Wyoming
Wyoming Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026)

Wyoming employers can monitor work email, phone lines, and computer systems under the federal wiretap law's business-use exception, and Wyoming's one-party consent rule lets a manager who takes part in a call record it without telling anyone else. Wyoming has not enacted any of the employee-monitoring-specific statutes some other states have: no monitoring-notice law, no social media password law, and no dedicated GPS tracking statute.
This article provides general legal information about Wyoming employee monitoring law as of July 9, 2026. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a Wyoming-licensed attorney about your specific situation.
Scope: This article covers Wyoming law on an employer's authority to monitor employees, access personal social media, and conduct workplace video, GPS, and biometric monitoring. It does not re-derive Wyoming's one-party consent recording rules (see our Wyoming recording laws guide and Wyoming workplace recording laws guide) or GPS law generally outside the employment context (see our Wyoming GPS tracking laws guide).
The Federal Baseline: the "Ordinary Course of Business" Exception
Wyoming's starting point for any workplace monitoring question is federal, not state, law. Title I of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act makes it unlawful to intentionally intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications without consent (, part of the Title I scheme at sections 2510-2523), but the statute excludes employer-furnished communications equipment from its definition of a covered device when that equipment is used in the ordinary course of business. Under this business-extension exemption, (5)(a), a doctrine courts have extended to employers who own the phone, email, and computer systems their staff use, monitoring communications on systems an employer furnishes for business use generally falls outside the Act's definition of an interception altogether.
The leading case applying this exception is Watkins v. L.M. Berry & Co., 704 F.2d 577 (11th Cir. 1983), where an employer monitored a sales line as part of a standing training program. The court held that once a monitored call is determined to be personal rather than business-related, the employer's ordinary-course exception generally ends, and continued listening can create liability.
The federal exception matters most where the employer is not itself a participant, such as automated review of stored email or internet-activity logs; a participating manager can already record under Wyoming's own one-party consent rule, Wyo. Stat. section 7-3-702(b)(iv), covered below.
Does Wyoming Require Notice Before Electronic Monitoring?
No. Connecticut, Delaware, New York, and (starting in 2026) Maine require employers to give employees written or posted notice before monitoring phone, email, or internet use on the job. Wyoming has not enacted a comparable statute for the general employment relationship.
One caution for anyone researching this topic: Wyoming does have a statute titled "Authorized Electronic Monitoring; Notice," Wyo. Stat. section 35-2-1304, but it has nothing to do with employers. It sits within Wyoming's Electronic Monitoring of Long-Term Care article and governs a nursing home or assisted-living resident's right to install a camera in the resident's own room, along with the facility's duty to accommodate that request. It is easy to mistake for an employee-monitoring law given its title, but it does not apply to the employer-employee relationship. A Wyoming employer can generally monitor employer-owned systems relying on the federal ordinary-course exception described above, without a state-mandated notice step.
Wyoming Has No Social Media Password Law
Unlike the 27 states that bar employers from demanding an employee's or applicant's social media username or password, including neighboring Colorado and Utah, Wyoming has not enacted a social media privacy statute for employees. A Wyoming employer is not prohibited by state law from asking a job applicant or current employee to disclose personal social media login credentials, require access to the account in the employer's presence, or add a supervisor as a connection.

That does not mean such a request carries no risk. An employer that accesses an employee's personal account and then uses information found there to make an adverse decision based on a protected characteristic, such as religion, disability, or family status revealed through social media, can still face liability under federal and state anti-discrimination law even though the underlying access itself is not separately regulated. Wyoming employees concerned about a specific request should document it and consult an employment attorney, since the analysis depends heavily on what the employer does with the information rather than on a monitoring-specific statute Wyoming does not have.
Video and Audio Surveillance in Wyoming Workplaces
Wyoming has no employment-specific video-surveillance statute, but general law still limits where a camera can point. Wyoming's voyeurism statute, Wyo. Stat. section 6-4-304, makes it unlawful to view another person in a clandestine or secretive manner in a place with a reasonable expectation of privacy, including restrooms, showers, dressing rooms, and bedrooms. The base offense is a misdemeanor, escalating to a felony, up to five years and a $5,000 fine, when committed by knowingly capturing an image with a camera or similar device. The Wyoming Supreme Court held in Kobielusz v. State, 2024 WY 10 (Wyo. Jan. 24, 2024), that the felony tier is satisfied by the act of capturing the image alone, with no need to prove anyone ever viewed the footage.
Cameras in common work areas, sales floors, warehouses, and entrances are generally permissible without a state-specific notice requirement. Audio recording of employees is governed separately by Wyoming's one-party consent rule under Wyo. Stat. section 7-3-702; recording conversations, as opposed to reviewing stored business communications, needs the consent structure that statute requires. Our Wyoming workplace recording guide covers an employee's own right to record at work in depth.
GPS and Vehicle Tracking of Wyoming Employees
Wyoming has not enacted a dedicated vehicle-tracking notice statute comparable to New Jersey's N.J. Stat. section 34:6B-22, and has no standalone criminal statute against merely placing a tracking device on a vehicle either. The relevant law is Wyoming's stalking statute, Wyo. Stat. section 6-2-506, which since a 2019 rewrite expressly lists "using any electronic, digital or global positioning system device or other electronic means to place another person under surveillance" without authorization as conduct supporting a stalking charge, when done with intent to harass.
Because the statute requires surveillance "without authorization from the other person," an employer that tracks a vehicle it owns has, as owner, already authorized that tracking, so ordinary fleet tracking of a company vehicle generally falls outside the statute regardless of advance notice. See our Wyoming GPS tracking laws guide for more on employer tracking, including what changes for an employee's own personal car.
Biometric Monitoring: Time Clocks and Wyoming's Data Privacy Gap
Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14, is the strongest biometric law nationally, requiring written consent before collection and creating a private right of action, but it does not apply outside Illinois, and Wyoming has no biometric consent statute of its own.

Wyoming also has no comprehensive consumer data privacy law of the kind California, Colorado, or Virginia have enacted, so it lacks even the general opt-in framework that indirectly touches employee biometric data elsewhere, usually with an employment-context exclusion anyway. Wyoming's data breach notification statute, Wyo. Stat. section 40-12-501, lists "unique biometric data used for authentication purposes" as one of twelve categories of protected personal identifying information, meaning a business must notify affected residents if that data is exposed in a breach. But the statute creates no requirement that an employer obtain consent, or even give notice, before collecting a fingerprint or face scan for a time clock. Wyoming employees are, practically speaking, protected mainly by employer policy and common-law privacy claims. See our Wyoming biometric privacy guide for the breach-notification rules.
What Wyoming Employees Can Do About Monitoring Concerns
Because Wyoming has not enacted most of the dedicated employee-monitoring statutes covered in this cluster, an employee's options depend more heavily on general law than in a state like Connecticut or Illinois. A camera in a restroom or locker room can support a report under Wyoming's voyeurism statute and, depending on the facts, a civil claim. Covert GPS tracking of an employee's own personal vehicle, as opposed to a company vehicle, can potentially support a stalking complaint under Wyo. Stat. section 6-2-506 if unauthorized and carried out with intent to harass.
Monitoring tied to a protected characteristic, retaliation for a workers' compensation claim, or interference with NLRA-protected concerted activity may fall under the Wyoming Department of Workforce Development or the National Labor Relations Board instead. Because Wyoming leans more heavily on federal law and common-law privacy claims than most states in this cluster, keep records (dates, what was monitored, any written policy) and consult a Wyoming-licensed employment attorney rather than assume a state statute covers the situation. For the broader 50-state picture, see our Employee Monitoring Laws by State hub and our general US recording laws guide.
Disclaimer
This article provides general legal information about Wyoming employee monitoring law as of July 9, 2026. It is not a substitute for individualized legal advice. Employment monitoring disputes often involve overlapping statutes, employer policy, and federal law, and outcomes depend on specific facts. Readers should consult an attorney licensed in Wyoming for advice about a particular situation.
Related articles
- Employee Monitoring Laws by State
- Wyoming Recording Laws
- Wyoming Workplace Recording Laws
- Wyoming GPS Tracking Laws
- Wyoming Biometric Privacy Laws
- US Recording Laws by State

Last updated: July 9, 2026. Statutes cited reflect their in-force version as of that date.
More Wyoming Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can my employer read my work email in Wyoming?
Generally yes, once the email is on an employer-owned system. Wyoming has no state notice statute for general electronic monitoring, so employers typically rely on the federal business-extension exemption in 18 U.S.C. section 2510(5)(a), which excludes employer-provided equipment used in the ordinary course of business from the Wiretap Act's definition of an interception device, to review company email and internet use.
Can my employer ask for my Facebook or Instagram password in Wyoming?
There is no state law stopping them. Wyoming is one of the minority of states that has not enacted a social media password protection statute for employees or applicants, unlike 27 other states.
Does Wyoming law require my employer to tell me I'm being monitored?
No. Wyoming has not enacted a general electronic-monitoring notice law like Connecticut, Delaware, New York, or Maine. A similarly titled statute, Wyo. Stat. section 35-2-1304, only covers cameras installed by residents in long-term care facility rooms and does not apply to employers.
Can my employer GPS track a company vehicle I drive in Wyoming?
Generally yes. Wyoming's stalking statute, Wyo. Stat. section 6-2-506, targets surveillance conducted without the tracked person's authorization. An employer that owns the vehicle has, as owner, authorized its own tracking, so ordinary company-vehicle GPS tracking is not stalking.
Can my employer put a camera in a Wyoming workplace restroom or locker room?
No. Wyoming's voyeurism statute, Wyo. Stat. section 6-4-304, prohibits viewing or recording someone without consent in a place with a reasonable expectation of privacy, and using a camera or recording device escalates the offense to a felony. This applies to employer-installed cameras just as it applies to anyone else.
Can my Wyoming employer require a fingerprint scan for the time clock?
Yes, with essentially no state-law restriction. Wyoming has no Illinois-style biometric consent statute and no comprehensive data privacy law. Its breach notification statute lists biometric data as protected information only in the event of a data breach, not as a consent requirement before collection.
Can I record my boss or an HR meeting in Wyoming?
Yes. As a one-party consent state under Wyo. Stat. section 7-3-702(b)(iv), you can record any conversation you participate in at work without telling anyone else, as long as your purpose is not criminal or tortious. Company no-recording policies may still lead to discipline for a policy violation even though the recording itself is legal.
What can I do if I think my employer is secretly tracking my personal vehicle in Wyoming?
Document the pattern of what you have found and when. If the vehicle is your own, not the employer's, and the tracking was placed without your authorization as part of a course of conduct intended to harass you, it can support a stalking complaint and a stalking protection order under Wyo. Stat. section 6-2-506 and Wyo. Stat. sections 7-3-506 through 7-3-512.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the employer 'ordinary course of business' monitoring doctrine, previously misattributed to 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(a)(i) (the service-provider exception), to its actual source: the business-extension exemption in 18 U.S.C. 2510(5)(a).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 7 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2510DefinitionsIn forcecited in 120 of our articles
As used in this chapter— “wire communication” means any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception (including the use of such connection in a switching station) furnished or operated by any person engaged in providing or operating such facilities for the transmission of interstate or foreign communications or communications affecting interstate or foreign commerce; “oral communication” means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation, but such term does not include any electronic communication; “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States; “intercept” means the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.1 So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,382 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527) · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services (Supreme Court of the United States 1977, 433 U.S. 425) · Gannett Co. v. DePasquale (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 443 U.S. 368)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, District of Columbia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Kentucky Phone Call Recording Laws: What You Need to Know
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 397 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-08-12 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511) · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297) · Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Audio Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties, Alabama Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use, Alabama Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Rules
Wyoming Statutes, Title 35 - Public Health and Safety - Chapter 2: Hospitals, Health Care Facilities and Health Services - Article 13: Electronic Monitoring of Long-term Care
§ 35-2-1304Authorized electronic monitoring; notice.In force
(a) Every facility where electronic monitoring devices are in use shall post and maintain a notice or signage in a conspicuous location at or near the facility's main entrances stating that electronic monitoring devices may be in use in or throughout the facility. (b) A facility shall post and maintain notice or signage in a conspicuous location at the entrance to each resident's room where an electronic monitoring device is being used. The notice or signage shall state that the resident's room is being monitored by an electronic monitoring device. (c) When electronic monitoring or security surveillance is used at a facility, upon admission or at any other necessary time as determined by the facility, a facility shall obtain the resident's or the resident's representative's signature on a form furnished by the department and provided to the resident or representative by the facility.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at wyoleg.gov
Wyoming Statutes, Title 40 - Trade and Commerce - Chapter 12: Consumer Protection - Article 5: Credit Freeze Reports
§ 40-12-501Definitions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) As used in this act: (i) "Breach of the security of the data system" means unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that materially compromises the security, confidentiality or integrity of personal identifying information maintained by a person or business and causes or is reasonably believed to cause loss or injury to a resident of this state. Good faith acquisition of personal identifying information by an employee or agent of a person or business for the purposes of the person or business is not a breach of the security of the data system, provided that the personal identifying information is not used or subject to further unauthorized disclosure; (ii) "Consumer" means any person who is utilizing or seeking credit for personal, family or household purposes; (iii) "Consumer reporting agency" means any person whose business is the assembling and evaluating of information as to the credit standing and credit worthiness of a consumer, for the purposes of furnishing credit reports, for monetary fees and dues to third parties; (iv) "Credit report" means any written or oral report, recommendation or representation of a consumer reporting agency as to the credit…
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at wyoleg.gov
Also relied on in: Wyoming Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026), Wyoming Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026)
Wyoming Statutes, Title 6 - Crimes and Offenses - Chapter 2: Offenses Against the Person - Article 5: Assault and Battery
§ 6-2-506Stalking; penalty.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) As used in this section: (i) "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose; (ii) "Harass" means to engage in a course of conduct, including but not limited to verbal threats, written threats, lewd or obscene statements or images, vandalism or nonconsensual physical contact, directed at a specific person that the defendant knew or should have known would cause: (A) A reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress; (B) A reasonable person to suffer substantial fear for their safety or the safety of another person; or (C) A reasonable person to suffer substantial fear for the destruction of their property.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 33 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Snow v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2009, 216 P.3d 505) · Law v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 2004, 98 P.3d 181) · Vit v. State (Wyoming Supreme Court 1996, 909 P.2d 953)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wyoming Statutes, Title 6 - Crimes and Offenses - Chapter 4: Offenses Against Morals, Decency and Family - Article 3: Obscenity
§ 6-4-304Voyeurism; penalties.In forcecited in 11 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months, a fine of not more than seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00), or both, if he, without the consent of the person being viewed, commits the crime of voyeurism by looking or viewing in a clandestine, surreptitious, prying or secretive nature into or within an area where the person being viewed has a reasonable expectation of privacy, including, but not limited to: (i) Restrooms; (ii) Baths; (iii) Showers; (iv) Dressing or fitting rooms; (v) Bedrooms; or (vi) Under the clothing being worn by another person, regardless of whether the person is in a place where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 5 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Shaun Thomas Kobielusz v. The State of Wyoming (Wyoming Supreme Court 2024, 541 P.3d 1101) · State, Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal Investigation v. Thomason (Wyoming Supreme Court 2008, 197 P.3d 144) · Howard v. Aspen Way Enterprises, Inc. (Wyoming Supreme Court 2017, 406 P.3d 1271)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wyoming Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2025
Wyoming Statutes, Title 7 - Criminal Procedure - Chapter 3: Fugitives and Prevention of Crime - Article 7: Communication Interception
§ 7-3-702Prohibition against interception or disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications; exceptions; penalties.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no person shall intentionally: (i) Intercept, attempt to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire, oral or electronic communication; (ii) Use, attempt to use, or procure any other person to use or attempt to use any electronic, mechanical or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (A) Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable or other like connection used in wire communication; or (B) Such device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of such communication.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at wyoleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2015
Leading cases: Serna v. Bureau of Land Management Worland Field Office (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2015, 614 F. App'x 384)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wyoming Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Guide, Wyoming Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules and Consent Guide
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-702, Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications (one-party consent at subsection (b)(iv))(wyoleg.gov).gov
- Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-506, Stalking; penalty(wyoleg.gov).gov
- Wyo. Stat. § 6-4-304, Voyeurism; penalties(wyoleg.gov).gov
- Wyo. Stat. § 35-2-1304, Authorized electronic monitoring; notice (long-term care facility resident rooms, not an employment statute)(wyoleg.gov).gov
- Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-501, Definitions (data breach notification; unique biometric data as protected personal identifying information)(wyoleg.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. section 2510(5)(a), Electronic Communications Privacy Act (business-extension exemption for employer-provided communications equipment used in the ordinary course of business)(uscode.house.gov).gov
- Watkins v. L.M. Berry & Co., 704 F.2d 577 (11th Cir. 1983)(law.resource.org)
- Kobielusz v. State, 2024 WY 10 (Wyo. Jan. 24, 2024)(wyocourts.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 2511 – Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited(uscode.house.gov).gov