Google Assistant Settlement: Final Approval Granted, Payment Pending
At a glance
- Status
- Approved, awaiting payment
- Defendant
- Google LLC
- Settlement fund
- $68,000,000
- Claim deadline
- August 27, 2026
- No-proof cash option
- Yes — point-based pro-rata; privacy-only class ~$2-$10, device purchasers ~$18-$56 per device
- Estimated payout
- point-based pro-rata; privacy-only class ~$2-$10, device purchasers ~$18-$56 per device
- Administrator
- A.B. Data, Ltd.
- Official site
- www.googleassistantprivacylitigation.com
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
- Case number
- 5:19-cv-04286 (In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation), No. 5:19-cv-04286
Last verified October 18, 2026
Key dates
| Milestone | Date | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Claim deadline | August 27, 2026(passed) | Last day to file for a payment |
| Opt-out (exclusion) deadline | August 27, 2026(passed) | Last day to leave the settlement and keep the right to sue |
| Objection deadline | August 27, 2026(passed) | Last day to object to the terms |
| Final approval hearing | October 1, 2026(passed) | When the judge decides whether to approve the settlement |
| Expected payout | Not yet scheduled | Payments are not sent until after final approval and any appeals |
Where to file
Google Assistant Privacy Litigation Settlement is administered by A.B. Data, Ltd.. The only place to file is the official settlement website:
Verify on the official sitewww.googleassistantprivacylitigation.com
Filing is free. No legitimate settlement charges a fee to file a claim.
You cannot file on RecordingLaw.com. We are an independent publisher, not the settlement administrator, and we are not affiliated with any court, agency, or defendant.
Google Assistant privacy settlement: $68 million fund, final approval granted
If you are searching "Google Assistant settlement," here is the short answer: the claim window has closed. Google has agreed to pay $68 million to resolve claims that Google Assistant sometimes recorded people without a deliberate 'Hey Google' or 'OK Google' trigger, and that some of those recordings were sent to outside reviewers. The deadline to file a claim, or to exclude yourself from the case, was August 27, 2026. The administrator's notice now says that deadline has passed, adding that claims submitted afterward may still be received but that accepting a late claim is at its discretion.
This page explains what the lawsuit actually alleged, who is covered, why no one, including the settlement's own administrator, will state an exact dollar amount, and what happens next now that the window has closed.
What the lawsuit was about
The case is the Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as case number 5:19-cv-04286, against Google LLC. The plaintiffs' core allegation involves what the case record calls a 'false accept': a moment when Google Assistant activates and starts recording on a Google-made device without the person deliberately saying a wake word.
The case also covers recordings that were disclosed to a third-party review vendor, meaning sent outside Google to a contractor for human review rather than staying inside Google's own systems. Google has not admitted wrongdoing by settling. A settlement resolves a case without either side having to prove its version of events at trial.
Google Assistant is the voice assistant built into Google-made phones, smart speakers, and other hardware. It is designed to listen for a wake phrase before recording anything, and the lawsuit's central claim is that it did not always work that way, sometimes capturing audio the person never intended to send anywhere.
The class period runs from May 18, 2016 to March 19, 2026, a nearly ten-year window. It covers both device purchases and alleged recordings during that time.
Where the settlement stands right now
As of October 18, 2026, the claim window has closed. The claim deadline was August 27, 2026, and that same date was the deadline to exclude yourself from the class. Filing a claim and opting out were opposite choices that shared a deadline here: filing asked for money and kept you in the class, while opting out removed you from the class and gave up any payment while preserving your right to sue Google separately. The administrator's notice says claims submitted after August 27, 2026 may still be received, but that accepting a late claim is at its discretion.
On October 13, 2026, the court granted final approval of the settlement. Judge Beth Labson Freeman had held the fairness hearing on October 1, 2026, which fell after the claim deadline, meaning the court allowed claims to be submitted while the settlement's final terms were still pending a judge's sign-off.
The order overruled all seven objections class members had filed. The administrator reported more than 1.49 million timely claims against 217 valid and timely exclusion requests, which the court described as an opt-out rate of less than 0.015 percent.
The same order awarded class counsel $22,666,666.70 in attorneys' fees and $1,021,738.40 in litigation expenses, and reduced the requested service awards to $5,000 for each class representative. Those amounts come out of the $68 million fund before claimants are paid, which is why each person's share stays pro rata.
Money has not moved yet. The court directed class counsel to submit a proposed judgment, and payment follows entry of that judgment and the point at which it becomes final, which depends on whether anyone appeals. The official settlement site is where payment timing will be posted.
Who is actually in the class
You may be part of the class if, between May 18, 2016 and March 19, 2026, either of two things is true for you. First, you are a U.S. resident who purchased a Google-made device. Second, whether or not you purchased a device, you were a Google Assistant user (a U.S. resident whose Google account was linked to at least one Google Assistant-enabled device during that period) or a member of such a user's household, and your communications were recorded or obtained by Google Assistant through a false accept, or were disclosed to a third-party review vendor. Only one of these needs to be true, not both.
That is a broad class definition. Owning or having owned a qualifying Google device during that window may be enough on its own; you did not necessarily need to prove Assistant recorded a specific private conversation of yours to be eligible under the device-purchase path.
How much people realistically get
This is the part worth reading slowly, because it is genuinely unusual among these settlements. The official settlement site describes the payout as point-based and pro rata; it does not commit to a fixed dollar amount per claimant. How much any individual receives depends on how many valid claims are filed in total, how the point system weighs different ways of qualifying, and what the court approves for attorneys' fees and administrative costs before the $68 million fund is divided.
Some sites you may find while searching quote specific per-claimant dollar ranges for this settlement. Treat those as unverified estimates, not promises. The official settlement site itself does not state a fixed payout figure, so no outside source can honestly hand you an exact number either. The only place that will calculate and confirm what you actually receive is the official claims administrator, after the claim deadline closes and the total number of valid claims is known.
What is certain is that this is a shared, common fund. It is split among everyone who files a valid claim, not a fixed amount handed to each person. If more people file than the fund can support at a higher rate, individual shares shrink to fit.
Because there are two different ways to qualify for this class, a device purchase or a recorded communication, the point system weighs them differently. According to the court-approved notice, members of the purchaser class receive four points for every eligible Google-made device in their claim, up to a cap of three devices, while members of the privacy class receive one point. Those points set each claimant's proportional share; what a single point is worth in dollars will not be known until the administrator tallies all valid claims.
What proof you need to file
This settlement did not require receipts, device serial numbers, or bills to file a claim. Filers attested on the claim form to how they were eligible, whether that was a device purchase or a recorded communication, rather than proving it with documentation.
A filer who purchased a Google-made device attested to that purchase within the class period. A filer whose communications were recorded through a false accept or disclosed to a review vendor attested to that instead. Either path used the same self-attestation approach; neither one asked for supporting evidence just to file.
How to file
Claims were filed only through the official settlement site, googleassistantprivacylitigation.com, by the August 27, 2026 deadline. The administrator's notice says a claim submitted after that date may still be received, but that accepting a late claim is at its discretion. The site is run by A.B. Data, Ltd., the court-appointed claims administrator. RecordingLaw does not process claims, collect your information for this settlement, or have any role in deciding who gets paid.
Staying out of the class entirely, which preserved the right to sue Google separately, ran through that same official site and closed on the same August 27, 2026 deadline. So did objecting to the settlement's terms, meaning staying in the class but telling the judge the deal is unfair. Both windows are now shut, and the official site is where payment timing will be posted now that the court has granted final approval.
If you're reading this after the deadline, or you're not sure this applies to you
This is a privacy lawsuit over how Google Assistant handled voice recordings, not a data breach. There is no indication in the case record that Social Security numbers, passwords, or financial account information were exposed. That means the usual post-breach playbook, freezing your credit at the three bureaus and watching for new accounts opened in your name, is not the most useful response here.
More useful: check your own Google account. Google's Voice & Audio Activity settings let you see what Assistant has recorded, delete past recordings, and turn off the setting that stores new audio going forward. The Federal Trade Commission also publishes general guidance on protecting your privacy with voice-enabled and internet-connected devices, which applies well beyond this one lawsuit.
Google Assistant is not the only voice assistant that has faced scrutiny over unintended recordings. If you use any voice-enabled device, it is worth periodically checking what it is allowed to listen for, what gets stored, and whether you can set recordings to delete automatically instead of letting them accumulate indefinitely.
If you are trying to figure out what rights you have over your personal data more broadly, RecordingLaw's overview of data privacy laws explains what protections apply depending on your state. And if you came across a mention of a different settlement and want to check whether it is real before you act on it, RecordingLaw's settlement tracker lists verified, currently open consumer settlements sourced from official administrator sites rather than search results.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Google Assistant settlement still accepting claims?
No. The deadline to file a claim was August 27, 2026, and the administrator's notice says that date has passed. It adds that claims submitted afterward may still be received, but that accepting a late claim is at the administrator's discretion.
What is the Google Assistant Privacy Litigation about?
The Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, case No. 5:19-cv-04286 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges Google Assistant sometimes activated and recorded without a deliberate wake word, called a 'false accept', and that some recordings were disclosed to a third-party review vendor. Google has not admitted wrongdoing by settling.
How much money will I get from the Google Assistant settlement?
There is no fixed answer. The official settlement site describes payment as point-based and pro rata rather than a set dollar amount, so your share depends on the total number of valid claims filed and what the court approves for fees and costs before the $68 million fund is divided. Be skeptical of any other site that states a specific dollar figure for you, since the official administrator itself does not.
Who is eligible for the Google Assistant settlement?
You may be eligible if, between May 18, 2016 and March 19, 2026, you purchased a Google-made device in the U.S., or you were a Google Assistant user (a U.S. resident whose Google account was linked to a Google Assistant-enabled device) or a member of a user's household and your communications were recorded or obtained by Google Assistant through a false accept or disclosed to a third-party review vendor. Only one of those has to apply to you.
Do I need to prove I was recorded to file a claim?
No. This settlement did not require receipts, device serial numbers, or other documentation. Filers attested on the claim form to how they were eligible.
What is the difference between opting out of and objecting to the Google Assistant settlement?
Opting out means leaving the class entirely: you give up any payment from the $68 million fund but keep your right to sue Google separately. Objecting means staying in the class while asking the judge to change or reject the settlement's terms. For this settlement, the deadline to opt out was the same as the claim deadline, August 27, 2026, and it has passed.
When does the Google Assistant settlement become final?
The court granted final approval on October 13, 2026, after holding the fairness hearing on October 1, 2026, and overruled all seven objections. One step remains before money moves: the court directed class counsel to submit a proposed judgment, and payment follows entry of that judgment and the point at which it becomes final, which depends on whether anyone appeals. The official settlement site is where payment timing will be posted.
Is this the same lawsuit as other Google privacy settlements I've seen?
No. Google is a party to several separate privacy matters covering different conduct. This page covers only the Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, case No. 5:19-cv-04286, over Assistant's false-accept recordings; it does not cover other Google lawsuits over unrelated conduct like location tracking.
How do I know a 'Google Assistant settlement' claim site is legitimate?
The only legitimate site is googleassistantprivacylitigation.com, run by claims administrator A.B. Data, Ltd. Since the official site itself does not promise a specific dollar amount, treat any site or message that guarantees you a set payout, or asks for payment to 'process' your claim, as a red flag.
How to tell a settlement notice is real
Check the case name, case number, and court against the official settlement site. Go to that site directly instead of clicking a link in an email or text. Nobody legitimate will call, text, or email out of the blue asking for your Social Security number, bank account, or card details, and nobody will charge you to file. Report anyone who does at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Already have a notice with a link or sender address? Paste it into our settlement notice checker to compare it with the official claim sites we track.
Informational only. Not legal, tax, or financial advice, and not affiliated with any settlement.
RecordingLaw.com is an independent legal-information publisher. We are not a law firm, not a settlement administrator, and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any court, government agency, defendant, or claims administrator described on this page. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship.
We do not process claims and we never collect your claim information. You cannot file a claim on RecordingLaw.com. To file, opt out, object, or check your status, use only the official settlement administrator identified above. We link to it for your convenience.
Filing a legitimate claim is free. No legitimate settlement or administrator will charge you a fee to file, or ask for your Social Security number, bank, or card details by unsolicited call, text, or email. If someone does, it is likely a scam. Report it at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Deadlines, amounts, and approval status change and are set by the court. We verify against the official administrator and court records, but confirm the current details on the official site before acting. Nothing here guarantees eligibility, a payment, or any amount. Settlement payments may be taxable. See IRS Publication 4345. and consult a tax professional. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state. Affiliate disclosure.
Updates
Added the court-approved notice's point allocation (four points per eligible Google-made device, up to three, versus one point for the privacy class) and clarified that the privacy class covers Google Assistant users and their household members.
Updated settlement status and dates: Title said "$68M, Open" now now states the claim window is closed and names the October 1 hearing
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Penal Code
§ 632In forcecited in 55 of our articles
(a) A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-23 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 267 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kimmel v. Goland (1990) held the section 47(2) litigation privilege does not bar a damages claim under Section 632 for recording confidential conversations without consent. Lieberman v. KCOP Television, Inc. (2003) held a Section 632 violation is complete the moment the recording is made, whether or not it is disclosed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rubin v. Green (California Supreme Court 1993, 4 Cal. 4th 1187)“…f telephone conversations with defendants, an offense under Penal Code section 632. We noted that defendants alleged that…”
- Kimmel v. Goland (California Supreme Court 1990, 51 Cal. 3d 202)✓Mobilehome owners secretly taped phone calls with park management in anticipation of suing; the court held the section 47(2) litigation privilege did not bar the cross-complaint for damages under Penal Code section 632, since the injury came from recording, not publication.
- Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc. (California Supreme Court 1998, 74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 843)✓A TV producer put a wireless microphone on the flight nurse treating a crash victim. No section 632 claim was before the court, but it called section 632 and the intrusion tort laws of general applicability and said the press may not eavesdrop in violation of section 632.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026), Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?, Can You Record ICE Agents? Know Your Rights by State (2026)
Sources and References
- Federal Trade Commission: Protecting Consumer Privacy and Security(ftc.gov).gov
- Google Assistant Privacy Litigation (Official Court-Authorized Settlement Site): Home(googleassistantprivacylitigation.com)
- Google Assistant Privacy Litigation (Official Court-Authorized Settlement Site): Frequently Asked Questions(googleassistantprivacylitigation.com)
- Google Search Help: Manage Audio Recordings in Your Web & App Activity(support.google.com)
- Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement and Long Form Notice, In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, No. 5:19-cv-04286-BLF, Doc. 549-2 (N.D. Cal. filed Jan. 23, 2026)(classaction.org)
- Order granting final approval, Kumandan v. Google LLC, No. 5:19-cv-04286-BLF (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2026), ECF No. 584(courtlistener.com)