Minnesota
Minnesota Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Minnesota is a mandatory no-fault (PIP) state under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act (Minn. Stat. ch. 65B). Your own insurer pays your medical bills and wage loss first regardless of fault, and you may sue the at-fault driver for pain and suffering only after clearing a hybrid monetary-or-verbal tort threshold. Fault is then allocated under modified comparative negligence, and recovery is barred if your share of fault exceeds 50% ().
Is Minnesota a no-fault or at-fault state?
Minnesota is one of the 12 states operating a true mandatory no-fault system, governed by the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act (Minn. Stat. ch. 65B, sections 65B.41 through 65B.71). After a crash, injured persons collect basic economic loss benefits (PIP) from their own insurer, regardless of who caused the collision. PIP is mandatory on every policy and not optional or waivable. The minimum basic economic loss benefit is $40,000 per person per accident, divided as $20,000 for medical expense benefits and $20,000 for non-medical economic loss (including wage replacement up to 85% of lost income, capped at $500 per week, and replacement services up to $200 per week).
The no-fault system restricts but does not eliminate the right to sue. Under , subd. 3, a person may bring a tort claim for noneconomic detriment (pain, suffering, mental anguish) only after meeting a statutory tort threshold. Minnesota's threshold is a hybrid: either pathway opens the door to a lawsuit. The monetary pathway is met when reasonable medical expense benefits (excluding diagnostic X-rays and rehabilitative services) exceed $4,000. The verbal pathway is met when the injury results in permanent disfigurement, permanent injury, death, or disability for 60 or more days (meaning the injured person cannot engage in substantially all usual and customary daily activities for that period). Satisfying either pathway permits a full tort lawsuit. Economic damages above PIP, such as medical expenses exceeding the PIP limit or wage loss beyond the PIP cap, may also be recovered in a tort claim.
How fault is shared: Minnesota's negligence rule
Minnesota follows modified comparative fault with a 51% bar, codified at . Under this system, an injured plaintiff can recover damages from an at-fault defendant as long as the plaintiff's own share of fault does not exceed the defendant's share. In practice, if the plaintiff's fault is 50% or less, recovery is permitted but reduced proportionally. If the plaintiff's fault is greater than the defendant's fault (51% or more), the plaintiff is completely barred from recovery.

For example, if a jury finds the plaintiff's total damages are $80,000 and the plaintiff was 30% at fault, the plaintiff recovers $56,000 (an $80,000 award reduced by 30%). If the plaintiff was found 55% at fault, they would recover nothing. This framework rewards careful driving and means that establishing the other driver's majority fault is often the central issue in a contested Minnesota car accident claim. Minnesota's rule is more favorable to plaintiffs than a pure contributory negligence state (where any fault bars recovery) but stricter than pure comparative fault states (where even a 99%-at-fault plaintiff can recover something).
Minimum car insurance in Minnesota
Minnesota law requires every motor vehicle registered in the state to carry a package of three mandatory coverages. First, residual (third-party) liability under , subd. 3, with minimum limits of 30/60/10: $30,000 bodily injury per person, $60,000 bodily injury per accident, and $10,000 property damage per accident. Second, mandatory PIP (basic economic loss benefits) under , with a minimum of $40,000 per person per accident ($20,000 medical and $20,000 non-medical economic loss). Third, mandatory UM/UIM under , subd. 3a, with minimum limits of $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for both uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage.
The UM/UIM coverage cannot be waived or rejected in Minnesota; it must appear on every policy. This is unusually protective compared to most states, where UM/UIM is offered but can be declined. Minnesota drivers are sometimes described as carrying at minimum a "30/60/10 + 25/50 UM/UIM + $40K PIP" package. If the at-fault driver carries only the minimum liability limits and your damages exceed those limits, your UIM coverage can bridge the gap up to your own UIM policy limit. PIP pays first for economic losses; UM/UIM is relevant primarily when economic losses exceed PIP or when noneconomic damages (meeting the threshold) exceed the at-fault driver's liability limits.
How long you have to file: the statute of limitations
Minnesota provides one of the longest personal-injury statutes of limitations in the country: 6 years from the date of injury, under , subd. 1(5). This applies to auto-accident negligence claims for both bodily injury and property damage. A shorter 4-year deadline applies specifically to underinsured-motorist (UIM) claims against your own insurer, under Minn. Stat. 65B.49, subd. 10(b). The 6-year window gives Minnesota injury victims substantially more time to investigate, negotiate with insurers, and decide whether to file suit compared to the 2- or 3-year deadlines common in other states.

Despite the generous deadline, waiting is still risky. Evidence fades, witnesses become unavailable, medical records become harder to reconstruct, and insurance adjusters may exploit any delay to argue injuries were not caused by the crash. The practical recommendation is to consult an attorney as early as possible after the crash, even if you have not yet decided to sue. Note that a separate 2-year limitation applies to certain intentional tort or assault claims, but ordinary auto-accident negligence claims fall under the 6-year rule. Property-damage claims for vehicle repair also fall under the 6-year period.
If a crash involves a government vehicle or a claim against a Minnesota government entity, special notice requirements under the Minnesota Tort Claims Act (Minn. Stat. 3.736 and 466.05) may impose shorter deadlines. Claims against cities, counties, or the state must generally be preceded by timely notice; consulting an attorney promptly for government-defendant cases is essential.
For more on Minnesota's limitation deadlines for other types of injury and civil claims, see our Minnesota statute of limitations page.
What a Minnesota car accident claim is worth
The value of a Minnesota car accident claim depends on several factors: the nature and extent of injuries, whether the tort threshold is met, how fault is allocated between the parties, and the insurance coverage available. Economic damages cover quantifiable losses: medical expenses beyond what PIP pays, future medical costs, wage loss beyond PIP's cap, diminished earning capacity, and out-of-pocket expenses related to the crash. These can be pursued in a tort claim once you are within the no-fault system's recovery limits or have crossed the tort threshold for a full lawsuit.
Non-economic damages, including pain, suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life, are available only if the tort threshold is met. Once the threshold is cleared (more than $4,000 in medical expenses or a serious verbal-pathway injury), there is no statutory cap on non-economic damages in Minnesota car accident cases. The modified comparative fault rule (Minn. Stat. 604.01) then reduces any award by your share of fault and bars recovery entirely if your fault exceeds 50%.
Insurance limits are a practical ceiling on what you can collect. If the at-fault driver carried only the minimum 30/60/10 limits and your damages are significant, your own UIM coverage (required at $25,000/$50,000 minimum) provides an important additional source of recovery. Use our Minnesota car accident settlement calculator to model how the tort threshold, PIP offsets, comparative fault, and insurance limits interact in your specific case.
What to do after a car accident in Minnesota
Taking the right steps immediately after a Minnesota crash protects your health, your legal rights, and your insurance recovery.

Stop, secure the scene, and call 911. Minnesota law requires the driver of any vehicle involved in a collision to stop immediately at the scene whenever the collision causes injury, death, or damage to another vehicle, with no dollar threshold (, subds. 1, 2, 4). The crash must also be reported to law enforcement if it results in a fatality, an injury requiring immediate medical treatment, disabling damage requiring a vehicle to be towed from the scene, or damage to highway fixtures or infrastructure (, subd. 8). An official police report creates an independent record of the facts and is often essential for insurance claims.
Seek medical care promptly, even if you feel fine. Soft-tissue injuries, concussions, and internal injuries often present or worsen in the hours or days after a crash. A timely medical evaluation creates a contemporaneous record linking your injuries to the crash, which is important both for PIP benefits and for meeting the tort threshold if your injuries qualify. PIP benefits begin covering your expenses immediately without waiting to determine fault.
Document everything. Photograph the vehicles, road conditions, visible injuries, and damage at the scene. Collect the other driver's name, address, license number, and insurance information. Get contact details for witnesses. Preserve any dashcam footage and request nearby business surveillance video quickly, before it is overwritten.
Notify your own insurer and file a PIP claim. Because Minnesota is a no-fault state, your first-party PIP claim runs through your own insurer. Cooperate with your insurer's reasonable documentation requests. Keep records of all medical visits, prescriptions, and lost-work time so PIP payments are accurately tracked against the $40,000 limit.
Do not give a recorded statement to the other driver's insurer without consulting an attorney. Minnesota's tort threshold rules, the modified comparative fault system, and the interaction between PIP and a third-party claim are layered. Opposing insurance adjusters are trained to obtain statements that reduce the value of your claim. An attorney consultation before accepting any settlement offer is strongly advisable, particularly if your injuries may meet the tort threshold or if fault is disputed.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Car accident law varies by state and changes, and settlement values depend on the specific facts. For advice about a specific crash, consult a licensed attorney in Minnesota.
Related pages:
- Minnesota Car Accident Settlement Calculator
- Minnesota Hit-and-Run Laws
- Car Accident Laws by State: Hub
- Minnesota Statute of Limitations
More Minnesota Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Minnesota a no-fault state?
Yes. Minnesota is a mandatory no-fault state under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act (Minn. Stat. ch. 65B). Your own PIP coverage pays medical expenses and wage loss after a crash regardless of who was at fault. You can still sue the at-fault driver for economic damages above PIP limits, and for pain and suffering if you meet the monetary ($4,000 in medical expenses) or verbal (permanent injury, permanent disfigurement, death, or 60-day disability) tort threshold under Minn. Stat. 65B.51.
Is Minnesota an at-fault state?
No. Minnesota is not an at-fault (tort) state. You do not claim against the at-fault driver's insurer first; instead, your own mandatory PIP coverage pays first. However, the no-fault system does not eliminate tort liability entirely. If your injuries meet the hybrid monetary-or-verbal threshold in Minn. Stat. 65B.51, you can bring a full tort lawsuit for both economic and noneconomic damages.
What is the statute of limitations for a car accident in Minnesota?
Minnesota allows 6 years from the date of injury to file a personal-injury lawsuit, under Minn. Stat. 541.05, subd. 1(5). Property-damage claims also fall under the 6-year window. This is one of the longest deadlines in the country. Ordinary negligence auto-accident claims use the 6-year period; intentional torts use a shorter 2-year period, but that does not apply to typical car accident negligence cases. A shorter 4-year deadline applies to underinsured-motorist (UIM) claims against your own insurer (Minn. Stat. 65B.49, subd. 10(b)).
Can I still recover if I was partly at fault in Minnesota?
Yes, as long as your share of fault is 50% or less. Minnesota uses modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar under Minn. Stat. 604.01. Your damages are reduced proportionally by your percentage of fault. If you are found to be more than 50% at fault (greater than the defendant's share), you are barred from recovering anything. For example, if you were 30% at fault and your damages were $100,000, you would recover $70,000.
What are the minimum car insurance requirements in Minnesota?
Every Minnesota policy must include three mandatory coverages: (1) residual liability at 30/60/10 ($30,000 bodily injury per person, $60,000 per accident, $10,000 property damage) under Minn. Stat. 65B.49, subd. 3; (2) PIP at $40,000 per person per accident ($20,000 medical + $20,000 non-medical economic loss) under Minn. Stat. 65B.44; and (3) UM/UIM at $25,000/$50,000 per person/per accident under Minn. Stat. 65B.49, subd. 3a. UM/UIM cannot be rejected.
What is the tort threshold in Minnesota?
The tort threshold (Minn. Stat. 65B.51, subd. 3) is the injury severity requirement you must meet to sue for pain and suffering in Minnesota. You meet it if EITHER: (1) reasonable medical expense benefits (excluding diagnostic X-rays and rehabilitation) exceed $4,000 (monetary pathway); OR (2) the injury results in permanent disfigurement, permanent injury, death, or disability for 60 or more days (verbal pathway). Satisfying either pathway opens the door to a full tort lawsuit.
How much is my Minnesota car accident claim worth?
It depends on your injury severity, whether you meet the tort threshold, how fault is divided, and available insurance coverage. Economic damages (medical bills above PIP, lost wages above PIP cap, future care costs) are recoverable in a tort suit. Non-economic damages like pain and suffering require clearing the threshold. Your recovery is then reduced by your comparative fault percentage and practically capped by available insurance limits. Use our Minnesota car accident settlement calculator to estimate your specific situation.
Injured in Minnesota? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Minnesota personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed an outdated $1,000 property-damage threshold for Minnesota's duty to stop and report after a crash; current Minn. Stat. 169.09 has no dollar floor, and the duty to stop is unconditional for any injury, death, or vehicle damage.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Added the 4-year underinsured-motorist (UIM) claim deadline (Minn. Stat. 65B.49, subd. 10(b)) alongside the general 6-year personal-injury statute of limitations, which the page previously stated without qualification in the KeyTakeaways, the statute-of-limitations section, and the FAQ.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169: TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
§ 169.09COLLISIONSIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Driver to stop for collision; injury or death. The driver of any motor vehicle involved in a collision shall immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the collision, or as close to the scene as possible, and reasonably investigate what was struck. If the driver knows or has reason to know the collision resulted in injury to or death of another, the driver in every event shall remain at the scene of the collision until the driver has fulfilled the requirements of this section as to the giving of information. The stop must be made without unnecessarily obstructing traffic. Subd. 2. Driver to stop for collision; attended vehicle. The driver of any motor vehicle involved in a collision shall immediately stop the motor vehicle at the scene of the collision, or as close to the collision as possible, and reasonably investigate what was struck. If the driver knows or has reason to know the collision involves damage to a vehicle driven or attended by another, the driver in every event shall remain at the scene of the collision until the driver has fulfilled the requirements of this section as to the giving of information.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 44 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- State v. Storvick (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1988, 428 N.W.2d 55)“…offense of leaving the scene of a personal injury accident, Minn.Stat. § 169.09, subds. 1 and 14(a) (1986), and gave hi…”
- State v. Al-Naseer (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2007, 734 N.W.2d 679)“…accident involving an unattended vehicle. See Minn.Stat. § 169.09, subd. 4 (2006). We conclude that the m…”
- Meyer v. Nwokedi (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2010, 777 N.W.2d 218)“…ich caps vicarious liability for rental-vehicle owners, and Minn.Stat. § 169.09, subd. 5a (2008), which, in relevant pa…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Minnesota Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, How to Get a Police Report in Minnesota (2026 Guide)
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 541: LIMITATION OF TIME, COMMENCING ACTIONS
§ 541.05VARIOUS CASES, SIX YEARSIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Six-year limitation. Except where the Uniform Commercial Code otherwise prescribes, the following actions shall be commenced within six years: (1) upon a contract or other obligation, express or implied, as to which no other limitation is expressly prescribed; (2) upon a liability created by statute, other than those arising upon a penalty or forfeiture or where a shorter period is provided by section 541.07; (3) for a trespass upon real estate; (4) for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including actions for the specific recovery thereof; (5) for criminal conversation, or for any other injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract, and not hereinafter enumerated; (6) for relief on the ground of fraud, in which case the cause of action shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud; (7) against sureties upon the official bond of any public officer, whether of the state or of any county, town, school district, or a municipality therein; in which case the limitation shall not begin to run until the term of such officer for which the bond was given shall have…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 438 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1986, 383 N.W.2d 645)“…e trial court held the limitation provision was modified by Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(1) (1984), which provides a 6-…”
- Toombs v. Daniels (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1985, 361 N.W.2d 801)“…5. The statute of limitations applicable to this action is Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1, sections (6) or (7), as follo…”
- Wegan v. Village of Lexington (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1981, 309 N.W.2d 273)“…ence, the six-year tort statute of limitations contained in Minn.Stat. § 541.05 (1980) is applicable. Additionally, no…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Minnesota Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Minnesota Motorcycle Accident Laws (2026): Deadlines, Minnesota Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 604: CIVIL LIABILITY
§ 604.01COMPARATIVE FAULT; EFFECTIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Scope of application. Contributory fault does not bar recovery in an action by any person or the person's legal representative to recover damages for fault resulting in death, in injury to person or property, or in economic loss, if the contributory fault was not greater than the fault of the person against whom recovery is sought, but any damages allowed must be diminished in proportion to the amount of fault attributable to the person recovering. The court may, and when requested by any party shall, direct the jury to find separate special verdicts determining the amount of damages and the percentage of fault attributable to each party and the court shall then reduce the amount of damages in proportion to the amount of fault attributable to the person recovering. Subd. 1a. Fault. "Fault" includes acts or omissions that are in any measure negligent or reckless toward the person or property of the actor or others, or that subject a person to strict tort liability.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 141 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Minnesota courts map Sec. 604.01 claim by claim: Florenzano v. Olson (1986) held its comparative responsibility principles reach negligent misrepresentation but not intentional fraud, and Lesmeister v. Dilly (1983) read it as not meant to apply generally to contract cases, though unreasonable failure to mitigate is apportionable fault.
Leading cases:
- Florenzano v. Olson (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1986, 387 N.W.2d 168)✓An insurance agent told a couple the wife should withdraw entirely from Social Security, and she later lost disability benefits; the court treated the claim as negligent misrepresentation and held comparative responsibility applies, so her 62.5 percent fault barred recovery.
- Lesmeister v. Dilly (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1983, 330 N.W.2d 95)✓A farmer's grain building was delivered late and leaked, spoiling stored corn; the court held the dispute was contractual, so fault could not be apportioned on those claims, but treated his unreasonable failure to mitigate as statutory fault, cutting damages 42.11 percent.
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2010, 789 N.W.2d 860)✓A city authority condemned Anda's property, found fuel oil contamination, and billed him for the cleanup; the court held refusing a comparative fault instruction was error, since evidence suggested the developer unreasonably failed to mitigate, and ordered a new damages trial.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Minnesota (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Truck Accident Laws in Minnesota (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Minnesota Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 65B: AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
§ 65B.44BASIC ECONOMIC LOSS BENEFITSIn force
Subdivision 1. Inclusions. (a) Basic economic loss benefits shall provide reimbursement for all loss suffered through injury arising out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle, subject to any applicable deductibles, exclusions, disqualifications, and other conditions, and shall provide a minimum of $40,000 for loss arising out of the injury of any one person, consisting of: (1) $20,000 for medical expense loss arising out of injury to any one person; and (2) a total of $20,000 for income loss, replacement services loss, funeral expense loss, survivor's economic loss, and survivor's replacement services loss arising out of the injury to any one person. (b) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, a person entitled to basic economic loss benefits under this chapter is entitled to the full medical expense benefits set forth in subdivision 2, and may not receive medical expense benefits that are in any way less than those provided for in subdivision 2, or that involve any preestablished limitations on the benefits. Medical expenses must be reasonable and must be for necessary medical care as provided in subdivision 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 144 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Meister v. Western National Mutual Insurance (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1992, 479 N.W.2d 372)“…age on one of the two cars that Michael’s father owns. 1 Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 1 (1988), says basic economic lo…”
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1984, 350 N.W.2d 368)“…must have arisen “out of the * * * use of a motor vehicle.” Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 1 (1982). 1 For an…”
- Nelson v. American Family Insurance Group (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2002, 651 N.W.2d 499)“…entitled to income loss benefits at 85% of the actual loss. Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 3 (2000). Nelson arrived at $10,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 65B.49INSURERSIn force
Subdivision 1. Mandatory offer of insurance benefits. On and after January 1, 1975, no insurance policy providing benefits for injuries arising out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle shall be issued, renewed, continued, delivered, issued for delivery, or executed in this state with respect to any motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this state unless coverage is provided therein or supplemental thereto, under provisions approved by the commissioner, requiring the insurer to pay, regardless of the fault of the insured, basic economic loss benefits. A plan of reparation security shall state the name and address of the named insured, the coverage afforded by the policy, the premium charged, the term and limits of liability, and shall contain an agreement or endorsement that insurance is provided thereunder in accordance with and subject to the provisions of sections 65B.41 to 65B.71. Subd. 2. Basic economic loss. Each plan of reparation security shall provide for payment of basic economic loss benefits. Subd. 3. Residual liability insurance.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 293 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Schmidt v. Clothier (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1983, 338 N.W.2d 256)“…injury liability limit of the owner of the other vehicle. Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 6(e) (1978) (repealed 1980). Thi…”
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1980, 288 N.W.2d 244)“…that the mandatory offer of optional coverages required by Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 6, was not made and these covera…”
- Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2008, 749 N.W.2d 41)“…cy on its face provides coverage for the accident; (2) that Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 3a(5) (2006), precludes the poli…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 65B.51DEDUCTION OF COLLATERAL BENEFITS FROM TORT RECOVERY; LIMITATION ON RIGHT TO RECOVER DAMAGESIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Deduction of basic economic loss benefits. With respect to a cause of action in negligence accruing as a result of injury arising out of the operation, ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided as required by sections 65B.41 to 65B.71, the court shall deduct from any recovery the value of basic or optional economic loss benefits paid or payable, or which would be payable but for any applicable deductible. In any case where the claimant is found to be at fault under section 604.01, the deduction for basic economic loss benefits must be made before the claimant's damages are reduced under section 604.01, subdivision 1. Subd. 2. Right to recover economic loss not covered in first party benefits.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 96 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases:
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2004, 685 N.W.2d 320)“…permanent injury, death or disability for 60 days or more. Minn.Stat. § 65B.51, subds. 1 and 3 (2002). [8] One arti…”
- Nelson v. American Family Insurance Group (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2002, 651 N.W.2d 499)“…would be payable but for any applicable deductible. Minn.Stat. § 65B.51, subd. 1. Further, the Act provides tha…”
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1983, 337 N.W.2d 667)“…expert testimony to support the tort threshold required by Minn.Stat. § 65B.51, subd. 3 (1982) and the element of caus…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Minn. Stat. 65B.51 (tort threshold, Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act)(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. 65B.44 (basic economic loss/PIP benefits, $40,000 minimum)(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. 65B.49 (residual liability 30/60/10 and mandatory UM/UIM 25/50)(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. 604.01 (modified comparative fault, 51% bar)(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. 541.05, subd. 1(5) (6-year personal-injury statute of limitations)(revisor.mn.gov).gov