Kansas
Kansas Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, Insurance, and Your Claim
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
Kansas is a no-fault (PIP) state, meaning your own Personal Injury Protection coverage pays your medical bills and lost wages after a crash regardless of who caused it. To sue the at-fault driver for pain and suffering, you must clear the K.S.A. 40-3117 tort threshold. Kansas follows modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar, so you can recover damages only if your fault is less than the other driver's; being 50% or more at fault bars recovery entirely.
Is Kansas a no-fault or at-fault state?
Kansas is a mandatory no-fault state governed by the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act (K.S.A. 40-3101 et seq.). Every auto insurance policy issued in Kansas must carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP). After a crash, PIP pays your medical expenses and lost wages first, without any need to prove the other driver was at fault. This is not a choice or add-on system; PIP is required across the board.
Because Kansas is a no-fault state, your ability to step outside that system and bring a tort claim against the at-fault driver is limited. You may only recover non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering, if you meet the K.S.A. 40-3117 tort threshold. That threshold has two prongs: a monetary prong (the reasonable value of your medical treatment is $2,000 or more) and a verbal/serious-injury prong (your injury involves permanent disfigurement, a fracture to a weight-bearing bone, a compound, comminuted, displaced, or compressed fracture, loss of a body member, permanent injury within reasonable medical probability, permanent loss of a bodily function, or death). Satisfying either prong opens the door to a tort claim for non-economic losses against the at-fault driver. If your injuries do not meet the threshold, you are limited to your PIP benefits for economic losses.
How fault is shared: Kansas's negligence rule
Kansas follows modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar, codified at K.S.A. 60-258a. Under this rule, each party's percentage of fault is determined, and damages are allocated accordingly. The statute permits recovery only when your negligence was less than the other party's, so if you are found less than 50% at fault for the crash, you may recover damages, but your award is reduced by your share of fault. If you are found to be 50% or more at fault, you are completely barred from recovering any damages.
For example, if a jury determines your total damages are $100,000 but you were 30% at fault, you would recover $70,000. If the same jury found you 51% at fault, you would recover nothing. This rule places real weight on how fault is allocated, especially in side-impact, lane-change, and shared-fault crashes. Because the 50% bar is strict, insurance adjusters and defense attorneys will often argue for a higher fault percentage on your side to reduce or eliminate a payout. Documenting the accident scene, getting witness statements, and consulting an attorney before accepting any settlement offer can protect your recovery.
Minimum car insurance in Kansas
Kansas law (K.S.A. 40-3107(e)) requires every motorist to carry at least 25/50/25 in liability coverage: $25,000 for bodily injury per person, $50,000 for bodily injury per accident, and $25,000 for property damage. These minimums apply to claims brought against you by other people injured in a crash you caused.
PIP coverage is also mandatory. The statutory minimum benefits under K.S.A. 40-3103 include at least $4,500 per person for medical expenses, disability and income-replacement benefits of at least $900 per month for up to one year, in-home and substitution-services coverage of $25 per day for up to 365 days, rehabilitation expenses of at least $4,500, and funeral or burial expenses up to $2,000. Survivor benefits are also payable under the Act.
Uninsured and underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage is required by K.S.A. 40-284. Your policy must include UM/UIM limits at least equal to your bodily-injury liability limits. You may reject in writing only coverage amounts above the 25/50 statutory minimum; you cannot waive the minimum UM/UIM coverage entirely. This protection is critical if you are hit by a driver who has no insurance or whose limits are too low to cover your losses.
How long you have to file: the statute of limitations
Under K.S.A. 60-513(a)(4), you have two years from the date of injury to file a personal-injury lawsuit arising from a car accident in Kansas. Property-damage claims carry the same two-year deadline under K.S.A. 60-513(a)(2). The clock generally begins running on the date of the crash, though K.S.A. 60-513(b) recognizes a discovery rule for cases where substantial injury was not immediately apparent.
Two years passes faster than it sounds, especially when medical treatment, insurance negotiations, and recovery consume your attention. If you miss the filing deadline, the court will almost certainly dismiss your case and you will lose your right to sue, no matter how strong your claim. If your accident involved a government vehicle or a government employee acting in an official capacity, notice-of-claim deadlines under Kansas tort claims law may be even shorter, so consult an attorney promptly. For a state-by-state comparison of filing deadlines, see the Kansas statute of limitations page.
What a Kansas car accident claim is worth
Kansas car accident claims divide into economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages include your past and future medical expenses, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, and property damage to your vehicle. Because Kansas is a no-fault state, your PIP coverage handles a significant portion of economic losses first (up to the PIP limits), leaving only amounts above those limits to be pursued through a tort claim, and then only if you have cleared the K.S.A. 40-3117 threshold.
Non-economic damages, including pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life, are available only once the threshold is met. Once you are in the tort system, your total recovery is subject to the 25/50/25 at-fault driver's liability limits (unless they carry more), your own UM/UIM coverage if the other driver is uninsured or underinsured, and any comparative-fault reduction under K.S.A. 60-258a. Serious injuries that clearly meet the verbal threshold, such as fractures or permanent impairment, tend to produce higher settlements because liability for non-economic damages is not in dispute. Soft-tissue cases close to the $2,000 monetary threshold involve more negotiation over whether the threshold is met at all. Use the Kansas car accident settlement calculator to get a ballpark estimate based on your specific facts.
What to do after a car accident in Kansas
Taking the right steps immediately after a crash protects both your health and your legal rights.
Stay safe and call for help. Move vehicles out of traffic if it is safe to do so. Call 911 if anyone is injured. Kansas law requires reporting accidents involving injury, death, or property damage above the threshold to local law enforcement.
Document the scene. Photograph the vehicles, road conditions, skid marks, traffic controls, and any visible injuries. Get the other driver's name, contact information, license plate, and insurance details. Note the names and phone numbers of any witnesses.
Seek medical attention promptly. Even if you feel fine, see a doctor as soon as possible. PIP pays for medical treatment regardless of fault, so cost should not be a barrier. Delayed medical care creates gaps that insurers use to argue your injuries were not caused by the crash.
Report the crash to your insurer. Notify your insurer to trigger your PIP coverage. Be factual; avoid giving recorded statements about fault until you understand your rights.
Do not accept a settlement offer without legal advice. Insurance companies often move quickly with low offers, especially in no-fault states where PIP claims look straightforward. Before you sign any release, consult a Kansas personal-injury attorney. A settlement releases all future claims, including any that may arise as your injuries evolve. See the Kansas hit-and-run laws page for additional obligations if the other driver fled the scene.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Car accident law varies by state and changes, and settlement values depend on the specific facts. For advice about a specific crash, consult a licensed attorney in Kansas.
Related: Kansas Car Accident Settlement Calculator | Kansas Hit-and-Run Laws | Car Accident Laws by State | Kansas Statute of Limitations
More Kansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kansas a no-fault state?
Yes. Kansas is a mandatory no-fault (PIP) state under the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act (K.S.A. 40-3101 et seq.). Your own Personal Injury Protection coverage pays your medical bills and lost wages after a crash, regardless of who was at fault. You can only sue the at-fault driver for pain and suffering if you meet the K.S.A. 40-3117 tort threshold.
Is Kansas an at-fault state?
No. Kansas is a no-fault state, not an at-fault (tort) state. You do not need to prove the other driver was at fault to receive PIP benefits. You can only pursue a tort claim against the at-fault driver for non-economic damages if your injuries meet the K.S.A. 40-3117 threshold (at least $2,000 in medical treatment or a qualifying serious injury).
What is the statute of limitations for a car accident in Kansas?
You have two years from the date of injury to file a personal-injury lawsuit in Kansas (K.S.A. 60-513(a)(4)). Missing this deadline generally bars your claim entirely. If your accident involved a government entity or employee, shorter notice-of-claim requirements may apply, so consult an attorney promptly.
Can I still recover if I was partly at fault in Kansas?
Yes, as long as your fault is less than 50%. Kansas uses modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar (K.S.A. 60-258a), which requires your negligence to be strictly less than the other driver's. Your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault. If you are found to be 50% or more at fault, you cannot recover anything from the other driver.
What are the minimum insurance requirements in Kansas?
Kansas requires at minimum 25/50/25 liability coverage ($25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident for bodily injury, $25,000 for property damage), mandatory PIP coverage (at least $4,500 medical, $900/month wage loss, $4,500 rehabilitation, $2,000 funeral), and UM/UIM coverage at limits equal to your liability limits (K.S.A. 40-3107, 40-3103, 40-284).
How much is my Kansas car accident claim worth?
The value depends on your economic losses (medical bills, lost wages, property damage), whether you cleared the K.S.A. 40-3117 tort threshold to claim pain and suffering, the other driver's liability limits, your UM/UIM coverage, and any comparative-fault reduction. PIP covers the first layer of economic losses up to its limits. Use the Kansas car accident settlement calculator for a ballpark estimate based on your facts.
What is the Kansas tort threshold for pain and suffering?
Under K.S.A. 40-3117, you may recover non-economic damages (pain and suffering) only if your medical treatment totals at least $2,000 (monetary prong) OR your injury involves permanent disfigurement, a fracture to a weight-bearing bone, a compound/comminuted/displaced/compressed fracture, loss of a body member, permanent injury within reasonable medical probability, permanent loss of a bodily function, or death (verbal prong). Either prong is sufficient.
Injured in Kansas? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Kansas personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the comparative-negligence bar: Kansas requires your fault to be strictly LESS THAN the other driver's to recover, so being exactly 50% at fault bars recovery, not just 'more than 50%' as the article previously said. Also corrected the property-damage statute-of-limitations subsection cite.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 40: INSURANCE
§ 40-284Uninsured motorist coverage and underinsured motorist coverage; rejection; antistacking provision; exclusions or limitations of coverage; subrogation rights of underinsured motorist coverage insurer.In force
(a) No automobile liability insurance policy covering liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this state with respect to any motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this state, unless the policy contains or has endorsed thereon, a provision with coverage limits equal to the limits of liability coverage for bodily injury or death in such automobile liability insurance policy sold to the named insured for payment of part or all sums which the insured or the insured's legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the uninsured owner or operator of a motor vehicle because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death, resulting therefrom, sustained by the insured, caused by accident and arising out of ownership, maintenance or use of such motor vehicle, or providing for such payment irrespective of legal liability of the insured or any other person or organization.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 123 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Bussman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America (Supreme Court of Kansas 2014, 298 Kan. 700)“…n future medical expenses. 2010 WL 5185785, at *12 ; see K.S.A. 40-284(e)(4). With respect to attorney fees, t…”
- Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (Supreme Court of Kansas 1976, 219 Kan. 595)“…attention to the newly adopted uninsured motorist statute. (K. S.A. 40-284.) Mrs. Van Hoozer indicated it was her…”
- Thompson v. KFB Insurance (Supreme Court of Kansas 1993, 252 Kan. 1010)“…n the failure of plaintiff to comply with the provisions of K.S.A. 40-284(f).” The argument developed by KFB is t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 40-3101Citation of act.In force
This act may be cited and shall be known as the "Kansas automobile injury reparations act."
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 81 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2020
Leading cases:
- Manzanares v. Bell (Supreme Court of Kansas 1974, 214 Kan. 589)“…8), and is incorporated in the Kansas Statutes Annotated as K.S.A. 40-3101 through 40-3121. The Act was defined by…”
- Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1990, 246 Kan. 336)“…4), we upheld the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act, K.S.A. 40-3101 et seq., since the legislative acts b…”
- Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. Bell (Supreme Court of Kansas 1988, 243 Kan. 333)“…court upheld the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act (K.S.A. 40-3101 et seq. ), noting that it provided a p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 40-3103Definitions.In force
As used in this act, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them herein: (a) "Commissioner" means the state commissioner of insurance. (b) "Disability benefits" means allowances for loss of monthly earnings due to an injured person's inability to engage in available and appropriate gainful activity, subject to the following conditions and limitations: (1) The injury sustained is the proximate cause of the injured person's inability to engage in available and appropriate gainful activity; (2) subject to the maximum benefits stated herein, allowances shall equal 100% of any such loss per individual, unless such allowances are deemed not includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes, in which event such allowances shall be limited to 85%; and (3) allowances shall be made up to a maximum of not less than $900 per month for not to exceed one year after the date the injured person becomes unable to engage in available and appropriate gainful activity. (c) "Director" means the director of vehicles. (d) "Funeral benefits" means allowances for funeral, burial or cremation expenses in an amount not to exceed $2,000 per individual.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 30 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2020
Leading cases:
- Polson v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc. (Supreme Court of Kansas 2009, 288 Kan. 165)“…ther Farmers was obligated to pay survivors’ benefits under K.S.A. 40-3103(y) to Timothy, Michelle, or their estat…”
- Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Court of Appeals of Kansas 1983, 8 Kan. App. 2d 475)“…2,000 can properly be considered PIP benefits as defined by K.S.A. 40-3103(q). This issue appears to be of first i…”
- Burriss v. Northern Assurance Co. of America (Supreme Court of Kansas 1984, 236 Kan. 326)“…provisions of the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act, K.S.A. 40-3103(1) and (y), unconstitutional and enteri…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 40-3107Motor vehicle liability insurance policies; required contents; exclusions of coverage; legislative interim study.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
Every policy of motor vehicle liability insurance issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2017, by an insurer to an owner residing in this state shall: (a) Designate by explicit description or by appropriate reference of all vehicles with respect to which coverage is to be granted; (b) insure the person named and any other person, as insured, using any such vehicle with the expressed or implied consent of such named insured, against loss from the liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of any such vehicle within the United States of America or the Dominion of Canada, subject to the limits stated in such policy; (c) state the name and address of the named insured, the coverage afforded by the policy, the premium charged and the policy period; (d) contain an agreement or be endorsed that insurance is provided in accordance with the coverage required by this act; (e) contain stated limits of liability, exclusive of interest and costs, with respect to each vehicle for which coverage is granted, not less than $25,000 because of bodily injury to, or death of, one person in any one accident and, subject to the limit for one person, to a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 82 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2020
Leading cases:
- Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. (Supreme Court of Kansas 2002, 273 Kan. 915)“…ng as they have the owner’s consent to operate the vehicle. K.S.A. 40-3107(a) and (b).” Based upon the abov…”
- West v. Collins (Supreme Court of Kansas 1992, 251 Kan. 657)“…of the ownership, maintenance or use of any such vehicle.” K.S.A. 40-3107(b). The trial court disposed of…”
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Allen (Supreme Court of Kansas 1997, 262 Kan. 811)“…sas unless a motor vehicle liability policy conforming with K.S.A. 40-3107 is in effect for such vehicle. K.S.A. 4…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), Motorcycle Accident Laws in Kansas (2026): Deadlines & Helmets
§ 40-3117Tort actions; conditions precedent to recovery of damages for pain and suffering.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
In any action for tort brought against the owner, operator or occupant of a motor vehicle or against any person legally responsible for the acts or omissions of such owner, operator or occupant, a plaintiff may recover damages in tort for pain, suffering, mental anguish, inconvenience and other non-pecuniary loss because of injury only in the event the injury requires medical treatment of a kind described in this act as medical benefits, having a reasonable value of $2,000 or more, or the injury consists in whole or in part of permanent disfigurement, a fracture to a weightbearing bone, a compound, comminuted, displaced or compressed fracture, loss of a body member, permanent injury within reasonable medical probability, permanent loss of a bodily function or death. Any person who is entitled to receive free medical and surgical benefits shall be deemed in compliance with the requirements of this section upon a showing that the medical treatment received has an equivalent value of at least $2,000.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 23 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases:
- Manzanares v. Bell (Supreme Court of Kansas 1974, 214 Kan. 589)“…on was entitled to receive. *595 (5) Section 17 changed K.S.A. 40-3117 ( a ) by removing the tort "shield" pro…”
- Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. Bell (Supreme Court of Kansas 1988, 243 Kan. 333)“…limits on the right to recovery. 214 Kan. at 599 . Under K.S.A. 40-3117, any person who was entitled to no-faul…”
- Martinez v. MILBURN ENTERPRISES, INC. (Supreme Court of Kansas 2010, 290 Kan. 572)“…of noneconomic damages in a motor vehicle tort action under K.S.A. 40-3117. Based upon Bates' holding on Medicai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Kansas (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 60: PROCEDURE, CIVIL
§ 60-258aComparative negligence.In forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) Effect of contributory negligence. The contributory negligence of a party in a civil action does not bar that party or its legal representative from recovering damages for negligence resulting in death, personal injury, property damage or economic loss, if that party's negligence was less than the causal negligence of the party or parties against whom a claim is made, but the award of damages to that party must be reduced in proportion to the amount of negligence attributed to that party. If a party claims damages for a decedent's wrongful death, the negligence of the decedent, if any, must be imputed to that party. (b) Special verdicts or findings required. When the comparative negligence of the parties is an issue, the jury must return special verdicts, or in the absence of a jury, the court must make special findings, determining the percentage of negligence attributable to each party and the total amount of damages sustained by each claimant. The court must determine the appropriate judgment. (c) Joining additional parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 247 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Brown v. Keill (1978) held that under K.S.A. 60-258a joint and several liability no longer applies, each defendant paying in proportion to its own fault, with the fault of persons not joined still compared. Kennedy v. City of Sawyer (1980) applied those comparative fault principles to strict liability and implied warranty claims.
Leading cases:
- Brown v. Keill (Supreme Court of Kansas 1978, 224 Kan. 195)✓A car owner sued the other driver over damage to his Jaguar; his son drove it and drew 90 percent of the fault at trial. The court held K.S.A. 60-258a abolished joint and several liability, capping the defendant at 10 percent, and let the unjoined son's fault be compared.
- Kennedy v. City of Sawyer (Supreme Court of Kansas 1980, 228 Kan. 439)✓A city employee sprayed an arsenic herbicide by its sewage lagoons and neighboring cattle died. Reading K.S.A. 60-258a, the court held its fault comparison reaches products claims joined with negligence, and replaced all-or-nothing implied indemnity with apportionment.
- Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1984, 235 Kan. 387)✓A woman who suffered kidney failure after taking an oral contraceptive won a failure-to-warn verdict. Applying K.S.A. 60-258a, the court held the trial judge properly refused to compare the fault of her settled physicians or of the plaintiff, since no causal negligence was shown.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Kansas Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Personal Injury Settlement Amounts: What Injuries Are Worth
§ 60-513Actions limited to two years.In forcecited in 11 of our articles
(a) The following actions shall be brought within two years: (1) An action for trespass upon real property. (2) An action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions for the specific recovery thereof. (3) An action for relief on the ground of fraud, but the cause of action shall not be deemed to have accrued until the fraud is discovered. (4) An action for injury to the rights of another, not arising on contract, and not herein enumerated. (5) An action for wrongful death. (6) An action to recover for an ionizing radiation injury as provided in K.S.A. 60-513a, 60-513b and 60-513c, and amendments thereto. (7) An action arising out of the rendering of or failure to render professional services by a health care provider, not arising on contract.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 762 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Martindale v. Tenny (Supreme Court of Kansas 1992, 250 Kan. 621)“…two-year and four-year statutes of limitation set forth in K.S.A. 60-513(a)(7) and K.S.A. 60-513(c) barred the a…”
- Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1997, 262 Kan. 635)“…der the general statutes of limitations of K.S.A 60-512 and K.S.A. 60-513. The parties framed the issues in such…”
- Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1990, 246 Kan. 336)“…imitations was shortened as to medical malpractice actions (K.S.A. 60-513); and the collateral source rule was mo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Kansas (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Kansas Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability Under the Reasonable-Care Standard, Kansas Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 40-3107 — Mandatory liability minimums and PIP requirement(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 40-3103 — PIP minimum benefit amounts(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 40-3117 — Tort threshold for pain and suffering(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 40-3101 et seq. — Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act (no-fault)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 40-284 — Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 60-258a — Modified comparative negligence, 50% bar(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 60-513(a)(2) & (a)(4) — 2-year statute of limitations (property damage and personal injury, respectively)(ksrevisor.gov).gov