Indiana flag

Indiana

Indiana Employee Monitoring Laws (2026): Tracking, GPS & More

Indiana Employee Monitoring Laws (2026): Tracking, GPS & More

Frequently Asked Questions

Does my employer have to tell me if they are monitoring my work email in Indiana?

No. Indiana has no state law requiring advance notice of email or internet monitoring. A proposed Notice of Electronic Monitoring Act did not pass, so Indiana employers rely on the federal business-extension exemption in 18 U.S.C. Section 2510(5)(a), which excludes employer-provided communications equipment used in the ordinary course of business from the Wiretap Act's definition of an interception device, and, typically, an acknowledged company policy.

Can my employer record my phone calls at work in Indiana?

Generally yes, if the employer is a party to the call or the employee has acknowledged a monitoring policy, because Indiana's wiretap chapter, Ind. Code Article 35-33.5, only requires one party's consent.

Can my employer require me to get a microchip implant as a condition of my job in Indiana?

No. Ind. Code Sections 22-5-8-1 to 22-5-8-4 prohibit an employer from requiring a candidate or employee to accept an implanted, injected, ingested, or inhaled device as a condition of employment, and bar retaliation against an employee who declines.

Can my employer track a company vehicle I drive with GPS in Indiana?

Likely yes, if the employer owns or leases the vehicle. Ind. Code Section 35-46-8.5-1 generally prohibits placing a tracking device on property someone uses without consent, but exempts a person with an ownership or contractual interest in that property, which typically covers an employer's own fleet vehicle, though no Indiana case has confirmed this in an employment dispute.

Can my employer put a camera in the locker room or restroom in Indiana?

No. Ind. Code Section 35-45-4-5 makes secretly recording someone in a restroom, shower, or changing area a Level 6 felony once a camera or recording device is used, regardless of the employer's stated purpose.

Can my employer ask for my personal social media password in Indiana?

There is no confirmed Indiana statute banning the request. Indiana does not appear on the National Conference of State Legislatures' list of 27 states with a social-media-password protection law, though an employer that actually accesses the account without authorization can face federal exposure under the Stored Communications Act.

Does Indiana have a biometric privacy law like Illinois' BIPA?

No. Indiana has not enacted a biometric-privacy statute, so an employer's fingerprint or facial-recognition time clock in Indiana is not subject to the written-consent, retention-schedule, and private-right-of-action framework that applies in Illinois under 740 ILCS 14.

Updates

Corrected the enactment date of Indiana's employee-microchipping ban (Ind. Code 22-5-8-1 to 22-5-8-4): it was enacted in the 2020 legislative session and took effect July 1, 2020, not 2021.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Re-anchored the employer ordinary-course monitoring doctrine to the correct statute, 18 U.S.C. 2510(5)(a)'s business-extension exemption, rather than the service-provider exception at 2511(2)(a)(i), including a mislabeled Sources entry.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

The Law Behind This Article

This article rests on 4 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.

United States Code Title 18

§ 2510DefinitionsIn forcecited in 120 of our articles
As used in this chapter— “wire communication” means any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception (including the use of such connection in a switching station) furnished or operated by any person engaged in providing or operating such facilities for the transmission of interstate or foreign communications or communications affecting interstate or foreign commerce; “oral communication” means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation, but such term does not include any electronic communication; “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States; “intercept” means the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.1  So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov

Cited in 2,382 court opinions1960s: 21970s: 3941980s: 3271990s: 4102000s: 4302010s: 4682020s: 351Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527) · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services (Supreme Court of the United States 1977, 433 U.S. 425) · Gannett Co. v. DePasquale (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 443 U.S. 368)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, District of Columbia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Kentucky Phone Call Recording Laws: What You Need to Know

§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 397 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-08-12 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov

Cited in 2,045 court opinions1960s: 51970s: 2581980s: 2991990s: 3792000s: 4272010s: 2972020s: 380Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511) · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297) · Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: Alabama Audio Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties, Alabama Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use, Alabama Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Rules

Indiana Code, TITLE 35. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE

§ 35-45-4-5Voyeurism; public voyeurism; aerial voyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
Sec. 5. (a) The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) "Camera" means a camera, a video camera, a device that captures a digital image, or any other type of video recording device. (2) "Peep" means: (A) any looking of a clandestine, surreptitious, prying, or secretive nature; or (B) using a concealed camera with the intent of capturing an intimate image (as defined by IC 34-21.5-2-1). (3) "Private area" means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, or buttocks of an individual.      (b) A person: (1) who knowingly or intentionally: (A) peeps; or (B) goes upon the land of another with the intent to peep; into an occupied dwelling of another person; or (2) who knowingly or intentionally peeps in or into an area where an occupant of the area reasonably can be expected to disrobe or is actually expected to disrobe, including: (A) restrooms; (B) baths; (C) showers; and (D) dressing rooms; without the consent of the other person, commits voyeurism, a Class B misdemeanor.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at iga.in.gov

Cited in 19 court opinions1990s: 12000s: 32010s: 142020s: 1Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: Casady v. State (Indiana Court of Appeals 2010, 934 N.E.2d 1181) · Steven M. Sandleben v. State of Indiana (Indiana Court of Appeals 2014, 22 N.E.3d 782) · David Delagrange v. State of Indiana (Indiana Court of Appeals 2013, 981 N.E.2d 1227)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: Indiana Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2025, Indiana Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties, Indiana Workplace Recording Laws: Employee Rights and Employer Rules

§ 35-46-8.5-1Unlawful photography, surveillance, and tracking on private propertyIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Sec. 1. (a) This section does not apply to any of the following: (1) Electronic or video toll collection facilities or activities authorized under any of the following: (A) IC 8-15-2. (B) IC 8-15-3. (C) IC 8-15.5. (D) IC 8-15.7. (E) IC 8-16. (F) IC 9-21-3.5. (2) A law enforcement officer who has obtained: (A) a search warrant; or (B) the consent of the owner of private property; to place a camera, electronic surveillance equipment, or tracking device on the private property, with respect to the placement of a camera, electronic surveillance equipment, or tracking device. (3) A law enforcement officer who uses a law enforcement recording device in performance of the officer's duties, with respect to the use of the law enforcement recording device. (4) A person who uses a tracking device to determine the location of a family member (as defined in IC 35-44.1-3-1), unless the person is the subject of a protective order obtained by the family member.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at iga.in.gov

Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal

Sources and References

  1. Ind. Code Sections 22-5-8-1 to 22-5-8-4, prohibition on employer-mandated device implantation(iga.in.gov).gov
  2. Ind. Code Section 35-46-8.5-1, Unlawful Photography, Surveillance, and Tracking on Private Property(iga.in.gov).gov
  3. Ind. Code Section 35-45-4-5, Voyeurism; public voyeurism; aerial voyeurism(iga.in.gov).gov
  4. Ind. Code Article 35-33.5, wiretapping and electronic surveillance(iga.in.gov).gov
  5. 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, Definitions (business-extension exemption for employer-provided equipment used in the ordinary course of business at (5)(a)(i))(uscode.house.gov).gov
  6. Workplace Privacy Report (Littler), Indiana Prohibits Employers from Mandating Device Implantations for Employees (2021)(workplaceprivacyreport.com)
  7. NCSL, Privacy of Employee and Student Social Media Accounts (50-state tracker)(ncsl.org)
  8. Indiana Law Journal, The Private Workplace and the Proposed "Notice of Electronic Monitoring Act": Is "Notice" Enough?(repository.law.indiana.edu)
  9. 18 U.S.C. § 2511 – Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited(uscode.house.gov).gov
Share: