Colorado
Colorado Spousal Maintenance (Alimony) Laws: The Advisory Guideline (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. How we verify our legal content

Colorado calls financial support paid between divorcing spouses "spousal maintenance." An advisory guideline under suggests an amount and a duration when the parties' combined annual adjusted gross income is $240,000 or less and the marriage lasted at least three years.
Information last verified on June 1, 2026.
Estimate your situation: Try our free Colorado alimony calculator to estimate spousal support and see the factors a Colorado court weighs.
What is spousal maintenance in Colorado?
Colorado uses the term "spousal maintenance" rather than "alimony" to describe court-ordered financial support paid from one spouse to the other following a divorce or legal separation. The authority to award maintenance comes from , part of the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act.
Maintenance is distinct from the division of marital property. A property award is a one-time transfer; maintenance is an ongoing payment stream intended to help a lower-earning spouse meet reasonable financial needs while transitioning to economic independence or supporting a lifestyle reasonably comparable to the marital standard of living.
Either spouse can seek maintenance. The statute does not presume that a particular spouse is entitled to an award. Courts look first at whether maintenance is appropriate at all, then at amount and duration.
Colorado law also distinguishes temporary maintenance, which can be ordered while a divorce case is pending, from permanent maintenance ordered in the final decree. The advisory guideline discussed in this article applies to both contexts, though courts have particularly wide discretion on temporary awards.
The advisory maintenance guideline
When the guideline applies

The advisory guideline kicks in only when two conditions are both met:
- The parties' combined annual adjusted gross income does not exceed $240,000.
- The marriage lasted at least three years.
If either condition is absent, the guideline does not apply. The court must then determine maintenance, if any, using the 14 statutory factors described below.
How the amount is calculated
The base amount under the guideline equals 40% of the parties' combined monthly adjusted gross income minus the lower-earning spouse's monthly adjusted gross income. This is the formula stated in C.R.S. section 14-10-114(3)(b)(I)(A).
A straightforward example: if the higher-earning spouse earns $8,000 per month and the lower-earning spouse earns $2,000 per month, combined monthly income is $10,000. Forty percent of $10,000 is $4,000. Subtracting the lower earner's $2,000 yields a base guideline amount of $2,000 per month.
If the calculation produces a negative number, the guideline amount is zero.
The non-deductibility adjustment
The federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminated the income-tax deduction for alimony and the corresponding income inclusion for the recipient, effective for divorce agreements executed after December 31, 2018 (IRS Topic No. 452). Because most current Colorado divorces produce non-deductible maintenance, the statute applies a downward multiplier to the base calculation:
- Combined monthly income of $10,000 or less: guideline amount equals 80% of the base figure.
- Combined monthly income of more than $10,000 and up to $20,000: guideline amount equals 75% of the base figure.
Using the example above ($10,000 combined monthly), the 80% multiplier would reduce the $2,000 base figure to $1,600 per month for a post-2018 non-deductible award.
The 40% income cap
The statute provides that if the formula result would push the recipient spouse's total monthly income above 40% of the parties' combined monthly adjusted gross income, the maintenance amount is reduced to keep the recipient at or below that 40% threshold. This cap prevents the guideline from overcompensating the lower-earning spouse.
The guideline is advisory only
C.R.S. section 14-10-114(3)(b) is explicit: the advisory guidelines "do not create a presumptive amount or term of maintenance." The court has full discretion to award more, less, or no maintenance, and must make written or oral findings addressing the parties' gross incomes, marital property awarded, financial resources, and reasonable financial need as established during the marriage.
How long maintenance lasts
The duration schedule
For marriages of at least three years and not more than 20 years, the guideline suggests a maintenance term equal to a percentage of the total marriage length. That percentage increases with the length of the marriage, starting at 31% for a three-year (36-month) marriage and rising to a cap of 50% once the marriage reaches 12.5 years (150 months). Key reference points from C.R.S. section 14-10-114(3)(b)(II)(B):
| Marriage Length | Guideline Percentage | Advisory Term |
|---|---|---|
| 3 years (36 months) | 31% | approximately 11 months |
| 5 years (60 months) | 35% | approximately 21 months |
| 7 years (84 months) | 39% | approximately 33 months |
| 10 years (120 months) | 45% | approximately 54 months |
| 12.5 years (150 months) | 50% (cap) | approximately 75 months |
| 15 years (180 months) | 50% | approximately 90 months |
| 20 years (240 months) | 50% | approximately 120 months |
The percentage increases roughly 0.165 percentage points per month of marriage between 36 and 150 months.
Marriages over 20 years
When the marriage exceeded 20 years, the court may award maintenance for a specified term of years or for an indefinite term. The statute prohibits the court from specifying a maintenance term shorter than the guideline term for a 20-year marriage (120 months) without making special findings justifying the shorter award.
Duration is also advisory
The duration table, like the amount formula, is advisory. The court may depart from the suggested term based on the statutory factors, the parties' agreement, or any other factor the court considers relevant. A court ordering a deviation must explain its reasoning in findings of fact.
When the guideline does not apply
Marriages under three years or combined income over $240,000

When the parties' marriage lasted fewer than three years, or when their combined annual adjusted gross income exceeds $240,000, the advisory guideline does not apply. The court proceeds directly to the 14 statutory factors in C.R.S. section 14-10-114(3)(c), which include:
- The financial resources of each party, including income from separate or marital property
- Each party's ability to meet their own reasonable needs independently
- The standard of living established during the marriage
- The distribution of marital property
- Both parties' income, employment history, and employability through reasonable diligence
- Historical patterns of income, including overtime and secondary employment
- The duration of the marriage
- Any temporary maintenance already paid
- The age and health of each party, including significant health-care needs
- Significant economic or non-economic contributions to the marriage
- Whether a nominal maintenance award should be entered to preserve a future claim
- The tax consequences of the award
- Any other factor the court deems relevant
Court discretion within the guideline range
Even when the guideline applies, the 14 factors remain relevant. A party seeking to deviate from the guideline (whether to increase or decrease the amount or term) presents evidence on these factors. The statute does not require the court to start from the guideline figure and then deviate; the guideline is a reference point, not a floor or ceiling.
How maintenance ends or changes
Automatic termination
Under , a maintenance obligation terminates automatically on the earliest of:
- The death of either party
- The recipient spouse's remarriage or entry into a civil union
- The expiration of the maintenance term stated in the decree (if no modification motion has been filed before expiration)
- A court order expressly terminating the obligation
Colorado law does not make cohabitation an automatic termination event. A paying spouse who believes the recipient's cohabitation amounts to a change of circumstances can file a modification motion, but a court would need to find the cohabitation constitutes a substantial and continuing change making continued maintenance unfair.
Modification
Either party may seek modification of a maintenance order by demonstrating "changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unfair" ((1)(a)). A modification is effective prospectively from the date the motion was filed, not from the date of the hearing. Courts will not modify arrears.
Job loss, a major health event, significant changes in either party's income, or retirement can all serve as grounds for a modification motion. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act explicitly does not constitute a substantial and continuing change of circumstances for modifying maintenance orders entered before its effective date.
Agreements on modification
Parties may agree in their separation agreement to make maintenance non-modifiable or to limit the grounds for modification. Courts will generally enforce such agreements. A provision making maintenance non-modifiable must be explicit.
Is maintenance taxable, and how it compares to Colorado child support
Federal tax treatment

For divorce or separation agreements executed after December 31, 2018, spousal maintenance is:
- Not deductible by the paying spouse for federal income tax purposes
- Not includable in gross income by the receiving spouse
This is the opposite of the rules that applied to pre-2019 agreements, under which maintenance was deductible by the payor and taxable to the recipient. Pre-2019 orders retain the old tax treatment unless they are modified after 2018 and the modification expressly adopts the new rules (IRS Topic No. 452).
The Colorado guideline formula accounts for this shift through the 80%/75% multipliers described above.
How maintenance differs from Colorado child support
Spousal maintenance and Colorado child support are separate legal obligations governed by separate statutes. Key differences:
- Child support is calculated under a mandatory formula (C.R.S. section 14-10-115) and presumed correct; the maintenance guideline is advisory.
- Child support is based primarily on parenting time and each parent's income; maintenance is based on the standard of living, marriage length, and financial resources.
- Child support terminates when the child reaches adulthood; maintenance terminates on remarriage, death, or expiration of the ordered term.
- Both obligations can be modified on a showing of substantial and continuing changed circumstances.
For a full overview of how Colorado calculates child support, see Colorado child support laws.
For the full national picture, visit our Alimony laws by state guide.
Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about Colorado spousal maintenance laws for educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Maintenance determinations are highly fact-specific. If you are involved in a divorce or separation proceeding, consult a licensed Colorado family law attorney for guidance on your individual circumstances.
Last updated: June 1, 2026.
More Colorado Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Colorado call it alimony or spousal maintenance?
Colorado uses the term spousal maintenance. The word alimony does not appear in C.R.S. section 14-10-114. The concept is the same: one spouse pays ongoing financial support to the other after divorce or legal separation.
Is the Colorado maintenance guideline mandatory?
No. The advisory guideline under C.R.S. section 14-10-114 explicitly does not create a presumption that maintenance will be awarded or that any particular amount or duration is appropriate. The court has full discretion to award more, less, or no maintenance based on the statutory factors.
What is the income threshold for the Colorado guideline?
The guideline applies only when the parties' combined annual adjusted gross income is $240,000 or less. Above that threshold, the court must determine maintenance using the 14 statutory factors without a formulaic starting point.
How is the guideline maintenance amount calculated?
The base figure equals 40% of the parties' combined monthly adjusted gross income minus the lower-earning spouse's monthly adjusted gross income. For post-2018 non-deductible awards, this base is multiplied by 80% if combined monthly income is $10,000 or less, or by 75% if combined monthly income is between $10,001 and $20,000.
Does Colorado maintenance end if the recipient moves in with a new partner?
Not automatically. Colorado law terminates maintenance automatically on death or the recipient's remarriage or civil union, but does not list cohabitation as an automatic termination trigger. A paying spouse who believes cohabitation represents a material change in circumstances can file a motion to modify or terminate maintenance under C.R.S. section 14-10-122.
Can a Colorado maintenance order be modified after the divorce?
Yes, unless the parties' agreement expressly makes it non-modifiable. Either party may seek modification by showing changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the existing terms unfair. Modifications are effective from the date the motion is filed, not the date of the hearing.
Is Colorado spousal maintenance taxable income?
For divorce agreements executed after December 31, 2018, maintenance is neither deductible by the paying spouse nor taxable to the receiving spouse under federal law. Agreements executed before January 1, 2019 follow the prior rules unless later modified to adopt the new tax treatment.
Talk to a Colorado family-law attorney: free case review
Every case has details a formula cannot capture. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Colorado family-law attorney.
Updates
Removed a maintenance factor that does not appear in the statute and corrected the factor count.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Restored the domestic-violence/coercive-control factor at C.R.S. 14-10-114(3)(c)(XII.5), which the article's factor list had dropped, and corrected the statutory factor count from 13 to 14 (13 specific factors plus a residual catch-all) throughout the page.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 14: Domestic Matters
§ 14-10-114Spousal maintenance - advisory guidelines - legislative declaration - definitionsIn force
(1) Legislative declaration. (a) The general assembly hereby finds that: (I) The economic lives of spouses are frequently closely intertwined in marriage and that it is often impossible to later segregate the respective decisions and contributions of the spouses; and (II) Consequently, awarding spousal maintenance may be appropriate if a spouse needs support and the other spouse has the ability to pay support. (b) The general assembly further finds that: (I) Because the statutes provide little guidance to the court concerning maintenance awards, there has been inconsistency in the amount and term of maintenance awarded in different judicial districts across the state in cases that involve similar factual circumstances; and (II) Courts and litigants would benefit from the establishment of a more detailed statutory framework that includes advisory guidelines to be considered as a starting point for the determination of fair and equitable maintenance awards.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 5 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2020
Leading cases:
- of Wright (Colorado Court of Appeals 2020, 459 P.3d 757)“…s $9,583 per month. The Court finds that under C.R.S. § 14-10-114, the Court is able to find that the…”
- Peters v. Wise (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 1239)“…iability of husband than property interest of wife). Under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-114(3), a court will award maintenance onl…”
- Baird v. Long (In Re Baird) (District Court, D. Colorado 1993, 152 B.R. 636)“…led a petition for spousal maintenance in state court under Colo.Rev.Stat. § 14-10-114(1), seeking an award of support in ligh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 14-10-122Modification and termination of provisions for maintenance, support, and property disposition - automatic lien - definitionsIn force
(1) (a) Except as otherwise provided in sections 14-10-112 (6) and 14-10-115 (11)(c), the provisions of any decree respecting maintenance may be modified only as to installments accruing subsequent to the motion for modification and only upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unfair, and, except as otherwise provided in subsection (5) of this section, the provisions of any decree respecting child support may be modified only as to installments accruing subsequent to the filing of the motion for modification and only upon a showing of changed circumstances that are substantial and continuing or on the ground that the order does not contain a provision regarding medical support, such as insurance coverage, payment for medical insurance deductibles and copayments, or unreimbursed medical expenses. The trial court retains continuing jurisdiction to modify a decree respecting maintenance or child support pursuant to this section during the pendency of an appeal. The court shall not revoke or modify the provisions as to property disposition unless the court finds the existence of conditions that justify the reopening of a judgment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 9 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- People v. McQuitty (Supreme Court of Colorado 2016, 371 P.3d 279)“…ining to apply the child support modification provisions of C.R.S. section 14-10-122 to reduce Respondent's temporary suppor…”
- Marriage of Webb (Colorado Court of Appeals 2025)“…er met his high burden to modify maintenance pursuant to CRS 14-10-122”; (2) failing to consider “the subst…”
- Lovejoy v. Commissioner (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2002, 293 F.3d 1208)“…maintenance is terminated upon the death of either party.” Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-122(2) (emphasis added). Conversely, the o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- C.R.S. 14-10-114 - Spousal maintenance - advisory guidelines(colorado.public.law)
- C.R.S. 14-10-122 - Modification and termination of maintenance(colorado.public.law)
- Colorado Judicial Branch - Spousal/Partner Maintenance Advisement Worksheet (Nov 2025)(coloradojudicial.gov)
- Colorado Judicial Branch - Maintenance Guideline Info (July 2, 2024)(coloradojudicial.gov)
- IRS Topic No. 452 - Alimony and Separate Maintenance(irs.gov)