South Carolina
South Carolina Child Custody Laws: 17 Best-Interests Factors and Your Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

South Carolina courts decide child custody by applying the best interests of the child standard under S.C. Code 63-15-230, weighing up to 17 statutory factors listed in 63-15-240. The state has no presumption of joint custody.
How does South Carolina decide child custody?
South Carolina Family Court decides custody by applying the best interests of the child standard codified in S.C. Code 63-15-230. Section 63-15-240(B) directs the court to consider the child's best interest and says that inquiry "may include, but is not limited to" 17 listed factors, so the list is illustrative and a judge can weigh additional circumstances that bear on the child's welfare. Before the court reaches that decision, S.C. Code 63-15-220(A) requires each parent, at every temporary hearing where custody is contested, to prepare, file, and submit a parenting plan covering parental preferences, the allocation of parenting time, and major decisions such as education, medical and dental care, extracurricular activities, and religious training. Parents may instead file a joint plan, and either party may file an updated plan at the final hearing. The court issues temporary and final custody orders only after considering these plans, although a party's failure to file one does not stop the court from issuing an order. South Carolina Family Court has exclusive jurisdiction over custody matters arising from divorce or separation proceedings. Judges have broad discretion in how they weigh the factors, and appellate courts defer to those findings unless the record shows a clear abuse of discretion. The parties can also reach a private custody agreement, which the court will approve if it serves the child's best interests.
Types of custody in South Carolina
South Carolina uses the standard custody framework. Legal custody is the authority to make major decisions about a child's upbringing, including choices about schooling, medical care, and religious practice. Physical custody determines where the child lives on a day-to-day basis and which parent provides daily care. Both legal and physical custody can be sole (held by one parent) or joint (shared by both). A common arrangement is joint legal custody, where both parents share decision-making authority, combined with primary physical custody in one home and scheduled parenting time for the other parent. A court can order any combination that it finds best serves the child.

Does South Carolina presume joint or 50/50 custody?
South Carolina does not presume joint custody. When parents cannot agree, the court must consider whether a joint arrangement would be in the child's best interests, but it is not required to order one. A judge weighs the relevant statutory factors, including each parent's willingness to cooperate and to support the child's relationship with the other parent, before deciding whether joint or sole custody better serves the child. South Carolina is not a 50/50-by-default state. Equal parenting time is a possible outcome if the facts support it, but it is the result of a careful case-by-case analysis, not a starting presumption.
Before proposing a schedule in a South Carolina case, the parenting-time calculator can convert an overnight count into a percentage and show its likely effect on support.
The best interests factors South Carolina courts weigh
S.C. Code 63-15-240(B) directs the court to consider the child's best interest, an inquiry the statute says "may include, but is not limited to" these 17 items:
- Temperament and developmental needs of the child. The court assesses the child's personality, age, and what kind of caregiving environment best fits those needs.
- Capacity and disposition of each parent to meet the child's needs. Whether each parent can understand and meet the child's emotional, developmental, educational, and special needs.
- Child's preference. The court considers each child's preference, with the weight given increasing as the child matures and demonstrates sufficient judgment.
- Wishes of the parents as to custody. What each parent is asking for in the custody arrangement.
- The child's relationships. The child's past and current relationship with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the child's best interest.
- Encouragement of the parent-child relationship. Each parent's actions to encourage the child's continuing relationship with the other parent, as appropriate, including compliance with court orders.
- Coercive or manipulative behavior. A parent's manipulation or coercive behavior aimed at involving the child in the parents' dispute weighs heavily against that parent.
- Disparagement. Whether a parent makes derogatory remarks about the other parent in the child's presence.
- Ability to be actively involved. Each parent's ability to be actively involved in the child's life.
- Adjustment to home, school, and community. How well the child is currently adjusted and the likely effect of any change on that adjustment.
- Stability of residences. The stability of the child's existing home and any proposed new residence.
- Mental and physical health of all parties. The mental and physical condition of everyone involved. A disability of a parent seeking custody is not, by itself, determinative unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the child's best interest.
- Cultural and spiritual background. The child's cultural identity and any spiritual or religious upbringing the parents wish to provide.
- Abuse or neglect. Whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected, which the court treats as a serious negative factor.
- Domestic violence. Whether a parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse, or the effect on the child of an abuser's actions. Separately from this factor, S.C. Code 63-15-40 requires the court to give weight to evidence of domestic violence, as explained in the next section.
- Relocation over 100 miles. Whether a parent has relocated more than 100 miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons.
- Any other relevant factor. The list is non-exhaustive; the court can consider anything else that bears on the child's welfare.
Domestic violence and custody in South Carolina
Domestic violence is not only one item on the best-interests list. S.C. Code 63-15-40(A) imposes a separate command: in making a custody decision, "in addition to other existing factors specified by law, the court must give weight to evidence of domestic violence" as defined in S.C. Code 16-25-20 or 16-25-65, including physical or sexual abuse and, if appropriate, evidence of which party was the primary aggressor under S.C. Code 16-25-70. The statute directs the court to give that evidence weight; it does not declare that domestic violence automatically overrides every other consideration.
Section 63-15-40(B) protects a parent who leaves. It provides that the absence or relocation from the home by a person against whom domestic violence has been perpetrated, if that person is not the primary aggressor, "must not be considered by the court to be sufficient cause, absent other factors, to deny custody of the minor child to that person." A survivor who moves out for safety is not, on that basis alone, forfeiting a custody claim. That protection sits alongside factor 16, which itself excepts a relocation made for safety reasons.
S.C. Code 63-15-50 governs visitation where domestic violence has been found. A court may award visitation to a person found to have committed domestic violence, or found to be the primary aggressor, only if it finds that adequate provision can be made for the safety of the child and the victim. The court may order exchanges in a protected setting, supervised visitation, completion of a batterer intervention program or counseling, abstinence from alcohol or controlled substances around visitation, a bond against unlawful retention of the child, or no overnight visitation, and it may keep the child's and the victim's address confidential. Under 63-15-50(F), the court must order the offending party to pay the actual cost of medical or psychological treatment for a child injured by acts of domestic violence.
Relocation: moving with your child in South Carolina
South Carolina has no standalone relocation statute setting out a notice-and-hearing procedure, but relocation appears in the code in two distinct places. Factor 16 of S.C. Code 63-15-240(B) identifies a parent's relocation of more than 100 miles from the child's primary residence within the past year as one of the illustrative best-interests factors, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons. Separately, S.C. Code 63-3-530(A)(30) limits the family court's own order-making power: the court "may not issue an order which prohibits a custodial parent from moving his residence to a location within the State unless the court finds a compelling reason or unless the parties have agreed to such a prohibition." In other words, an in-state move by a custodial parent cannot be barred by court order absent a compelling reason or an agreement, while a move of more than 100 miles still feeds into the best-interests analysis. A relocation of that distance can also qualify as a substantial change in circumstances, which would open the door to a full modification review. The relocating parent is not automatically prohibited from moving, but if the move materially disrupts the custody arrangement, the other parent can seek a modification hearing. Courts analyze whether the proposed move serves a legitimate reason, how it affects the child's relationships, and what revised parenting-time schedule could preserve both parent-child bonds.

Changing a custody order (modification)
A South Carolina custody order can be modified only when the requesting parent demonstrates a substantial change in circumstances affecting the child's welfare since the prior order was entered, and then shows that modification serves the child's best interests under the 17-factor analysis. The bar is intentionally high to promote stability for the child. Courts do not revisit custody simply because a parent is unhappy with the outcome or wishes for more time. Significant changes such as a parent's relocation of more than 100 miles, a change in the child's school needs, documented abuse, or a dramatic shift in a parent's ability to care for the child are the types of circumstances that can clear the threshold.
For related financial matters, see South Carolina's child support laws and alimony laws.
If you are facing a custody case in South Carolina
Prepare a parenting plan, because filing one is required, not optional. Under S.C. Code 63-15-220(A), at every temporary hearing where custody is contested each parent must prepare, file, and submit a parenting plan to the court, and the court issues temporary and final custody orders only after considering those plans. Failing to file does not stop the judge from ruling, so a parent who skips it simply gives up the chance to shape the order. The plan must reflect parental preferences, the allocation of parenting time, and major decisions such as education, medical and dental care, extracurricular activities, and religious training. Beyond the bare requirement, a detailed plan helps: South Carolina Family Court is more receptive to parents who demonstrate they have thought through the child's daily schedule, school pickups, medical appointments, and holiday arrangements than to parents who simply ask for maximum custody without a concrete proposal. Either party may file an updated plan at the final hearing.

Document your existing involvement in the child's life with school records, medical records, photos, and calendars. Factor 9, each parent's ability to be actively involved in the child's life, rewards documented, active involvement; records matter far more than assertions.
Keep communication with the other parent businesslike and child-focused. Disparagement (factor 8) and coercive or manipulative behavior (factor 7) are independent negative factors; text messages and emails that show a pattern of bad-mouthing the other parent can be used against you at trial. Mediation is widely used in South Carolina Family Court and frequently produces agreements that avoid a contested hearing. In a contested dispute, ask a South Carolina family lawyer for a free case evaluation on your parenting plan and the factors in play (attorney advertising).
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Child custody law varies by state and turns on the specific facts of each family. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed family-law attorney in South Carolina.
Related pages: Child Custody Laws by State (hub) | South Carolina Child Support Laws | South Carolina Alimony Laws | South Carolina Emancipation Laws
More South Carolina Laws
- South Carolina Alimony Laws
- South Carolina Child Support Laws
- South Carolina Divorce Laws
- South Carolina Emancipation Laws
- South Carolina Restraining Order Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How is child custody determined in South Carolina?
South Carolina courts apply the best interests of the child standard under S.C. Code 63-15-230, weighing up to 17 non-exhaustive statutory factors listed in 63-15-240. The court has broad discretion to emphasize whichever factors are most relevant to the specific family.
Does South Carolina favor the mother in custody cases?
No. South Carolina custody law is entirely gender-neutral. The tender-years doctrine that once presumed mothers were better suited to raise young children has been abolished. Fathers and mothers are evaluated equally under the same 17-factor framework.
Is South Carolina a 50/50 custody state?
No. South Carolina has no presumption of joint or equal custody. When a case is contested, the court must consider joint custody but is not required to order it. Equal parenting time is possible if the facts support it but results from a case-by-case analysis, not a default rule.
At what age can a child choose which parent to live with in South Carolina?
There is no fixed age in South Carolina law. Child preference is one of the 17 statutory factors, and courts give it increasing weight as the child grows older and shows sound judgment. A teenager's well-reasoned preference is meaningful but is weighed alongside the other 16 factors.
How do I change a custody order in South Carolina?
You must prove a substantial change in circumstances affecting the child's welfare since the last order was entered, then show that modification serves the child's best interests under the 17 statutory factors. Routine dissatisfaction or a desire for more time is not sufficient without an underlying change.
Can a parent move away with the child in South Carolina?
South Carolina does not have a standalone relocation statute, but relocation appears in the code twice. A move of more than 100 miles is listed as one of the best-interests factors under S.C. Code 63-15-240(B)(16), unless the parent relocated for safety reasons, and it can also constitute a substantial change in circumstances that supports a modification hearing. Separately, S.C. Code 63-3-530(A)(30) provides that the family court may not issue an order prohibiting a custodial parent from moving to a location within South Carolina unless the court finds a compelling reason or the parties agreed to such a prohibition.
Does leaving the home because of domestic violence hurt my custody case in South Carolina?
Not by itself. S.C. Code 63-15-40(B) provides that the absence or relocation from the home by a person against whom domestic violence has been perpetrated, if that person is not the primary aggressor, must not be treated as sufficient cause, absent other factors, to deny that person custody. Section 63-15-40(A) also requires the court to give weight to evidence of domestic violence, and factor 16 of the best-interests list excepts a relocation made for safety reasons.
What is the difference between legal and physical custody in South Carolina?
Legal custody is the authority to make major decisions about the child's education, healthcare, and religious upbringing. Physical custody determines where the child lives and who provides daily care. Both can be sole or joint, in any combination the court determines best serves the child.
Updates
Added South Carolina’s mandatory parenting-plan filing requirement and its standalone domestic-violence custody provisions, corrected the claim that the 100-mile factor is the only relocation reference in the code, and conformed the description of the 17 best-interest factors to the statute’s permissive wording.
Clarified that the 17 items in South Carolina’s best-interests statute are illustrative rather than a required checklist, and re-verified the parenting-plan, domestic-violence and relocation provisions against the current statutory text.
Added the statutory safety-reasons exception to the relocation factor (S.C. Code 63-15-240(B)(16)) everywhere it appeared, since the page previously stated a parent's 100-mile relocation counts against them with no exception even when the move was for safety. Also rebuilt the 17-factor best-interests list to match the statute's own numbering and wording: restored the omitted 'wishes of the parents as to custody' factor, corrected a mischaracterized caregiving factor to its actual forward-looking wording, folded a wrongly standalone 'sibling relationships' item back into the statute's combined relationships factor (which also names grandparents), and restored the disability non-discrimination clause on the mental/physical-health factor.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 63: SOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S CODE
§ 63-15-230Final custody determination; considerationsIn force
(A) The court shall make the final custody determination in the best interest of the child based upon the evidence presented. (B) The court may award joint custody to both parents or sole custody to either parent. (C) If custody is contested or if either parent seeks an award of joint custody, the court shall consider all custody options, including, but not limited to, joint custody, and, in its final order, the court shall state its determination as to custody and shall state its reasoning for that decision. (D) Notwithstanding the custody determination, the court may allocate parenting time in the best interest of the child.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-05 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
§ 63-15-240Contents of order for custody affecting rights and responsibilities of parents; best interests of the childIn force
(A) In issuing or modifying an order for custody affecting the rights and responsibilities of the parents, the order may include, but is not limited to: (1) the approval of a parenting plan; (2) the award of sole custody to one parent with appropriate parenting time for the noncustodial parent; (3) the award of joint custody, in which case the order must include: (a) residential arrangements with each parent in accordance with the needs of each child; and (b) how consultations and communications between the parents will take place, generally and specifically, with regard to major decisions concerning the child's health, medical and dental care, education, extracurricular activities, and religious training; (4) other custody arrangements as the court may determine to be in the best interest of the child.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Klein v. Barrett (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2019, 427 S.C. 74)“…ents to understand and meet the needs of the child[ren]." S.C. Code Ann. § 63-15-240 (B) (Supp. 2018). According to our d…”
- Tyrus Clark v. Amika Clark (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2025)“…determining what is in the best interest of the child. See S.C. Code Ann.§ 63-15-240 (B). Inherent in several of those facto…”
- Khalil Abbas-Ghaleb v. Anna Ghaleb (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2024)“…C. 252, 260, 758 S.E.2d 206, 210 (Ct. App. 2014); see also S.C. Code Ann. § 63-15-240(B) (Supp. 2023) (providing a non-exhaus…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 63-3-530Jurisdiction in domestic mattersIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
(A) The family court has exclusive jurisdiction: (1) to hear and determine matters which come within the provisions of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act; (2) to hear and determine actions for divorce a vinculo matrimonii, separate support and maintenance, legal separation, and in other marital litigation between the parties, and for settlement of all legal and equitable rights of the parties in the actions in and to the real and personal property of the marriage and attorney's fees, if requested by either party in the pleadings; (3) to hear and determine actions for and related to the adoption of children and adults; (4) to hear and determine actions for termination of parental rights, whether such action is in connection with an action for adoption or apart therefrom; (5) (Reserved) (6) to hear and determine actions for the annulment of marriage; (7) (Reserved) (8) to hear and determine actions for changing names, whether in connection with a divorce or a separate support and maintenance action or apart therefrom; (9) to hear and determine actions for the correction of birth records; (10) to consent to the enlistment of a minor in the military service or the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 73 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):South Carolina courts use this section's exclusive-jurisdiction list to fix which court may act. Brown v. Sojourner (2018) held a circuit court had no subject matter jurisdiction to relitigate an annulment, and Wardlaw v. S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. (2019) held the family court could order DSS to remove a name from the child abuse Registry.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Clark v. Clark (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2018, 815 S.E.2d 772)✓A mother challenged the joint-custody award for her daughter after a contested divorce. Citing section 63-3-530(A)(42) as the family court's authority to order joint custody in a child's best interests, the court found exceptional circumstances and affirmed the award.
- Randall Seels v. Joe Smalls (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2022)“…urt are set forth in the South Carolina Code. See generally S.C. Code Ann. § 63-3-530 (2010 & Supp. 2021) (family court); S.C…”
- Murphy v. Collins (In re Fields) (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2018, 424 S.C. 627)“…es not vanish just because public assistance appears. See S.C. Code § 63-3-530(A)(14) (2010) (empowering the family co…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Emancipation Laws: How Minors Become Emancipated in South Carolina (2026), South Carolina Child Support Laws (2026): Guidelines & Calculator, South Carolina Grandparents' Rights: Visitation and Custody Laws
§ 63-15-220Parenting plansIn force
(A) At all temporary hearings where custody is contested, each parent must prepare, file, and submit to the court a parenting plan, which reflects parental preferences, the allocation of parenting time to be spent with each parent, and major decisions, including, but not limited to, the child's education, medical and dental care, extracurricular activities and religious training. However, the parties may elect to prepare, file, and submit a joint parenting plan. The court shall issue temporary and final custody orders only after considering these parenting plans; however, the failure by a party to submit a parenting plan to the court does not preclude the court from issuing a temporary or final custody order. (B) At the final hearing, either party may file and submit an updated parenting plan for the court's consideration. (C) The South Carolina Supreme Court shall develop rules and forms for the implementation of the parenting plan.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
§ 63-15-40Consideration of domestic violenceIn force
(A) In making a decision regarding custody of a minor child, in addition to other existing factors specified by law, the court must give weight to evidence of domestic violence as defined in Section 16-25-20 or Section 16-25-65 including, but not limited to: (1) physical or sexual abuse; and (2) if appropriate, evidence of which party was the primary aggressor, as defined in Section 16-25-70. (B) The absence or relocation from the home by a person, against whom an act of domestic violence has been perpetrated, if that person is not the primary aggressor, must not be considered by the court to be sufficient cause, absent other factors, to deny custody of the minor child to that person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2012
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hines v. Hines (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2012)“…required in resolving custody issues. Id. (citing S.C. Code Ann. § 63-15-40 (Supp. 2008) (formerly S.C. Code An…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 63-15-50Domestic violence and visitation; payment for treatmentIn force
(A) A court may award visitation to a person who has been found by a general sessions, magistrates, municipal, or family court to have committed domestic violence, as defined in Section 16-25-20 or Section 16-25-65, or in cases in which complaints were made against both parties, to the person found by a general sessions, magistrates, municipal, or family court to be the primary aggressor under Section 16-25-70, only if the court finds that adequate provision for the safety of the child and the victim of domestic violence can be made.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES
§ 16-25-20Acts prohibited; penaltiesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) It is unlawful to: (1) cause physical harm or injury to a person's own household member; or (2) offer or attempt to cause physical harm or injury to a person's own household member with apparent present ability under circumstances reasonably creating fear of imminent peril. (B) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person commits the offense of domestic violence in the first degree if the person violates the provisions of subsection (A) and: (1) great bodily injury to the person's own household member results or the act is accomplished by means likely to result in great bodily injury to the person's own household member; (2) the person violates a protection order and in the process of violating the order commits domestic violence in the second degree; (3) has two or more prior convictions of domestic violence within ten years of the current offense; (4) the person uses a firearm in any manner while violating the provisions of subsection (A); or (5) in the process of committing domestic violence in the second degree one of the following also results: (a) the offense is committed in the presence of, or while being perceived by a minor; (b) the offense is…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Clemons (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2024)“…along with its general criminal domestic violence statute, S.C. Code Ann § 16-25-20 (2015 & Supp. 2023), was enacted in 201…”
- State v. Olandio R. Workman (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2022)“…circumstances reasonably creating fear of imminent peril." S.C. Code Ann. § 16-25-20(A) (Supp. 2021). A defendant is guilty…”
- Doe v. State (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2017)“…ormerly have cohabited." (Emphasis added.) 10 See, e.g., S.C. Code Ann. § 16-25-20 (Supp. 2017) (providing: (1) enhanced p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-25-70Warrantless arrest or search; admissibility of evidenceIn force
(A) A law enforcement officer may arrest, with or without a warrant, a person at the person's place of residence or elsewhere if the officer has probable cause to believe that the person is committing or has freshly committed a misdemeanor or felony pursuant to the provisions of Section 16-25-20, 16-25-65, or 16-25-125, even if the act did not take place in the presence of the officer. The officer may, if necessary, verify the existence of probable cause related to a violation pursuant to the provisions of this chapter by telephone or radio communication with the appropriate law enforcement agency. A law enforcement agency must complete an investigation of an alleged violation of this chapter even if the law enforcement agency was not notified at the time the alleged violation occurred. The investigation must be documented on an incident report form which must be maintained by the investigating agency. If an arrest warrant is sought, the law enforcement agency must present the results of the investigation and any other relevant evidence to a magistrate who may issue an arrest warrant if probable cause is established.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Mitchell (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2009)“…probable cause to arrest Mitchell was developed. See S.C. Code Ann. § 16-25-70 (A) (Supp. 2008) (providing that a la…”
- Rivero v. Loftis (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2018)“…ity is on the governmental entity asserting the defense."); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-25-70(I) (2015) ("In addition to the protecti…”
- Kristen Decina v. Horry County Police Department (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2023)“…South Carolina’s Criminal Domestic Violence statute, S.C. Code Ann. § 16-25-70 (the “CDV” statute), states th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- S.C. Code 63-15-230 and 63-15-240 (Custody; 17 Factors)(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code 63-15-300 et seq. (UCCJEA)(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code 63-3-530(A)(30) (Family court jurisdiction; limit on orders barring an in-state move by a custodial parent)(scstatehouse.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.