Washington Police Body Camera Laws: Mandate & Access

Washington has no statewide law requiring police to use body cameras, though a 2026 bill to create one stalled in committee. Agencies that deploy cameras must adopt policies under RCW 10.109, and public access to footage is governed by RCW 42.56.240(14), which exempts recordings only where nondisclosure protects a real privacy interest.

This guide is part of our Police Bodycam Laws by State series.

Jurisdiction scope: This article addresses Washington law governing police body-worn cameras: the policy requirements under RCW 10.109 for agencies that deploy cameras, and public access to footage under RCW 42.56.240(14) of the Public Records Act. It does not address a bystander's right to record on-duty police, a different legal question covered in our guide to recording laws.

Does Washington require police departments to use body cameras?

Not yet, statewide. Washington regulates how agencies that use body-worn cameras must operate them, but no statute forces a department to buy or deploy cameras in the first place. RCW 10.109.010 requires any law-enforcement or corrections agency that "deploys body worn cameras" to adopt written policies, language that governs agencies once they opt in rather than compelling them to opt in. That leaves Washington's roughly 300 city, county, and tribal law-enforcement agencies to decide individually whether to fund a body-camera program, resulting in uneven coverage across the state. Seattle, King County, and many other larger departments have deployed cameras; smaller and rural agencies vary widely, according to MRSC, the Municipal Research and Services Center that advises Washington local governments.

What must a Washington agency's body-camera policy address?

RCW 10.109.010 sets six mandatory subjects for any policy governing a deployed body-worn camera program. At minimum, the policy must specify when a camera must be activated and deactivated and when that decision is left to officer discretion; how officers should respond when a person appears unwilling to be recorded; how officers document an early deactivation during an ongoing interaction; how officers notify the public that they are being recorded, including procedures for non-English speakers, people with limited English proficiency, and people who are deaf or hard of hearing; training requirements and how often that training is renewed; and the security rules protecting stored footage, according to RCW 10.109.010. An agency that deployed cameras before June 9, 2016 had 120 days to adopt a compliant policy; an agency deploying cameras afterward must have the policy in place before the cameras go into use.

What Washington bodycam footage is exempt from public disclosure?

Washington's Public Records Act does not treat bodycam footage as categorically open or categorically closed. Instead, RCW 42.56.240(14) allows an agency to withhold a recording only "to the extent nondisclosure is essential for the protection of any person's right to privacy," and it lists specific circumstances Washington agencies treat as presumptively highly offensive to a reasonable person if disclosed, according to RCW 42.56.240.

Even within a presumptively exempt category, the agency must also determine the footage is not of legitimate concern to the public before withholding it, so the presumption can be overcome. Everything outside these enumerated categories, the large majority of routine bodycam footage involving traffic stops, public encounters, and calls for service in ordinary settings, is subject to the Public Records Act's general presumption of disclosure.

How do you request Washington bodycam footage, and who gets special access?

A Washington public-records request for bodycam footage must reasonably describe the recording being sought. Agencies commonly ask requesters to identify the people involved, the incident or case number, and the date, time, and location of the encounter, along with the name of the officer involved, to help staff locate the correct file among potentially thousands of recordings. Under RCW 42.56.240(14)(e)(i), a person directly involved in the recorded incident, and that person's attorney, receive preferential treatment: while the agency may still redact exempt material, it cannot charge that requester for the cost of the redaction work, according to MRSC. General requesters, including journalists and members of the public not involved in the incident, can be billed for that redaction time. A 2024 amendment to RCW 42.56.240 also lets an agency give a criminal defense attorney a complete, unredacted copy for discovery purposes once the attorney signs a written agreement to keep it confidential and use it only for the client's defense, according to the Washington State Legislature's report on 2SHB 1080.

Washington's push for a statewide mandate

Washington came closer to a statewide activation requirement in 2026 than at any earlier point. On January 22, 2026, Representative Tarra Simmons introduced House Bill 2644, the Law Enforcement Body Worn Camera Act, which would create a uniform statewide standard requiring all law-enforcement officers to activate their body cameras during law-enforcement encounters and would let anyone who is the subject of a recorded interaction obtain a copy at no cost, according to Washington House Democrats. The bill was referred to the House Civil Rights & Judiciary Committee on January 23, 2026, but did not advance further before the 2026 session's cutoff deadlines, according to the Washington State Legislature's bill tracking page. Until a future version of this or a similar bill passes, whether a given Washington resident's interaction with police is recorded still depends on which agency responds and that agency's own policy, not a statewide floor.

Is a civilian allowed to record the police in Washington?

That is the reverse question from the one this page answers. Washington generally recognizes a person's right to record an on-duty officer performing public duties in a public place. For the full explanation of that right and how it differs from the rules on police-generated bodycam footage discussed here, see Is It Illegal to Record Someone?