North Dakota Police Body Camera Laws: Access & Public Records

North Dakota treats police bodycam footage differently depending on where it was recorded. Under N.D. Cent. Code § 44-04-18.7(9), an image or recording taken in a public place is an open record on request, while one taken in a private place is an exempt record the agency may still choose to release.

This guide is part of our Police Bodycam Laws by State series.

Jurisdiction scope: This article addresses North Dakota state law governing police body cameras: the location-based public-record rule under N.D. Cent. Code § 44-04-18.7(9), the interaction with the state's criminal investigative information exemption, and the absence of a statewide use mandate. It does not address a civilian's right to record law enforcement, which is covered separately in our guide to recording laws.

Is North Dakota police bodycam footage a public record?

It depends on where the camera was pointed. N.D. Cent. Code § 44-04-18.7(9) provides that "an image taken with a body camera or similar device and which is taken in a private place is an exempt record." The provision was added by House Bill 1264 in the 2015 legislative session and took effect August 1, 2015, drafted at the request of law enforcement and firefighters specifically to protect the privacy of people recorded inside homes and other private settings, according to O'Keeffe O'Brien Lyson Attorneys' summary of the law. The subsection says nothing about footage recorded in a public place, and because it says nothing, that footage is not pulled out of North Dakota's general open-records law, codified at N.D.C.C. ch. 44-04, which presumes a record held by a public entity is open unless a specific statute exempts or makes it confidential, according to the North Dakota Attorney General's Open Records Guide. The practical result is a location-based rule: footage of a traffic stop, an arrest on a sidewalk, or an encounter in a store is presumptively open, while footage recorded inside a residence or another private space is not.

What does "exempt" actually mean under North Dakota law?

An exempt classification is weaker than it sounds. North Dakota's open records framework separates records into three buckets: open records, which any agency must produce on request; confidential records, which an agency is legally barred from releasing outside a specific exception; and exempt records, which an agency is not required to release but retains discretion to release anyway. Body camera footage recorded in a private place falls into the exempt category, not the confidential one, according to the Attorney General's Open Records Guide. That means a police chief or sheriff can choose to release private-place footage, for example to correct public misinformation about an incident or to support an officer's account of events, even though nothing in the statute forces that release. A requester who is denied private-place footage has no statutory right to force disclosure the way they could for a wrongfully withheld open record.

Does North Dakota require police to wear body cameras?

No. Unlike states such as South Carolina, Illinois, or Colorado, North Dakota has never enacted a statewide mandate requiring law enforcement agencies to purchase or issue body cameras, and § 44-04-18.7 itself only addresses what happens to footage once it exists, not whether an agency must record in the first place. Adoption has been left to individual departments and their budgets. Cities including Devils Lake, Grand Forks, and West Fargo have equipped patrol officers with body cameras as a matter of local policy, while smaller and rural agencies vary in whether and how extensively they use the technology. Because there is no state mandate, there is also no statewide activation trigger or retention floor written into § 44-04-18.7; agencies that use cameras set their own activation rules and retention periods through internal policy and applicable state or local government records retention schedules.

Can an active investigation keep public-place footage closed anyway?

Yes, and this is where North Dakota's rules get less intuitive. The location-based rule in § 44-04-18.7(9) only exempts private-place footage; it does not make public-place footage automatically producible the moment a request is filed. North Dakota's broader criminal investigative information provisions allow an agency to withhold records, including public-place bodycam video, for as long as a related prosecution remains pending, because the footage is treated as active investigative information regardless of where it was recorded. Once the case concludes, whether through a plea, a dismissal, or a final judgment, that basis for withholding disappears and the general open-records presumption reasserts itself for public-place footage.

A real dispute: the Grand Forks DUI arrest

A 2024 case shows how the active-investigation exemption operates even for a straightforward, public traffic stop. On May 7, 2024, Grand Forks police arrested then-state representative Claire Cory on suspicion of driving under the influence. The Grand Forks Herald requested the arresting officers' bodycam footage right away, and the department declined, citing the ongoing criminal case rather than the private-place exemption, according to the Grand Forks Herald's reporting on the dispute. After Cory pleaded guilty to reckless driving on July 2, 2024, the department released the footage promptly. The Herald's publisher asked Attorney General Drew Wrigley to issue a formal opinion on whether the earlier denial was lawful; Wrigley's office ruled on March 24, 2026, that it was, reasoning that a prosecution is not complete simply because an arrest has occurred, so the footage remained active criminal investigative information at the time of the original request. A separate 2022 incident illustrates the same dynamic on a more serious case: after Fargo police officer Adam O'Brien fatally shot 28-year-old Shane Netterville, Attorney General Wrigley declined to release the bodycam video while the investigation and any related proceedings were ongoing, according to KFYR-TV's coverage.

Is it illegal to record police in North Dakota?

That is a different question from the one this page answers. North Dakota generally recognizes a person's right to record an on-duty officer performing public duties in a public place, as covered in our separate guide to recording laws linked above. The rules on this page apply only to footage the police themselves record and to the public's ability to obtain a copy of it afterward.

More North Dakota Laws

• North Dakota Data Privacy Laws
• North Dakota Drone Laws
• North Dakota Recording Laws