District of Columbia flag

District of Columbia

Washington DC Drone Laws (2026): Rules & Restrictions

Washington DC Drone Laws (2026): Rules & Restrictions

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I legally fly a drone anywhere in Washington, DC?

Almost nowhere without specific advance authorization. Nearly all of DC sits inside the FAA's 15-mile-radius Flight Restricted Zone, where drone flight is prohibited without authorization from the FAA and the Transportation Security Administration, a federal rule separate from DC's own law.

Does DC have a law against a drone spying on me at home?

DC has no drone-specific privacy statute, but its general voyeurism law, D.C. Code Section 22-3531, applies to any device, including a drone, used to secretly capture an image of a person's private area or of them undressing or bathing without consent.

Do DC police need a warrant to fly a drone?

DC has no statute requiring a warrant for police drone use. The Metropolitan Police Department's own policy, General Order 803.09, bars facial recognition and weapons on its drones and limits deployments to specific scenarios, but that is internal agency policy rather than a codified warrant requirement.

Is flying a drone over the National Mall illegal?

Yes. The National Park Service bans launching, landing, or operating any drone in areas it administers, which includes the National Mall, the Ellipse, and other parts of DC's monumental core, and US Park Police actively cite and confiscate equipment for violations.

Can a drone hovering over my DC property count as trespassing?

This is unresolved. DC's unlawful entry statute, D.C. Code Section 22-3302, was written for physical entry onto land, and neither the DC Council nor DC courts have addressed whether a drone hovering in the airspace above private property without landing satisfies that statute.

Is it legal to shoot down a drone over my property in DC?

No. Shooting down any drone is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. Section 32 regardless of where it is flying, and discharging a firearm within DC would independently expose the shooter to serious DC weapons charges.

Updates

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

The Law Behind This Article

This article rests on 3 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.

Code of the District of Columbia, Title 22: Criminal Offenses and Penalties. - Chapter 31A: Stalking.

§ 22-3133Stalking.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to purposefully engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific individual: (1) With the intent to cause that individual to: (A) Fear for his or her safety or the safety of another person; (B) Feel seriously alarmed, disturbed, or frightened; or (C) Suffer emotional distress; (2) That the person knows would cause that individual reasonably to: (A) Fear for his or her safety or the safety of another person; (B) Feel seriously alarmed, disturbed, or frightened; or (C) Suffer emotional distress; or (3) That the person should have known would cause a reasonable person in the individual’s circumstances to: (A) Fear for his or her safety or the safety of another person; (B) Feel seriously alarmed, disturbed, or frightened; or (C) Suffer emotional distress. (b) This section does not apply to constitutionally protected activity. (c) Where a single act is of a continuing nature, each 24-hour period constitutes a separate occasion. (d) The conduct on each of the occasions need not be the same as it is on the others.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at github.com

Cited in 10 court opinions2010s: 42020s: 6Most recently applied by a court: 2025

Leading cases: Ronald L. Atkinson v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2015, 121 A.3d 780) · Johnnie Coleman v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2019, 202 A.3d 1127) · Joy Whylie v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2014, 98 A.3d 156)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: Washington DC GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), District of Columbia Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)

Code of the District of Columbia, Title 22: Criminal Offenses and Penalties. - Chapter 33: Trespass; Injuries to Property.

§ 22-3302Unlawful entry on property.In force
(1) Any person who, without lawful authority, shall enter, or attempt to enter, any private dwelling, building, or other property, or part of such dwelling, building, or other property, against the will of the lawful occupant or of the person lawfully in charge thereof, or being therein or thereon, without lawful authority to remain therein or thereon shall refuse to quit the same on the demand of the lawful occupant, or of the person lawfully in charge thereof, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, imprisonment for not more than 180 days, or both. The presence of a person in any private dwelling, building, or other property that is otherwise vacant and boarded-up or otherwise secured in a manner that conveys that it is vacant and not to be entered, or displays a no trespassing sign, shall be prima facie evidence that any person found in such property has entered against the will of the person in legal possession of the property.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at github.com

Cited in 45 court opinions1960s: 11970s: 21980s: 01990s: 02000s: 12010s: 232020s: 18Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: Adam Jaramillo Ortberg v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2013, 81 A.3d 303) · JACQUELINE FREY v. UNITED STATES. (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2016, 137 A.3d 1000) · Larson-Olson v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2024)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Code of the District of Columbia, Title 22: Criminal Offenses and Penalties. - Chapter 35A: Voyeurism.

§ 22-3531Voyeurism.In forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) For the purposes of this section, the term: (1) “Electronic device” means any electronic, mechanical, or digital equipment that captures visual or aural images, including cameras, computers, tape recorders, video recorders, and cellular telephones. (2) “Private area” means the naked or undergarment-clad genitals, pubic area, anus, or buttocks, or female breast below the top of the areola. (b) Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, it is unlawful for any person to occupy a hidden observation post or to install or maintain a peephole, mirror, or any electronic device for the purpose of secretly or surreptitiously observing an individual who is: (1) Using a bathroom or rest room; (2) Totally or partially undressed or changing clothes; or (3) Engaging in sexual activity. (1) Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, it is unlawful for a person to electronically record, without the express and informed consent of the individual being recorded, an individual who is: (A) Using a bathroom or rest room; (B) Totally or partially undressed or changing clothes; or (C) Engaging in sexual activity.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at github.com

Cited in 14 court opinions2010s: 72020s: 7Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: BERNARD FREUNDEL v. UNITED STATES (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2016, 146 A.3d 375) · In re Prosecution of Clinton Perrow (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2017, 172 A.3d 894) · Mario Giovani Valendzuela-Castillo v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2018, 180 A.3d 74)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: District of Columbia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, District of Columbia Security Camera Laws: Installation Rules and Privacy Limits, District of Columbia Video Recording Laws: What You Need to Know

Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal

Sources and References

  1. D.C. Code Section 22-3531 (Voyeurism)(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
  2. D.C. Code Section 22-3133 (Stalking)(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
  3. D.C. Code Section 22-3302 (Unlawful entry on property)(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
  4. Metropolitan Police Department, "Drones and Unmanned Aircraft Systems" (UAS Program, General Order 803.09)(mpdc.dc.gov).gov
  5. Federal Aviation Administration, "DC Area Prohibited & Restricted Airspace"(faa.gov).gov
  6. National Park Service, "D.C. Resident Cited for Illegal Drone Operation Near Washington Monument"(nps.gov).gov
  7. 18 U.S.C. Section 32 (Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities)(uscode.house.gov).gov
Share: