
- Allan Candelore v. Tinder, Inc., Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County
- Case number
- BC583162
Last verified September 10, 2026
Key dates
| Milestone | Date | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Claim deadline | August 18, 2026(passed) | Last day to file for a payment |
| Opt-out (exclusion) deadline | April 8, 2026(passed) | Last day to leave the settlement and keep the right to sue |
| Objection deadline | April 8, 2026(passed) | Last day to object to the terms |
| Final approval hearing | June 4, 2026(passed) | When the judge decides whether to approve the settlement |
| Expected payout | Not yet scheduled | Payments are not sent until after final approval and any appeals |
Where to file
The only place to file is the official settlement website:
Verify on the official sitewww.tindercalclassaction.com
Filing is free. No legitimate settlement charges a fee to file a claim.
You cannot file on RecordingLaw.com. We are an independent publisher, not the settlement administrator, and we are not affiliated with any court, agency, or defendant.
If you paid for Tinder Plus or Tinder Gold in California and noticed you were charged more than a friend under 30, you may be part of the class in Candelore v. Tinder, Inc. As of September 9, 2026, the $60.5 million settlement over Tinder's age-based pricing has final court approval, and the August 18, 2026 deadline for class members to choose how they get paid has passed. The settlement record still lists no payout date. Here is what the case was about, who is covered, and what happens next.
What Tinder is accused of doing
The case is Allan Candelore v. Tinder, Inc., filed in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, case number BC583162. Candelore's complaint alleged that Tinder charged users age 30 and older more per month for Tinder Plus than it charged younger users for the same subscription, based only on their age, in violation of California's Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code section 51) and Unfair Competition Law (Business and Professions Code section 17200).
Tinder initially won dismissal at the trial court. Candelore appealed, and in a published opinion filed January 29, 2018, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, reversed. The court held that charging older users more, based on a broad generalization about their finances rather than anything about the individual person, could violate California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, the state law that bars businesses from arbitrary discrimination, including discrimination based on age. That ruling sent the case back for further litigation rather than ending it.
The class that eventually resulted covers people who paid the higher, age-tiered price: California users who bought Tinder Plus or Tinder Gold while older than 29 on or after March 2, 2015, or older than 28 on or after March 2, 2016. Tinder has not admitted wrongdoing; a settlement resolves a case without either side proving its version of events at trial.
Where the case stands right now, as of September 2026
This settlement is further along than most on this tracker: it already has final approval. The court granted final approval on June 4, 2026, and the deadline for class members to exclude themselves from the class or object to the settlement, April 8, 2026, had already passed by then.
What has not happened yet is payment. The verified settlement record does not list an expected payout date, so there is no confirmed date for when payments will actually go out. The step that remained was administrative: class members who received notice had until August 18, 2026 to choose how they wanted to be paid, and that date has now passed. People who never got a notice directly have a separate process for proving they belong in the class, described below.
That August date is worth pausing on, because it is easy to mistake for a standard "file your claim by this date" deadline, and it was not quite that. Tinder's own billing records already show who paid the higher price, so most class members do not need to submit a claim form the way you would for a typical data breach settlement. Instead, August 18, 2026 was the deadline to select a payment method: PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, ACH bank transfer, or a mailed paper check.
Who's actually in the class
You may be part of the class if you purchased Tinder Plus or Tinder Gold in California at the higher, age-based price. Specifically, the class covers people who were older than 29 when they subscribed in California on or after March 2, 2015, and people who were older than 28 when they subscribed in California on or after March 2, 2016.
Simply having used Tinder is not enough on its own. The claim is specifically about the price you were charged for a paid subscription tier because of your age, not about using the free version of the app or any other Tinder feature.
How much you can realistically expect
The fund is $60.5 million, and payouts come from what remains after the court-approved attorneys' fees and costs. The settlement agreement splits that net fund in two. Seventy percent is divided equally among all class members, regardless of how much they paid. The other 30% is divided in proportion to how much each class member paid Tinder for Tinder Plus and Tinder Gold during the class period, so, as the court-approved notice puts it, class members who paid more will receive a higher payment.
For class members Tinder has no payment data for, the settlement uses an average amount paid instead. Your share still depends on how many class members there are in total, and the settlement does not set a documented-loss cap or a guaranteed per-person figure.
That means there is no confirmed "up to $X" figure to cite here, and any specific dollar amount quoted elsewhere for this settlement is not something we can verify against the official record. No receipts or proof of the amount you were overcharged are required to receive a payment; the payment-based portion uses Tinder's own billing records. Choosing a payment method affects how you are paid, not how much.
What class members had to do by August 18, 2026
If Tinder sent you notice of this settlement directly, most likely by email tied to your account, your task was to choose how you wanted to be paid: PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, ACH bank transfer, or a mailed check. A class member who made no selection is still in the class and will still be paid: the court-approved notice says the settlement administrator will attempt to pay them electronically through PayPal, Venmo, or Zelle, using the information in Tinder's records.
Someone who did not receive notice directly but believes they belong in the class follows a different process: contacting the settlement administrator to verify membership, including through a verification form on the official site. The settlement agreement ties that deadline to the final approval hearing date (90 days after it), not to the August 18 payment-method date, so check the official site or contact the administrator before assuming the window has closed. Both steps happen only through the official settlement site, which is also the place to check on a selection you already made.
If you already got a payment, or nothing here matches your situation
Because no payout date has been set, no one should have received a check or deposit from this settlement yet. A payment that claims to be from this case and already arrived is worth checking against the official site before you assume it is legitimate. If you paid for Tinder Plus or Gold outside California, or you were never charged the higher, age-tiered price, the verified record here does not describe you as part of this class.
For other verified, currently open or recently resolved consumer settlements, see RecordingLaw's data breach and privacy settlement tracker.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Candelore v. Tinder settlement about?
Candelore v. Tinder, Inc. is a $60.5 million settlement over Tinder's age-based subscription pricing. The lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County as case number BC583162, alleged that Tinder charged users a higher monthly price for Tinder Plus once they reached a certain age.
Is this a data breach settlement?
No. This is a pricing-discrimination case, not a data breach. No one alleges that Tinder's systems were hacked or that personal data was exposed; the claim is about the price Tinder charged certain users because of their age.
What law did Tinder allegedly violate?
The lawsuit alleged that Tinder's higher pricing for older users violated two California laws: the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code section 51) and the Unfair Competition Law (Business and Professions Code section 17200). A California Court of Appeal held in a January 2018 published opinion that charging older users more for the same subscription, based on a generalization about their age rather than anything specific to the individual, could violate California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, the state law barring arbitrary discrimination by businesses, including discrimination based on age.
Who is eligible for the Tinder age-based pricing settlement?
You may be eligible if you purchased Tinder Plus or Tinder Gold in California at the higher, age-tiered price: specifically if you were older than 29 when you subscribed on or after March 2, 2015, or older than 28 when you subscribed on or after March 2, 2016.
Can I still opt out of or object to the settlement?
No. The deadline to exclude yourself from the class or object to the settlement's terms was April 8, 2026, and that window closed before the court's June 4, 2026 final approval hearing.
How much will I get from the Tinder settlement?
There is no guaranteed dollar figure. After court-approved fees and costs, 70% of the net fund is split equally among class members and 30% is split in proportion to how much each member paid for Tinder Plus and Tinder Gold, so people who paid more receive more. The exact amount depends on the total number of class members and the final net fund.
What is the August 18, 2026 deadline for?
August 18, 2026 was not a traditional claim-form deadline. It was the date by which class members could select a payment method (PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, ACH transfer, or mailed check), and it has passed. Class members who did not choose will be paid electronically through PayPal, Venmo, or Zelle based on Tinder's records. People who never received direct notice verify their membership under a separate deadline set by the settlement agreement, so they should check the official site.
When will Tinder settlement payments actually go out?
As of September 9, 2026, the settlement record still lists no payment date. The settlement has final court approval, but the verified record does not list an expected payout date, so there is nothing yet to confirm about when checks or electronic payments will be sent.
Is tindercalclassaction.com the real settlement site?
Yes. Tindercalclassaction.com is the official, court-authorized site for the Candelore v. Tinder settlement. Use it directly rather than a link from an unexpected text, email, or call, especially since the settlement record still lists no payout date as of September 9, 2026.
How to tell a settlement notice is real
Check the case name, case number, and court against the official settlement site. Go to that site directly instead of clicking a link in an email or text. Nobody legitimate will call, text, or email out of the blue asking for your Social Security number, bank account, or card details, and nobody will charge you to file. Report anyone who does at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Already have a notice with a link or sender address? Paste it into our settlement notice checker to compare it with the official claim sites we track.
Informational only. Not legal, tax, or financial advice, and not affiliated with any settlement.
RecordingLaw.com is an independent legal-information publisher. We are not a law firm, not a settlement administrator, and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any court, government agency, defendant, or claims administrator described on this page. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship.
We do not process claims and we never collect your claim information. You cannot file a claim on RecordingLaw.com. To file, opt out, object, or check your status, use only the official settlement administrator identified above. We link to it for your convenience.
Filing a legitimate claim is free. No legitimate settlement or administrator will charge you a fee to file, or ask for your Social Security number, bank, or card details by unsolicited call, text, or email. If someone does, it is likely a scam. Report it at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Deadlines, amounts, and approval status change and are set by the court. We verify against the official administrator and court records, but confirm the current details on the official site before acting. Nothing here guarantees eligibility, a payment, or any amount. Settlement payments may be taxable. See IRS Publication 4345. and consult a tax professional. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state. Affiliate disclosure.
Updates
Corrected the description of the Candelore v. Tinder complaint to the Tinder Plus pricing the Court of Appeal's opinion actually describes.
Corrected how payouts are calculated (class members who paid more receive more), added the Unfair Competition Law claim, stated the default electronic payment for class members who made no selection, and separated the verification deadline for people who never received notice from the August 18 payment-method deadline.
Updated settlement status and dates: Title said '$60.5M, Approved' but gave no hint that the class-member deadline had passed now now 'Approved, Not Yet Paid'
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Civil Code
§ 51In force
(a) This section shall be known, and may be cited, as the Unruh Civil Rights Act. (b) All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever. (c) This section shall not be construed to confer any right or privilege on a person that is conditioned or limited by law or that is applicable alike to persons of every sex, color, race, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status, or to persons regardless of their genetic information.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 4,738 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission (California Supreme Court 1987, 43 Cal. 3d 1379)“…ing housing discrimination, and the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, §§ 51-52, enacted by Stats. 1959, ch. 1866, §…”
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (California Supreme Court 1991, 52 Cal. 3d 1142)“…ues involving interpretation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, §§ 51, 52; hereafter the Unruh Act or the Act…”
- Rojo v. Kliger (California Supreme Court 1990, 52 Cal. 3d 65)“…ative intent to supersede all preexisting state laws except Civil Code section 51. Were it otherwise, he argues, the Civi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
California Business and Professions Code
§ 17200In forcecited in 4 of our articles
As used in this chapter, unfair competition shall mean and include any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice and unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising and any act prohibited by Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17500) of Part 3 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 7,522 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Blank v. Kirwan (California Supreme Court 1985, 39 Cal. 3d 311)“…e has stated a cause of action for unfair competition under Business and Professions Code section 17200. He is unpersuasive. "Unfair competit…”
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. (California Supreme Court 1999, 83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 548)“…if not specifically proscribed by some other law. “Because Business and Professions Code section 17200 is written in the disjunctive, it estab…”
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court 2011, 51 Cal. 4th 310)“…e asserting violations of the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) for unlawful, unfair, and frau…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Fandango Settlement: Claim Window Closed, Awaiting Court Approval, Grubhub Settlement: Claim Window Closed, Hearing Oct 7, 2026, California Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
Sources and References
- Candelore v. Tinder, Inc., California Court of Appeal Opinion, Case No. B270172 (Certified for Publication, filed Jan. 29, 2018)(courts.ca.gov).gov
- California Civil Code Section 51: The Unruh Civil Rights Act(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Candelore v. Tinder, Inc. Settlement (Official Court-Authorized Settlement Site)(tindercalclassaction.com)
- Candelore v. Tinder, Inc. Settlement: Frequently Asked Questions (Official Site)(tindercalclassaction.com)
- California Business and Professions Code Section 17200: Unfair Competition Law(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Candelore v. Tinder, Inc.: Court-Authorized Notice of Class Action Settlement(classaction.org)
- Candelore v. Tinder, Inc.: Class Action Settlement Agreement(classaction.org)