Alaska
Alaska Spousal Support (Alimony) Laws: How It Works (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Alaska's primary divorce judgment statute does not use the word "alimony." The state calls it spousal support or spousal maintenance, and the governing authority is Alaska Statute 25.24.160(a)(2). The word "alimony" does still appear in current law, in the separate modification statute at AS 25.24.170(a). There is no formula, no guidelines chart, and no calculator. A judge decides whether to award maintenance, how much to pay, and for how long, based entirely on the facts of the case.
Information last verified on June 1, 2026.
Estimate your situation: Try our free Alaska alimony calculator to estimate spousal support and see the factors a Alaska court weighs.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Alaska state law only. For a comparison of all fifty states, see Alimony Laws by State.
What Is Spousal Support in Alaska?
Spousal support is a court-ordered payment from one former spouse to the other following a divorce or legal separation. Alaska Statute 25.24.160 is the primary divorce judgment statute. Subsection (a)(2) specifically authorizes the court to award maintenance and sets out the framework courts must follow.
Alaska uses the terms "spousal support" and "spousal maintenance" in the primary judgment statute, AS 25.24.160(a)(2). The older term "alimony" still appears in current law too, in the separate modification statute, AS 25.24.170(a), which authorizes a court to "set aside, alter, or modify so much of the judgment as may provide for alimony." If you have an older court order that says "alimony," it refers to the same obligation now governed by AS 25.24.160(a)(2).
The purpose of the award is to fairly allocate the economic effect of divorce. An award may be paid in a lump sum or as periodic installments. It may be awarded for a limited time or, in rare cases, for an indefinite period. The statute explicitly permits courts to craft whatever arrangement is just and necessary under the circumstances.
Either spouse may be ordered to pay. The statute does not favor one gender over the other.
Property Division Comes First
Alaska courts operate under a clear preference: meet each spouse's post-divorce financial needs through the division of marital property before turning to maintenance. The Alaska Supreme Court has reinforced this principle in decisions going back to the 1980s, making clear that where marital assets are adequate to provide equitably for both parties, maintenance awards should be limited or denied.
This preference matters because it shapes how courts analyze cases from the outset. A judge will first determine what property exists and how it should be divided equitably. Only after that analysis, if one spouse still cannot reasonably meet their needs, will the court seriously consider a maintenance award.
The practical effect is significant. In marriages with substantial assets, property division often resolves the financial disparity between spouses without any ongoing payment obligation. Maintenance becomes more likely in marriages with modest assets, long marriages where one spouse left the workforce, or situations where a spouse faces medical or educational barriers to self-sufficiency.
Types of Spousal Support in Alaska
Alaska courts recognize two principal types of spousal support, each serving a distinct purpose.
Reorientation Support
Reorientation support helps a spouse adjust to a lower income level than they had during the marriage. It provides a financial bridge while the recipient adapts to living independently on reduced resources.
This type of support is intentionally short-term. The Alaska Court System describes it as money to help a spouse "get used to living on less money than when you were married." Awards typically last one year or less. Courts award reorientation support when property division alone does not fully address one spouse's financial needs but the gap does not require a longer intervention.
Rehabilitative Support
Rehabilitative support funds education or job training that allows a spouse to re-enter the workforce or improve their earning capacity. The idea is that a spouse who sacrificed career development during the marriage deserves a concrete opportunity to become self-supporting.
To obtain rehabilitative support, the requesting spouse generally must demonstrate three things: a specific employment goal, a particular educational program that advances that goal, and an expected timeline for completing the program. This keeps the award focused and time-limited.
The Alaska Court System indicates rehabilitative awards typically last up to four years. If the recipient does not use the funds for their stated educational purpose, the court may terminate payments early.
The Alaska Supreme Court addressed the scope of rehabilitative support in Schanck v. Schanck, confirming that in cases where marital assets adequately provide for both parties, rehabilitative support is properly limited to job training or other means directly aimed at securing earned income for the recipient spouse.
Long-Term or Indefinite Maintenance
Long-term or indefinite maintenance is uncommon in Alaska. Courts award it only in exceptional circumstances, such as a very long marriage combined with a spouse's disability or advanced age that makes self-sufficiency genuinely impossible. The general expectation is that the supported spouse will work toward financial independence, and the type and duration of support should reflect that expectation.
How Alaska Courts Decide: The AS 25.24.160(a)(2) Factors
Alaska Statute 25.24.160(a)(2) does not give judges a formula. Instead, it requires courts to base a maintenance award on consideration of specific factors, then award whatever amount is just and necessary. The six factors courts examine are:
1. The length of the marriage and station in life during the marriage. Longer marriages and higher marital standards of living weigh in favor of larger or longer awards. A 25-year marriage in which one spouse did not work outside the home presents a very different picture than a 3-year marriage between two working spouses.
2. The age and health of each party. Older spouses or those with significant health conditions face greater difficulty re-entering the workforce. Courts account for whether a spouse has a realistic path to self-sufficiency given their physical condition and stage of life.
3. The earning capacity of each party. This factor looks beyond current income. Courts examine educational backgrounds, professional training, employment skills, work history, how long a spouse has been out of the job market, and childcare responsibilities the spouse handled during the marriage. A spouse who left a career to raise children may have significantly diminished earning capacity compared to where they would have been had the marriage not occurred.
4. The financial condition of each party. This includes all assets, debts, income, and expenses. The statute specifically calls out the availability and cost of health insurance as part of this analysis.
5. The conduct of the parties. Courts may consider whether either spouse engaged in unreasonable depletion or dissipation of marital assets. Alaska courts do not assign fault for the breakdown of the marriage in the usual sense, but waste or misconduct with marital property is a relevant consideration.
6. The division of property. Because the property division and maintenance decisions are part of the same overall judgment, courts must factor in what each spouse receives from the marital estate when deciding whether and how much maintenance is appropriate.
No single factor is controlling. Courts weigh all of them together, along with any other facts the judge considers relevant to a fair outcome.
When Spousal Support Ends
Automatic Termination
Spousal support in Alaska terminates automatically upon the death of either party or the remarriage of the recipient spouse. These events end the obligation without any need for a court filing or modification order.
A court order or agreement may specify additional termination events, such as the recipient beginning cohabitation with a new partner or reaching a specific income level.
Duration Set by the Court
Most maintenance awards in Alaska have a defined end date tied to the type of support ordered. Reorientation support typically runs no more than one year. Rehabilitative support runs through completion of the educational program, usually no more than four years.
The court's judgment will state the specific end date or condition. Once the period expires, no further payments are owed and no court action is required to close out the obligation.
Modification Under AS 25.24.170
Either party may ask the court to modify or terminate a maintenance order by demonstrating a substantial and ongoing material change in circumstances since the original order was entered. Under AS 25.24.170, courts have authority to set aside, alter, or modify maintenance provisions of a judgment when such a change is shown.
Examples of material changes that courts recognize include significant changes in income for either party, a serious new health condition, completion of education, or loss of employment. The change must be substantial, not merely temporary or minor.
To seek a modification, a party files a motion with the Alaska superior court that issued the original divorce decree. The court typically requires supporting documentation of the changed circumstances. The form DR-735 (Request to Modify Order or Decree Concerning Spousal Maintenance) is the standard form the Alaska Court System provides for this purpose.
Tax Treatment of Spousal Support
The federal tax rules changed significantly with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
For divorce or separation agreements executed after December 31, 2018, spousal support payments are not deductible by the payer and are not taxable income to the recipient. This applies to all new Alaska divorce agreements entered since January 1, 2019.
For agreements executed on or before December 31, 2018, the older rules still apply: payments are generally deductible by the payer and included in the recipient's gross income. However, if such a pre-2019 agreement is later modified and the modification expressly states that the TCJA repeal of the deduction applies, the modified agreement follows the post-2018 rules.
Child support is never deductible or taxable under any version of these rules.
The IRS provides detailed guidance in Topic No. 452 (Alimony and Separate Maintenance). Consult a tax professional for advice specific to your situation.
Spousal Support vs. Alaska Child Support
Spousal support and child support are separate legal obligations with different purposes, different calculations, and different tax treatment.
Child support is governed by Alaska's child support guidelines under Alaska Administrative Code Title 25. Unlike spousal support, child support follows a formula tied to the parents' incomes and parenting time schedule. It is non-negotiable in the sense that courts apply the guidelines unless a deviation is justified.
Spousal support, by contrast, is entirely discretionary. There is no formula, and courts have wide latitude to award nothing, a short-term payment, or in rare cases an extended award.
Child support is owed to the child for the child's benefit. Spousal support is owed to the former spouse to address economic disparity from the marriage. The two obligations run in parallel and do not offset each other. A parent who pays child support may also be ordered to pay spousal support, or vice versa.
For a full overview of how Alaska calculates child support, see Alaska Child Support Laws.
More Alimony Resources
This page covers Alaska specifically. For a side-by-side comparison of all fifty states, see Alimony Laws by State.
Legal disclaimer: This page provides general legal information, not legal advice. Alaska spousal support law is fact-specific and discretionary. The outcome of any case depends on the particular facts before the court. Consult a licensed Alaska family law attorney for advice about your situation.
Last updated: June 1, 2026.
More Alaska Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Alaska award alimony?
Yes, but Alaska calls it 'spousal support' or 'spousal maintenance,' not alimony. It is authorized under Alaska Statute 25.24.160(a)(2). Awards are fully discretionary and less common than in some other states, because Alaska courts prefer to meet each spouse's needs through property division first.
How long does spousal support last in Alaska?
Most awards are short-term. Reorientation support typically lasts one year or less. Rehabilitative support lasts through the completion of an education or training program, generally up to four years. Long-term or indefinite maintenance is uncommon and reserved for exceptional situations such as disability or very long marriages where self-sufficiency is not realistic.
Is there a formula for calculating spousal support in Alaska?
No. Alaska has no formula, guidelines, or calculator for spousal support. A judge considers six statutory factors under AS 25.24.160(a)(2) and then awards whatever amount is just and necessary. The outcome depends entirely on the specific facts of the case.
Can spousal support be modified after divorce in Alaska?
Yes. Under AS 25.24.170, either party may seek modification or termination of a spousal support order by showing a substantial and ongoing material change in circumstances since the original order was entered. A party files a motion with the superior court using Form DR-735.
Does spousal support end if the recipient remarries in Alaska?
Yes. Remarriage of the recipient spouse automatically terminates the spousal support obligation. The death of either party also ends the obligation. No court filing is needed to stop payments when these triggering events occur.
Is spousal support taxable income in Alaska?
For divorce agreements signed after December 31, 2018, spousal support is neither deductible by the payer nor taxable to the recipient under federal law. For agreements signed before January 1, 2019, the older rules apply: payments are generally deductible by the payer and taxable income to the recipient, unless the agreement was later modified to adopt the newer rules.
What is the difference between reorientation and rehabilitative support in Alaska?
Reorientation support helps a spouse adjust to a lower standard of living after divorce. It is typically awarded for one year or less. Rehabilitative support funds education or job training to help a spouse build earning capacity. It lasts through completion of a specific program, usually up to four years. Both types are time-limited and aim toward the recipient's financial independence.
Talk to a Alaska family-law attorney: free case review
Every case has details a formula cannot capture. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Alaska family-law attorney.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the claim that Alaska statutes never use the word "alimony" -- the modification statute, AS 25.24.170(a), which the article itself cites, does use the term.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Alaska Statutes, Title 25. Marital and Domestic Relations, Chapter 24. Divorce and Dissolution of Marriage
§ 25.24.160JudgmentIn force
(a) In a judgment in an action for divorce or action declaring a marriage void or at any time after judgment, the court may provide (1) for the payment by either or both parties of an amount of money or goods, in gross or installments that may include cost-of-living adjustments, as may be just and proper for the parties to contribute toward the nurture and education of their children, and the court may order the parties to arrange with their employers for an automatic payroll deduction each month or each pay period, if the period is other than monthly, of the amount of the installment; if the employer agrees, the installment shall be forwarded by the employer to the clerk of the superior court that entered the judgment or to the court trustee, and the amount of the installment is exempt from execution; (2) for the recovery by one party from the other of an amount of money for maintenance, for a limited or indefinite period of time, in gross or in installments, as may be just and necessary without regard to which of the parties is in fault; an award of maintenance must fairly allocate the economic effect of divorce by being based on a consideration of the following factors: (A) the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 201 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Laing v. Laing (Alaska Supreme Court 1987, 741 P.2d 649)“…ard. [2] II. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review. AS 25.24.160(a)(4) grants the trial court broad disc…”
- Lewis v. Lewis (Alaska Supreme Court 1990, 785 P.2d 550)“…quired during marriage, whether title is joint or separate. AS 25.24.160(a)(4) 7 ; Rose,…”
- Julsen v. Julsen (Alaska Supreme Court 1987, 741 P.2d 642)“…etermination of what assets are available for distribution. AS 25.24.160(a)(4) 3 places all propert…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 25.24.170Modification of judgmentIn force
(a) Subject to AS 25.20.110, any time after judgment the court, upon the motion of either party, may set aside, alter, or modify so much of the judgment as may provide for alimony, for the appointment of trustees for the care and custody of the minor children or for their nurture and education, for the care, nurture, and education of unmarried 18-year-old children of the marriage while they are actively pursuing a high school diploma or an equivalent level of technical or vocational training and living as dependents with a parent, guardian, or designee of the parent or guardian, or for the maintenance of either party to the action. (b) For the purposes of a motion to modify or terminate child support, the adoption or enactment of guidelines or a significant amendment to guidelines for determining support is a material change in circumstances if the guidelines are relevant to the motion. As necessary to comply with 42 U.S.C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 33 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2022
Leading cases:
- Clauson v. Clauson (Alaska Supreme Court 1992, 831 P.2d 1257)“…terest in this benefit, “is a change of circumstances under AS 25.24.170 3 and in addition constitu…”
- Burrell v. Burrell (Alaska Supreme Court 1984, 696 P.2d 157)“…he superior court’s judgment pursuant to AS 09.-55.220 (now AS 25.24.170), and Civil Rule 60(b)(5-6). The trial…”
- Dewey v. Dewey (Alaska Supreme Court 1994, 886 P.2d 623)“…ef from judgment pursuant to Alaska Civfl Rule 60(b) and to AS 25.24.170 on July 16, 1992. The superior court de…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Alaska Statute 25.24.160: Judgment (Spousal Maintenance)(akleg.gov)
- Alaska Statute 25.24.170: Modification of Judgment(akleg.gov)
- Spousal Support: Alaska Court System Self-Help Center(courts.alaska.gov)
- Schanck v. Schanck, Alaska Supreme Court (1986), S-837(courts.alaska.gov)
- Topic No. 452: Alimony and Separate Maintenance(irs.gov)