Oregon
Oregon Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Oregon is an at-fault (tort) state with mandatory add-on Personal Injury Protection (PIP), and it follows modified-51 comparative fault under ORS 31.600, meaning you retain the right to sue the at-fault driver for all damages but are barred from recovery if you are 51% or more at fault.
Is Oregon a no-fault or at-fault state?
Oregon is an at-fault (tort) state, but with a mandatory "add-on" PIP layer that makes it distinct from the 12 traditional no-fault states. Under ORS 742.520-742.524, every private-passenger auto liability policy issued in Oregon must include PIP benefits that pay the injured party's own medical expenses, wage-loss, and essential-services losses regardless of who caused the crash. After you collect PIP, you then pursue the at-fault driver's liability insurance for all remaining losses, including pain and suffering. There is no verbal or monetary threshold to satisfy before suing for non-economic damages. You can seek full compensation from the at-fault driver from the first dollar of loss. Oregon's PIP insurer retains reimbursement and inter-insurer recovery rights against the at-fault driver's insurer under ORS 742.534-742.544.
The key distinction from a true no-fault state is that Oregon preserves the full tort right. An injured motorist in Massachusetts or Michigan must meet a serious-injury threshold before suing. An injured motorist in Oregon faces no such barrier. PIP is a first-party benefit that speeds up early medical payment; it does not replace or limit the right to sue the person responsible for the accident.
How fault is shared: Oregon's negligence rule
Oregon follows modified-51 comparative fault under ORS 31.600. This rule has two consequences. First, if you are partially at fault for the accident, your total damages award is reduced in proportion to your own percentage of fault. If a jury finds your damages are $100,000 and you were 30% at fault, you recover $70,000. Second, if you are found 51% or more at fault, you receive nothing. The cutoff is at the majority-fault line: a party who is exactly 50% at fault can still recover the other 50%; a party who is 51% at fault is completely barred.

This is not Oregon's most permissive possible rule. Under pure comparative fault (used by California and a handful of other states), a plaintiff who is 99% at fault could still recover 1% of damages. Oregon draws a harder line. For practical purposes, comparative fault disputes are central to many Oregon car accident claims. Insurers frequently argue that the injured party bears some share of fault to reduce the payout, so documenting the other driver's negligence thoroughly from the scene forward is critical.
Minimum car insurance in Oregon
Every motor vehicle operated in Oregon must carry at least the mandatory minimum liability limits set by ORS 806.070(2): $25,000 bodily injury or death per person; $50,000 bodily injury or death per accident (when two or more people are injured); and $20,000 property damage per accident, often written as 25/50/20. Note that Oregon's property-damage minimum is $20,000, which is lower than many states' $25,000 floor. These limits fulfill the Financial Responsibility Law under ORS chapter 806, and proof of insurance is required to register and operate a vehicle in the state.
On top of liability coverage, every Oregon policy must include at least $15,000 in PIP medical coverage per person (ORS 742.524), along with wage-loss and essential-services benefits, payable regardless of fault.
Uninsured motorist (UM) coverage is mandatory, not optional (ORS 742.502). It must be included on every motor-vehicle bodily-injury liability policy at limits matching the policy's liability limits, unless the named insured elects lower limits in writing, and the limits can never fall below the 25/50 statutory minimum. Underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage is a required part of that UM coverage under ORS 742.502(2)(a).
SB 411 (Oregon Laws 2015, chapter 5) changed how UIM pays out. ORS 742.504(7) now lists the only amounts that can reduce what your UIM coverage owes: payments made or payable under a workers' compensation law, disability benefits law or similar law under subsection (7)(b), and a credit the insurer earns under subsection (7)(c). Subsection (7)(d) goes further and provides that the amount payable may not be reduced by liability proceeds that were offered but never paid to the injured person.
The at-fault driver's liability payment is not on that list, so UIM sits on top of it rather than being subtracted from it. If the at-fault driver pays a $25,000 liability limit and you carry $100,000 in UIM, your UIM limit is not cut to $75,000, so total recovery on a large enough claim can exceed the UIM limit standing alone. That is the change from the older difference-in-limits approach, which credited the liability payment against the UIM limit.
This is not the same thing as stacking. Stacking means combining the limits of more than one policy or more than one insured vehicle, and Oregon does not require insurers to permit it.
How long you have to file: the statute of limitations
Oregon gives injury victims two years from the date of injury to file a personal-injury lawsuit, including claims arising from a car accident, under ORS 12.110(1). The clock generally starts on the date of the crash, though the discovery rule can delay the start in limited circumstances where the injury was not immediately apparent. Missing the two-year deadline will almost certainly result in dismissal and the loss of any right to recovery.

Property damage claims follow a longer timeline: Oregon's general 6-year statute of limitations under ORS 12.080 applies to property-damage losses. If you totaled your car but were not injured, you have more time, but waiting is still inadvisable because evidence deteriorates and witnesses become harder to locate.
An absolute 10-year statute of repose for negligent injury applies under ORS 12.115, which can cut off even latent-injury claims more than a decade after the negligent act.
Claims against government defendants, such as a crash involving a government-owned vehicle driven by a state employee, require a separate step: you must serve a tort-claim notice within 180 days of the injury under the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS 30.275. Failure to file the notice within that window bars the claim entirely, regardless of how strong the underlying case may be. If a government entity was involved in your crash, consult an attorney immediately so the notice deadline is not missed.
For more on Oregon-specific filing deadlines, see the Oregon statute of limitations page.
What an Oregon car accident claim is worth
Damages in an Oregon car accident claim fall into two broad categories. Economic damages cover objectively verifiable financial losses: medical bills (past and future), lost wages, reduced earning capacity, vehicle repair or replacement, and out-of-pocket expenses. Non-economic damages cover losses that are real but harder to quantify: physical pain, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and disfigurement. Oregon does not cap non-economic damages in an ordinary automobile personal-injury claim, so the amount depends on the severity of the injury, the quality of medical documentation, and the persuasiveness of the evidence. Two statutory limits do still exist, though, and an insurer can raise them. ORS 31.710(1) caps non-economic damages at $500,000 in a claim for wrongful death, and a 2021 amendment (Oregon Laws 2021, chapter 478) narrowed that section so it now reaches only wrongful-death claims. Separately, ORS 31.715 bars a plaintiff from recovering non-economic damages at all if the plaintiff was driving uninsured (ORS 806.010) or under the influence of intoxicants (ORS 813.010) when the crash occurred. That bar has its own exceptions in ORS 31.715(5) and (6), including where the defendant was also uninsured or intoxicated, where the defendant committed an intentional tort or was reckless driving under ORS 811.140, and where the plaintiff was insured within the 180 days before the crash.
Oregon's modified-51 comparative fault rule directly affects the value of your claim. If the insurer can successfully argue that you were partly at fault (for speeding, failing to brake, or not wearing a seatbelt), your award is reduced proportionally. In practice, settlement negotiations often center on the fault split, not just the medical bills.
Insurance limits are the practical ceiling in most cases. Even a strong claim is capped by the at-fault driver's liability policy if the driver carried only Oregon's mandatory 25/50/20 minimums. UM/UIM coverage and your own PIP layer become critical when the at-fault driver is underinsured or uninsured. You can use the Oregon car accident settlement calculator to get a general sense of how common injury scenarios play out given Oregon's fault and damages rules.
What to do after a car accident in Oregon
The steps you take in the hours and days after a crash directly affect your ability to recover full compensation.

First, make sure everyone is safe and move out of traffic if possible without worsening any injuries. Call 911. A police report creates an official record of the crash, which is foundational evidence in any claim.
Exchange insurance and contact information with every driver involved. Document the scene thoroughly: photograph damage to all vehicles, road conditions, skid marks, traffic control signs, and any visible injuries. Gather names and contact information for witnesses before they leave.
Seek medical attention even if you feel fine. Some injuries, including soft-tissue injuries and concussions, do not produce severe symptoms immediately. A same-day or next-day medical record ties your injuries to the crash date and prevents the insurer from arguing the harm was caused by something else.
Report the crash to your own insurer as required by your policy. Your PIP coverage begins paying your medical expenses and wage losses without waiting for a fault determination, which can provide critical financial relief during recovery.
If the at-fault driver's insurer calls with an offer, let an Oregon car accident lawyer look at it in a free claim review (attorney advertising). Insurance adjusters may contact you quickly with an offer that sounds reasonable but is calculated to close your claim before the full extent of your injuries and future medical costs is clear. Oregon's 2-year statute of limitations gives you time to make an informed decision, and a signed release is final.
Related Oregon resources: Oregon hit-and-run laws | Oregon car accident settlement calculator | Car accident laws by state hub
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Car accident law varies by state and changes, and settlement values depend on the specific facts. For advice about a specific crash, consult a licensed attorney in Oregon.
More Oregon Laws
- Oregon Dashcam Laws
- Oregon Hit and Run Laws
- Oregon Slip and Fall Laws
- Oregon Statute of Limitations
- Oregon Workers Compensation Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Oregon a no-fault state?
No. Oregon is an at-fault (tort) state. You have the right to sue the driver who caused your accident for all damages, including pain and suffering, with no injury threshold to satisfy. Oregon does require mandatory add-on PIP coverage that pays your own medical and wage-loss benefits first regardless of fault, but this does not make Oregon a no-fault state; your tort rights against the at-fault driver are fully preserved.
Is Oregon an at-fault state?
Yes. Oregon is an at-fault state, meaning the driver who caused the accident is legally responsible for the victims' injuries and losses. Injured parties file claims against the at-fault driver's liability insurance. Oregon's mandatory add-on PIP is layered on top of this tort system to provide immediate medical payment, but it does not replace the right to sue the at-fault driver for full compensation.
What is the statute of limitations for a car accident in Oregon?
Two years from the date of injury for personal-injury claims (ORS 12.110(1)). Property-damage claims have a 6-year limit under ORS 12.080. If a government vehicle was involved, you must also file a tort-claim notice within 180 days of the injury under ORS 30.275; missing that notice deadline bars the claim.
Can I still recover if I was partly at fault in Oregon?
Yes, as long as you are 50% or less at fault. Oregon's modified-51 comparative fault rule (ORS 31.600) reduces your damages by your percentage of fault but only bars recovery entirely if you are 51% or more at fault. For example, if you were 25% at fault and your total damages are $80,000, you recover $60,000.
What are the minimum insurance requirements in Oregon?
Oregon requires 25/50/20 minimum liability limits: $25,000 bodily injury per person, $50,000 per accident, and $20,000 property damage (ORS 806.070). Every policy must also include at least $15,000 in PIP medical coverage per person (ORS 742.524) and mandatory UM/UIM coverage at limits matching your liability limits unless you elect lower in writing (ORS 742.502).
What does Oregon's mandatory PIP cover?
Oregon's mandatory add-on PIP (Personal Injury Protection) pays at least $15,000 in medical expenses per person plus wage-loss and essential-services benefits, regardless of who caused the accident (ORS 742.524). PIP pays first; after PIP is exhausted you pursue the at-fault driver for all remaining losses. PIP does not limit your right to sue for pain and suffering.
How much is my Oregon car accident claim worth?
Your claim's value depends on your economic losses (medical bills, lost wages, future care costs) plus non-economic damages (pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment), reduced by your share of fault under modified-51 comparative fault. Oregon does not cap non-economic damages in an ordinary auto injury claim, though ORS 31.710(1) caps them at $500,000 in a wrongful-death claim and ORS 31.715 can bar them entirely if you were driving uninsured or under the influence when the crash happened. The at-fault driver's insurance limits are a practical ceiling in many claims, which is why UM/UIM coverage matters. Use the Oregon car accident settlement calculator for a general estimate.
Updates
Corrected how underinsured motorist coverage pays after SB 411 (the at-fault driver's liability payment does not reduce your UIM limit) and added the two non-economic damages limits Oregon still has on the books: the $500,000 wrongful-death cap and the bar that applies when the injured driver was uninsured or intoxicated.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 31: Tort Actions
§ 31.600Contributory negligence not bar to recovery; comparative negligence standard; third party complaintsIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
31.600 Contributory negligence not bar to recovery; comparative negligence standard; third party complaints. (1) Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery in an action by any person or the legal representative of the person to recover damages for death or injury to person or property if the fault attributable to the claimant was not greater than the combined fault of all persons specified in subsection (2) of this section, but any damages allowed shall be diminished in the proportion to the percentage of fault attributable to the claimant. This section is not intended to create or abolish any defense. (2) The trier of fact shall compare the fault of the claimant with the fault of any party against whom recovery is sought, the fault of third party defendants who are liable in to
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Also relied on in: Oregon Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability Under Comparative Fault, Truck Accident Laws in Oregon (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Oregon (2026): Deadlines & Helmets
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 806: Financial Responsibility Law
§ 806.070Minimum payment scheduleIn force
(1) This section establishes a schedule of payments for the following purposes: (a) An insurance policy described under ORS 806.080 must provide for payment of at least amounts necessary to cover the minimum required payments under this section to qualify for use for financial responsibility under ORS 806.060. (b) A person who is self-insured under ORS 806.130 must agree to pay according to the payment schedule established by this section. (c) The payment schedule is the minimum required payment of a judgment for purposes of ORS 809.130 and 809.415. (2) The schedule of payments is as follows: (a) $25,000 because of bodily injury to or death of one person in any one accident; (b) Subject to that limit for one person, $50,000 because of bodily injury to or death of two or more persons in any one accident; and (c) $20,000 because of injury to or destruction of the property of others in any one accident.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 60 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. Mowry (Oregon Supreme Court 2011, 350 Or. 686)“…by the Financial Responsibility Law (FRL), ORS 806.060 and ORS 806.070. Id. at 347 . The exclusion, howev…”
- North Pacific Insurance v. Hamilton (Oregon Supreme Court 2001, 332 Or. 20)“…of an insured to the minimum liability coverage required by ORS 806.070(2)(a) for bodily injury to one person i…”
- Collins v. Farmers Insurance (Oregon Supreme Court 1991, 312 Or. 337)“…y to or death of one person in any one accident is $25,000. ORS 806.070(2)(a). The only question before us co…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 806.010Driving uninsured prohibited; penaltyIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of driving uninsured if the person operates a motor vehicle in this state on any highway or premises open to the public in this state without either: (a) The person being insured while driving the vehicle under a motor vehicle liability insurance policy that meets the requirements described under ORS 806.080; or (b) The person or the owner of the vehicle providing the Department of Transportation with other satisfactory proof of compliance with the financial responsibility requirements of this state. (2) Exemptions from this section are established under ORS 806.020. (3) In addition to other penalties under this section the following apply: (a) A person who is involved in a motor vehicle accident at any time the person is in violation of this section is subject to suspension of the person’s driving privileges under ORS 809.417. (b) A person who is convicted of violating this section is subject to ORS 806.230, if the person does not make future responsibility filings as required by that section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lawson v. Hoke (Oregon Supreme Court 2005, 339 Or. 253)“…ion of a motor vehicle if the plaintiff was in violation of ORS 806.010 [driving uninsured] or 813.010 [driving…”
- Farmers Insurance v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Oregon 1994, 128 Or. App. 516)“…r the provisions of the Financial Responsibility Law (FRL). ORS 806.010 et seq. We reverse. The parties sti…”
- Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. Pannell (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2001, 176 Or. App. 90)“…aw, it was not subject to the Financial Responsibility Law, ORS 806.010 et *1186 seq., [3] because a sch…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 742: Insurance Policies Generally; Property and Casualty Policies
§ 742.502Uninsured motorist coverage; underinsurance coverageIn force
(1) Every motor vehicle liability policy that insures against a loss that a natural person suffers and that results from liability imposed by law for bodily injury or death that arises out of owning, maintaining or using a motor vehicle shall provide in the policy or by indorsement on the policy uninsured motorist coverage if the policy is either: (a) Issued for delivery in this state; or (b) Issued or delivered by an insurer that does business in this state with respect to any motor vehicle then principally used or principally garaged in this state. (2)(a) A motor vehicle bodily injury liability policy must have the same limits for uninsured motorist coverage as for bodily injury liability coverage unless a named insured in writing elects lower limits. The insured may not elect limits lower than the amounts prescribed to meet the requirements of ORS 806.070 for bodily injury or death.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 103 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Vega v. Farmers Insurance (Oregon Supreme Court 1996, 323 Or. 291)“…required to provide the coverage specified in ORS 742.502 shall provide uninsured motorist…”
- Bergmann v. Hutton (Oregon Supreme Court 2004, 337 Or. 596)“…gin by examining the statutes pertinent to UIM coverage. 5 ORS 742.502 contains a general UM and UIM coverage…”
- Mid-Century Insurance v. Perkins (Oregon Supreme Court 2008, 344 Or. 196)“…of UIM benefits. Both cases center on the interpretation of ORS 742.502(2)(a) in light of this court’s decision…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 742.524Contents of personal injury protection benefits; deductiblesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Personal injury protection benefits required by ORS 742.520 consist of the following payments for the injury or death of each person: (a) All reasonable and necessary expenses of medical, hospital, dental, surgical, ambulance and prosthetic services incurred within two years after the date of the person’s injury, but not more than $15,000 in the aggregate for all such expenses of the person. Expenses of medical, hospital, dental, surgical, ambulance and prosthetic services are presumed to be reasonable and necessary unless the provider receives notice of denial of the charges not more than 60 calendar days after the insurer receives from the provider notice of the claim for the services. At any time during the first 50 calendar days after the insurer receives notice of claim, the provider shall, within 10 business days, answer in writing questions from the insurer regarding the claim. For purposes of determining when the 60-day period provided by this paragraph has elapsed, counting of days shall be suspended if the provider does not supply written answers to the insurer within 10 days and may not resume until the answers are supplied.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 32 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon (Oregon Supreme Court 2011, 350 Or. 336)“…er the date of the person's injury," up to a certain limit. ORS 742.524(1)(a). [2] Because the parties do not…”
- Ivanov v. Farmers Insurance (Oregon Supreme Court 2008, 344 Or. 421)“…d the PIP statutes. Instead, Farmers argued that: (1) under ORS 742.524, insureds such as plaintiffs, whose PIP…”
- Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co. (Oregon Supreme Court 2017, 361 Or. 62)“…tion against defendant, arguing that medical expenses under ORS 742.524(1)(a) included, as a statutory matter,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 742.504Required provisions of uninsured motorist coverageIn force
Every policy required to provide the coverage specified in ORS 742.502 shall provide uninsured motorist coverage that in each instance is no less favorable in any respect to the insured or the beneficiary than if the following provisions were set forth in the policy. However, nothing contained in this section requires the insurer to reproduce in the policy the particular language of any of the following provisions: (1)(a) Notwithstanding ORS 30.260 to 30.300, the insurer will pay all sums that the insured or the heirs or legal representative of the insured is legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured vehicle because of bodily injury sustained by the insured caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the uninsured vehicle. Determination as to whether the insured, the insured’s heirs or the insured’s legal representative is legally entitled to recover such damages, and if so, the amount thereof, shall be made by agreement between the insured and the insurer, or, in the event of disagreement, may be determined by arbitration as provided in subsection (10) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 145 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Vega v. Farmers Insurance (Oregon Supreme Court 1996, 323 Or. 291)“…(2) defendant’s exhaustion provision is inconsistent with ORS 742.504(7)(c) and is, therefore, unenforceable;…”
- To v. State Farm Mutual Insurance (Oregon Supreme Court 1994, 319 Or. 93)“…equivalent to the statutory "phantom vehicle" provision in ORS 742.504(2)(g), set out infra. [2] After th…”
- Bergmann v. Hutton (Oregon Supreme Court 2004, 337 Or. 596)“…ourt, plaintiff contends that, under the governing statute, ORS 742.504(7)(c)(B), the workers’ compensation ben…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 742.520Personal injury protection benefits for motor vehicle liability policies; applicabilityIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1)(a) Every motor vehicle liability policy issued for delivery in this state that covers any private passenger motor vehicle shall provide personal injury protection benefits to the person insured thereunder, members of that person’s family residing in the same household, children not related to the insured by blood, marriage or adoption who are residing in the same household as the insured and being reared as the insured’s own, passengers occupying the insured motor vehicle and pedestrians struck by the insured motor vehicle. (b) A transportation network company shall provide a motor vehicle liability policy with personal injury protection benefits to each driver who operates a personal motor vehicle in affiliation with the transportation network company. (c) A taxi company shall provide a motor vehicle liability policy with personal injury protection benefits to each driver who operates a taxi in affiliation with the taxi company.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 54 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon (Oregon Supreme Court 2011, 350 Or. 336)“…ly mandated provision of motor vehicle insurance in Oregon. ORS 742.520(1) (mandating PIP coverage for "[e]very…”
- Carrigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Oregon Supreme Court 1997, 326 Or. 97)“…om the use, occupancy or maintenance of any motor vehicle,” ORS 742.520(2)(a), quoted below, 326 Or at 100, may…”
- Barackman v. Anderson (Oregon Supreme Court 2005, 338 Or. 365)“…injuries, plaintiff requested arbitration. See ORS 742.520(6) (PIP disputes between insurers and b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 742.534Reimbursement of other insurers paying benefits; arbitrating issues of liability and amount of reimbursementIn force
(1) Except as provided in ORS 742.544, every authorized motor vehicle liability insurer whose insured is or would be held legally liable for damages for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident by a person for whom personal injury protection benefits have been furnished by another such insurer, or for whom benefits have been furnished by an authorized health insurer, shall reimburse such other insurer for the benefits it has so furnished if it has requested such reimbursement, has not given notice as provided in ORS 742.536 that it elects recovery by lien in accordance with that section and is entitled to reimbursement under this section by the terms of its policy. Reimbursement under this subsection, together with the amount paid to injured persons by the liability insurer, shall not exceed the limits of the policy issued by the insurer. (2) In calculating such reimbursement, the amount of benefits so furnished shall be diminished in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person for whom benefits have been so furnished, and the reimbursement shall not exceed the amount of damages legally recoverable by the person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 31 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Garrett v. State Farm Mutual Insurance (Court of Appeals of Oregon 1992, 112 Or. App. 539)“…icy did not entitle defendant to direct reimbursement under ORS 742.534 from the tortfeasor’s insurer, defendan…”
- Babb v. Mid-Century Insurance (Court of Appeals of Oregon 1991, 110 Or. App. 67)“…s declaratory judgment action to determine her rights under ORS 742.534(1) 1 and an insurance poli…”
- Mid-Century Insurance. v. Turner (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2008, 219 Or. App. 44)“…provisions of the Oregon Insurance Code, viz., ORS 742.534, ORS 742.536, and ORS 742.538. Accordin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 811: Rules of the Road for Drivers
§ 811.140Reckless driving; penaltyIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of reckless driving if the person: (a) Recklessly drives a vehicle upon a highway or premises open to the public in a manner that endangers the safety of persons or property; or (b) Operates a vehicle on a highway or premises open to the public and, in the presence of two or more persons assembled for the purpose of spectating the conduct, intentionally: (A) Breaks the traction of the vehicle’s rear tires; or (B) Spins the vehicle’s rear tires continuously by pressing the accelerator and increasing the engine speed in a manner that leaves marks on the surface upon which the vehicle is being driven. (2) As used in this section, “intentionally” and “recklessly” have the meanings given those terms in ORS 161.085. (3) The offense described in this section, reckless driving, is a Class A misdemeanor. [1983 c.338 §571; 2023 c.158 §2] SPECIAL SAFETY MEASURES
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 241 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Tison (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2018, 292 Or. App. 369)“…entered in a separate case, for reckless driving and DUII. ORS 811.140 ; ORS 813.010. Defendant's DUII and rec…”
- State v. Smith (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2002, 184 Or. App. 118)“…nt of conviction for, among other things, reckless driving, ORS 811.140, based on an incident in which he was s…”
- Morehouse v. Haynes (Oregon Supreme Court 2011, 350 Or. 318)“…endant was driving in a way that constitutes a violation of ORS 811.140, 4 which prohibits reckless driving. 5…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 813: Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants
§ 813.010Driving under the influence of intoxicants; penaltyIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicants if the person drives a vehicle while the person: (a) Has 0.08 percent or more by weight of alcohol in the blood of the person as shown by chemical analysis of the breath or blood of the person made under ORS 813.100, 813.140 or 813.150; (b) Is under the influence of an intoxicant or a combination of intoxicants; or (c) Within two hours after driving a vehicle, and without consuming alcohol in the intervening time period, has 0.08 percent or more by weight of alcohol in the blood of the person, as shown by chemical analysis of the breath or blood of the person made under ORS 813.100, 813.140 or 813.150. (2) A person may not be convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicants on the basis of being under the influence of a controlled substance or an inhalant unless the fact that the person was under the influence of a controlled substance or an inhalant is pleaded in the accusatory instrument and is either proved at trial or is admitted by the person through a guilty plea.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-05 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 1,069 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. O'Key (Oregon Supreme Court 1995, 321 Or. 285)“…tion for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…”
- State v. Spencer (Oregon Supreme Court 1988, 305 Or. 59)“…le while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 or of a municipal ordinance. A test sha…”
- State v. Nagel (Oregon Supreme Court 1994, 320 Or. 24)“…ng while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 or a municipal ordinance. Before the te…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon DUII Laws: Penalties, BAC Limit & License (2026), Oregon Expungement Laws: How to Set Aside a Conviction Under ORS 137.225
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- ORS 806.070 — Mandatory minimum liability limits 25/50/20(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 742.520 and 742.524 — Mandatory Personal Injury Protection ($15,000 min)(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 742.502 and 742.504 — Mandatory UM/UIM Coverage(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 31.600 — Modified-51 Comparative Fault(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 12.110(1) — Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute of Limitations(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 12.080 — Six-Year Property-Damage Limitation(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 30.275 — Oregon Tort Claims Act: 180-Day Notice Requirement(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.