North Dakota
Common Law Marriage in North Dakota: Is It Recognized? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

North Dakota does not recognize common law marriage formed within the state. Under , no marriage may be solemnized in North Dakota without a valid license, and limits who may perform that solemnization. North Dakota has never enacted a statute permitting informal marriage formation, so there is no grandfather cutoff date for North Dakota-formed unions. North Dakota does, however, recognize a common law marriage that was validly formed in another state.
Information last verified on June 2, 2026.
Does North Dakota recognize common law marriage?
North Dakota does not allow couples to form a common law marriage within the state. The North Dakota Century Code title 14, chapter 03 governs marriage in North Dakota, and its requirements are formal and procedural. provides that no marriage may be solemnized without a license issued under that chapter. identifies the officials and clergy authorized to solemnize a marriage. Together, these provisions establish the license and ceremony as mandatory prerequisites to a valid North Dakota marriage.
North Dakota has never enacted a statute recognizing common law marriage formation. Unlike states such as Alabama or Ohio that recognized common law marriage for a period of time and later abolished it by setting a prospective cutoff date, North Dakota simply never adopted the doctrine. Because there was no prior recognition to abolish, there is no grandfather date for informal unions formed within the state.
The practical consequence is straightforward: a couple that cohabits in North Dakota for any number of years, holds itself out publicly as married, files joint tax returns, and genuinely considers itself married has nonetheless not formed a legally recognized marriage under North Dakota law without a license and ceremony. Intent and cohabitation, however longstanding, do not substitute for the statutory formalities.
Why North Dakota requires a license and solemnization
North Dakota's formal marriage requirements reflect the legislature's policy choice to maintain a clear, public record of marital status. The license requirement creates an official record through the county recorder's office before the ceremony takes place. The solemnization requirement ensures a recognizable event marks the transition to married status.

These requirements serve several purposes that courts and legislators across the country have identified over time: they protect both parties by making the legal consequences of marriage clear at the outset, they create a public record that simplifies questions of inheritance, property rights, and benefits eligibility, and they avoid the evidentiary difficulties that arise when parties later dispute whether a marriage was ever formed at all.
defines what constitutes marriage in North Dakota, establishing the foundational framework into which the license and solemnization requirements fit. Because the code has never included a provision permitting informal or common law marriage formation, the absence of such a statute is itself the legal rule.
For couples who cohabit in North Dakota without marrying, the state does not provide a parallel legal status equivalent to marriage. Long-term cohabiting partners do not acquire marital rights simply by living together, regardless of the duration or nature of the relationship.
Does North Dakota recognize a common law marriage from another state?
Yes. North Dakota gives full legal effect to a common law marriage that was validly formed in a state that permits such marriages. This recognition flows from two sources.
The first is the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, Article IV, Section 1, which requires each state to give credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other states. Federal statute implements this clause procedurally, governing how another state's acts, records, and judicial proceedings are authenticated and admitted into evidence in North Dakota courts. Once properly authenticated, a marriage record valid in the state where it was formed can be used as evidence of that marriage in North Dakota.
The second source is the common law doctrine of comity, under which courts recognize legal relationships validly created in other jurisdictions as a matter of interstate legal harmony.
Practically, this means that a couple who formed a valid common law marriage in Colorado under C.R.S. 14-2-109.5, in Texas under , in Iowa based on the intent-and-holding-out standard, or in any other state that still permits common law marriage formation, retains that marital status when the couple moves to North Dakota. North Dakota courts treat the couple as legally married for purposes of divorce, property division, spousal support, inheritance, intestate succession, and all other legal incidents of marriage.
To establish North Dakota recognition of an out-of-state common law marriage, a party must show that the claimed marriage met all of the requirements of the state where it was allegedly formed. For example, a couple asserting a Colorado common law marriage must show mutual agreement to enter the marital relationship and conduct manifesting that agreement, the two-part test adopted in In re the Marriage of Hogsett & Neale, 2021 CO 1, 478 P.3d 713. Hogsett replaced Colorado's older multi-factor test and held that no single factor, including public reputation as a married couple, is independently required; courts weigh the totality of the parties' conduct instead.
How to prove a common law marriage formed in another state
A common law marriage leaves no license or certificate. The burden of proving that one exists falls on the party asserting it. The standard of proof and the specific elements are governed by the law of the state where the marriage was allegedly formed, but courts reviewing such evidence look at a consistent set of categories.

Evidence courts commonly consider includes:
- Joint federal and state income tax returns filed as married filing jointly or married filing separately
- Joint bank accounts, credit accounts, or investment accounts opened in both names
- Deeds, leases, or mortgage documents listing both parties as husband and wife or as spouses
- Life insurance policies or retirement account beneficiary designations naming the other party as a spouse
- Loan applications, credit applications, or government-benefit forms identifying the relationship as a marriage
- Testimony from family members, friends, neighbors, coworkers, clergy, or others who knew the couple as married
- Correspondence, cards, social media posts, or other written records in which the parties referred to each other as husband, wife, or spouse
- Use of a shared last name or documented use of the other partner's last name
- Affidavits signed by both parties acknowledging the existence of a marriage
No single piece of evidence is automatically conclusive. Courts look at the totality of the relationship to determine whether the parties genuinely agreed to be married and held themselves out as married under the law of the state where the marriage was allegedly formed.
The 7-year myth
A widespread misconception holds that living together for seven years automatically creates a common law marriage. This is false in every state in the United States.
No state, including the states that still permit common law marriage formation, sets a minimum number of years of cohabitation as a requirement or an automatic trigger. The states that allow common law marriage focus on the intent and conduct of the parties: a mutual present agreement to be married, cohabitation in the permitting state, and public representation of the marriage to the community. Duration of cohabitation may be relevant as circumstantial evidence of the parties' intent, but there is no fixed number of years that by itself creates a marriage.
In North Dakota, where common law marriage formation is not permitted at all, the point is especially clear. No period of cohabitation in North Dakota, whether seven years or forty years, creates a legal marriage without a license and ceremony. The seven-year figure has no basis in North Dakota law or in the law of any other state.
How a common law marriage ends
A valid common law marriage, wherever it was formed, can only be terminated by formal divorce proceedings or by the death of a spouse. There is no such thing as a common law divorce, and no informal act dissolves a legal marriage.

This rule has significant practical consequences for North Dakota residents. A person with a valid out-of-state common law marriage who moves to North Dakota and separates from the other party without filing for divorce remains legally married under North Dakota law. Attempting to marry a new partner in North Dakota without first obtaining a divorce would create a void or voidable second marriage.
North Dakota divorce proceedings for a valid common law marriage formed in another state follow the same rules as any other North Dakota divorce under N.D.C.C. chapter 14-05. The court applies North Dakota dissolution law to property, spousal support, and any parenting issues.
For more on the financial aspects of dissolving a marriage in North Dakota, see North Dakota alimony laws and North Dakota child support laws.
For a state-by-state comparison of which states recognize common law marriage, see Common law marriage by state.
Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about common law marriage recognition in North Dakota and is not legal advice. Marriage and family law determinations are fact-specific and depend on individual circumstances, including the law of the state where any claimed common law marriage was formed. This information was verified as of June 2, 2026. Consult a licensed North Dakota family law attorney for advice about your specific situation.
Last updated: June 2, 2026.
More North Dakota Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does North Dakota have common law marriage?
No. North Dakota has never recognized common law marriage formed within the state. N.D.C.C. 14-03-10 requires a valid license before solemnization, and N.D.C.C. 14-03-09 limits who may perform that ceremony. Because North Dakota never adopted the common law marriage doctrine, there is no grandfather cutoff date for North Dakota-formed unions.
Is 7 years of living together considered common law marriage in North Dakota?
No. This is a myth with no basis in law. No state, including North Dakota, sets a minimum number of years of cohabitation as a trigger for common law marriage. North Dakota does not allow common law marriage formation at all, so no period of cohabitation in the state creates a legal marriage without a license and ceremony.
Does North Dakota recognize a common law marriage from another state?
Yes. North Dakota recognizes a common law marriage that was validly formed in another state under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution and the principle of comity. A couple who formed a valid common law marriage in Colorado, Texas, Iowa, or another permitting state retains that marital status in North Dakota.
How do I prove a common law marriage in North Dakota that was formed in another state?
You must show that the marriage met all the requirements of the state where it was formed. Evidence courts consider includes joint tax returns filed as married, joint bank accounts, deeds or leases listing both parties as spouses, insurance policies naming the other party as a spouse, and testimony from people who knew the couple as married. Courts look at the totality of the evidence under the law of the state where the marriage was allegedly formed.
What states allow common law marriage that North Dakota would recognize?
As of 2026, the states that still allow formation of new common law marriages include Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma (with some contested recognition), Rhode Island, Texas (called informal marriage under Texas Family Code section 2.401), and Utah (requires a court order). The District of Columbia also recognizes common law marriage. A marriage validly formed in any of those jurisdictions will be recognized in North Dakota.
Does a common law marriage require a divorce to end in North Dakota?
Yes, if the common law marriage was validly formed in another state. A legal marriage, whether ceremonial or common law, can only be dissolved by divorce, annulment, or death. There is no informal dissolution. A person with a valid out-of-state common law marriage who moves to North Dakota must obtain a formal divorce before remarrying.
Can long-term cohabiting partners in North Dakota get marital rights without a marriage license?
No. North Dakota does not recognize any form of informal marriage, and there is no statewide domestic partnership registry for unmarried couples. Cohabiting partners, regardless of how long they have lived together or how they present themselves publicly, do not acquire marital rights in North Dakota without a valid marriage license and ceremony.
Updates
Corrected the description of Colorado's common-law-marriage test to reflect the Colorado Supreme Court's 2021 decision in Hogsett & Neale, which replaced the older reputation/cohabitation checklist with a two-part mutual-agreement-and-conduct standard, and fixed a dead Cornell Law citation link for the U.S. Constitution's Full Faith and Credit Clause.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected an overstated description of 28 U.S.C. 1738, which is a procedural authentication/evidence statute, not a substantive rule that compels recognition of an out-of-state marriage.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Dakota Century Code
§ 14-03-01What constitutes marriage - Spouse definedIn force
Marriage is a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between one man and one woman to which the consent of the parties is essential. The marriage relation may be entered into, maintained, annulled, or dissolved only as provided by law. A spouse refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 6 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2014
Leading cases:
- Cermak v. Cermak (North Dakota Supreme Court 1997, 569 N.W.2d 280)“…ota abrogated common-law marriages shortly after statehood. N.D.C.C. § 14-03-01 (Supp.1997) (providing only marriages e…”
- Botner v. Botner (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 545 N.W.2d 188)“…is a relationship personal to the parties of the marriage. N.D. Cent. Code § 14-03-01 . The divorce is between the parties, n…”
- Thorson v. Thorson (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 541 N.W.2d 692)“…is a relationship personal to the parties of the marriage. N.D.Cent.Code § 14-03-01. Under section 14-05-01, NDCC, Doris’s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 14-03-09Who may solemnize marriagesIn force
Marriages may be solemnized at any location within the state by: All judges of courts of record; Municipal judges; Recorders, unless the board of county commissioners designates a different official; Ordained ministers of the gospel, priests, and clergy, authorized by recognized denominations; and By any individual authorized by the rituals and practices of any religious persuasion.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
§ 14-03-10Marriage may not be solemnized without licenseIn force
A person may not solemnize any marriage until the parties to the marriage produce a license regularly issued not more than sixty days before the date of the marriage by: A recorder serving the county in which either of the contracting parties resides or is temporarily domiciled, unless the board of county commissioners designates a different official; A recorder serving the county in which a parent of either of the parties resides or is temporarily domiciled, unless the board of county commissioners designates a different official; or A recorder serving the county in which the marriage is to be solemnized, unless the board of county commissioners designates a different official. For the purpose of obtaining a marriage license, a member of the armed forces of the United States stationed within the state of North Dakota is deemed to reside in the county in which that person is stationed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Texas Family Code
§ 2.401PROOF OF INFORMAL MARRIAGEIn forcecited in 22 of our articles
(a) In a judicial, administrative, or other proceeding, the marriage of a man and woman may be proved by evidence that: (1) a declaration of their marriage has been signed as provided by this subchapter; or (2) the man and woman agreed to be married and after the agreement they lived together in this state as husband and wife and there represented to others that they were married. (b) If a proceeding in which a marriage is to be proved as provided by Subsection (a)(2) is not commenced before the second anniversary of the date on which the parties separated and ceased living together, it is rebuttably presumed that the parties did not enter into an agreement to be married. (c) A person under 18 years of age may not: (1) be a party to an informal marriage; or (2) execute a declaration of informal marriage under Section 2.402. (d) A person may not be a party to an informal marriage or execute a declaration of an informal marriage if the person is presently married to a person who is not the other party to the informal marriage or declaration of an informal marriage, as applicable.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 98 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Joplin v. Borusheski (2008) applied section 2.401(b): a suit filed over two years after separation raises a rebuttable presumption the parties never agreed to marry, which that proponent did not rebut. In Lan Ngoc Nguyen v. Dinh Duc Nguyen (2011) the 2.401(d) prior-marriage impediment was not proved, and that finding was reversed.
Leading cases:
- Lan Ngoc Nguyen v. Dinh Duc Nguyen (Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) 2011, 355 S.W.3d 82)✓A husband fought his wife's divorce petition by claiming an earlier Vietnamese marriage was an impediment under Section 2.401(d); the court found the proof of that prior marriage factually insufficient and remanded to decide the statute's three informal-marriage elements.
- Assoun v. Gustafson (Court of Appeals of Texas 2016, 493 S.W.3d 156)✓An ex-husband sued to have his former wife declared informally married to her boyfriend, ending his alimony; applying Section 2.401(a), the court affirmed summary judgment for the couple because their sworn denials of any agreement to marry defeated his circumstantial proof.
- Joplin v. Borusheski (Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) 2008, 244 S.W.3d 607)✓A man filed for divorce in 2005 claiming a common-law marriage, more than two years after the couple stopped living together; the court applied Section 2.401(b)'s rebuttable presumption of no agreement to marry and held his testimony failed to rebut it.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Common Law Marriage by State: Where It's Recognized (2026), Common Law Marriage in Arizona: Is It Recognized? (2026), Common Law Marriage in Arkansas: Is It Recognized? (2026)
United States Code Title 28
§ 1738State and Territorial statutes and judicial proceedings; full faith and creditIn force
The Acts of the legislature of any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States, or copies thereof, shall be authenticated by affixing the seal of such State, Territory or Possession thereto. The records and judicial proceedings of any court of any such State, Territory or Possession, or copies thereof, shall be proved or admitted in other courts within the United States and its Territories and Possessions by the attestation of the clerk and seal of the court annexed, if a seal exists, together with a certificate of a judge of the court that the said attestation is in proper form. Such Acts, records and judicial proceedings or copies thereof, so authenticated, shall have the same full faith and credit in every court within the United States and its Territories and Possessions as they have by law or usage in the courts of such State, Territory or Possession from which they are taken.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 5,810 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Hanson v. Denckla (Supreme Court of the United States 1958, 357 U.S. 235)“…ive to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 28 U. S. C. § 1738 . Even before passage of the Fourteenth…”
- Allen v. McCurry (Supreme Court of the United States 1980, 449 U.S. 90)“…hey have by law or usage in the courts of such State . . . 28 U. S. C. § 1738 . 8 Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincol…”
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education (Supreme Court of the United States 1984, 465 U.S. 75)“…implemented by the federal full faith and credit statute, 28 U. S. C. § 1738 . That statute reads in pertinent part:…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.D.C.C. 14-03-10 - Marriage may not be solemnized without license(ndlegis.gov)
- N.D.C.C. 14-03-09 - Who may solemnize marriages(ndlegis.gov)
- N.D.C.C. 14-03-01 - What constitutes marriage(ndlegis.gov)
- U.S. Constitution Art. IV Sec. 1 (Full Faith and Credit Clause)(law.cornell.edu)
- 28 U.S.C. 1738 - Full Faith and Credit(law.cornell.edu)
- Texas Family Code section 2.401, Informal Marriage. Texas Legislature(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov