Arkansas
Arkansas At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arkansas is an at-will employment state, meaning employers may terminate workers at any time, for any reason or no reason, without legal liability under the general common law. The at-will doctrine governs the vast majority of private employment relationships in Arkansas and applies unless an employment contract, collective bargaining agreement, or recognized exception alters those terms.
Is Arkansas an at-will employment state?
Yes. Arkansas follows the at-will employment doctrine as a default rule of common law. Under at-will employment, either the employer or the employee may end the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause, and with or without advance notice. There is no single Arkansas statute that creates the at-will rule; it exists as a common-law presumption that applies whenever no employment contract, union agreement, or recognized exception governs the relationship. If you do not have a written employment contract that specifies a definite term of employment or requires cause for termination, the law treats you as an at-will employee subject to discharge at any time.
Exceptions to at-will employment in Arkansas
Arkansas recognizes two of the three major common-law exceptions to at-will employment and rejects the third. Understanding each exception is critical because Arkansas has drawn the boundaries of its public-policy protection differently from most states.

Public-policy exception: RECOGNIZED, but as a contract claim, not a tort. In most states that recognize the public-policy exception, it is treated as a wrongful-discharge tort, which means employees can pursue both compensatory and punitive damages. Arkansas takes a different path. The Arkansas Supreme Court recognized in Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 743 S.W.2d 380 (Ark. 1988), that an employee who is discharged for reporting an employer's legal violations has a cause of action. The court grounded that claim in contract principles rather than tort, which carries a significant practical consequence: punitive damages are not available in Arkansas public-policy wrongful discharge cases because punitive damages are a tort remedy. Compensatory damages for breach of the implied duty remain available. When evaluating a potential claim, this distinction matters both for damages and for procedural strategy.
Implied-contract exception: RECOGNIZED. If an employer issues an employee handbook that contains specific promises about how terminations will be handled, those provisions can form an implied employment contract binding on the employer. The Arkansas Supreme Court announced that modification of the at-will rule in Gladden v. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 292 Ark. 130, 728 S.W.2d 501 (1987), which held that "where an employee relies upon a personnel manual that contains an express provision against termination except for cause he may not be arbitrarily discharged in violation of such a provision." The court applied and extended Gladden in Crain Industries, Inc. v. Cass, 305 Ark. 566, 810 S.W.2d 910 (1991), enforcing an express handbook promise that layoffs would follow departmental seniority. Whether a handbook creates enforceable rights depends on the specificity and definiteness of its language. Vague aspirational statements generally will not bind an employer, but concrete procedures (for example, progressive-discipline steps or language conditioning termination on "just cause") may. A conspicuous disclaimer reserving the employer's right to modify or disregard the handbook can defeat the implied-contract claim.
Good-faith and fair-dealing exception: NOT recognized. Approximately 11 states imply a covenant of good faith and fair dealing into every employment relationship, preventing employers from terminating employees in bad faith or for pretextual reasons. Arkansas has not adopted this exception. Employers in Arkansas owe no general common-law duty of good faith in making termination decisions beyond the obligations imposed by contract or specific statutes.
Is Arkansas a right-to-work state?
Yes. Arkansas is a right-to-work state under Ark. Const. Amendment 34, which Arkansas voters adopted in 1944, making Arkansas one of the earliest states to constitutionalize the right-to-work principle. The General Assembly's enabling legislation for the amendment, Act 101 of 1947, is codified today at Ark. Code Ann. secs. 11-3-301 to 11-3-304. Arkansas is among the 26 states with right-to-work laws in 2026 (Michigan repealed its law effective February 13, 2024, reducing the national count from 27).
Right-to-work is frequently confused with at-will employment, but the two rules address entirely different aspects of employment. Right-to-work concerns union membership and dues: in a right-to-work state, no employee covered by a union contract can be required to join the union or pay union fees as a condition of keeping a job. Employers and unions may not negotiate a "union security clause" that makes membership or dues payment mandatory. At-will employment, by contrast, governs the circumstances under which any employee (union or non-union) can be terminated. A unionized employee in Arkansas may enjoy contractual "just cause" termination protections under a collective bargaining agreement while still working in a right-to-work state. The two rules coexist without contradiction.
What at-will employment does not allow in Arkansas
At-will employment is a default rule, not an unlimited license to fire employees for any reason. Both federal and state law carve out broad categories of protected employees, and those protections apply in Arkansas regardless of the at-will doctrine.

Federal law establishes a floor that applies in every state. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers with 15 or more employees cannot terminate workers because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects workers 40 and older from age-based discharge. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits termination because of a disability and requires reasonable accommodation. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) bars termination based on genetic information. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) adds protections for pregnancy-related conditions. The Equal Pay Act prohibits sex-based wage discrimination. Federal law also prohibits retaliation against employees for engaging in protected activity: filing a discrimination charge, taking leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), reporting wage violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), engaging in concerted activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), reporting workplace safety concerns under OSHA, or exercising rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA).
At the state level, the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 (Ark. Code Ann. sec. 16-123-101 et seq.) prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, religion, national origin, gender, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability. The operative provision, Ark. Code Ann. sec. 16-123-107(a)(1), declares the right to obtain and hold employment without discrimination, and the Act defines a covered "employer" as one who employs nine or more employees in Arkansas in each of twenty or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year (Ark. Code Ann. sec. 16-123-102(5)). The contract-based public-policy protection from Sterling Drug v. Oxford also adds a layer beyond the federal floor for employees who are fired for reporting employer violations.
If you were fired in Arkansas
If you lost your job in Arkansas, the at-will doctrine means your employer was not legally required to provide a reason or advance notice. The absence of a stated reason does not mean, however, that the termination was lawful. An illegal reason remains illegal even when the employer stays silent.

Begin by documenting everything you can: save emails, performance reviews, disciplinary notices, and any communications surrounding your termination. Write down a detailed timeline of events while the facts are still fresh. Then consider whether one of the following applies to your situation: (1) you had a written employment contract specifying a definite term or requiring cause for termination; (2) your employee handbook contained specific promises about termination procedures (the implied-contract rule from Gladden v. Arkansas Children's Hospital and Crain Industries v. Cass); (3) you were discharged for reporting your employer's violations (the contract-based public-policy protection from Sterling Drug v. Oxford); (4) you believe the actual reason for your termination was a protected characteristic or retaliatory motive under federal or state law.
If any of these apply, you may have a viable legal claim. Deadlines in employment law are short: most federal discrimination charges must be filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days of the termination (or 300 days if a state deferral agency has jurisdiction). Missing these deadlines typically bars your claim. Before those days run out, ask an Arkansas employment lawyer in a free case evaluation whether the 180-day or 300-day limit applies to you (attorney advertising).
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Employment law varies by state and changes frequently, and it is not a substitute for advice about a specific termination. For guidance on your situation, consult a licensed employment attorney in Arkansas.
Related: At-Will Employment by State | Whistleblower Protections
More Arkansas Laws
- Arkansas Employee Monitoring Laws
- Arkansas Final Paycheck Laws
- Arkansas Whistleblower Laws
- Arkansas Workers Compensation Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Arkansas an at-will state?
Yes. Arkansas is an at-will employment state. Employers may terminate employees at any time, for any lawful reason or no reason, and employees may resign at any time. This default rule applies unless an employment contract, collective bargaining agreement, or a recognized exception changes those terms.
Can I be fired for no reason in Arkansas?
Generally yes, under the at-will doctrine. However, you cannot be fired for an illegal reason, such as your race, sex, age, disability, or for engaging in a protected activity like reporting your employer's legal violations (Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 743 S.W.2d 380 (Ark. 1988)).
Can my employer fire me for reporting illegal activity?
No, if the illegal activity involves your employer's own violations. The Arkansas Supreme Court held in Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 743 S.W.2d 380 (Ark. 1988), that discharging an employee for reporting employer violations gives rise to a contract-based wrongful-discharge claim. Note that this claim sounds in contract rather than tort, so punitive damages are not available. See also the whistleblower protections hub for federal options.
Does an employee handbook protect me in Arkansas?
It may. The Arkansas Supreme Court modified the at-will rule for handbooks in Gladden v. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 728 S.W.2d 501 (Ark. 1987), holding that an employee who relies on a personnel manual containing an express provision against termination except for cause may not be arbitrarily discharged in violation of it, and it applied that reasoning to enforce an express seniority-based layoff promise in Crain Industries, Inc. v. Cass, 810 S.W.2d 910 (Ark. 1991). Whether your handbook provides protection depends on how definite the termination language is and whether the employer included a clear disclaimer reserving the right to change or disregard those policies.
Is Arkansas a right-to-work state?
Yes. Arkansas is a right-to-work state under Ark. Const. Amendment 34 (1944). No employee may be required to join a union or pay union dues as a condition of employment. Right-to-work addresses union membership, not whether an employer needs a reason to fire you; those are two separate legal concepts.
Does Arkansas recognize the public-policy exception to at-will employment?
Yes, but in a narrower form than most states. Arkansas treats it as a contract claim, not a tort, following Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 743 S.W.2d 380 (Ark. 1988). Employees fired for reporting employer violations have a claim, but punitive damages are not available because the claim does not sound in tort.
Does Arkansas recognize a good-faith exception to at-will employment?
No. Arkansas does not recognize a covenant of good faith and fair dealing in employment relationships. Employers in Arkansas owe no general common-law duty to act in good faith when deciding to terminate an employee.
Updates
Corrected the description of Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford to the public policy the Arkansas Supreme Court actually identified (discharge for reporting a violation of state or federal law), removing a refusal-to-break-the-law scenario the court did not hold.
Corrected the adoption year of Arkansas Constitution Amendment 34 to 1944 (Act 101 of 1947 is its enabling statute, not its ratification date) and credited Gladden v. Arkansas Children's Hospital (1987), rather than Crain Industries v. Cass (1991), with creating the employee-handbook exception to at-will employment.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated
§ 11-3-304Contracts to exclude persons from employment prohibited.In force
(a) No person, group of persons, firm, corporation, association, or labor organization shall enter into any contract to exclude from employment: (1) Persons who are members of, or affiliated with, a labor union; (2) Persons who are not members of, or who fail or refuse to join or affiliate with,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 16-123-107Discrimination offenses.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) The right of an otherwise qualified person to be free from discrimination because of race, religion, national origin, gender, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability is recognized as and declared to be a civil right.…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 73 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bader v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2001, 344 Ark. 241)“…trial court invoked were Ark.Code Ann. § 16-123-102(8) and Ark.Code Ann. § 16-123-107(a). Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-102 (8) pr…”
- Odom Antennas, Inc. v. Stevens (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 1998, 61 Ark. App. 182)“…Rights Act claim; that amount was limited to $50,000 under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-107 (c) (Supp. 1997), based on a perceived…”
- Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of Wynne (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2000, 340 Ark. 563)“…onstitute gender discrimination expressly prohibited under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-107 (a)(1). Specifically, Flentje alleged t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report, Wrongful Termination in Arkansas (2026): Laws, Deadlines, How to File
§ 11-3-301Policy.In force
Freedom of organized labor to bargain collectively and freedom of unorganized labor to bargain individually is declared to be the public policy of the state under Arkansas Constitution, Amendment 34.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2005
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 2005)“…f the state under Arkansas Constitution, Amendment 34 . A.C.A. § 11-3-301 (Repl. 2002). The Arkansas Supreme Cou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-123-101Title.In force
This subchapter shall be referred to as the “Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993”.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 118 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Malone v. Trans-States Lines, Inc. (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1996, 325 Ark. 383)“…sical impairment sought under Arkansas’s Civil Rights Act ( Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-123-101 , particularly -107). The trial court s…”
- Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of Wynne (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2000, 340 Ark. 563)“…ights Act of 1964 and under the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-123-101 (1993) et. seq. In September 1996, Fle…”
- Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's Hospital (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2002, 347 Ark. 941)“…The Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 is codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-123-101 to -108 (Supp. 2001). Disability is de…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Ark. Const. Amendment 34 (right-to-work, 1947)(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
- Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford, 743 S.W.2d 380 (Ark. 1988) (contract-based public-policy wrongful discharge)(opinions.arcourts.gov).gov
- Crain Industries, Inc. v. Cass, 810 S.W.2d 910 (Ark. 1991) (handbook implied-contract exception)(opinions.arcourts.gov).gov
- Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993, Ark. Code Ann. sec. 16-123-101 et seq.(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
- Gladden v. Arkansas Children's Hospital, 292 Ark. 130, 728 S.W.2d 501 (1987) (modifies the at-will rule where a personnel manual contains an express provision against termination except for cause)(courtlistener.com)
- Kaiser v. Price-Fewell, Inc., 235 Ark. 295, 359 S.W.2d 449 (1962) (Amendment 34 was adopted by the electors of Arkansas in 1944; Act 101 of 1947 is its enabling statute)(courtlistener.com)
- Crain Industries, Inc. v. Cass, 305 Ark. 566, 810 S.W.2d 910 (1991) (applies Gladden to enforce an express handbook promise of seniority-based layoffs)(courtlistener.com)
- Ark. Code Ann. sec. 16-123-107(a)(1) (right to obtain and hold employment without discrimination); sec. 16-123-102(5) (employer means nine or more employees)(archive.org)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.