Louisiana
Louisiana Drone Laws: Privacy, Critical Infrastructure & Shoot-Down Rules

Louisiana treats a camera-equipped drone the same as any other recording device under its video voyeurism law, and treats it as a security risk when it flies over a refinery, prison, or military site. Federal rules control where a drone may fly; Louisiana law controls what an operator may record and where a drone may not go at all.
Federal Airspace Rules vs. Louisiana State Law
The Federal Aviation Administration regulates the national airspace. Every drone is an "aircraft" under , which pulls it into 14 CFR Part 107 (commercial flight, Remote Pilot Certificate, registration, Remote ID broadcast) or the recreational exception at . States cannot regulate flight altitude, flight paths, or airspace access; the FAA's state-and-local regulation guidance and the persuasive federal decision in Singer v. City of Newton, 284 F. Supp. 3d 125 (D. Mass. 2017), both draw that line. What Louisiana regulates instead is conduct: what an operator records with a drone-mounted camera, and where a drone may not fly regardless of altitude when a protected facility sits below it. The Fifth Circuit's decision in National Press Photographers Ass'n v. McCraw, 90 F.4th 770 (5th Cir. 2024) (reissued January 2024, superseding the withdrawn October 2023 opinion), upheld Texas's comparable image-capture and critical-infrastructure statute against both a First Amendment and a preemption challenge, the strongest current appellate confirmation that conduct-based laws like Louisiana's survive scrutiny that airspace rules would not.

Louisiana's Video Voyeurism Law Covers Drone Cameras
La. R.S. 14:283, Louisiana's video voyeurism statute, defines a covered device broadly enough to include "an unmanned aircraft system equipped with any camera," treating a drone the same as a hidden camera in a bedroom. The statute makes it a crime to use such a device to observe, view, photograph, film, or videotape a person without consent, either for a lewd or lascivious purpose, or to record specified sexually explicit conduct, such as sexual intercourse, masturbation, or exposed intimate body parts, in a place where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. A first conviction carries up to a $2,000 fine and two years in prison; subsequent convictions carry six months to three years at hard labor without benefit of parole or probation. If the recording is sexually explicit, penalties rise to up to $10,000 and one to five years at hard labor, and up to $10,000 and two to ten years at hard labor if the victim is a minor.
Subsection F of the statute requires anyone convicted of video voyeurism to register as a sex offender under Chapter 3-B of Title 15. That registration requirement is significantly harsher than the penalty structure most other states attach to a first drone-privacy offense, and it applies regardless of whether the underlying conduct involved a minor. Subsection H exempts bona fide news broadcasts and legitimate news-gathering activity.
Flying a Drone Over a "Targeted Facility" Is a Separate Crime
Beyond individual privacy, La. R.S. 14:337 criminalizes using a drone to conduct surveillance of, gather evidence about, or photograph a defined list of "targeted facilities" without the owner's prior written consent. That list covers petroleum and alumina refineries, chemical and rubber manufacturing plants, nuclear power generation facilities, school premises, grain elevators and storage facilities, and critical infrastructure as defined in La. R.S. 14:61(B). A first offense carries a fine of up to $500 or up to six months in jail; a second or subsequent offense carries a fine of $500 to $4,000 or six months to two years, plus mandatory forfeiture of the drone. The statute has been amended repeatedly since it was first enacted in 2014, most recently by Acts 2025, No. 23 and No. 170, reflecting how quickly this area of Louisiana law is moving.
Separate subsections of the same statute bar operating a drone over a correctional facility without authorization (up to $2,000 and six months on a first offense, escalating on repeat) and interfering with a military installation (fines from $2,000 to $5,000 and up to five years at hard labor). Louisiana has recent, concrete reasons to police that airspace: Barksdale Air Force Base near Bossier City, home to a B-52 bomber wing, confirmed multiple waves of unauthorized drones over its flight line between March 9 and March 15, 2026, prompting a shelter-in-place order and an active federal investigation. That incident involved a federal military installation, not a civilian prosecution under R.S. 14:337, but it illustrates why Louisiana lawmakers keep tightening the targeted-facility statute.
A 2025 amendment added a subsection giving a law enforcement officer or agency express authority to take "reasonable and necessary mitigation measures," including detection, tracking, jamming, hacking, or physical capture, against a drone when there is reasonable suspicion the aircraft is involved in criminal activity, poses an imminent threat to public safety, or is otherwise operating in violation of state or federal law. That authority belongs to police, not to the facility owner or a private citizen who spots a drone overhead.
Does Louisiana Require a Warrant Before Police Fly a Drone Over My Property?
Louisiana has not enacted a general statute requiring a law enforcement agency to obtain a warrant before using a drone to surveil a private citizen or their property, unlike roughly a dozen other states that have adopted one (see Drone Laws by State for how other states handle this question). Absent a Louisiana-specific statute, ordinary Fourth Amendment case law governs: whether warrantless drone surveillance of a particular area violates a reasonable expectation of privacy depends on factors like altitude, duration, and whether the area is curtilage. Louisiana's targeted-facility statute constrains how a drone may be used near the specific list of protected sites, but it does not create a general warrant requirement for flying over an ordinary residence. Readers should not assume Louisiana mirrors states that have adopted an explicit statutory warrant floor; it has not.
Can I Shoot Down a Drone Over My Property in Louisiana?
No. Federal law, not Louisiana law, controls this question, and the answer is the same everywhere in the United States. The Aircraft Sabotage Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 32, makes it a federal felony to willfully damage, destroy, or disable an "aircraft," and the FAA has classified drones as aircraft within the National Airspace System since 2012. A conviction carries up to 20 years in federal prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and permanent loss of Second Amendment rights as a convicted felon. Federal prosecutors rarely bring a full Section 32 charge over a neighbor's hobby drone; publicized incidents, like the 2015 "Kentucky Drone Slayer" case, typically end in reduced or dismissed state charges instead. That outcome reflects prosecutorial discretion, not a legal right to shoot down a drone. The drone owner's federal civil suit in that case, Boggs v. Merideth, was dismissed in 2017 for lack of federal subject-matter jurisdiction; the court never ruled on whether a drone over private land is a trespass, so the underlying question remains unresolved nationally.
No Louisiana statute, including the 2025 mitigation authority added to R.S. 14:337, authorizes a private property owner to disable or shoot down a drone. That authority runs to law enforcement agencies only, and only under the specific threat conditions described above.
Recreational and Commercial Drone Flights in Louisiana
Whether a Louisiana flight is recreational or commercial is a federal, not a state, question. A hobbyist flies under after passing the free TRUST safety test; anyone flying for business, including real estate photography or agricultural mapping, needs an FAA Remote Pilot Certificate under Part 107. Both groups must register any drone over 0.55 pounds with the FAA and broadcast Remote ID. Near Louisiana's busier airports, including Louis Armstrong New Orleans International and Baton Rouge Metropolitan, a drone flight inside controlled airspace also needs a LAANC or DroneZone authorization before takeoff, on top of whatever La. R.S. 14:283 and 14:337 require once the drone is in the air. None of that federal layer changes the state-law analysis above; a fully FAA-compliant flight can still violate Louisiana's privacy or targeted-facility statutes if the camera is pointed at the wrong subject.
Penalties at a Glance
| Conduct | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Using a drone to record a person for a lewd purpose, or to record sexually explicit conduct in a place with a reasonable expectation of privacy | La. R.S. 14:283 | Up to $2,000 and 2 years (first offense); mandatory sex offender registration |
| Recording sexually explicit conduct without consent | La. R.S. 14:283 | Up to $10,000 and 1 to 5 years at hard labor |
| Surveilling a "targeted facility" without written consent | La. R.S. 14:337 | Up to $500 and 6 months (first offense); $500 to $4,000 and 6 months to 2 years (repeat), plus forfeiture |
| Interfering with a military installation by drone | La. R.S. 14:337 | $2,000 to $5,000 and up to 5 years at hard labor |
| Shooting down or disabling any drone (private citizen, anywhere in the US) | 18 U.S.C. Section 32 | Up to 20 years and $250,000 fine (federal) |
Local Ordinances and Where Louisiana Drone Law Is Headed
La. R.S. 2:2 gives the State of Louisiana exclusive authority to regulate the testing and operation of unmanned aircraft systems, and expressly preempts any parish or municipal ordinance that tries to do the same, subject to narrow carve-outs for local law enforcement, fire departments, and utility companies using drones within the scope of their duties. A resident who wants to know whether a local drone rule applies should start from the assumption that it does not; state law occupies the field. For the security-camera side of Louisiana privacy law, including hidden cameras and workplace monitoring, see Louisiana Surveillance Camera Laws. Louisiana's drone statutes have been amended in nearly every legislative session since 2014, so residents and operators should confirm the current version before relying on older secondary summaries, and Louisiana's one-party consent recording rule under Louisiana Recording Laws governs the separate question of recording conversations rather than images.
More Louisiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I fly a drone over my neighbor's yard in Louisiana?
Simple overflight is not, by itself, a crime under Louisiana law. It becomes illegal under La. R.S. 14:283 if you use the drone's camera to observe or record your neighbor without their consent for a lewd purpose, or to record specified sexually explicit conduct, such as through a bedroom or bathroom window, in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Recording an ordinary, non-sexual moment in a fenced backyard does not by itself trigger this statute.
Is it illegal to record someone with a drone in Louisiana?
It can be. La. R.S. 14:283 makes it a crime to use a drone-mounted camera to observe, photograph, or record a person without consent for a lewd purpose, or to record specified sexually explicit conduct in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. A conviction requires registration as a sex offender under Title 15, Chapter 3-B.
Can police fly a drone over my house without a warrant in Louisiana?
Louisiana has no statute specifically requiring a warrant before police use a drone to surveil ordinary private property, so the question is governed by general Fourth Amendment principles rather than a state-specific statutory floor.
What counts as a "targeted facility" under Louisiana drone law?
La. R.S. 14:337 defines targeted facilities to include petroleum and alumina refineries, chemical and rubber manufacturing plants, nuclear power facilities, schools, grain elevators, and other critical infrastructure as defined in La. R.S. 14:61(B). Flying a drone to surveil or photograph one of these sites without the owner's written consent is a crime.
Can I legally shoot down a drone flying over my property in Louisiana?
No. Shooting a drone out of the sky anywhere in the United States, including over your own land, is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. Section 32, regardless of any Louisiana statute. Only law enforcement agencies, acting under the mitigation authority added to La. R.S. 14:337 in 2025, may lawfully disable a drone, and only under specific threat conditions.
Does Louisiana require drones to be registered beyond the FAA's federal registration?
No. Louisiana has not created a state drone registry separate from the FAA's federal registration requirement under 49 U.S.C. 44809 and 14 CFR Part 107; operators register once with the FAA.
What happens if someone uses a drone to fly contraband into a Louisiana prison?
Flying a drone over a correctional facility without authorization is a separate offense under La. R.S. 14:337, and using it to deliver contraband can expose the operator to additional charges under Louisiana's contraband statutes, on top of the drone-specific penalties.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected La. R.S. 14:283's privacy-expectation prong, which requires the recorded content to be sexually explicit per (B)(3), not any drone recording in a place with a privacy expectation, and broadened the 2025 La. R.S. 14:337 mitigation-authority trigger to its actual three independent conditions (criminal activity, public-safety threat, or any state/federal law violation).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 6 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
United States Code Title 49
§ 40102DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
In this part— “aeronautics” means the science and art of flight. “air carrier” means a citizen of the United States undertaking by any means, directly or indirectly, to provide air transportation. “air commerce” means foreign air commerce, interstate air commerce, the transportation of mail by aircraft, the operation of aircraft within the limits of a Federal airway, or the operation of aircraft that directly affects, or may endanger safety in, foreign or interstate air commerce. “air navigation facility” means a facility used, available for use, or designed for use, in aid of air navigation, including— a landing area; runway lighting and airport surface visual and other navigation aids; apparatus, equipment, software, or service for distributing aeronautical and meteorological information to air traffic control facilities or aircraft; communication, navigation, or surveillance equipment for air-to-ground or air-to-air applications; any structure, equipment, or mechanism for guiding or controlling flight in the air or the landing and takeoff of aircraft; and buildings, equipment, and systems dedicated to the national airspace system.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 167 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: United States v. Yousef (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2003, 327 F.3d 56) · Richard A. Bower v. Federal Express Corporation (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1996, 96 F.3d 200) · CSI Aviation Services, Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2011, 637 F.3d 408)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Massachusetts Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Trespass, and Warrant Rules
§ 44809Exception for limited recreational operations of unmanned aircraftIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (e), and notwithstanding chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, a person may operate a small unmanned aircraft without specific certification or operating authority from the Federal Aviation Administration if the operation adheres to all of the following limitations: The aircraft is flown strictly for recreational purposes. The aircraft is operated in accordance with or within the programming of a community-based organization’s set of safety guidelines that are developed in coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration. The aircraft is flown within the visual line of sight of the person operating the aircraft or a visual observer co-located and in direct communication with the operator. The aircraft is operated in a manner that does not interfere with and gives way to any manned aircraft. In Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport, the operator obtains prior authorization from the Administrator or designee before operating and complies with all airspace restrictions and prohibitions.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2022
Leading cases: Tyler Brennan v. Stephen Dickson (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2022, 45 F.4th 48)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Florida Drone Laws 2026: Privacy, Warrants & Penalties, Georgia Drone Laws 2026: Privacy, Prisons & Preemption, Hawaii Drone Laws 2026: Trespass, Privacy & Warrants
Louisiana Revised Statutes
§ 14:283Video voyeurism; penaltiesIn forcecited in 30 of our articles
A. Video voyeurism is any of the following: (1) The use of any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, or an unmanned aircraft system equipped with any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping a person where that person has not consented to the specific instance of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping and either: (a) It is for a lewd or lascivious purpose. (b) The observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping is as described in Paragraph (B)(3) of this Section and occurs in a place where an identifiable person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. (2) The transfer of an image obtained by activity described in Paragraph (1) of this Subsection by live or recorded telephone message, electronic mail, the Internet, or a commercial online service.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at legis.la.gov
Cited in 16 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases: State v. Batiste (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2006, 939 So. 2d 1245) · State v. Boudreaux (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2006, 945 So. 2d 898) · State v. Perry (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2012, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 298)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), Louisiana Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Louisiana Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties
§ 14:337Unlawful use of an unmanned aircraft systemIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
A.(1) Unlawful use of an unmanned aircraft system is any of the following: (a) The intentional use of an unmanned aircraft system to conduct surveillance of, gather evidence or collect information about, or photographically or electronically record a targeted facility without the prior written consent of the owner of the targeted facility. (b) The intentional use of an unmanned aircraft system over the grounds of the governor's mansion, state or local jail, prison, or other correctional facility that incarcerates or detains juveniles or adults accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for violations of criminal law without the express written consent of the person in charge of that state building, state or local jail, prison, or other correctional facility.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at legis.la.gov
Cross-referenced in the statute itself: § 14:61
Also relied on in: Louisiana Security Camera Laws: Residential and Business Rules, Louisiana Video Recording Laws: Surveillance Rules and Privacy Limits, Louisiana Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 14:61Unauthorized entry of a critical infrastructureIn force
A. Unauthorized entry of a critical infrastructure is any of the following: (1) The intentional entry by a person without authority into any structure or onto any premises, belonging to another, that constitutes in whole or in part a critical infrastructure that is completely enclosed by any type of physical barrier. (2) The use or attempted use of fraudulent documents for identification purposes to enter a critical infrastructure. (3) Remaining upon or in the premises of a critical infrastructure after having been forbidden to do so, either orally or in writing, by any owner, lessee, or custodian of the property or by any other authorized person. (4) The intentional entry into a restricted area of a critical infrastructure which is marked as a restricted or limited access area that is completely enclosed by any type of physical barrier when the person is not authorized to enter that restricted or limited access area. B.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at legis.la.gov
Cited in 16 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases: State v. Randle (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2002, 827 So. 2d 657) · State of Louisiana v. Gilbert v. Robinson Jr. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2025) · White Hat v. Landry (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 2024)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2:2Regulation of unmanned aerial systems and unmanned aircraft systems; preemptionIn force
A. Subject to the provisions of Subsection C of this Section and except as otherwise provided by law: (1) The state shall have exclusive jurisdiction to regulate all unmanned aircraft systems and all unmanned aerial systems. (2) State law shall supersede and preempt any rule, regulation, code, or ordinance of any political subdivision or other unit of local government. Nothing in this Section shall preempt the exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States as set forth in 49 U.S.C. 40103. Any interpretation or application of any provision of this Section that contradicts the exclusive authority of the United States government to regulate unmanned aircraft systems and all unmanned aerial systems shall be null. B. As used in this Section, the following phrases shall have the following meanings: (1) "Unmanned aerial system" means an unmanned aircraft and all associated support equipment, control station, data links, telemetry, communications, and navigation equipment necessary to operate the unmanned aircraft.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at legis.la.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- La. R.S. 14:283: Video Voyeurism (Louisiana State Legislature)(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 14:337: Unlawful Use of an Unmanned Aircraft System (Louisiana State Legislature)(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 2:2: Regulation of Unmanned Aerial and Aircraft Systems; Preemption(legis.la.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. Section 32: Destruction of Aircraft or Aircraft Facilities (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- Office of Governor Jeff Landry: Louisiana Becomes First State to Authorize Local Law Enforcement to Neutralize Dangerous Drones(gov.louisiana.gov).gov
- KSLA News: Barksdale Air Force Base Confirms Multiple Drones Entered Its Airspace the Week of March 9(ksla.com)
- FAA: State and Local Regulation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems(faa.gov).gov