EnglishEspañol
Arkansas flag

Arkansas

Arkansas At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arkansas At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights

Updates

Corrected the description of Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford to the public policy the Arkansas Supreme Court actually identified (discharge for reporting a violation of state or federal law), removing a refusal-to-break-the-law scenario the court did not hold.

Corrected the adoption year of Arkansas Constitution Amendment 34 to 1944 (Act 101 of 1947 is its enabling statute, not its ratification date) and credited Gladden v. Arkansas Children's Hospital (1987), rather than Crain Industries v. Cass (1991), with creating the employee-handbook exception to at-will employment.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Ark. Const. Amendment 34 (right-to-work, 1947)(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
  2. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 743 S.W.2d 380 (Ark. 1988) (contract-based public-policy wrongful discharge)(opinions.arcourts.gov).gov
  3. Crain Industries, Inc. v. Cass, 810 S.W.2d 910 (Ark. 1991) (handbook implied-contract exception)(opinions.arcourts.gov).gov
  4. Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, Ark. Code Ann. sec. 16-123-101 et seq.(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
  5. Gladden v. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 292 Ark. 130, 728 S.W.2d 501 (1987) (modifies the at-will rule where a personnel manual contains an express provision against termination except for cause)(courtlistener.com)
  6. Kaiser v. Price-Fewell, Inc., 235 Ark. 295, 359 S.W.2d 449 (1962) (Amendment 34 was adopted by the electors of Arkansas in 1944; Act 101 of 1947 is its enabling statute)(courtlistener.com)
  7. Crain Industries, Inc. v. Cass, 305 Ark. 566, 810 S.W.2d 910 (1991) (applies Gladden to enforce an express handbook promise of seniority-based layoffs)(courtlistener.com)
  8. Ark. Code Ann. sec. 16-123-107(a)(1) (right to obtain and hold employment without discrimination); sec. 16-123-102(5) (employer means nine or more employees)(archive.org)
Share:

Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.